The Role of the Cell-mediated Immunity in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Sclerosis with Focus on Th17 and Treg Lymfocytes

Česká verzia

Authors: M. Svobodová ¹; P. Štourač ^1,2
Authors place of work: Neurologická klinika LF MU a FN Brno ¹; CEITEC – Středoevropský technologický institut, MU, Brno ²
Published in the journal: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2017; 80/113(2): 173-179
Category: Review Article
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn2017173

Podpořeno grantem MZ ČR – RVO (FNBr, 65269705) a projektem specifického výzkumu č. MUNI/ A/ 1072/ 2015 z programu podpory studentských projektů na Masarykově univerzitě.

Summary

Multiple sclerosis is a serious autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. It occurs with relatively high prevalence, especially in young people. It is essential to understand the pathogenesis of this disease in order to develop new treatments. All components of immunity are involved in this process but current research mainly focuses on lymphocyte populations. Previously, imbalance between subtypes of helper lymphocytes Th1 and Th2 was considered as the main cause of multiple sclerosis. Recently, the influence of other cell elements, such as B lymphocytes, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, was shown. Moreover, new cell types, regulatory T lymphocytes and helper Th17 lymphocytes, have been discovered. The aim of this article is to describe the main roles of individual lymphocyte subtypes in multiple sclerosis pathogenesis, focusing first on regulatory T lymphocytes and helper Th17 lymphocytes.

Key words:
multiple sclerosis – B lymphocytes – T lymphocytes – regulatory T lymphocytes – Th17 lymphocytes

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.

Zdroje

1. Havrdová E. Neuroimunologie. 1. vyd. Praha: Maxdorf 2001.

2. Constantinescu CS, Farooqi N, O’Brien K, et al. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as a model for multiple sclerosis (MS). Br J Pharmacol 2011;164(4):1079– 106. doi: 10.1111/ j.1476-5381.2011. 01302.x.

3. Kuhlmann T, Lassmann H, Brück W. Diagnosis of inflammatory demyelination in biopsy specimens: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol 2008;115(3)275– 87. doi: 10.1007/ s00401-007-0320-8.

4. Lauerová L, Kocák I. Regulace protinádorové imunity pomocnými CD4+ TH1/ TH2 lymfocyty. Klin Onkol 2001;14(5):154– 6.

5. Noble A, Thomas MJ, Kemeny DM. Early Th1/ Th2 cell polarization in the absence of IL-4 and IL-12: T cell receptor signaling regulates the response to cytokines in CD4 and CD8 T cells. Eur J Immunol 2001;31(7):2227– 35.

6. Sallusto F, Geginat J, Lanzavecchia A. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu Rev Immunol 2004;22:745– 63. doi: 10.1146/ annurev.immunol.22.012703.104702.

7. Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, et al. Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 2008;133(5):775– 87.doi: 10.1016/ j.cell.2008.05.009.

8. Acosta-Rodriguez EV, Rivino L, Geginat J, et al. Surface phenotype and antigenic specificity of human interleukin 17 producing T helper memory cells. Nat Immunol 2007;8(6):639– 46. doi: 10.1038/ ni1467.

9. Horejší V, Bartůňková J. Základy imunologie. 4. vyd. Praha: Triton 2009.

10. Chiba K, Adachi K. Discovery of fingolimod, the sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor modulator and its application for the therapy of multiple sclerosis. Future Med Chem 2012;4(6):771– 81. doi: 10.4155/ fmc.12.25.

11. Sato DK, Nakashima I, Bar-Or A, et al. Changes in Th17 and regulatory T cells after fingolimod initiation to treat multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2014;268(1– 2):95– 8. doi: 10.1016/ j.jneuroim.2014.01.008.

12. Yusuf-Makagiansar H, Anderson ME, Yakovleva TV, et al. Inhibition of LFA-1/ ICAM-1 and VLA-4/ VCAM-1 as a therapeutic approach to inflammation and autoimmune diseases. Med Res Rev 2002;22(2):146– 67.

13. Mehling M, Johnson TA, Antel J, et al. Clinical immunology of the sphingosine 1 phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2011;76(Suppl 3):S20– 7. doi: 10.1212/ WNL.0b013e31820db341.

14. Cao Y, Goods BA, Raddassi K, et al. Functional inflammatory profiles distinguish myelin-reactive T cellsfrom patients with multiple sclerosis. Sci Transl Med2015;7(287):287ra74. doi: 10.1126/ scitranslmed.aaa8038.

15. Villar LM, Masterman T, Casanova B, et al. CSF oligoclonal band patterns reveal disease heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2009;211(1– 2):101– 4. doi: 10.1016/ j.jneuroim.2009.03.003.

16. Ireland S, Monson N. Potential impact of B cells on T cell function in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Int 2011;2011:423971. doi: 10.1155/ 2011/ 423971.

17. Buc M. Role of regulatory T cells in pathogenesis and biological therapy of multiple sclerosis. Mediators Inflamm 2013;2013:963748. doi: 10.1155/ 2013/ 963748.

18. Tobón GJ, Izquierdo JH, Cañas CA. B lymphocytes: development, tolerance, and their role in autoimmunity-focus on systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmune Dis 2013;2013:827254. doi: 10.1155/ 2013/ 827254.

19. Cross AH, Klein RS, Piccio L. Rituximab combination therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2012;5(6):311– 9. doi: 10.1177/ 1756285612461165.

20. Krumbholz M, Meinl E. B cells in MS and NMO: pathogenesis and therapy. Semin Immunopathol 2014;36(3):339– 50. doi: 10.1007/ s00281-014-0424-x.

21. Scollay R, Smith J, Stauffer V. Dynamics of early T cells:prothymocyte migration and proliferation in the adult mouse thymus. Immunol Rev 1986;91:129– 57.

22. Starr TK, Jameson SC, Hogquist KA. Positive and negative selection of T cells. Annu Rev Immunol 2003; 21:139– 76. doi: 10.1146/ annurev.immunol.21.120601.141107.

23. Brucklacher-Waldert V, Stuerner K, Kolster M, et al. Phenotypical and functional characterization of T helper 17 cells in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2009;132(12):3329– 41. doi: 10.1093/ brain/ awp289.

24. Neumann H, Medana IM, Bauer J, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes in autoimmune and degenerative CNS diseases. Trends Neurosci 2002;25(6):313– 9.

25. Lassmann H, Ransohoff RM. The CD4-Th1 model for multiple sclerosis: a critical [correction of crucial] re-appraisal. Trends Immunol 2004;25(3):132– 7. doi: 10.1016/ j.it.2004.01.007.

26. Denic A, Wootla B, Rodriguez M. CD8+ T Cellsin Multiple Sclerosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2013;17(9):1053– 66. doi: 10.1517/ 14728222.2013.815726.

27. Lake DB, Poole TR. Tacrolimus. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87(1):121– 2.

28. Zheng SG. Regulatory T cells vs Th17: differentiation of Th17 versus Treg, are the mutually exclusive? Am J Clin Exp Immunol 2013;2(1):94– 106.

29. Lovett-Racke AE, Yang Y, Racke MK. Th1 versus Th17: are T cell cytokines relevant in multiple sclerosis? Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1812(2):246– 51. doi: 10.1016/ j.bbadis.2010.05.012.

30. Zhang J, Cheng Y, Cui W, et al. MicroRNA-155 modulates Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation and is associated with multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunol 2014;266(1– 2):56– 63. doi: 10.1016/ j.jneuroim.2013.09.019.

31. Kebir H, Ifergan I, Alvarez JI, et al. Preferential recruitment of interferon-gamma-expressing TH17 cells in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2009;66(3):390– 402. doi: 10.1002/ ana.21748.

32. Rostami A, Ciric B. Role of Th17 cells in the pathogenesis of CNS inflammatory demyelination. J Neurol Sci 2013;333(1– 2):76– 87. doi: 10.1016/ j.jns.2013.03.002.

33. Krejsek J, Holmannová D. Imunopatogeneze roztroušené sklerózy mozkomíšní. Postgrad Med 2012;14:933– 8.

34. Maier E, Duschl A, Horejs-Hoeck J. STAT6-dependent and -independent mechanisms in Th2 polarization. Eur J Immunol 2012;42(11):2827– 33. doi: 10.1002/ eji.201242433.

35. Krejsek J, Kopecký O. Klinická imunologie. 1. vyd. Hradec Králové: NUCLEUS HK 2004.

36. Liblau R. Glatiramer acetate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: evidence for a dual anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective role. J Neurol Sci 2009;287(Suppl 1):S17– 23. doi: 10.1016/ S0022-510X(09)71296-1.

37. Schrempf W, Ziemssen T. Glatiramer acetate: mechanisms of action in multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 2007;6(7):469– 75. doi: 10.1016/ j.autrev.2007.02.003.

38. Bettelli E, Korn T, Kuchroo VK. Th17: the third member of the effector T cell trilogy. Curr Opin Immunol 2007;19(6):652– 7. doi: 10.1016/ j.coi.2007.07.020.

39. Miossec P. IL-17 and Th17 cells in human inflammatory diseases. Microbes Infect 2009;11(5):625– 30. doi: 10.1016/ j.micinf.2009.04.003.

40. Lee YK, Mukasa R, Hatton RD, et al. Developmental plasticity of Th17 and Treg cells. Curr OpinImmunol 2009;21(3):274– 80. doi: 10.1016/ j.coi.2009.05.021.

41. Zambrano-Zaragoza JF, Romo-Martínez EJ, Durán-Avelar MJ, et al. Th17 cells in autoimmune and infectious diseases. Int J Inflamm 2014;2014:651503. doi: 10.1155/ 2014/ 651503.

42. Babaloo Z, Aliparasti MR, Babaiea F, et al. The role of Th17 cells in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F serum levels. Immunol Lett 2015;164(2):76– 80. doi: 10.1016/ j.imlet.2015.01.001.

43. Li Y, Wang H, Long Y, et al. Increased memory Th17 cells in patients with neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2011;234(1– 2):155– 60. doi: 10.1016/ j.jneuroim.2011.03.009.

44. Di Mitri D, Sambucci M, Loiarro M, et al. The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade modulates T helper type 17 differentiation and functionality in multiple sclerosis. Immunology 2015;146(2):251– 63. doi: 10.1111/ imm.12497.

45. Jamshidian A, Shaygannejad V, Pourazar A, et al. Biased Treg/ Th17 balance away from regulatory toward inflammatory phenotype in relapsed multiple sclerosis and its correlation with severity of symptoms. J Neuroimmunol 2013;262(1– 2):106– 12. doi: 10.1016/ j.jneuroim.2013.06.007.

46. Poojary KV, Kong YM, Farrar MA. Control of Th2-mediated inflammation by regulatory T cells. Am J Pathol 2010;177(2):525– 31. doi: 10.2353/ ajpath.2010.090936.

47. Dejaco C, Duftner C, Grubeck-Loebenstein B, et al. Imbalance of regulatory T cells in human autoimmune diseases. Immunology 2006;117(3):289– 300. doi: 10.1111/ j.1365-2567.2005.02317.x.