#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#
preLekára.sk / Journals / General Practitioner / 2024 - 1

Methods of measuring limb oedema volume: a literature review

Česká verzia

Authors: K. Ratislavová 1;  V. Resl 1;  M. Leba 2;  Kateřina Janoušková 1
Authors place of work: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni ;  Fakulta zdravotnických studií Děkan: Ing. Jan Beránek, MBA 1;  Fakulta aplikovaných věd Děkan: doc. Ing. Miloš Železný, Ph. D. 2
Published in the journal: Prakt. Lék. 2024; 104(1): 30-35
Category: Of different specialties

Summary

Oedema is a common symptom of many diseases and its continuous static and dynamic measurement and monitoring is essential for practice. The disappearance or increase in swelling may indicate the success or failure of treatment. The aim of our literature review is to a) identify currently available methods for measuring limb oedema volume, b) obtain information on their validity and reliability. A systematic search for studies was performed to identify relevant sources. Twenty studies describing methods for measuring upper or lower limb oedema volume were included in the review. The most commonly described methods in the studies were tape measurements, water volumetry or perimeter measurements, which are considered the "gold standard". Therefore, these methods were often used to test the validity and reliability of new methods of measuring limb oedema volume, which mainly included three-dimensional imaging and bioimpedance spectroscopy. Technological advances have brought new possibilities and methods in the measurement of limb edema volume, but their efficacy and accuracy are still under validation.

Keywords:

review – methods – limb oedema – volume measurement

Zdroje
  1. Ashby J, Lewis M, Sunderland C, et al. The reliability and validity of a portable three-dimensional scanning system to measure leg volume. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23(22): 9177.
  2. Bahadori S, Immins T, Wainwright TW. Volumetric assessment of lower limb oedema using 3D laser scanning technique: a systematic review. J Med Eng Technol. 2022; 46(1): 40–45.
  3. Deltombe T, Jamart J, Recloux S, et al. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema. Lymphology 2007; 40(1): 26–34.
  4. Devoogdt N, Cavaggion C, Van der Gucht E, et al. Reliability, validity, and feasibility of water displacement method, figure-ofeight method, and circumference measurements in determination of ankle and foot edema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2019; 17(5): 531–536.
  5. Hameeteman M, Verhulst AC, Vreeken RD, et al. 3D stereophotogrammetry in upper-extremity lymphedema: An accurate diagnostic method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69(2): 241–247.
  6. Houwen F, Stemkens J, de Schipper PJ, et al. Estimates for assessment of lymphedema: reliability and validity of extremity measurements. Lymphat Res Biol. 2022; 20(1): 48–52.
  7. Houwen F, Stemkens J, van Sonsbeek D, et al. New device to measure cross-sectional areas and segmental volumes of objects and limbs. Med Devices Evid Res. 2023; 16: 101–110.
  8. Chausiaux O, Williams G, Nieznański M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of a video and AI solution to measure lower leg and foot volume. Med Devices Evid Res. 2021; 14: 105–118.
  9. Chromy A, Zalud L, Dobsak P, et al. Limb volume measurements: comparison of accuracy and decisive parameters of the most used present methods. Springerplus 2015; 4: 707.
  10. Hidding JT, Viehoff PB, Beurskens CHG, et al. Measurement properties of instruments for measuring of lymphedema: systematic review. Physical Ther. 2016; 96(12): 1965–1981.
  11. Lippi L, Turco A, Moalli S, et al. Quantitative assessment of upper-limb volume: implications for lymphedema rehabilitation? Appl Sci. 2023; 13(17): 9810.
  12. Llanos C, Gan EY, Chen J, et al. Reliability and validity of physical tools and measurement methods to quantify hand swelling: a systematic review. Physical Ther. 2021; 101(2): pzaa206.
  13. Mabrouk S, Hersek S, Jeong HK, et al. Robust longitudinal ankle edema assessment using wearable bioimpedance spectroscopy. IEEE T Biomed Eng. 2020; 67(4): 1019–1029.
  14. Machaczka O, Homza M, Zatloukalová J, Janout V. Optoelektronické skenování jako nástroj pro měření antropometrických rozměrů dolních končetin. Prakt. lék. 2018; 98(1): 121–126.
  15. Musil D. Diagnostický a terapeutický algoritmus při otocích dolních končetin. Interní med. 2005; 7(6): 296–300.
  16. Musil D. Diferenciální diagnostika otoků dolních končetin. In: Herman J. Chirurgie varixů dolních končetin. Praha: Grada Publishing 2003; 158–163.
  17. Nascimben M, Lippi L, Fusco N, et al. Technical aspects and validation of custom digital algorithms for hand volumetry. Technol Health Care 2023; 31(5): 1835–1854.
  18. Oezel L, Latz D, Gehrmann SV, et al. Volumetry of hand and forearm: A 3D volumetric approach. Hand 2022: 15589447221141492.
  19. Qin ES, Bowen MJ, Chen WF. Diagnostic accuracy of bioimpedance spectroscopy in patients with lymphedema: A retrospective cohort analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018; 71(7): 1041–1050.
  20. Rabe E, Carpentier P, Maggioli A. Understanding lower leg volume measurements used in clinical studies focused on venous leg edema. Int Angiol. 2018; 37(6): 437–443.
  21. Scaliusi SF, Gimenez L, Pérez P, et al. From bioimpedance to volume estimation: a model for edema calculus in human legs. Electronics 2023; 12(6): 1383.
  22. Sharkey AR, King SW, Kuo RY, et al. Measuring limb volume: accuracy and reliability of tape measurement versus perometer measurement. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018; 16(2): 182–186.
  23. Shinkai H, Yamamoto M, Tatebe M, et al. Non-invasive volumetric analysis of asymptomatic hands using a 3-D scanner. PLoS One 2017; 12(8): e0182675.
  24. Skřivan J, Blecha T, Soukup R, Řeboun J, Resl V. Sensors in textiles for monitoring patients with edema. ISSE 2018, Zlatibor, Serbia, 41st International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology ID: I02.
  25. Verhulst AC, Wesselius TS, Glas HH, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of a newly developed tool for volume measurements of the arm using 3D stereophotogrammetry. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017; 70(12): 1753–1759.
  26. Wolfs JAGN, Bijkerk E, Schols RM, et al. Evaluation of a novel water-based volumetric device for measuring upper limb lymphedema: first experience with healthy volunteers. Lymphat Res Biol. 2019; 17(4): 434–439.
  27. Yu F, Bilberg A, Xiao L, Yderstraede KB. Foot edema simulation and monitoring using dielectric electro-active polymer sensors. Sens Actuator A Phys. 2015; 225: 33–40.

adresa pro korespondenci:
PhDr. Kristina Janoušková, Ph.D.
Fakulta zdravotnických studií ZČU
Husova 11, 301 00 Plzeň
e-mail: kjanousk@kos.zcu.cz

Štítky
General practitioner for children and adolescents General practitioner for adults
Článek Snus – the new and former support agent: for how long?
Článek Fezolinetant, the neurokinin 3 receptor antagonist in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in perimenopause
Článek Non-pharmacological treatment procedures used in patients suffering from dementia
Článek Occupational diseases reported in the Czech Republic in 2023
Článek Risk of sudden cardiac attack and the number of push-ups managed
Článek Purkyne’s Review Živa – its Foundation, Fall and Renewal
Článek Eponyma v medicíně aneb po kom to slovo je
Článok vyšiel v časopise

General Practitioner

Číslo 1
2024 Číslo 1
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#