Why we use mammography to screening breast cancer and why we won't to stop it not even after publication of recent Canadian study? Reaction to study of AB Miller et al published in British Medical Journal 2014
Authors:
Ondřej Májek 1; Ladislav Dušek 1; Jan Daneš 2; Miroslava Skovajsová 3
Authors place of work:
Institut biostatistiky a analýz LF MU, Brno
1; Radiodiagnostická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN, Praha, přednosta prof. MUDr. Jan Daneš, CSc.
2; Breast Unit Prague, a. s., mamocentrum
3
Published in the journal:
Prakt Gyn 2014; 18(1): 66-68
Category:
Oncogynecology: Review Article
Summary
The article of professor A. B. Miller and colleagues published in February 2014 in the BMJ, which summarizes findings from 25 year follow-up in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study made in the first half of 1980s, doesn't bring new compelling evidence of the ineffectiveness of mammography screening and its conclusions are similar to the previous article about this study published in 2000. Several recent reviews have confirmed a reduction in mortality from breast cancer by tens of percent due to mammography screening. Different results of this study might be due to specific design of the study and used mammographic techniques. It should also be noted that results extrapolation from long-term foreign studies in terms of other country must be done very carefully.
Key words:
Canadian National Breast Screening Study – mammography – screening
Zdroje
1. Vainio H, Bianchini F (eds) et al. Breast Cancer Screening. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Vol. 7. IARC Press: Lyon 2002. ISBN 92–832–3007–8 a ISSN 1027–5622.
2. Paci E, Group EW. Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet. J Med Screen 2012;19(Suppl 1): 5–13.
3. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 2012; 380(9855): 1778–1786.
4. Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ et al. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ 2014; 348:g366. Dostupné z DOI: <http://doi: 10.1136/bmj.g366>.
5. Miller AB, To T, Baines CJ, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2: 13-year results of a randomized trial in women aged 50–59 years. J Nati Cancer Inst 2000; 92(18): 1490–1499.
6. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 -a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(1): 23–34.
7. Pavlík T, Májek O, Büchler T et al. Trends in stage-specific population-based survival of cancer patients in the Czech Republic in the period 2000–2008. Cancer Epidemiol 2014; 38(1): 28–34.
Štítky
Paediatric gynaecology Gynaecology and obstetrics Reproduction medicineČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Practical Gynecology
2014 Číslo 1
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Father on childbirth
- Specifics of ovarian cancer in patients with BRCA mutations: PARP Inhibitor Treatment in Ovarian and Breast Cancer
-
Hymen, Godsend or Curse?
Surgical Outpatient Hysteroscopy Using Vaginoscopic Access in Patients with Preserved Hymen - Thyroid cancer in pregnancy: case reports