The importance of collateral circulation in acute basilar artery occlusion

Česká verzia

Authors: M. Tinková ¹; P. Malý ¹; H. Parobkova ²; O. Bradáč ¹
Authors place of work: Ústav klinických neurooborů, Komplexní cerebrovaskulární centrum, – neurologické a neurochirurgické, oddělení, ÚVN a VFN, Praha ; Radiodiagnostické oddělení, ÚVN a VFN, Praha ²
Published in the journal: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2019; 82(5): 518-525
Category: Original Paper
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn2019518

Summary

Aim: We evaluated the prognostic value of a radiological Basilar Artery on Computed Tomography Angiography (BATMAN) score in patients with acute arterial basilaris occlusion (BAO).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data of consecutive endovascular therapy-treated patients with BAO in our stroke unit between 2006– 2018. The diagnosis of BAO was made on CTA. BATMAN score is a 10-point CTA-based grading system. Good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0– 3 within 3 months.

Results: We included 67 patients (37 men) with BAO treated with endovascular therapy (mechanical thrombectomy): mean age 63 years (range 31– 82 years), median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) 16; and interquartile range 2– 36. Succesful recanalization modified as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b-3 was achieved in 91% (61/ 67) of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified BATMAN score ≤ 7 (OR 27.59; 95% CI 5.78– 131.81; P = 0.001) and initial NIHSS ≥ 10 (OR 9.62; 95% CI 1.47– 63.10; P = 0.0183) as independent predictors of poor outcome.

Conclusion: The BATMAN score demonstrated its ability to predict severe disability and death after BAO despite endovascular reperfusion therapies.

Autoři deklarují, že v souvislosti s předmětem studie nemají žádné komerční zájmy.

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

Redakční rada potvrzuje, že rukopis práce splnil ICMJE kritéria pro publikace zasílané do biomedicínských časopisů.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.

Přijato k recenzi: 19. 7. 2019

Přijato do tisku: 21. 8. 2019

侧支循环在急性基底动脉阻塞中的重要性

目的：我们评估了放射基底动脉对急性基底动脉阻塞(BAO)患者的ct血管成像(BATMAN)评分的预后价值。

方法：我们回顾性分析了2006 - 2018年期间在我们卒中单元连续进行血管内治疗的BAO患者的临床和影像学资料。BAO的诊断是在CTA上做出的。BATMAN 分数是一个基于cta的10分制评分系统。好结果定义为3个月内修改Rankin评分0 - 3分。

结果：我们纳入67例(37名男性)鲍接受血管内治疗(机械血栓切除术)的患者:平均年龄63岁(范围31 - 82岁)，中位国家卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS) 16;四分位数范围为2 - 36。脑梗死(TICI) 2b-3再通改良溶栓成功91%(61/ 67)。多元逻辑回归分析确定BATMAN得分≤7（OR 27.59; 95％CI 5.78– 131.81; P = 0.001）和初始NIHSS≥10（OR 9.62; 95％CI 1.47– 63.10; P = 0.0183）作为不良结果的独立预测因子。

结论：尽管进行了血管内再灌注治疗，BATMAN评分也证明了其能够预测BAO后严重残疾和死亡的能力。

关键词：基底动脉闭塞–侧支循环–血管内治疗– BATMAN评分

Keywords:

basilar artery occlusion – collateral circulation – endovascular therapy – BATMAN score

Zdroje

1. Alemseged F, Shah DG, Diomedi M et al. The basilar artey on computed tomography angiography prognostic score for basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2017; 48(3): 631– 637. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.116.015492.

2. Alemseged F, Van der Hoeven E, Di Giulliano F et al. Response to late-window endovascular revascularisation is associated with collateral status in basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2019; 50: 1415– 1422. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.118.023361.

3. Cho TH, Nighoghossian N, Tahon F et al. Brain stem Diffusion-weighted imaging lesion score: a potential marker of outcome in acute basilar artery occlusion. AJNR 2009; 30(1): 194– 198. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr. A1278.

4. Goldmakher GV, Camargo EC, Furie KL et al. Hyperdense basilar artery sign on unenhanced CT pedicts thrombus ando oucome in acute posterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2009; 40(1): 134– 139. doi: 10.1161/ STROKE AHA.108.516690.

5. Kayan Y, Meyers PD, Prestigiacomo CJ et al. Current endovascular strategies for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: report on the Society of neurointerventional surgery standards and guidelines committee. J Neurointervent Surg 2019. pii: neurintsurg-2019-014873. doi: 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2019-014873.

6. Roth C, Mileke A, Siekmann R et al. First experiences with a new device for mechanical thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011; 32(1): 28– 34. doi: 10.1159/ 00324948.

7. Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Schroth G et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalisation and outcome of 40 patients with acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 2004; 75(6): 857– 862. doi: 10.1136/ jnnp. 2003.020479.

8. Baek JM, Yoon W, Kim SK et al. Acute basilar artery occlusion: outcome of mechanical thrombectomy with Solitaire stent within 8 hours of stroke onset. AJNR 2014; 35(5): 989– 993. doi: org/ 10.3174/ ajnr.A3813.

9. Bose A, Henkes H, Alfke K et al. The Penumbra system: a mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke due to thromboembolism. AJNR 2008; 29(7): 1409– 1413. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A1110.

10. Berg-Dammer E, Felber SR, Henkes H et al. Long-term outcome after local intra-arterial fibrinolysis of basilar artery thrombosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000; 10(3): 183– 188. doi: 10.1159/ 000016054.

11. Dumont AS, Ford GA. Delayed revascularisation in patients with basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2019; 50(6): 1327– 1328. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.119.025499.

12. Eckert B, Koch CH, Thomalla G et al. Aggressive therapy with intravenous abciximab and intra-arterial rtPA and additional PTA/ stenting improves clinical outcome in acute vertebrobasilar occlusion. Stroke 2005; 36(6): 1160– 1165. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.000165918.80812.

13. Goyal N, Tsivgoulis G, Nickele C et al. Posterior circulation CT angiography collaterals predict outcome of endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy for basilar artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8(8):783– 786. doi:10.1136/ neurintsurg-2015-011883.

14. Ostrem JL, Saver JL, Alger JR et al. Acute basilar artery occlusion – diffusion-perfusion MRI characterisation of tissue salvage in patients receiving intra-arterial stroke therapies. Stroke 2004; 35(2): e30– e34. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.0000113783.45745.BE.

15. Sairanen T, Strbian D, Soinne L et al. Intravenous thrombolysis of basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2011; 42(8): 2175– 2179. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.110.605584.

16. Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Bruckmann H, Hamann GF et al. Ischemic and hemorrhagic complications after intra-arterial fibrinolysis in vertebrobasilar occlusion. AJNR 2007; 28(2): 378– 381.

17. Puetz V, Sylaja PN, Hill MD et al. CT Angiography source images predicts final infarct extent in patients with basilar artery occlusion. AJNR 2009; 30(10): 1877– 1883. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A1723.

18. Yu W, Konstanian V, Fischer M: Endovascular recanalisation of basilar artery occlusion 80 days after symptom onset. Stroke 2007; 38(4): 1387– 1389. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.0000260186.93667.a2.

19. Tountopoulou A, Ahl B, Weissenborn K et al. Intra-arterial thrombolysis using rt-PA in patients with acute stroke due to vessel occlusin of anterior and/ or posterior cerebral circulation. Neuroradiology 2008; 50(1): 75– 83. doi: 10.1007/ s00234-007-0306-1.

20. Dias FA, Alessio-Alvez FF, Castro-Alfonzo LHet al. Clinical outcomes of patients with acute basilar artery occlusion in Brazil: an observational study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017; 26(10): 2191– 2198. doi. org/ 10. 1016/ jstrokecerebrovascdis.

21. Mordasini P, Brekenfeld C, Byrne JV et al. Technical feasibility and application of mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire FR revascularisation device in acute basilar artery occlusion. AJNR 2013; 34(1): 159– 163. doi: org/ 10.3174/ ajnr.A3168.

22. Tomek A et al. Neurointenzivní péče. 3. vyd. Praha: Mladá fronta a. s. 2018.

23. Uno J, Kameda K, Otsuji R et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion in early therapeutic time window. Cerebrovasc Dis 2017; 44(3– 4): 217– 224.doi: 10.1159/ 000479939.

24. Kalina M. Akutní neurologie – intenzivní péče v neurologii. Praha: Triton 2000.

25. Sparaco M. Basilar artery occlusion: clinical management and therapy. Clin Management Issues 2018; 12(1): 67– 76. doi: 10.7175/ cmi.v12i1.1363.

26. Goldemund D, Brichta J, Vaníček J et al. Spontánní disekce a. basilaris jako vzácná příčina mozkového infarktu. Neurol praxi 2012; 13(5): 292– 294.

27. Mrklovský M, Klzo L, Geier P. Disekce bazilární tepny jako příčina ischemické cévní příhody. Ces Radiol 2008; 62(1): 92– 96.

28. Drábek P. Trombóza arteria basilaris imitující temporální konus. Cesk Slov Neurol N 1988; 51: 148– 150.

29. Ferbert A, Bruckmann H, Drummen E. Clinical features of proven basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 1990; 21(8): 1135– 1142. doi: 10.1161/ 01.str.21.8.1135.

30. Bergui M, Stura G, Daniele D et al. Mechanical thrombolysis in ischemic stroke attributable to basilar artery occlusion as first-line treatment. Stroke 2006; 37(1): 145– 150. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.0000195178.20019.dc.

31. Hankey GJ. The BASICS of treating symptomatic basilar artery thrombosis. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8(8): 695– 697. doi: 10.1016/ S1474-4422(09)70152-8.

32. Školoudík D, Šaňák D et al. Rekanalizační terapie akutní ischemické cévní mozkové příhody. Praha: Maxdorf 2013.

33. Škoda O. Diagnostika a léčba ischemických CMP ve vertebrobazilárním povodí. CMP Journal 2019; 1: 9– 15.

34. Škoda O, Herzig R, Mikulík R et al. Klinický standard pro diagnostiku a léčbu pacientů s ischemickou cévní mozkovou příhodou. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2016; 79/ 112(3): 351– 363. doi: 10.14735/ amcsnn2016351.

35. Liebeskind D. Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003; 34(9): 2279– 2284. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.0000086465.41263.06.

36. Volný O, Mikulík R. Kolaterální cirkulace mozku – potencionální cíl terapie mozkových infarktů. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2013; 76/ 109(3): 307– 314.

37. Brandt T, von Kummer R, Muller-Kuppers M et al. Thrombolytic therapy of acute basilar artery occlusion: variables affecting recanalisation and outcome. Stroke 1996; 27(5): 875– 881. doi: 10.1161/ 01.STR.27.5.875.

38. Nekula J, Vlachová I, Chudoba V. Dynamika uzávěru bazilární tepny v DSA a MR obraze. Ces Radiol 1995; 49(2): 93– 96.

39. Maas MB, Lev MH, Ay H et al. Collateral vessels on CT Angiography predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009; 40(9): 3001– 3005. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.109.552513.

40. Nambiar V, Sohn SI, Almekhlafi MA et al. CTA collateral status and response to recanalisation in patients with acute ischemic stroke. AJNR 2014; 35(5): 884– 890. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A3817.

41. Souza LC, Yoo AJ, Chaudhry ZA et al. Malignant CTA collateral profile is highly specific for large admission DWI infarct core and poor outcome in acute stroke. AJNR 2012; 33(7): 1331– 1336. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A2985.

42. Tan IY, Demchuk AM, Hopyan J et al. CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. AJNR 2009; 30(3): 525– 531. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A1408.

43. Vagal A, Aviv R, Sucharew H et al. Collateral clock is more important than time clock for tissue fate. Stroke 2018; 49(9): 2102– 2107. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.118.021484.

44. Bang OY, Saver JL, Kim SJ et al. Collateral flow predicts response to endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011; 42(3): 693– 699. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.110.595256.

45. Lau AY, Wong EH, Wong A et al. Significance of good collateral compensation in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 33(6): 517– 524. doi: 10.1159/ 000337332.

46. Sallustio F, Motta C, Pizzuto S et al. CT angiography-based collateral flow and time to reperfusion are strong predictors of outcome in endovascular treatment of patients with stroke. J Neurointervent Surg 2017; 9(10): 940– 943. doi: org/ 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2016-012628.

47. Brunner F, Tomandl B, Hanken K et al. Impact of collateral circulation on early outcome and risk of hemorrhagic complications after systemic thrombolysis. Int J Stroke 2014; 9(8): 992– 998. doi: 10.1111/ j.1747-4949. 2012.00922.x.

48. Shuaib A, Butcher K, Mohammad AA et al. Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10(10): 909– 921. doi: 10.1016/ S1474-4422(11)70195-8.

49. Bang OY, Saver JL, Kim SJ et al. Collateral flow averts hemorrhagic transformation after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2011; 42(8): 2235– 2239. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.110.604603.

50. Angermaier A, Langner S, Kirsch M et al. CT-angiographic collateralisation predicts final infarct volume after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011; 31(2): 177– 184. doi: 10.1159/ 000321868.

51. van der Hoeven EJ, McVerry F, Vos JA et al. BASICS Registry Investigators. Collateral flow predicts outcome after basilar artery occlusions: the posterior circulation collateral score. Int J Stroke 2016; 11(7): 768– 775. doi: 10.1177/ 1747493016641951.

52. Singer OC, Berkefeld J, Nolte CH et al. ENDOSTROKE study Group. Mechanical recanalisation in basilar artery occlusion: the ENDOSTROKE Study. Ann Neurol 2015; 77(3): 415– 424. doi: 10.1002/ ana.2436.

53. Hacke W, Kaste M. Fieschi C et al. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous altepase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Lancet 1998; 352(9136): 1245– 1251.

54. Baixue J, Liebeskind DS, Ning M et al. Factors associated with perforator stroke after selective basilar artery angioplasty or stenting. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9(8): 738– 742. doi: 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2016-012329.

55. Gory B, Mazighi M, Laubreuche J et al. Predictors for mortality after mechanical thrombectomy of acute basilar artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 45(1– 2): 61– 67. doi: 10.1159/ 000486690.

56. Renard D, Landragin N, Robinson A et al. MRI-Based Score for acute basilar artery thrombosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25(6): 511– 516. doi: 10.1159/ 00013668.

57. Krajina A, Krajíčková D, Lojík M et al. Endovaskulární rekanalizace při léčbě akutních uzávěrů mozkových tepen. Ces Slov Neurol N 2010; 73/ 106(6): 678– 684.

58. Vergouwen MD, Compter A, Tanne D et al. Outcomes of basilar artery occlusion in patients aged 75 years or older on the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study. J Neurol 2012; 259(11): 2341– 2346. doi: 10.1007/ s00415-012-6498-2.

59. Dorňák T, Herzig R, Krajina A et al. Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: time to treatment is crucial. Clin Radiol 2015; 70(5): e20– e27. doi: org/ 10.1016/ j.crad.2015.01.008.

60. Jung S, Mono ML, Fischer U et al. Three-month and longterm outcomes and their predictors in acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke 2011; 42(7): 1946– 1951. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.110.606038.

61. Schonewille WJ, Algra A, Serena J et al. Outcome in patients with basilar artery occlusion treated conventionally. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76(9): 1238– 1241. doi: 10.1136/ jnnp.049924.

62. Bouslama M, Haussen DC, Aghaebrahim A et al. Predictors of good outcome after endovascular therapy for vertebrobasilar occlusion stroke. Stroke 2017; 48(12): 3252– 3257. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.117.018270.

63. Yoon W, Kim SK, Heo TW et al. Predictors of good outcome after stent retriever thrombectomy in acute basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2015; 46(10): 2972– 2975. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.115.010840.

64. Voetsch B, DeWitt D, Pessin MS et al. Basilar artery occlusive disease in the New England Medical Center Posterior Circulation Registry. Arch Neurol 2004; 61(4): 496– 504. doi: 10.1001/ archneur.61.4.496.

65. Ottomeyer C, Zeller J, Fesl G et al. Multimodal recanalisation therapy in acute basilar artery occlusion. Stroke 2012; 43(8): 2130– 2135. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.112.651281.

66. Tsao JW, Hemphill JC, Johnston C et al. Glasgow Coma Scale Score predicts outcome following thrombolysis for posterior circulation stroke. Arch Neurol 2005; 62(7): 1126– 1129. doi: 10.1001/ archneur.62.7.1126.

67. Powers CJ, Dornbos D, Mlynash M et al. Thrombectomy with conscious sedation compared with general anesthesia: a DEFUSE 3 analysis. AJNR 2019; 40(6): 1001– 1005. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A6059.

68. Goyal N, Malhotra K, Ishfaq MF et al. Current evidence for anesthesia management during endovascular stroke therapy: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11(2): 107– 113. doi: 10.1136/ neurintsurg-2018-013916.

69. Jagani M, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA et al. Hemodynamics during anestesia for intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Neurointervent Surg 2016; 8(9): 883– 888. doi: 10.1136-neurintsurg-2015-011867.

70. Lowhagen Hendén P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE et al. Hypotension during endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke is a risk factor for poor neurological outcome. Stroke 2015; 46(9): 2678– 2680. doi: 10.1161/ STROKE AHA.115.009808.

71. Molina CA, Selim MH. General ol local anesthesia during endovascular procedures. Stroke 2010; 41(11): 2720– 2721. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.110.595447.

72. Abou Chebl A, Lin R, Hussain MS et al. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke. Stroke 2010; 41(6): 1175– 1179. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.115.008761.

73. Lansberg MG, Albers GW, Wijman CA. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a review of the risk factors. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007; 24(1): 1– 10. doi: 10.1159/ 000103110.

74. Liu S, Jung JH, Kim SM et al. Simultaneous bilateral carotid stenting in high risk patients. AJNR 2010; 31(6): 1113– 1117. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A1970.

75. Liu AY, Do HM, Albers GW et al. Hyperperfusion syndrome with hemorrhage after angioplasty for middle cerebral artery stenosis. AJNR 2001; 22(8): 1597– 1601.

76. Coutts SB, Hill MD, Sutherland G et al. Hyperperfusion syndrome: toward a stricter definition. Neurosurgery 2003; 53(5): 1053– 1060. doi: 10.1227/ 01.NEU.0000088738.80838.74.

77. Krajíčková D. Komplikace chirurgické a endovaskulární léčby onemocnění magistrálních mozkových tepen. Neurol praxi 2003; 3: 133– 136.

78. Mraček J, Choc M, Richtr P et al. Hyperperfuzní syndrom. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2005; 3: 192– 197.

79. Meinel TR, Kaesmacher J, Panos L et al. Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion: efficacy, outcomes, and futile recanalisation in comparison with the anterior circulation. J Neurointerv Surg 2019. pii: neurintsurg-2018-014516. doi: 10.1136-neuintsurg-2018-014516.

80. Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) – European Society for minimally invasive neurological therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2019; 11(6): 535– 538. doi:10.1136/ neurintsurg-2018-014569.

81. Powers WS, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018; 49(3): e46– e110. doi: 10.1161/ STR. 00000000000000158.

82. Becktepe JS, You SJ, Berkefeld J et al. Clinical outcome after mechanical recanalisation as mono- or adjunctive therapy in acute stroke: importance of time to recanalisation. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011; 32(3): 211– 218. doi: 10.1159/ 00328814.

83. Hussein HM, Georgiadis AL, Vazquez G et al. Occurence and predictors of futile recanalisation following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study. AJNR 2010; 31(3): 454– 458. doi 10.3174/ ajnr.A2006.

84. Molina CA. Futile recanalisation in mechanical embolectomy trials. A call to improve selection of patients for revascularisation. Stroke 2010; 41(5): 842– 843. doi: 10.1161/ STROKEAHA.110.580266.

85. Nagel S, Herweh CH, Kohrmann M et al. MRI in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion-DWI lesion scoring is and independent predictor of outcome. Int J Stroke 2012; 7(4): 282– 288. doi/ 10.1111/ ijs.2012.7.issue-4/ issuetoc.

86. Nie X, Pu Y, Zhang Z et al. Futile recanalisation after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 5879548. doi: 10.1155/ 2018/ 5879548.

87. Mourand I, Machi P, Nogué E et al. Diffusion--weighted imaging score of the brainstem: a predictor of outcome in acute basilar artery occlusion treated with Solitaire FR Device. AJNR 2014; 35(6): 1117– 1123. doi: 10.3174/ ajnr.A3870.

88. Noufal M, Schmidley JW, Erdem E et al. Basilar artery occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy beyond eight hours with succesful recanalisation and good functional outcomes. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 27(6): 614– 615. doi: 10.1159/ 000218072.