Gene × Physical Activity Interactions in Obesity: Combined Analysis of 111,421 Individuals of European Ancestry
Numerous obesity loci have been identified using genome-wide association studies. A UK study indicated that physical activity may attenuate the cumulative effect of 12 of these loci, but replication studies are lacking. Therefore, we tested whether the aggregate effect of these loci is diminished in adults of European ancestry reporting high levels of physical activity. Twelve obesity-susceptibility loci were genotyped or imputed in 111,421 participants. A genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated by summing the BMI-associated alleles of each genetic variant. Physical activity was assessed using self-administered questionnaires. Multiplicative interactions between the GRS and physical activity on BMI were tested in linear and logistic regression models in each cohort, with adjustment for age, age2, sex, study center (for multicenter studies), and the marginal terms for physical activity and the GRS. These results were combined using meta-analysis weighted by cohort sample size. The meta-analysis yielded a statistically significant GRS × physical activity interaction effect estimate (Pinteraction = 0.015). However, a statistically significant interaction effect was only apparent in North American cohorts (n = 39,810, Pinteraction = 0.014 vs. n = 71,611, Pinteraction = 0.275 for Europeans). In secondary analyses, both the FTO rs1121980 (Pinteraction = 0.003) and the SEC16B rs10913469 (Pinteraction = 0.025) variants showed evidence of SNP × physical activity interactions. This meta-analysis of 111,421 individuals provides further support for an interaction between physical activity and a GRS in obesity disposition, although these findings hinge on the inclusion of cohorts from North America, indicating that these results are either population-specific or non-causal.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Gene × Physical Activity Interactions in Obesity: Combined Analysis of 111,421 Individuals of European Ancestry. PLoS Genet 9(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003607
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003607
Souhrn
Numerous obesity loci have been identified using genome-wide association studies. A UK study indicated that physical activity may attenuate the cumulative effect of 12 of these loci, but replication studies are lacking. Therefore, we tested whether the aggregate effect of these loci is diminished in adults of European ancestry reporting high levels of physical activity. Twelve obesity-susceptibility loci were genotyped or imputed in 111,421 participants. A genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated by summing the BMI-associated alleles of each genetic variant. Physical activity was assessed using self-administered questionnaires. Multiplicative interactions between the GRS and physical activity on BMI were tested in linear and logistic regression models in each cohort, with adjustment for age, age2, sex, study center (for multicenter studies), and the marginal terms for physical activity and the GRS. These results were combined using meta-analysis weighted by cohort sample size. The meta-analysis yielded a statistically significant GRS × physical activity interaction effect estimate (Pinteraction = 0.015). However, a statistically significant interaction effect was only apparent in North American cohorts (n = 39,810, Pinteraction = 0.014 vs. n = 71,611, Pinteraction = 0.275 for Europeans). In secondary analyses, both the FTO rs1121980 (Pinteraction = 0.003) and the SEC16B rs10913469 (Pinteraction = 0.025) variants showed evidence of SNP × physical activity interactions. This meta-analysis of 111,421 individuals provides further support for an interaction between physical activity and a GRS in obesity disposition, although these findings hinge on the inclusion of cohorts from North America, indicating that these results are either population-specific or non-causal.
Zdroje
1. OgdenCL, CarrollMD, CurtinLR, McDowellMA, TabakCJ, et al. (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295: 1549–1555.
2. FraylingTM, TimpsonNJ, WeedonMN, ZegginiE, FreathyRM, et al. (2007) A common variant in the FTO gene is associated with body mass index and predisposes to childhood and adult obesity. Science 316: 889–894.
3. LoosRJ, LindgrenCM, LiS, WheelerE, ZhaoJH, et al. (2008) Common variants near MC4R are associated with fat mass, weight and risk of obesity. Nat Genet 40: 768–775.
4. ScuteriA, SannaS, ChenWM, UdaM, AlbaiG, et al. (2007) Genome-wide association scan shows genetic variants in the FTO gene are associated with obesity-related traits. PLoS Genet 3: e115.
5. ThorleifssonG, WaltersGB, GudbjartssonDF, SteinthorsdottirV, SulemP, et al. (2009) Genome-wide association yields new sequence variants at seven loci that associate with measures of obesity. Nat Genet 41: 18–24.
6. WillerCJ, SpeliotesEK, LoosRJ, LiS, LindgrenCM, et al. (2009) Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation. Nat Genet 41: 25–34.
7. AndreasenCH, Stender-PetersenKL, MogensenMS, TorekovSS, WegnerL, et al. (2008) Low physical activity accentuates the effect of the FTO rs9939609 polymorphism on body fat accumulation. Diabetes 57: 95–101.
8. FranksPW, JablonskiKA, DelahantyLM, McAteerJB, KahnSE, et al. (2008) Assessing gene-treatment interactions at the FTO and INSIG2 loci on obesity-related traits in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetologia 51: 2214–2223.
9. SonestedtE, RoosC, GullbergB, EricsonU, WirfaltE, et al. (2009) Fat and carbohydrate intake modify the association between genetic variation in the FTO genotype and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 90: 1418–1425.
10. RampersaudE, MitchellBD, PollinTI, FuM, ShenH, et al. (2008) Physical activity and the association of common FTO gene variants with body mass index and obesity. Arch Intern Med 168: 1791–1797.
11. KilpelainenTO, QiL, BrageS, SharpSJ, SonestedtE, et al. (2011) Physical activity attenuates the influence of FTO variants on obesity risk: a meta-analysis of 218,166 adults and 19,268 children. PLoS Med 8: e1001116.
12. LiS, ZhaoJH, LuanJ, EkelundU, LubenRN, et al. (2010) Physical activity attenuates the genetic predisposition to obesity in 20,000 men and women from EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med 7: e1000332.
13. InterActC (2012) Validity of a short questionnaire to assess physical activity in 10 European countries. Eur J Epidemiol 27: 15–25.
14. XiaoR, BoehnkeM (2009) Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol 33: 453–462.
15. RaglandDR (1992) Dichotomizing continuous outcome variables: dependence of the magnitude of association and statistical power on the cutpoint. Epidemiology 3: 434–440.
16. WongMY, DayNE, LuanJA, ChanKP, WarehamNJ (2003) The detection of gene-environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement? Int J Epidemiol 32: 51–57.
17. DelahantyLM, PanQ, JablonskiKA, WatsonKE, McCafferyJM, et al. (2012) Genetic predictors of weight loss and weight regain after intensive lifestyle modification, metformin treatment, or standard care in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care 35: 363–366.
18. GoringHH, TerwilligerJD, BlangeroJ (2001) Large upward bias in estimation of locus-specific effects from genomewide scans. Am J Hum Genet 69: 1357–1369.
19. FranksPW (2011) Gene × environment interactions in type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 11: 552–561.
20. FranksPW, NettletonJA (2010) Invited commentary: Gene × lifestyle interactions and complex disease traits–inferring cause and effect from observational data, sine qua non. Am J Epidemiol 172: 992–997 discussion 998–999.
21. LoosRJ (2012) Genetic determinants of common obesity and their value in prediction. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 26: 211–226.
22. EkelundU, BrageS, BessonH, SharpS, WarehamNJ (2008) Time spent being sedentary and weight gain in healthy adults: reverse or bidirectional causality? Am J Clin Nutr 88: 612–617.
23. LoosRJ, RankinenT, TremblayA, PerusseL, ChagnonY, et al. (2005) Melanocortin-4 receptor gene and physical activity in the Quebec Family Study. Int J Obes (Lond) 29: 420–428.
24. MetcalfBS, HoskingJ, JefferyAN, VossLD, HenleyW, et al. (2011) Fatness leads to inactivity, but inactivity does not lead to fatness: a longitudinal study in children (EarlyBird 45). Arch Dis Child 96: 942–947.
25. CecilJE, TavendaleR, WattP, HetheringtonMM, PalmerCN (2008) An obesity-associated FTO gene variant and increased energy intake in children. N Engl J Med 359: 2558–2566.
26. JonssonA, FranksPW (2009) Obesity, FTO gene variant, and energy intake in children. N Engl J Med 360: 1571–1572 author reply 1572.
27. QiQ, ChuAY, KangJH, JensenMK, CurhanGC, et al. (2012) Sugar-sweetened beverages and genetic risk of obesity. N Engl J Med 367: 1387–1396.
28. RidkerPM, ChasmanDI, ZeeRY, ParkerA, RoseL, et al. (2008) Rationale, design, and methodology of the Women's Genome Health Study: a genome-wide association study of more than 25,000 initially healthy american women. Clin Chem 54: 249–255.
29. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 894: i–xii, 1–253.
30. RenstromF, ShunginD, JohanssonI, InvestigatorsM, FlorezJC, et al. (2011) Genetic predisposition to long-term nondiabetic deteriorations in glucose homeostasis: Ten-year follow-up of the GLACIER study. Diabetes 60: 345–354.
31. RenstromF, PayneF, NordstromA, BritoEC, RolandssonO, et al. (2009) Replication and extension of genome-wide association study results for obesity in 4923 adults from northern Sweden. Hum Mol Genet 18: 1489–1496.
32. InterActC, LangenbergC, SharpS, ForouhiNG, FranksPW, et al. (2011) Design and cohort description of the InterAct Project: an examination of the interaction of genetic and lifestyle factors on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in the EPIC Study. Diabetologia 54: 2272–2282.
33. Browne WJ, Mousa G, Parker RMA (2009) A Guide to Sample Size Calculations for Random Effect Models via Simulation and the MLPowSim Software Package. Bristol, United Kingdom: University of Bristol.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 7
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- The Cohesion Protein SOLO Associates with SMC1 and Is Required for Synapsis, Recombination, Homolog Bias and Cohesion and Pairing of Centromeres in Drosophila Meiosis
- Gene × Physical Activity Interactions in Obesity: Combined Analysis of 111,421 Individuals of European Ancestry
- Independent Evolution of Transcriptional Inactivation on Sex Chromosomes in Birds and Mammals
- SLC26A4 Targeted to the Endolymphatic Sac Rescues Hearing and Balance in Mutant Mice