Association between the 2008–09 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine and Pandemic H1N1 Illness during Spring–Summer 2009: Four Observational Studies from Canada
Background:
In late spring 2009, concern was raised in Canada that prior vaccination with the 2008–09 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) was associated with increased risk of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) (pH1N1) illness. Several epidemiologic investigations were conducted through the summer to assess this putative association.
Methods and Findings:
Studies included: (1) test-negative case-control design based on Canada's sentinel vaccine effectiveness monitoring system in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec; (2) conventional case-control design using population controls in Quebec; (3) test-negative case-control design in Ontario; and (4) prospective household transmission (cohort) study in Quebec. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for TIV effect on community- or hospital-based laboratory-confirmed seasonal or pH1N1 influenza cases compared to controls with restriction, stratification, and adjustment for covariates including combinations of age, sex, comorbidity, timeliness of medical visit, prior physician visits, and/or health care worker (HCW) status. For the prospective study risk ratios were computed. Based on the sentinel study of 672 cases and 857 controls, 2008–09 TIV was associated with statistically significant protection against seasonal influenza (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.33–0.59). In contrast, estimates from the sentinel and three other observational studies, involving a total of 1,226 laboratory-confirmed pH1N1 cases and 1,505 controls, indicated that prior receipt of 2008–09 TIV was associated with increased risk of medically attended pH1N1 illness during the spring–summer 2009, with estimated risk or odds ratios ranging from 1.4 to 2.5. Risk of pH1N1 hospitalization was not further increased among vaccinated people when comparing hospitalized to community cases.
Conclusions:
Prior receipt of 2008–09 TIV was associated with increased risk of medically attended pH1N1 illness during the spring–summer 2009 in Canada. The occurrence of bias (selection, information) or confounding cannot be ruled out. Further experimental and epidemiological assessment is warranted. Possible biological mechanisms and immunoepidemiologic implications are considered.
: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Vyšlo v časopise:
Association between the 2008–09 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine and Pandemic H1N1 Illness during Spring–Summer 2009: Four Observational Studies from Canada. PLoS Med 7(4): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000258
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000258
Souhrn
Background:
In late spring 2009, concern was raised in Canada that prior vaccination with the 2008–09 trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) was associated with increased risk of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) (pH1N1) illness. Several epidemiologic investigations were conducted through the summer to assess this putative association.
Methods and Findings:
Studies included: (1) test-negative case-control design based on Canada's sentinel vaccine effectiveness monitoring system in British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec; (2) conventional case-control design using population controls in Quebec; (3) test-negative case-control design in Ontario; and (4) prospective household transmission (cohort) study in Quebec. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for TIV effect on community- or hospital-based laboratory-confirmed seasonal or pH1N1 influenza cases compared to controls with restriction, stratification, and adjustment for covariates including combinations of age, sex, comorbidity, timeliness of medical visit, prior physician visits, and/or health care worker (HCW) status. For the prospective study risk ratios were computed. Based on the sentinel study of 672 cases and 857 controls, 2008–09 TIV was associated with statistically significant protection against seasonal influenza (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.33–0.59). In contrast, estimates from the sentinel and three other observational studies, involving a total of 1,226 laboratory-confirmed pH1N1 cases and 1,505 controls, indicated that prior receipt of 2008–09 TIV was associated with increased risk of medically attended pH1N1 illness during the spring–summer 2009, with estimated risk or odds ratios ranging from 1.4 to 2.5. Risk of pH1N1 hospitalization was not further increased among vaccinated people when comparing hospitalized to community cases.
Conclusions:
Prior receipt of 2008–09 TIV was associated with increased risk of medically attended pH1N1 illness during the spring–summer 2009 in Canada. The occurrence of bias (selection, information) or confounding cannot be ruled out. Further experimental and epidemiological assessment is warranted. Possible biological mechanisms and immunoepidemiologic implications are considered.
: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Zdroje
1. CDC 2009 Swine influenza A (H1N1) infection in two children - Southern California, March–April 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58 400 402
2. Novel swine-origin influenza A(H1N1) virus investigation team 2009 Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. New Engl J Med 361 1 10
3. ChowellG
BertozziSM
ColcheroMA
Lopez-GatellH
Alpuche-ArandaC
2009 Severe respiratory disease concurrent with the circulation of H1N1 influenza. New Engl J Med 361 674 79
4. Perez-PadillaR
de la Rosa-ZamboniD
Ponce de LeonS
HernandezM
Quinones-FalconiF
2009 Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. New Engl J Med 361 680 89
5. WHO 11 June 2009 Transcript of statement by Margaret Chan, Director-General of the World Health Organization. Available: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/influenzaAH1N1_presstranscript_20090611.pdf. Accessed 26 February 2010
6. KatzJ
HancockK
VeguillaV
ZhongW
SunH
2009 Serum cross-reactive antibody response to a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus after vaccination with seasonal influenza vaccine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58 521 524
7. WHO 2009 WHO pandemic (H1N1) briefing note 9: Preparing for the second wave: lessons from current outbreaks. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/notes/h1n1_second_wave_20090828/en/index.html. Accessed 26 February 2010
8. National Advisory Committee on Immunization 2008 Statement on influenza vaccination for the 2008–09 season. Can Commun Dis Rep ACS-3 34 1 46
9. JanjuaNZ
SkowronskiDM
HottesTS
OseiW
PetricM
2010 Seasonal influenza vaccine and increased risk of pandemic H1N1 illness: first detection of the association during outbreak investigation in British Columbia, Canada. 13th Annual Conference on Vaccine Research, Bethesda, MD, 27 April 2010. Abstract # 130
10. SkowronskiDM
GilbertM
TweedSA
PetricM
LiY
2005 Effectiveness of vaccine against medical consultation due to laboratory-confirmed influenza: results from a sentinel physician pilot project in British Columbia, 2004–05. Can Commun Dis Rep 31 181 192
11. SkowronskiDM
MasaroC
KwindtTL
MakA
PetricM
2007 Estimating vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed influenza using a sentinel physician network: results from the 2005–2006 season of dual A and B vaccine mismatch in Canada. Vaccine 25 2842 2851
12. SkowronskiDM
De SerresG
DickinsonJ
PetricM
MakA
2009 Component-specific effectiveness of trivalent influenza vaccine as monitored through a sentinel surveillance network in Canada, 2006–07. J Infect Dis 199 168 179
13. RodriguesL
KirkwoodBR
1990 Case-control designs in the study of common diseases: updates on the demise of the rare disease assumption and the choice of sampling scheme for controls. Int J Epidemiol 19 205 13
14. OrensteinWA
BernierRH
DonderoTJ
HinmanAR
MarksJS
1985 Field evaluation of vaccine efficacy. Bull WHO 63 1055 1068
15. Statistics Canada 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey (Cycle 3.1). Ottawa, ON
16. Statistics Canada 2009 Influenza Immunization Coverage by Province and age 2007–08. In: Table 105-0502. Health indicator profile, annual estimates, by age group and sex, Canada, provinces, territories, health regions (2007 boundaries) and peer groups, occasional (1209600 series). Available: http://cansim2.statcan.gc.ca/cgi-win/cnsmcgi.pgm?Lang=E&RootDir=CII/&Array_Pick=1&ArrayId=105-0502&C2DB=PRD&ResultTemplate=CII%2FCII
17. ItohY
ShinyaK
KisoM
WatanabeT
SakodaY
2009 In vitro and in vivo characterization of new swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses. Nature 460 1021 1025
18. HancockK
VeguillaV
XiuhuaL
ZhongW
ButlerEN
2009 Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. 361 1 8
19. HakE
VerheijThJM
GrobbeeDE
NicholKL
2002 Confounding by indication in non-experimental evaluation of vaccine effectiveness: the example of prevention of influenza complications. J Epidemiol Community Health 56 951 955
20. JacksonLA
JacksonML
NelsonJC
NeuzilKM
WeissNS
2006 Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors. Int J Epidemiol 35 337 344
21. JacksonLA
NelsonJC
BensonP
NeuzilKM
ReidRJ
2006 Functional status is a confounder of the association of influenza vaccine and risk of all cause mortality in seniors. Int J Epidemiol 35 345 352
22. KellyH
GrantK
2009 Interim analysis of pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009 in Australia: surveillance trends, age of infection and effectiveness of seasonal vaccination. Eurosurveillance 14. Available: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19288. Accessed 26 February 2010
23. Garcia-GarciaL
Valdespino-GomezJL
Lazcano-PonceE
Jimenez-CoronaA
Higuera-IglesiasA
2009 Partial protection of seasonal trivalent inactivated vaccine against novel pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009: case-control study in Mexico City. BMJ 339: b3928. Available: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/339/oct06_2/b3928 Accessed 26 February 2010
24. Echevarria-ZunoS
Mejia-ArangureJM
Mar-ObesoAJ
Grajales-MunizC
Robles-PerezE
2009 Infection and deaths from influenza A H1N1 virus in Mexico: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 374 2072 2079
25. GargiulloP
ShayD
KatzJ
BramleyA
NowellM
2009 Effectiveness of 2008–09 trivalent influenza vaccine against 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) - United States, May–June 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 58 1241 1245
26. IulianoAD
ReedC
GuhA
DesaiM
KuttyP
2009 Notes from the field: outbreak of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus at a large public university in Delaware, April–May 2009. Clin Infect Dis 49 1811 1820
27. Crum-CianfloneNF
BlairPJ
FaixD
ArnoldJ
EcholsS
2009 Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of an outbreak of novel H1N1 (swine origin) influenza A virus among United States military beneficiaries. Clin Infect Dis 49 1801 1810
28. JanjuaNZ
SkowronskiDM
HottesTS
De SerresG
CrowcroftNS
2009 Seasonal vaccine and H1N1. Selection bias explains seasonal vaccine's protection. BMJ 339 b4972
29. JanjuaNZ
SkowronskiDM
HottesTS
De SerresG
CrowcroftNS
2010 Bias and seasonal vaccine effectiveness against pandemic A/H1N1. Lancet 375 801 802
30. HoskinsTW
DaviesJR
SmithAJ
AlchinA
MillerCL
1976 Influenza at Christ's Hospital: March, 1974. Lancet 1 105 108
31. BodewesR
KreijtzJHCM
BaasC
Geelhoed-MierasMM
de MutsertG
2009 Vaccination against human influenza A/H3N2 virus prevents the induction of heterosubtypic immunity against lethal infection with avian influenza A/H5N1 Virus. PLoS ONE 4 e5538 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005538
32. BodewesR
KreijtzJHCM
RimmelzwaanGF
2009 Yearly influenza vaccinations: a double-edged sword? Lancet Infect Dis 9 784 788
33. PaleseP
2004 Influenza: new and old threats. Nat Med 10 S82 7
34. WebsterRG
1966 Original antigenic sin in ferrets: the response to sequential infections with influenza viruses. J Immunol 97 177 183
35. de St. FazekasG
WebsterRG
1966 Disquisitions on original antigenic sin, II: proof in lower creatures. J Exp Med 124 347 361
36. de St. FazekasG
WebsterRG
1966 Disquisitions of original antigenic sin, I: evidence in man. J Exp Med 124 331 345
37. KimJH
SkountzouI
CompansR
JacobJ
2009 Original antigenic sin responses to influenza viruses. J Immunol 183 3294 3301
38. StephensonJR
2005 Understanding dengue pathogenesis: implications for vaccine design. Bull WHO 83 308 314
39. SauterP
HoberD
2009 Mechanisms and results of the antibody-dependent enhancement of viral infections and role in the pathogenesis of coxsackievirus B-induced diseases. Microbes Infect 11 443 451
40. TakadaA
KawaokaY
2003 Antibody-dependent enhancement of viral infection: molecular mechanisms and in vivo implications. Rev Med Virol 13 387 398
41. GotoffR
TamuraM
JanusJ
ThompsonJ
WrightP
1994 Primary influenza A virus infection induces cross-reactive antibodies that enhance uptake of virus into Fc receptor-bearing cells. J Infect Dis 169 200 203
42. OchiaiH
KurokawaM
KurokiY
NiwayamaS
1990 Infection enhancement of influenza A H1 subtype viruses in macrophage-like P388D1 cells by cross-reactive antibodies. J Med Virol 30 258 265
43. OchiaiH
KurokawaM
HayashiK
NiwayamaS
1988 Antibody-mediated growth of influenza A NWS virus in macrophagelike cell line P388D1. J Virol 62 20 26
44. OchiaiH
KurokawaM
MatsuiS
YamamotoT
KurokiY
1992 Infection enhancement of influenza A NWS virus in primary murine macrophages by anti-hemagglutinin monoclonal antibody. J Med Virol 36 217 221
45. VincentAL
LagerKM
JankeBH
GramerMR
RichtJA
2008 Failure of protection and enhanced pneumonia with a US H1N2 swine influenza virus in pigs vaccinated with an inactivated classical swine H1N1 vaccine. Vet Microbiol 126 310 323
46. KitikoonP
NilubolD
EricksonBJ
JankeBH
HooverTC
2006 The immune response and maternal antibody interference to a heterologous H1N1 swine influenza virus infection following vaccination. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 112 117 128
47. KobingerGP
MeunierI
PatelA
PilletS
GreenJ
2010 Assessment of the efficacy of commercially available and candidate vaccines against a pandemic H1N1 2009 virus. J Infect Dis 201 1000 1006
48. GreenbaumJA
KotturiMF
KimY
OseroffC
VaughanK
2009 Pre-existing immunity against swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses in the general human population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 20365 20370 Available: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/48/20365. Accessed 26 February 2010
49. World Health Organization 2010 Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 – update 89. Weekly virological surveillance update. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/laboratory26_02_2010/en/index.html. Accessed 26 February 2010
50. World Health Organization 2010 Recommended composition of influenza vaccines for use in the 2010 southern hemisphere influenza season. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/recommendations2010south/en/index.html. Accessed 26 February 2010
51. World Health Organization 2010 Recommended viruses for influenza vaccines for use in the 2010–2011 northern hemisphere influenza season. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/recommendations2010_11north/en/index.html. Accessed 26 February 2010
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2010 Číslo 4
- Statinová intolerance
- Očkování proti virové hemoragické horečce Ebola experimentální vakcínou rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP
- Co dělat při intoleranci statinů?
- Pleiotropní účinky statinů na kardiovaskulární systém
- DESATORO PRE PRAX: Aktuálne odporúčanie ESPEN pre nutričný manažment u pacientov s COVID-19
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Preoperative/Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Response and Resection Percentages
- Economic Appraisal of Ontario's Universal Influenza Immunization Program: A Cost-Utility Analysis
- China's Engagement with Global Health Diplomacy: Was SARS a Watershed?
- Laboratory Capacity Building in Asia for Infectious Disease Research: Experiences from the South East Asia Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network (SEAICRN)