Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Determining and Interpreting Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Interventions
To monitor progress towards the Millennium Development Goals, it is essential to monitor the coverage of health interventions in subgroups of the population, because national averages can hide important inequalities. In this review, we provide a practical guide to measuring and interpreting inequalities based on surveys carried out in low- and middle-income countries, with a focus on the health of mothers and children. Relevant stratification variables include urban/rural residence, geographic region, and educational level, but breakdowns by wealth status are increasingly popular. For the latter, a classification based on an asset index is the most appropriate for national surveys. The measurement of intervention coverage can be made by single indicators, but the use of combined measures has important advantages, and we advocate two summary measures (the composite coverage index and the co-coverage indicator) for the study of time trends and for cross-country comparisons. We highlight the need for inequality measures that take the whole socioeconomic distribution into account, such as the relative concentration index and the slope index of inequality, although simpler measures such as the ratio and difference between the richest and poorest groups may also be presented for non-technical audiences. Finally, we present a framework for the analysis of time trends in inequalities, arguing that it is essential to study both absolute and relative indicators, and we provide guidance to the joint interpretation of these results.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Determining and Interpreting Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Interventions. PLoS Med 10(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001390
Kategorie:
Review
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001390
Souhrn
To monitor progress towards the Millennium Development Goals, it is essential to monitor the coverage of health interventions in subgroups of the population, because national averages can hide important inequalities. In this review, we provide a practical guide to measuring and interpreting inequalities based on surveys carried out in low- and middle-income countries, with a focus on the health of mothers and children. Relevant stratification variables include urban/rural residence, geographic region, and educational level, but breakdowns by wealth status are increasingly popular. For the latter, a classification based on an asset index is the most appropriate for national surveys. The measurement of intervention coverage can be made by single indicators, but the use of combined measures has important advantages, and we advocate two summary measures (the composite coverage index and the co-coverage indicator) for the study of time trends and for cross-country comparisons. We highlight the need for inequality measures that take the whole socioeconomic distribution into account, such as the relative concentration index and the slope index of inequality, although simpler measures such as the ratio and difference between the richest and poorest groups may also be presented for non-technical audiences. Finally, we present a framework for the analysis of time trends in inequalities, arguing that it is essential to study both absolute and relative indicators, and we provide guidance to the joint interpretation of these results.
Zdroje
1. GrayAM (1982) Inequalities in health. The Black Report: a summary and comment. Int J Health Serv 12: 349–380.
2. Almeida-FilhoN, KawachiI, Pellegrini-FilhoA, DachsJN (2003) Research on health inequalities in Latin America and the Caribbean: bibliometric analysis (1971–2000) and descriptive content analysis (1971–1995). Am J Public Health 93: 2037–2043.
3. WhiteheadM (1992) The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv 22: 429–445.
4. MackenbachJP, KunstAE (1997) Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med 44: 757–771.
5. KakwaniN, WagstaffA, van DoorslaerE (1997) Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation, and statistical inference. J Econom 77: 87–103.
6. WagstaffA, PaciP, van DoorslaerE (1991) On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med 33: 545–557.
7. MurrayCJ, GakidouEE, FrenkJ (1999) Health inequalities and social group differences: what should we measure? Bull World Health Organ 77: 537–543.
8. BravemanP, KriegerN, LynchJ (2000) Health inequalities and social inequalities in health. Bull World Health Organ 78: 232–234; discussion 234–235.
9. BravemanP, TarimoE (2002) Social inequalities in health within countries: not only an issue for affluent nations. Soc Sci Med 54: 1621–1635.
10. VictoraCG, WagstaffA, SchellenbergJA, GwatkinD, ClaesonM, et al. (2003) Applying an equity lens to child health and mortality: more of the same is not enough. Lancet 362: 233–241.
11. GwatkinDR (2000) Health inequalities and the health of the poor: what do we know? What can we do? Bull World Health Organ 78: 3–18.
12. KawachiI, AdlerNE, DowWH (2010) Money, schooling, and health: mechanisms and causal evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1186: 56–68.
13. Marmot Review (2010) Fair society, healthy lives: strategic review of health inequalities in England post 2010. London: Marmot Review.
14. Lee JH, Sadana R, editors(2011) Improving equity in health by addressing social determinants. Geneva: World Health Organization.
15. VictoraCG, BarrosAJ, AxelsonH, BhuttaZA, ChopraM, et al. (2012) How changes in coverage affect equity in maternal and child health interventions in 35 Countdown to 2015 countries: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet 380: 1149–1156.
16. World Health Organization (2012) Global health observatory. Available: http://www.who.int/gho/. Accessed 12 November 2012.
17. Countdown to 2015: Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival (2012) Countdown to 2015: Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival. Available: www.countdown2015mnch.org. Accessed 12 November 2012.
18. MEASURE DHS (2012) Demographic and Health Surveys. Available: http://www.measuredhs.com/ Accessed 12 November 2012.
19. UNICEF (2012) Statistics and Monitoring: Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey. Available: http://www.unicef.org/statistics/index_24302.html. Accessed 12 November 2012.
20. Gwatkin DR, Rutstein S, Johnson K, Suliman E, Wagstaff A, et al.. (2007) Socio economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries. Washington: The World Bank.
21. Barros F, Victora C, Scherpbier R, Gwatkin D (2009) Inequities in the health and nutrition of children. In: Blas E, Sivasankara Kurup A, editors. Priority public health conditions: from learning to action on social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization. pp. 50–75.
22. BarrosAJ, RonsmansC, AxelsonH, LoaizaE, BertoldiAD, et al. (2012) Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet 379: 1225–1233.
23. KriegerN, WilliamsDR, MossNE (1997) Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18: 341–378.
24. HoweLD, GalobardesB, MatijasevichA, GordonD, JohnstonD, et al. (2012) Measuring socio-economic position for epidemiological studies in low- and middle-income countries: a methods of measurement in epidemiology paper. Int J Epidemiol 41: 871–886.
25. Filmer D, Pritchett L (1998) Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: with an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Policy Research Working Paper WPS1994. Washington (District of Columbia): The World Bank. Available: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1998/10/442667/estimating-wealth-effects-without-expenditure-data-or-tears-application-educational-enrollments-states-india. Accessed 12 December 2012.
26. Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. New York: Springer.
27. BoermaJT, BryceJ, KinfuY, AxelsonH, VictoraCG (2008) Mind the gap: equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health services in 54 Countdown countries. Lancet 371: 1259–1267.
28. MorrisSS (2000) Validity of rapid estimates of household wealth and income for health surveys in rural Africa. J Epidemiol Community Health 54: 381–387.
29. HouwelingTA, KunstAE, MackenbachJP (2003) Measuring health inequality among children in developing countries: does the choice of the indicator of economic status matter? Int J Equity Health 2: 8.
30. WirthME, BalkD, DelamonicaE, StoreygardA, SacksE, et al. (2006) Setting the stage for equity-sensitive monitoring of the maternal and child health Millennium Development Goals. Bull World Health Organ 84: 519–527.
31. Filmer D, Kinnon S (2008) Assessing asset indices. Policy Research Working Paper WPS4605. Washington (District of Columbia): The World Bank.
32. KawachiI, SubramanianSV, Almeida-FilhoN (2002) A glossary for health inequalities. J of Epidemiol Community Health 56: 647–652.
33. VictoraCG, FennB, BryceJ, KirkwoodBR (2005) Co-coverage of preventive interventions and implications for child-survival strategies: evidence from national surveys. Lancet 366: 1460–1466.
34. Countdown to 2015 (2012) Building a future for women and children. The 2012 report. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available: http://countdown2015mnch.org/reports-and-articles/2012-report. Accessed 12 November 2012.
35. Harper S, Lynch J (2005) Methods for measuring cancer disparities: using data relevant to healthy people 2010 cancer-related objectives. Bethesda (Maryland): National Cancer Institute.
36. Measure DHS (2009) Nigeria: standard DHS, 2008. Available: http://www.measuredhs.com/what-we-do/survey/survey-display-302.cfm. Accessed 12 November 2012.
37. Harper S, Lynch J (2007) Selected comparisons of measures of health disparities: a review using databases relevant to healthy people 2010 cancer-related objectives. Bethesda (Maryland): National Cancer Institute.
38. MoserK, FrostC, LeonDA (2007) Comparing health inequalities across time and place—rate ratios and rate differences lead to different conclusions: analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries 1991–2001. Int J Epidemiol 36: 1285–1291.
39. HarperS, KingNB, MeersmanSC, ReichmanME, BreenN, et al. (2010) Implicit value judgments in the measurement of health inequalities. Milbank Q 88: 4–29.
40. MinujinA, DelamonicaE (2003) Mind the gap! Widening child mortality disparities. J Hum Dev 4: 397–418.
41. Scanlon JP (2011). Measuring health disparities—summary. Available: http://www.jpscanlan.com/measuringhealthdisp.html. Accessed 15 November 2012.
42. O'Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Lindelow M (2008) Analyzing health equity using household survey data. A guide to techniques and their implementation. Washington (District of Columbia): The World Bank. 220 p.
43. World Bank (2010) Health Equity and Financial Protection—tools for equity analyses [under section “Stata programs and Excel files to accompany Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data"]. Available: http://go.worldbank.org/YHORYCGNK0. Accessed 5 December 2012.
44. DeatonA (2001) Counting the world's poor: problems and possible solutions. World Bank Res Obs 16: 125–147.
45. Deaton A, Zaidi S (2002) Guidelines for constructing consumption aggregates for welfare analysis. Washington (District of Columbia): The World Bank. 108 p.
46. Macro International (1996) Sampling manual. DHS-III basic documentation, No. 6. Calverton (Maryland): Macro International.
47. World Health Organization (2005) The world health report 2005. Make every mother and child count. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2013 Číslo 5
- Statinová intolerance
- Očkování proti virové hemoragické horečce Ebola experimentální vakcínou rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP
- Co dělat při intoleranci statinů?
- Pleiotropní účinky statinů na kardiovaskulární systém
- DESATORO PRE PRAX: Aktuálne odporúčanie ESPEN pre nutričný manažment u pacientov s COVID-19
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Gene Expression Classification of Colon Cancer into Molecular Subtypes: Characterization, Validation, and Prognostic Value
- Domestic Violence and Perinatal Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies
- Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Challenges in Monitoring the Proportion of Young Children with Pneumonia Who Receive Antibiotic Treatment