SILS appendectomy for acute appendicitis – two-year experience
Authors:
R. Krajničák 1; A. Vrzgula 1; V. Pribula 1; M. Šašala 1; M. Múdry 1; T. Vasilenko 1; J. Slavík 1
Authors place of work:
1III. Chirurgická klinika SZU, Nemocnica Košice-Šaca a. s., 1. súkromná nemocnica, Slovensko
prednosta: MUDr. A. Vrzgula, PhD.
1; OAIM, Nemocnica Košice-Šaca a. s., 1. súkromná nemocnica, Slovensko, primár: MUDr. J. Slávik
2
Published in the journal:
Rozhl. Chir., 2012, roč. 91, č. 9, s. 469-474.
Category:
Original articles
Summary
Introduction:
The study aims to present our two-year experience with SILS (Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery) appendectomy in patients operated on for acute appendicitis symptoms. The results obtained were analysed and then compared with patients operated by standard laparoscopy, as well as with data available from the published literature with emphasis on safety and advantages of a new operating technique.
Material and methods:
A retrospective analysis of patients operated on at the Third Department of Surgery, Slovak Medical University, the Košice-Šaca Hospital, a.s., in the past two years was performed. Age, sex, BMI, length of operation, post-operative hospitalization period, occurrence of pre- and post-operative complications were evaluated.
Results:
In the period from 1 November 2009 to 31 October 2011, 116 patients were operated on by the authors, 47 of them by the SILS technique. The group included 26 males and 21 females with average age of 37.13 years (18–80) and average BMI 26.3 kg/m2 (18–47.1). Average length of the operation was 54.81 minutes (30–100). The length of post-operative hospital stay was 3.83 days (2–6). An abscess in the surgical wound was found in three patients. One patient had to be reoperated due to a pericaecal abscessed hematoma. Incisional hernia was not observed in our group.
Conclusion:
Our results are comparable with the data from international published literature and confirm that the SILS appendectomy is a safe method and represents an appropriate alternative to the standard laparoscopic technique. It is suitable for surgeons with advanced experience in laparoscopy. Apart from the excellent cosmetic effect, other advantages or disadvantages in comparison with standard laparoscopy will require confirmation by prospective randomized studies.
Key words:
appendectomy – laparoscopy – SILS
Zdroje
1. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15(2): 59–64.
2. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer 3rd MD., Harrison JB. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 1994;219(6):725–731.
3. Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205(1):60–65.
4. Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Surg Endosc 2010;24(2):266–269.
5. Li et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterology 2010;10:129.
6. Kapischke M, Friedrich F, Hedderich J, Schulz T, Caliebe A. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy – quality of life 7 years after surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011;396:69–75.
7. Korndorffer Jr., RJ, Fellinger E, Reed W. SAGES guideline for laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2010;24:757–761.
8. Ahmed K, Wang TT, Patel VM, Nagpal K, Clark J, Ali M, Deeba S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva P. The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2011;25:378–396.
9. Vrzgula A, Pribula V, Múdry M, Šašala M. SILS apendektómia. Miniinvazívna chirurgia II/2010:4–6.
10. Neto MG, Ramos A, Campos J. Single port laparoscopic access surgery. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2009;11:84–93.
11. Lee J, Back J, Kim W. Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endoc Percutan Tech 2010;20: 100–103.
12. Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Wong SK, Lai PB, Ng EK. A case-controlled comparison of single-site access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2011;25(5): 1415–1419.
13. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Nehme J, Darzi LA, Paraskeva P. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy: A retrospective comparative analysis. Surg Endosc 2010;24(10):2567–2574.
14. Kang K, Lee S, Kang D, Kim S, Oh J, Choi D, Park W, Lee J. Application of Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Appendectomies in Patients with Complicated Appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctology 2010;26(6):388–394.
15. Vidal O, Ginesta C, Valentini M, Martí J, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC. Suprapubic single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a nonvisible-scar surgical option. Surg Endosc 2011;25 (4):1019–1023.
16. Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginesta C, Martí J, Espert J, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas J. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2010;24:686–691.
17. Jun Ho Park et al.Laparoscopic vs Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy; Results of Prospective Randomized Trial. J Korean Surg Soc 2010;78:213–218.
18. Feinberg EJ, O’Connor DJ, Feinberg ML, Vemulapalli P, Camacho D. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy: An Early Experience. The American Surgeon 2011;(77)3:286–289.
19. Chiu CG, Nguyen NH, Bloom SW. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy using conventional instruments: an initial experience using a novel technique. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1153–1159.
20. Kim HJ, Lee JI, Lee YS, Lee IK, Park JH, Lee SK, Kang WK, Cho H-M, You YK, Oh ST. Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: 43 consecutive cases. Surgical Endoscopy 2010;24(11):2765–2769.
21. Park J, Kwak H, Kim SG, Lee S. Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: Comparison with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques 2012;22(2):142–145.
22. Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Luján JA, García A, Hernández Q, Valero G, Parrilla P. Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy: initial experience. CIR ESP 2011;89(1):37–41.
23. Chouillard E, Dache A, Torcivia A, Helmy N, Ruseykin I, Gumbs A. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience. Epub 2010;24(8):1861–1865
24. Raakow R, Jacob DA. Initial experience in laparoscopic single-port appendectomy: a pilot study. Dig Surg 2011;28(1):74–79.
25. Cho MS, Min BS, Hong YK, Lee WJ. Single-site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison of short-term operative outcomes. Surg Endosc 2011;25:36–40.
Štítky
Surgery Orthopaedics Trauma surgeryČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Perspectives in Surgery
2012 Číslo 9
- Spasmolytic Effect of Metamizole
- Metamizole at a Glance and in Practice – Effective Non-Opioid Analgesic for All Ages
- Metamizole in perioperative treatment in children under 14 years – results of a questionnaire survey from practice
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A giant gastrointestinal stromal tumour – a case report
- Diverticulum of the greater curvature of the stomach as a cause of anaemisation
- The development of surgical treatment in liver and biliary tract diseases
- SILS appendectomy for acute appendicitis – two-year experience