Monitoring Intervention Coverage in the Context of Universal Health Coverage
Monitoring universal health coverage (UHC) focuses on information on health intervention coverage and financial protection. This paper addresses monitoring intervention coverage, related to the full spectrum of UHC, including health promotion and disease prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliation. A comprehensive core set of indicators most relevant to the country situation should be monitored on a regular basis as part of health progress and systems performance assessment for all countries. UHC monitoring should be embedded in a broad results framework for the country health system, but focus on indicators related to the coverage of interventions that most directly reflect the results of UHC investments and strategies in each country. A set of tracer coverage indicators can be selected, divided into two groups—promotion/prevention, and treatment/care—as illustrated in this paper. Disaggregation of the indicators by the main equity stratifiers is critical to monitor progress in all population groups. Targets need to be set in accordance with baselines, historical rate of progress, and measurement considerations. Critical measurement gaps also exist, especially for treatment indicators, covering issues such as mental health, injuries, chronic conditions, surgical interventions, rehabilitation, and palliation. Consequently, further research and proxy indicators need to be used in the interim. Ideally, indicators should include a quality of intervention dimension. For some interventions, use of a single indicator is feasible, such as management of hypertension; but in many areas additional indicators are needed to capture quality of service provision. The monitoring of UHC has significant implications for health information systems. Major data gaps will need to be filled. At a minimum, countries will need to administer regular household health surveys with biological and clinical data collection. Countries will also need to improve the production of reliable, comprehensive, and timely health facility data.
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Vyšlo v časopise:
Monitoring Intervention Coverage in the Context of Universal Health Coverage. PLoS Med 11(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001728
Kategorie:
Collection Review
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001728
Souhrn
Monitoring universal health coverage (UHC) focuses on information on health intervention coverage and financial protection. This paper addresses monitoring intervention coverage, related to the full spectrum of UHC, including health promotion and disease prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliation. A comprehensive core set of indicators most relevant to the country situation should be monitored on a regular basis as part of health progress and systems performance assessment for all countries. UHC monitoring should be embedded in a broad results framework for the country health system, but focus on indicators related to the coverage of interventions that most directly reflect the results of UHC investments and strategies in each country. A set of tracer coverage indicators can be selected, divided into two groups—promotion/prevention, and treatment/care—as illustrated in this paper. Disaggregation of the indicators by the main equity stratifiers is critical to monitor progress in all population groups. Targets need to be set in accordance with baselines, historical rate of progress, and measurement considerations. Critical measurement gaps also exist, especially for treatment indicators, covering issues such as mental health, injuries, chronic conditions, surgical interventions, rehabilitation, and palliation. Consequently, further research and proxy indicators need to be used in the interim. Ideally, indicators should include a quality of intervention dimension. For some interventions, use of a single indicator is feasible, such as management of hypertension; but in many areas additional indicators are needed to capture quality of service provision. The monitoring of UHC has significant implications for health information systems. Major data gaps will need to be filled. At a minimum, countries will need to administer regular household health surveys with biological and clinical data collection. Countries will also need to improve the production of reliable, comprehensive, and timely health facility data.
Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
Zdroje
1. World Health Organization (2010) The world health report - health systems financing: the path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available: http://www.who.int/whr/en/index.html. Accessed 14 December 2013.
2. BoermaT, EozenouP, EvansD, EvansT, KienyM-P, et al. (2014) Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med 11: e1001731 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001731
3. SaksenaP, HsuJ, EvansD (2014) Financial risk protection and universal health coverage: evidence and measurement challenges. PLoS Med 11: e1001701 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001701
4. Bertrand JT, Magnani RJ, Rutenberg N (1996) Evaluating family planning programs: with adaptations for reproductive health. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: The Evaluation Project.
5. Boerma T, Pisani E, Schwartländer B, Mertens T (2000) A framework for the evaluation of national AIDS programmes. MEASURE Evaluation WP-99-17. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: The Evaluation Project.
6. BryceJ, VictoraCG, BoermaT, PetersDH, BlackRE (2011) Evaluating the scale-up for maternal and child survival: a common framework. Int Health 3: 139–146.
7. BryceJ, VictoraCG, HabichtJP, BlackRE, ScherpbierRW (2005) MCE-IMCI Technical Advisors (2005) Programmatic pathways to child survival: results of a multi-country evaluation of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness. Health Policy Plan 20 Suppl 1: i5–i17.
8. World Health Organization (2011) Monitoring, evaluation and review of national health strategies: a country-led platform for information and accountability. International Health Partnership+ and WHO, Geneva. Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/country_monitoring_evaluation/documentation/en/index.html. Accessed 21 September 2013.
9. EvansDB, HsuJ, BoermaT (2013) Universal health coverage and universal access. Bull World Health Organ 91: 546–546A.
10. TanahashiT (1978) Health service coverage and its evaluation. Bull World Health Organ 56: 295–303.
11. PenchanskyR, ThomasJW (1981) The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care 19: 127–140.
12. ShengeliaB, TandonA, AdamsOB, MurrayCJL (2005) Access, utilization, quality, and effective coverage: an integrated conceptual framework and measurement strategy. Soc Sci Med 61: 97–109.
13. United Nations Statistics Division (2008) Official list of MDG indicators. New York: United Nations. Available: http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/host.aspx?Content=indicators/officiallist.htm. Accessed 14 December 2013.
14. RequejoJH, NewbyH, BryceJ (2013) Measuring coverage in MNCH: challenges and opportunities in the selection of coverage indicators for global monitoring. PLoS Med 10: e1001416.
15. World Health Assembly (2013). Resolution EB 132/7. Draft action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: World Health Assembly.
16. WHO, Countdown to 2015, Health Metrics Network and UNICEF (2011) Monitoring maternal, newborn and child health: understanding key progress indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization.
17. BeckettM, WeinsteinM, GoldmanN, Yu-HsuanL (2000) Do health interview surveys yield reliable data on chronic illness among older respondents? Am J Epidemiol 151: 315–323.
18. World Health Organization (2013) Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action. Geneva: World Health Organization.
19. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2012) Incheon strategy to “make the right real” for persons with disabilities in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok Available: http://www.unescap.org/resources/incheon-strategy-%E2%80%9Cmake-right-real%E2%80%9D-persons-disabilities-asia-and-pacific. Accessed 14 December 2013.
20. World Health Organization and United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) (2008) Training manual on disability statistics. Bangkok Available: http://www.cbm.org/article/downloads/82788/Training_Manual_Disability_Statistics_WHO.pdf. Accessed 14 December 2013.
21. CornmanJC, FreedmanVA, AgreeEM (2005) Measurement of assistive device use: implications for estimates of device use and disability in late life. Gerontologist 45: 347–358.
22. BryceJ, ArnoldF, BlancA, HanciogluA, NewbyH, et al. (2013) Measuring coverage in MNCH: new findings, new strategies, and recommendations for action. PLoS Med 10: e1001423.
23. HosseinpoorAR, BergenN, MendisS, HarperS, VerdesE, et al. (2012) Socioeconomic inequality in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: results from the World Health Survey. BMC Public Health 12: 474.
24. LevesqueJF, MukherjeeS, GrimardD, BoivinA, MishraS (2013) Measuring the prevalence of chronic diseases using population surveys by pooling self-reported symptoms, diagnosis and treatments: results from the World Health Survey of 2003 for South Asia. Int J Public Health 58: 435–447.
25. KowalP, ChatterjiS, NaidooN, BiritwumR, FanW, et al. (2012) Data resource profile: the World Health Organization Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Int J Epidemiol 41: 1639–1649.
26. WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium (2004) Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA 291: 2581–2590.
27. GroenRS, SamaiM, StewartKA, CassidyLD, KamaraTB, et al. (2012) Untreated surgical conditions in Sierra Leone: a cluster randomized, cross-sectional, countrywide survey. Lancet 380: 1082–1087.
28. WHO (2011) Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Available: www.who.int/diabetes/publications/report-hba1c_2011.pdf. Accessed 14 December 2013.
29. BourneRR, RosserDA, SukudomP, DineenB, LaidlawDA, et al. (2003) Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys. Eye (Lond) 17: 754–758.
30. National Research Council (US) Committee on Population; Finch CE, Vaupel JW, Kinsella K, editors (2001). Cells and surveys: should biological measures be included in social science research? Washington (D.C.): National Academies Press (US).
31. MahyM, TassieJM, GhysP, StoverJ, BeusenbergM, et al. (2010) Estimation of antiretroviral therapy coverage: methodology and trends. Curr Opinion HIV AIDS 5: 97–102.
32. WHO (2013) Global Tuberculosis report 2013. Geneva: World Health Organization.
33. YatesR (2009) Universal health care and the removal of user fees. Lancet 373: 2078–2081.
34. Organization for Economic Development (OECD) (2013), Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2013-en. Accessed 13 December 2013. Accessed 14 December 2013.
35. AguileraX, Castillo-LabordeC, Nájera-De FerrariM, DelgadoI, IbañezC (2014) Monitoring and evaluating progress towards universal health coverage in Chile. PLoS Med 11: e1001676 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001676
36. de Looper M, Lafortune G (2009) Measuring disparities in health status in access and use of health care in OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers No. 43. Paris: OECD.
37. MengQ, XuL, ZhangY, QianJ, CaiM, et al. (2012) Trends in access to health services and financial protection in China between 2003 and 2011: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 379: 805–814.
38. BhandariA, WagnerT (2006) Self-reported utilization of health care services: improving measurement and accuracy. Med Care Research and Reviews 63: 217–235.
39. Devaux M, de Looper M (2012), “Income-Related Inequalities in Health Service Utilisation in 19 OECD Countries, 2008–2009”, OECD Health Working Papers 58. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k95xd6stnxt-en.
40. BoermaJT, BryceJ, KinfuY, AxelsonH, VictoraCG (2008) Mind the gap: equity and trends in coverage of maternal, newborn and child health services in 54 Countdown countries. Lancet 371: 1259–1267.
41. VictoraCG, BarrosAJ, AxelsonH, BhuttaZA, ChopraM, et al. (2012) How changes in coverage affect equity in maternal and child health interventions in 35 Countdown to 2015 countries: an analysis of national surveys. Lancet 380: 1149–1156.
42. KumarC, Kumar SinghP, Kumar RaiR (2013) Coverage gap in maternal and child health services in India: assessing trends and regional deprivation during 1992–2006. J Public Health 35: 598–606.
43. World Health Organization (2013). Global Health Observatory. Database. Available: http://www.who.int/gho/database/en/. Accessed 23 December 2013.
44. The DHS Program (2013) Available: http://www.measuredhs.com/ (accessed 23 December 2013).
45. World Health Organization (2013). STEPwise approach to surveillance. Available: http://www.who.int/chp/steps/en/. Accessed 23 December 2013.
46. HudaT, KhanJAM, AhsanKZ, JamilK, El ArifeenS (2014) Monitoring and evaluating progress towards universal health coverage in Bangladesh. PLoS Med 11(9): e1001722.
47. Kelly E, Hurst J (2006). Health care quality indicators project: conceptual framework paper. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Working papers 23, Paris. Available: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/36262363.pdf.
48. BhuttaZ, ChopraM, AxelsonH, BermanO, BoermaT, et al. (2010) Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000–2010): taking stock in progress in maternal, newborn and child survival. Lancet 375: 2032–2044.
49. WHO and Health Metrics Network (2011) Country health information systems. A review of the current situation and trends. Geneva: WHO. Available: http://www.who.int/healthmetrics/news/chis_report.pdf?ua=1.
50. AbouzahrC, BoermaT (2005) Health information systems: the foundation of public health. Bull World Health Organ 83: 578–583.
51. BraaJ, HeywoodA, SahayS (2012) Improving quality and use of data through data-use workshops: Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Health Organ 90: 379–384.
52. HosseinpoorAR, BergenN, KollerT, PrasadA, SchlotheuberA, et al. (2014) Equity-oriented monitoring in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS Med 11(9): e1001727 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001727
53. World Health Organization (2013) Research for universal health coverage. World Health Report. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2014 Číslo 9
- Statiny indukovaná myopatie: Jak na diferenciální diagnostiku?
- MUDr. Dana Vondráčková: Hepatopatie sú pri liečbe metamizolom väčším strašiakom ako agranulocytóza
- Vztah mezi statiny a rizikem vzniku nádorových onemocnění − metaanalýza
- Nech brouka žít… Ať žije astma!
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Proton Pump Inhibitors and Hospitalization with Hypomagnesemia: A Population-Based Case-Control Study
- Monitoring and Evaluating Progress towards Universal Health Coverage in Chile
- Malaria Prevention during Pregnancy—Is There a Next Step Forward?
- The PLOS “Monitoring Universal Health Coverage” Collection: Managing Expectations