A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in Children

English version České info

Background:
In clinical trials the selection of appropriate outcomes is crucial to the assessment of whether one intervention is better than another. Selection of inappropriate outcomes can compromise the utility of a trial. However, the process of selecting the most suitable outcomes to include can be complex. Our aim was to systematically review studies that address the process of selecting outcomes or outcome domains to measure in clinical trials in children.

Methods and Findings:
We searched Cochrane databases (no date restrictions) in December 2006; and MEDLINE (1950 to 2006), CINAHL (1982 to 2006), and SCOPUS (1966 to 2006) in January 2007 for studies of the selection of outcomes for use in clinical trials in children. We also asked a group of experts in paediatric clinical research to refer us to any other relevant studies. From these articles we extracted data on the clinical condition of interest, description of the method used to select outcomes, the people involved in the selection process, the outcomes selected, and limitations of the method as defined by the authors. The literature search identified 8,889 potentially relevant abstracts. Of these, 70 were retrieved, and 25 were included in the review. These studies described the work of 13 collaborations representing various paediatric specialties including critical care, gastroenterology, haematology, psychiatry, neurology, respiratory paediatrics, rheumatology, neonatal medicine, and dentistry. Two groups utilised the Delphi technique, one used the nominal group technique, and one used both methods to reach a consensus about which outcomes should be measured in clinical trials. Other groups used semistructured discussion, and one group used a questionnaire-based survey. The collaborations involved clinical experts, research experts, and industry representatives. Three groups involved parents of children affected by the particular condition.

Conclusions:
Very few studies address the appropriate choice of outcomes for clinical research with children, and in most paediatric specialties no research has been undertaken. Among the studies we did assess, very few involved parents or children in selecting outcomes that should be measured, and none directly involved children. Research should be undertaken to identify the best way to involve parents and children in assessing which outcomes should be measured in clinical trials.

Vyšlo v časopise: A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in Children. PLoS Med 5(4): e96. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050096
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050096

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. SulsJRothmanA

2004

Evolution of the biopsychosocial model: prospects and challenges for health psychology.

Health Psychol

119

125

2. JonesB

1987

Impairment, disability and handicap.

Child Care Health Dev

359

3. NosadiniRTonoloG

2004

Relationship between blood glucose control, pathogenesis and progression of diabetic nephropathy.

J Am Soc Nephrol

4. MolenberghsGBurzykowskiTAlonsoABuyseM

2004

A perspective on surrogate endpoints in controlled clinical trials.

Stat Methods Med Res

177

206

5. TugwellPBoersM

1993

OMERACT conference on outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials: Introduction.

J Rheum

528

530

6. FlemingTRDeMetsDL

1996

Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled.

Ann Intern Med

125

605

613

7. HollowayRGDickAW

2002

Clinical trial end points: On the road to nowhere.

Neurology

679

686

8. ClarkeM

2007

Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews.

Trials

9. DuncanPWJorgensenHSWadeDT

2000

Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice.

Stroke

1429

1438

10. GiacoiaGPBirenbaumDLSachsHCMattisonDR

2006

The newborn drug development initiative.

Pediatrics

117

11. GriffithsAMOtleyARHyamsJQuirosARGrandRJ

2005

A review of activity indices and end points for clinical trials in children with Crohn's disease.

Inflamm Bowel Dis

185

196

12. RamseyBWBoatTF

1994

Outcome measures for clinical trials in cystic fibrosis. Summary of a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation consensus conference.

J Pediatr

124

177

192

13. PavleticSZMartinPLeeSJMitchellSJacobsohnD

2006

Measuring therapeutic response in chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: IV. Response criteria working group report.

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant

252

266

14. GianniniEHRupertoNRavelliALovellDJFelsonDT

1997

Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis.

Arthritis Rheum

1202

15. MillerFWRiderLGChungYLCooperRDankoK

2001

Proposed preliminary core set measures for disease outcome assessment in adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Rheumatology

1262

1273

16. RupertoNRavelliAMurrayKJLovellDJAndersson-GareB

2003

Preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis.

Rheumatology

1452

1459

17. CarlsonGAJensenPSFindlingRLMeyerRECalabreseJ

2003

Methodological issues and controversies in clinical trials with child and adolescent patients with bipolar disorder: Report of a consensus conference.

J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol

18. GoldsteinBGiroirBRandolphAMembers of the International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis

2005

International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics.

Pediatr Crit Care Med

19. LaFranceWCJr.AlperKBabcockDBarryJJBenbadisS

2006

Nonepileptic seizures treatment workshop summary.

Epilepsy Behav

451

461

20. AnandKJArandaJVBerdeCBBuckmanSCapparelliEV

2006

Summary proceedings from the neonatal pain-control group.

Pediatrics

117

S22

21. ClancyRR

2006

Summary proceedings from the neurology group on neonatal seizures.

Pediatrics

117

S23

S27

22. FinerNNHigginsRKattwinkelJMartinRJ

2006

Summary proceedings from the apnea-of-prematurity group.

Pediatrics

117

S47

S51

23. RothSJAdatiaIPearsonGDMembers of the Cardiology Group

2006

Summary proceedings from the cardiology group on postoperative cardiac dysfunction.

Pediatrics

117

S40

S46

24. ShortBLVanMKEvansJR

2006

Summary proceedings from the cardiology group on cardiovascular instability in preterm infants.

Pediatrics

117

25. LuxALOsborneJP

2004

A proposal for case definitions and outcome measures in studies of infantile spasms and West syndrome: consensus statement of the West Delphi group.

Epilepsia

1416

1428

26. SmithMALeederSRJalaludinBSmithWT

1996

The asthma health outcome indicators study.

Aust N Z J Public Health

27. DeRouenTALerouxBGMartinMDTownesBDWoodsJS

2002

Issues in design and analysis of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety of dental amalgam restorations in children.

Control Clni Trials

301

320

28. DalkeyN

1969

The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion

Santa Monica (California)

Rand

29. van TeijlingenEPitchforthEBishopCRussellE

2006

Delphi method and nominal group technique in family planning and reproductive health research.

J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care

249

252

30. RupertoNRavelliACutticaREspadaGOzenS

2005

The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the disease activity core set.

Arthritis Rheum

2854

2864

31. LewisA

1992

Group child interviews as a research tool.

Br Educ Res J

413

421

32. DevaneDBegleyCMClarkeMHoreyDO'BoyleC

2007

Evaluating maternity care: A core set of outcome measures.

Birth

164

172

33. RiderLGGianniniEHHarris-LoveMJoeGIsenbergD

2003

Defining clinical improvement in adult and juvenile myositis.

J Rheum

603

617

34. HuttonJLWilliamsonPR

2000

Bias in meta-analysis due to outcome variable selection within studies.

R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat

359

370

35. WilliamsonPRGambleCAltmanDGHuttonJL

2005

Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.

Stat Methods Med Res

515

524

36. ChanAWAltmanDG

2005

Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors.

BMJ

330

753

37. ConnersCEpsteinJMarchJAngoldAWellsK

2001

Multimodal treatment of ADHD in the MTA: An alternative outcome analysis.

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

159

167

38. JuniperEFGuyattGHFeenyDHGriffithLEFerriePJ

1997

Minimum skills required by children to complete health-related quality of life instruments for asthma: Comparison of measurement properties.

Eur Respir J

2285

2294

39. RaatHBotterweckAMLandgrafJMHoogeveenWCEssink-BotML

2005

Reliability and validity of the short form of the child health questionnaire for parents (CHQ-PF28) in large random school based and general population samples.

J Epidemiol Community Health

40. DealLGoldBDGremseDAWinterHSPetersSBFragaPDMackMEGaylordSMToliaVFitzgeraldJF

2005

Age-specific questionnaires distinguish GERD symptom frequency and severity in infants and young children: development and initial validation.

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

178

185

41. AnandKJSArandaJVBerdeCBBuckmanSCapparelliEV

2005

Analgesia and anesthesia for neonates: study design and ethical issues.

Clin Ther

814

843

42. OsborneJPLuxA

2001

Towards an international consensus on definitions and standardised outcome measures for therapeutic trials (and epidemiological studies) in West syndrome.

Brain Dev

677

682

43. RiderLG

2002

Outcome assessment in the adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Rheum Dis Clin North Am

935

977

44. RiderLGGianniniEHBrunnerHIRupertoNJames-NewtonL

2004

International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis.

Arthritis Rheum

2281

2290

45. OddisCV

2005

Outcomes and disease activity measures for assessing treatments in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Curr Rheum Rep

46. RupertoNRavelliAOliveiraSAlessioMMihaylovaD

2006

The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization/American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the definition of improvement.

Arthritis Rheum

355

363