Pomalidomide in the Treatment of Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Authors:
Ľ. Roziaková 1,2; M. Mistrík 1; A. Bátorová 1
Authors place of work:
Klinika hematológie a transfuziológie LF UK a UN Bratislava, Slovensko
1; Ústav patologickej fyziológie, LF UK v Bratislave, Slovensko
2
Published in the journal:
Klin Onkol 2014; 27(5): 318-325
Category:
Reviews
doi:
https://doi.org/10.14735/amko2014318
Summary
Despite improvements in multiple myeloma therapy, the vast majority of patients continue to suffer relapses. Unfortunately, many patients event. develop disease that is refractory to lenalidomide and bortezomib and have few treatment options. Pomalidomide is a potent second-generation immunomodulatory agent with direct antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic, and antiangiogenic effects, as well as modulatory effects on bone resorption and on the immune system. Pomalidomide exhibited more potent anti-myeloma activity compared with thalidomide and lenalidomide. The optimal starting dose of pomalidomide is 4 mg given orally on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle and combination with dexamethasone produces synergistic effects. In clinical trials, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone has shown better responses, progression-free and overall survival than high-dose dexamethasone or pomalidomide alone. Pomalidomide has limited cross-resistance with lenalidomide, and the overall response rates of pomalidomide in lenalidomide/bortezomib dual-refractory patients ranged from 26 to 31%. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events are hematologic, consisting of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. Pomalidomide was approved by the FDA and the EMA in patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and bortezomib and have demonstrated disease progression on their last therapy. We review pomalidomide mechanism of action, clinical trials in relapsed and refractory patients, and novel pomalidomide-based combinations.
Key words:
pomalidomide – multiple myeloma – immunomodulatory agents
This study was supported by grant VEGA No. 1/0906/14.
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.
Submitted:
5. 6. 2014
Accepted:
26. 6. 2014
Zdroje
1. Attal M, Lauwers‑ Cances V, Marit G et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after stem‑ cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(19): 1782– 1791. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1114138.
2. McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC et al. Lenalidomide after stem‑ cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(19): 1770– 1781. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1114083.
3. Palumbo A, Hajek R, Delforge M et al. Continuous lenalidomide treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(19): 1759– 1769. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1112704.
4. Rossi A, Mark T, Jayabalan D et al. BiRd (clarithromycin, lenalidomide, dexamethasone): an update on long term lenalidomide therapy in previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2013; 121(11): 1982– 1985. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2012‑ 08‑ 448563.
5. Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter International Myeloma Working Group study. Leukemia 2012; 26(1): 149– 157. doi: 10.1038/ leu.2011.196.
6. Hájek R, Plonková H, Gumulec J. Thalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma: focus on combination with bortezomib. Klin Onkol 2013; 26(3): 163– 169.
7. Holánek M, Hájek R. The use of lenalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Klin Onkol 2010; 23(2): 67– 72.
8. Roziaková L, Mistrík M. Lenalidomide maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Klin Onkol 2013; 26(3): 186– 190.
9. Sedlarikova L, Kubiczkova L, Sevcikova S et al. Mechanism of immunomodulatory drugs in multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 2012; 36(10): 1218– 1224. doi: 10.1016/ j.leukres.2012.05.010.
10. Escoubet‑ Lozach L, Lin IL, Jensen‑ Pergakes K et al. Pomalidomide and lenalidomide induce p21 WAF‑ 1 expression in both lymphoma and multiple myeloma through a LSD1- mediated epigenetic mechanism. Cancer Res 2009; 69(18): 7347– 7356. doi: 10.1158/ 0008‑ 5472.CAN‑ 08‑ 4898.
11. Li S, Pal R, Monaghan SA et al. IMiD immunomodulatory compounds block C/ EBPβ translation through eIF4E down‑ regulation resulting in inhibition of MM. Blood 2011; 117(19): 5157– 5165. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2010‑ 10‑ 314278.
12. Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V et al. Apoptotic signaling induced by immunomodulatory thalidomide analogs in human multiple myeloma cells: therapeutic implications. Blood 2002; 99(12): 4525– 4530.
13. Corral LG, Haslett PA, Muller GW et al. Differential cytokine modulation and T cell activation by two distinct classes of thalidomide analogues that are potent inhibitors of TNF‑alpha. J Immunol 1999; 163(1): 380– 386.
14. Hayashi T, Hideshima T, Akiyama M et al. Molecular mechanisms whereby immunomodulatory drugs activate natural killer cells: clinical application. Br J Haematol 2005; 128(2): 192– 203.
15. Reddy N, Hernandez‑ Ilizaliturri FJ, Deeb G et al. Immunomodulatory drugs stimulate natural killer‑ cell function, alter cytokine production by dendritic cells, and inhibit angiogenesis enhancing the anti‑tumour activity of rituximab in vivo. Br J Haematol 2008; 140(1): 36– 45.
16. Galustian C, Meyer B, Labarthe MC et al. The anti‑cancer agents lenalidomide and pomalidomide inhibit the proliferation and function of T regulatory cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009; 58(7): 1033– 1045. doi: 10.1007/ s00262‑ 008‑ 0620‑ 4.
17. Xu Y, Li J, Ferguson GD et al. Immunomodulatory drugs reorganize cytoskeleton by modulating rho GTPases. Blood 2009; 114(2): 338– 345. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2009‑ 02‑ 200543.
18. Lu L, Payvandi F, Wu L et al. The anti‑cancer drug lenalidomide inhibits angiogenesis and metastasis via multiple inhibitory effects on endothelial cell function in normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Microvasc Res 2009; 77(2): 78– 86. doi: 10.1016/ j.mvr.2008.08.003.
19. Dankbar B, Padró T, Leo R et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin‑6 in paracrine tumor‑ stromal cell interactions in multiple myeloma. Blood 2000; 95(8): 2630– 2636.
20. Gupta D, Treon SP, Shima Y et al. Adherence of multiple myeloma cells to bone marrow stromal cells upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor secretion: therapeutic applications. Leukemia 2001; 15(12): 1950– 1961.
21. Anderson G, Gries M, Kurihara N et al. Thalidomide derivative CC‑ 4047 inhibits osteoclast formation by down‑ regulation of PU.1. Blood 2006; 107(8): 3098– 3105.
22. Bolzoni M, Abeltino M, Storti P et al. The immunomodulatory drugs lenalidomide and pomalidomide inhibit multiple myeloma‑induced osteoclast formation and RANKL/ OPG ratio in myeloma microenvironment targeting the expression of adhesion molecules. Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2010; 116: abstr. 448.
23. Pal R, Monaghan SA, Hassett AC et al. Immunomodulatory derivatives induce PU.1 down‑ regulation, myeloid maturation arrest, and neutropenia. Blood 2010; 115(3): 605– 614. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2009‑ 05‑ 221077.
24. Ferguson GD, Jensen‑ Pergakes K, Wilkey C et al. Immunomodulatory drug CC‑ 4047 is a cell‑type and stimulus‑ selective transcriptional inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2.J Clin Immunol 2007; 27(2): 210– 220.
25. Broyl A, Kuiper R, van Duin M et al. High cereblon expression is associated with better survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide maintenance. Blood 2013; 121(4): 624– 627. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2012‑ 06‑ 438101.
26. Rychak E, Mendy D, Miller K et al. Overcoming resistance: the use of pomalidomide (Pom) and dexamethasone (Dex) in re‑sensitizing lenalidomide (Len)‑resistant multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Haematologica 2011; 96: 126.
27. Quach H, Ritchie D, Stewart AK et al. Mechanism of action of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDS) in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2010; 24(1): 22– 32. doi: 10.1038/ leu.2009.236.
28. Lopez‑ Girona A, Mendy D, Ito T et al. Cereblon is a direct protein target for immunomodulatory and antiproliferative activities of lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Leukemia 2012; 26(11): 2326– 2335. doi: 10.1038/ leu.2012.119.
29. Robson RA. The effects of quinolones on xanthine pharmacokinetics. Am J Med 1992; 92 (Suppl 4A): 22S– 25S.
30. Hoffmann M, Kasserra C, Reyes J et al. Absorption, metabolism and excretion of [14C]pomalidomide in humans following oral administration. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2013; 71(2): 489– 501. doi: 10.1007/ s00280‑ 012‑ 2040‑ 6.
31. Matous J, Siegel DS, Duong HK et al. MM‑ 008: a phase 1trial evaluating pharmacokinetics and tolerability of pomalidomide + low‑dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment. Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 122: abstr. 5393.
32. Clinicaltrials.gov [homepage on the Internet]. ClinicalTrial.gov. A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. [cited 2014 May 31]. Available from: http:/ / clinicaltrials.gov/ .
33. Schey SA, Fields P, Bartlett JB et al. Phase I study of an immunomodulatory thalidomide analog, CC‑ 4047, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(16): 3269– 3276.
34. Streetly MJ, Gyertson K, Daniel Y et al. Alternate day pomalidomide retains anti‑myeloma effect with reduced adverse events and evidence of in vivo immunomodulation. Br J Haematol 2008; 141(1): 41– 51. doi: 10.1111/ j.1365‑ 2141.2008.07013.x.
35. Richardson PG, Siegel D, Baz R et al. Phase 1 study of pomalidomide MTD, safety, and efficacy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma who have received lenalidomide and bortezomib. Blood 2013; 121(11): 1961– 1967. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2012‑ 08‑ 450742.
36. Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Gertz MA et al. Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low‑dose dexamethasone as therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(30): 5008– 5014. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2009.23.6802.
37. Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Gertz MA et al. Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low dose dexamethasone (pom/ dex) is active and well tolerated in lenalidomide refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Leukemia 2010; 24(11): 1934– 1939. doi: 10.1038/ leu.2010.190.
38. Richardson PG, Siegel DS, Vij R et al. Pomalidomide alone or in combination with low‑dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 study. Blood 2014; 123(12): 1826– 1832. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2013‑ 11‑ 538835.
39. Leleu X, Attal M, Arnulf B et al. Pomalidomide plus low dose dexamethasone is active and well tolerated in bortezomib and lenalidomide‑ refractory multiple myeloma: Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 2009- 02. Blood 2013; 121(11): 1968– 1975. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2012‑ 09‑ 452375.
40. San Miguel J, Weisel K, Moreau P et al. Pomalidomide plus low‑dose dexamethasone versus high‑dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM‑ 003): a randomised, open‑ label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14(11): 1055– 1066. doi: 10.1016/ S1470‑ 2045(13)70380‑ 2.
41. Lacy MQ, Allred JB, Gertz MA et al. Pomalidomide plus low‑dose dexamethasone in myeloma refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide: comparison of 2 dosing strategies in dual‑ refractory disease. Blood 2011; 118(11): 2970– 2975. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2011‑ 04‑ 348896.
42. Lacy MQ, Kumar SK, LaPlant BR et al. Pomalidomide plus low‑dose dexamethasone (pom/ dex) in relapsed myeloma: long term follow up and factors predicing outcome in 345 patients. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2012; 120: abstr. 201.
43. Siegel DS, Martin T, Wang M et al. A phase 2 study of single‑agent carfilzomib (PX‑ 171- 003- A1) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; 120(14): 2817– 2825. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2012‑ 05‑ 425934.
44. Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Song KW et al. Final analysis, cytogenetics, long‑term treatment, and long‑term survival in MM‑ 003, a phase 3 study comparing pomalidomideţlow‑dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDEX) vs high‑dose dexamethasone (HiDEX) in relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 122: abstr. 408.
45. Leleu X, Karlin L, Macro M et al. Pomalidomide plus low‑dose dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with deletion (del)17p and/ or translocation t(4;14). Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 122: abstr. 689.
46. San Miguel J, Weisel KC, Moreau P et al. Quality of life improvements for pomalidomide+low‑dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDEX) in relapsed and refractory MM (RRMM). Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk (IMW Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 13 (Suppl 1): abstr. 430.
47. Larocca A, Montefusco V, Bringhen S et al. Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide and prednisone for relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma: a multicenter phase 1/ 2 open label study. Blood 2013; 122(16): 2799– 2806. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2013‑ 03‑ 488676.
48. Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Blood 2012; 119(19): 4375– 4382. doi: 10.1182/ blood‑ 2011‑ 11‑ 395749.
49. Richardson PG, Hofmeister CC, Siegel D et al. mm‑ 005: a phase 1 trial of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and low‑dose dexamethasone (pvd) in relapsed and/ or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 122: abstr. 1969.
50. Shah JJ, Stadtmauer EA, Abonour R et al. Phase I/ IIdose expansion of a multi‑center trial of carfilzomib and pomalidomide with dexamethasone (car‑ pom‑ d) in patients with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 122: abstr. 690.
51. Mark TM, Boyer A, Rossi AC et al. Clapd (clarithromycin, pomalidomide, dexamethasone) therapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 122: abstr. 1955.
52. Berenson JR, Hilger JD, Klein L et al. Pomalidomide, dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for patients with relapsed/ refractory multiple myeloma: results from a phase 1/ 2 trial. Blood (ASH Annu Meet Abstr) 2013; 122: abstr. 3218.
53. Dimopoulos MA, Leleu X, Palumbo A et al. Expert panel consensus statement on the optimal use of pomalidomide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. In press 2014. doi: 10.1038/ leu.2014.60.
54. Ludwig H, Miguel JS, Dimopoulos MA et al. International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for global myeloma care. Leukemia 2014; 28(5): 981– 992. doi: 10.1038/ leu.2013.293.
55. Flowers CR, Seidenfeld J, Bow EJ et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis and outpatient management of fever and neutropenia in adults treated for malignancy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(6): 794– 810. doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2012.45.8661.
56. Palumbo A, Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA et al. Prevention of thalidomide‑ and lenalidomide‑associated thrombosis in myeloma. Leukemia 2008; 22(2): 414– 423.
57. Leleu X, Rodon P, Hulin C et al. MELISSE, a large multicentric observational study to determine risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma treated with immunomodulatory drugs. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110(4): 844– 851. doi: 10.1160/TH13‑ 02‑ 0140.
Štítky
Paediatric clinical oncology Surgery Clinical oncologyČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Clinical Oncology
2014 Číslo 5
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
- Current Insights into the Antispasmodic and Analgesic Effects of Metamizole on the Gastrointestinal Tract
- Obstacle Called Vasospasm: Which Solution Is Most Effective in Microsurgery and How to Pharmacologically Assist It?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Prognostic Markers of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma – Assessing the Significance of Oncomarkers Using Data-mining Techiques RPA
- Breast Cancer Patient Satisfaction with Immediate Two-stage Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
- Cereblon – a New Target of Therapy in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
- Function of CDK12 in Tumor Initiation and Progression and Its Clinical Consequences