Psychometric validation of Czech version of the questionnaire Jacelon Attributed Dignity Scale.

Česká verzia

Authors: Mgr. Bc. Jana Bermellová ^1,2; doc. PhDr. Helena Kisvetrová, Ph.D. ¹
Authors place of work: Centrum vědy a výzkumu, Fakulta zdravotnických věd, UP v Olomouci ¹; II. intermí klinika – gastroenterologická a geriatrická FN Olomouc ²
Published in the journal: Geriatrie a Gerontologie 2020, 9, č. 4: 203-208
Category: Review Article

Summary

Jacelon Attributed Dignity Scale (JADS) questionnaire helps to understand the perception of dignity from the perspective of older people. The aim of the study was to verify the psychometric properties of the Czech version of this questionnaire. The group consisted of 150 older adults who were hospitalized for at least one week (mean age 77.7 ± 8 years; 104 women [69.3%], length of hospitalization at the time of completing the questionnaire [10.2 ± 5.8 days]). The total value of attributed dignity in the elderly was relatively high (63 ± 5.84). The reliability of the Czech version of JADS was good (á = 0.802). A weak positive correlation was found in JADS with the Attitude to Aging Questionnaire scale (r = 0.288, p = 0.0004) and a weak negative correlation with the Patient Dignity Inventory (r = -0.188, p = 0.021) and Geriatric Depression Scale (r = - 0.206, p = 0.011). Factor analysis resulted in a four-factor solution (Self-value; Perceived value from others; Self in relation to others; Behaviour with respect towards others). The results were compared with published results of psychometric validations of the JADS scale in the USA, Greece and Iran. Our study confirmed that the Czech version of JADS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring attributed dignity in Czech hospitalized older adults.

Keywords:

older adults – dignity – evaluation – questionnaire – validation

Zdroje

1. Kabadayi S, Hu K, Lee Y, et al.: Fostering older adult care experiences to maximize well-being outcomes. Journal of Service Management, ahead-of-print 2020 doi:10.1108/josm-11-2019-0346 (cit. 2020–8-9). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JOSM-11-2019-0346/full/html

2. Kisvetrová H. Demence a kvalita života. 1. vyd. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého 2020.

3. Štyglerová T, Němečková M, Šimek M. Stárnutí se nevyhneme. Český statistický úřad. 2014 (cit. 2020–7-9). https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/ea002b5947.

4. Sarvimaki A, Stenbock-Hult B. The meaning of vulnerability to older persons. Nurs Ethics 2016; 23: 372–383.

5. Merchant RA, Chen MZ, Tan LWL, et al. Singapore Healthy Older People Everyday (HOPE) Study: Prevalence of Frailty and Associated Factors in Older Adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18(8): 734.e9–734.e14.

6. Thiyagarajan JA, Araujo de Carvalho I, Peña-Rosas JP., et al. Redesigning care for older people to preserve physical and mental capacity: WHO guidelines on community-level interventions in integrated care. PLoS Med 2019; 16(10): e1002948.

7. Allen, J, Hutchinson AM, Brown R, et al.: User Experience and Care Integration in Transitional Care for Older People From Hospital to Home. Qual Health Res 2016; 27(1): 24–36.

8. Digby R, Lee S, Williams A. The experience of people with dementia and nurses in hospital: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26(9-10): 1152–1171.

9. Lohne V, Høy B, Lillestø B, et al. Fostering dignity in the care of nursing home residents through slow caring. Nurs Ethics 2016; 24(7): 778–788.

10. Kisvetrová H, Herzig R, Bretšnajdrová M, et al.: Predictors of quality of life and attitude to ageing in older adults with and without dementia. Aging Ment Health 2019; 1–8. Early Access.

11. Oosterveld-Vlug, MG, Pasman, HRW, vanGennip, IE. et al: Dignity and the factors that influence it according to nursing home residents: a qualitative interview study. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70(1): 97–106.

12. Guo Q, Jacelon CS. An integrative review of dignity in end-of-life care. Palliat Med 2014; 28(7): 931–940.

13. Erikson, EH, Erikson, JM, Kivnick, HQ.: Vital involvement in old age. New York: WW Norton & Co. 1986.

14. Walsh, K. and Kowanko, I.: Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of dignity. Int J Nurs Pract 2002; 8: 143–151.

15. George, LK.: Dignity and quality of life in old age. J Gerontol Soc Work 1998; 29(2/3): 39–52.

16. Jacelon, CS.: The dignity of elders in an acute care hospital. Qual Health Res 2003; 13: 543–556.

17. Tadd, W., Bayer, T. and Dieppe, P. Dignity in health care: Reality or rhetoric. Rev Clin Gerontol 2002; 12: 1–4.

18. Jacelon, C., Dixon, J. and Knafl, K. Development of the Attributed Dignity Scale. Res Gerontol Nurs 2009; 1(4): 202–213.

19. Jacelon, CS, Connelly, TW, Brown, R. et al. A concept analysis of dignity in older adults. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48(1): 76–83.

20. Jacelon, CS, and Choi, J. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Jacelon Attributed Dignity Scale. J Adv Nurs 2014; 70: 2149–2161.

21. Jacelon, CS. Strategies used by older adults to maintain or restore attributed dignity. Res Gerontol Nurs 2014; 7(6):273–283.

22. Papastavrou E, Charitou P, Kouta C. Psychometric properties of the Greek version of Jacelon Attributed Dignity Scale. Nurs Ethics 2016; 24(5): 612–625.

23. Namjoo S, Allahverdipour H, Shaghaghi A, et al.: Psychometric Properties of Jacelon’s Attributed Dignity Scale with Iranian Older People. Nurs Ethics 2019; 096973301984512.

24. Chochinov HM, Hassard T, McClement S, et al.: The Patient Dignity Inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. J Pain Symp Manage 2008; 36:559–571.

25. Kisvetrová H, Školoudík D, Danielová L, et al.: Czech Version of the Patient Dignity Inventory: Translation and Validation in Incurable Patients. J Pain Symp Manage 2018; 55(2): 444–450.

26. Dragomirecká E, Prajsová J. WHOQOL-OLD. 1. vyd. Praha: Psychiatrické centrum 2009.

27. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. „Mini-mental state“. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975 Nov;12(3):189–98.

28. Mahoney FI, Barthel D. “Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.” Maryland State Med Journal 1965;14:56–61.

29. Yesavage, JA, Brink, TL, Rose, TL et al.: Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-83;17(1):37–49.