Twenty years of experience with ERCP in the University Hospital Motol
Authors:
J. Lochmannová 1; M. Wasserbauer 1; R. Keil 1; J. Drábek 1; J. Šťovíček 1; J. Chudý 1; I. Námešný 1; J. Schwarz 2; A. Raidl 3
Authors place of work:
Interní klinika 2. LF UK a FN v Motole, Praha
1; III. chirurgická klinika 1. LF UK a FN v Motole, Praha
2; Matematicko‑fyzikální fakulta, UK v Praze
3
Published in the journal:
Gastroent Hepatol 2015; 69(2): 124-129
Category:
Digestive Endoscopy: Original Article
doi:
https://doi.org/10.14735/amgh2015124
Summary
Operation of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was launched in the University Hospital Motol in 1993 as part of urgent endoscopic services. The procedure is performed for catchment area patients and for patients from surrounding hospitals. Between the years 1993 and 2012, 4,487 urgent procedures were performed in our department. The main indications were acute cholangitis, acute biliary pancreatitis and biliary tract injuries. Cannulation success achieved in our department was 93.5%, the extraction success was 83%. Given the high number of urgent ERCP procedures, the endoscopic centre in the University Hospital Motol is a highly specialised department, offering experienced, knowledgeable staff and modern technical facilities.
Key words:
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography – cholangitis – pancreatitis
The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.
The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE „uniform requirements“ for biomedical papers.
Submitted:
8. 10. 2014
Accepted:
7. 4. 2015
Zdroje
1. McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report. Ann Surg 1968; 167(5): 752– 756.
2. Demling L, Koch H, Classen M et al. Endoscopic papillotomy and removal of gall‑stones: animal experiments and first clinical results (author’s trans). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1974; 99(45): 2255– 2257.
3. Maple JT, Ikenberry SO, Anderson MA et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74(4): 731– 744. doi: 10.1016/ j.gie.2011.04.012.
4. Lekharaju VP, Iqbal J, Noorullah O et al. Emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in critically ill patients is a safe and effective procedure. Frontline Gastroenterology 2013; 4(2): 138– 142.
5. Cotton PB, Leung JW (eds). Advanced digestive endoscopy: ERCP. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 2005.
6. Boender J, Nix GA, de Ridder MA et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and biliary drainage in patients with cholangitis due to common bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90(2): 233– 238.
7. Leung JW, Chung SC, Sung JJ et al. Urgent endoscopic drainage for acute suppurative cholangitis. Lancet 1989; 1(8650): 1307– 1309.
8. Lau JY, Chung SC, Leung JW et al. Endoscopic drainage aborts endotoxaemia in acute cholangitis. Br J Surg 1996; 83(2): 181– 184.
9. Lai EC, Mok FP, Tan ES et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1992; 326(24): 1582– 1586.
10. Neoptolemos JP, Carr‑ Locke DL, London NJ et al. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet 1988; 2(8618): 979– 983.
11. Lai EC, Mok FP, Tan ES et al. Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis. N Engl J Med 1992; 326(24): 1582– 1586.
12. Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP et al. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(4): 228– 232.
13. Working Group IAP/ APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/ APA evidence‑based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13 (4 Suppl 2): e1– e15. doi: 10.1016/ j.pan.2013.07.063.
14. Tse F, Yuan Y. Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 5: CD009779. doi: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD009779.pub2.
15. Fogel EL, Sherman S. ERCP for gallstone pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370(2): 150– 157. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMct1208450.
16. Schwarz J, Keil R, Drábek J et al. Urgentní ERCP. Rozhl Chir 2002; 81(6): 304– 307.
17. Colton JB, Curran CC. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70(3): 457– 467. doi: 10.1016/ j.gie.2008.11.022.
18. Mo LR, Chang KK, Wang CH et al. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9(2): 191– 195.
19. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Fockens P et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile duct stones. Lancet 1997; 349(9059): 1124– 1129.
20. Granke K, Jordan FT, Mazzeo RJ et al. Endoscopic papillotomy: impact on community hospital treatment of common duct stones. Am Surg 1988; 54(6): 347– 351.
21. Carr‑ Locke DL. Therapeutic role of ERCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56 (6 Suppl): S170– S174.
Štítky
Paediatric gastroenterology Gastroenterology and hepatology SurgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
2015 Číslo 2
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
- Current Insights into the Antispasmodic and Analgesic Effects of Metamizole on the Gastrointestinal Tract
- Obstacle Called Vasospasm: Which Solution Is Most Effective in Microsurgery and How to Pharmacologically Assist It?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Maltofer®
- Atypical picture of colon infiltration with lymphoma in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
- Novel oral anticoagulants – the advantages and drawbacks of the therapy
- Twenty years of experience with ERCP in the University Hospital Motol