Premalignancies of Colon
Authors:
M. Šachlová
Authors place of work:
Gastroenterologické oddělení, Masarykův onkologický ústav, Brno
Published in the journal:
Klin Onkol 2013; 26(Supplementum): 38-43
Summary
The most common premalignant lesions of colorectal carcinoma include sporadic adenomas. Tubular and tubulovillous adenomas with mild dysplasia are considered benign lesions, while villous adenomas represent tumors with uncertain biological behavior. In recent years, demonstrable growth of flat lesions in the proximal intestine has been seen. Precision and yield of colonoscopy depends to some extent on good preparation, careful screening of intestine and use of new instruments of better quality. As an indicator of screening colonoscopy quality, the so‑ called adenoma detection rate is used. The text briefly describes options of endoscopic and surgical resolving of premalignancies. In the Czech Republic, attendance in the screening program is low, which could be changed by prepared addressed invitations of clients. The population with a genetic or familiar risk is examined according to recommended procedures intended for increased‑ risk persons.
Key words:
adenomatous polyp – screening – clinical practice
The author declares she has no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, pruducts, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.
Submitted:
26. 8. 2013
Accepted:
13. 10. 2013
Zdroje
1. Jirásek T. Histomorfologický obraz prekanceróz. In: Černoch J et al (eds). Prekancerózy v trávicím traktu. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada 2012: 45– 70.
2. Schlemper RJ, Riddell R, Kato Y et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47(2): 251– 255.
3. Kohoutová M. Genové změny v prekancerózách. In: Čer-noch J et al (eds). Prekancerózy v trávicím traktu. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada 2012: 27– 40.
4. Plevová P, Novotný J, Šachlová M et al. Hereditární nepolypózní kolorektální karcinom. Klin Onkol 2009; 22 (Suppl): S12– S15.
5. Plevová P, Štekrtová J, Kohoutová M et al. Familiární adenomatózní polypóza. Klin Onkol 2009; 22 (Suppl): S16– S19.
6. Hodgson SV, Foulkes WD, Eng Ch et al. A Practical Guide to Human Cancer Genetics. Cambridge University Press 2007.
7. Černoch J. Klasifikace slizničních změn. In: Černoch J et al (eds). Prekancerózy v trávicím traktu. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada 2012: 125– 147.
8. Kudo SE, Lambert R, Allen JI et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesion of colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68 (4 Suppl): S3– S47.
9. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continous quality improvement process of colonoscopy: recomendations of the U.S.Multi‑Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97(6): 1296– 1308.
10. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(19): 1795– 1803.
11. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355(24): 2533– 2541.
12. Rastogi A, Early DS, Gupta N et al. Randomized, controlled trial of standard‑ definition white‑light, high‑definition white‑light and narrow‑ band imaging colonoscopy for the detection of colon polyps and prediction of polyp histology. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74(3): 593– 602.
13. Sato R, Fujiya M, Watari J et al. The diagnostic accuracy of high‑resolution endoskopy, eutofluorescence paging and narrow band paging for differentially diagnosing colon adenoma. Endoscopy 2011; 43(10): 862– 868.
14. Zádorová Z. Kolonoskopie. Doporučený postup endoskopického vyšetření tlustého střeva. Čes a Slov Gastroent a Hepatol 2005; 59(1): 26– 30.
15. Efthymiou M, Taylor AC, Desmond PV et al. Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps. Endoscopy 2011; 43(4): 312– 316.
16. Urban O, Falt P. Endoskopická léčba prekanceróz a časných neoplazií trávicí trubice. In: Černoch J et al (eds). Prekancerózy v trávicím traktu. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada 2012: 151– 186.
17. Martínek J. Endoskopická resekce. In: Špičák J et al (eds). Novinky v gastroenterologii a hepatologii. Praha: Grada 2008:189– 227.
18. Zádorová Z. Gastrointestinální endoskopie u nemocných s antikoagulační a antiagregační terapií. Čes a Slov Gastroent a Hepatol 2007; 61(6): 314– 317.
19. Boustière C, Veitch A, Vanbiervliet G et al. Endoscopy and antiplatelet agents. ESGE Guideline. Endoscopy 2011; 43(5): 445– 461.
20. Heldwein W, Dollhopf M, Rösch T et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study: Prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy 2005; 37(11): 1116– 1122.
21. Ondrák M, Šefr R, Eber Z. Transanální endoskopická mikrochirurgie a její postavení v chirurgii rekta – přehled. Rozhl Chir 2011; 90(8): 450– 456.
22. de Jonge V, Sint Nicolaas J, van Leerdam ME et al. Systematic literature review and pooled analyses of risk factors for finding adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2011; 43(7): 560– 572.
23. Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73(6): 1207– 1214.
24. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi‑Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130(6): 1872– 1885.
25. Mikoviny Kajzrlíková I, Vítek P. Endoskopická polypektomie – jak dosáhnout standardu kvality v roce 2012? Gastroent Hepatol 2012; 66(4): 294– 297.
26. Dušek L. II. Evropské dny kolorektálního karcinomu, 26.– 27. dubna 2013, Brno.
27. Zavoral J. II. Evropské dny kolorektálního karcinomu, 26.– 27. dubna 2013, Brno.
28. Šachlová M, Foretová L. Dispenzarizace osob s familiárním výskytem kolorektálního karcinomu. Klin Onkol 2009; 22(6): 296– 297.
Štítky
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncologyČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Clinical Oncology
2013 Číslo Supplementum
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
- Current Insights into the Antispasmodic and Analgesic Effects of Metamizole on the Gastrointestinal Tract
- Obstacle Called Vasospasm: Which Solution Is Most Effective in Microsurgery and How to Pharmacologically Assist It?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Precancerous Conditions and Lesions of the Stomach
- Premalignancies of Colon
- Preinvasive Lesions in Gynecology – Vulva
- Precancerous Conditions in the ENT Area