Incidentally Discovered White Subcupsular Liver Nodules during Laparoscopic Surgery: Biliary Hamartoma and Peribiliary Gland Hamartoma
Bílé subkapsulární jaterní uzly objevené náhodně během laparoskopické operace: žlučové hamartomy a peribiliární žlázový hamartom
Během rutinní laparoskopické operace se může chirurg setkat s přítomností malých bílých subkapsulárních jaterních uzlů, ať už solitárních nebo mnohočetných. Tyto léze mohou napodobovat jaterních metastáze a v mnoha případech nejsou prokázány předoperačním ultrazvukem nebo počítačovou tomografií. Cílem tohoto článku je seznámit laparoskopického chirurga s náhodným objevem těchto uzlíků, které představují dva typy intrahepatálních benigních malformací žlučových cest a zahrnují žlučové hamartomy, které jsou obvykle mnohočetné nezhoubné malformace intrahepatických žlučovodů, a peribiliární žlázový hamartom, který je obvykle solitární a skládá se z benigního epiteliálního nádoru v játrech odvozeného od buněk žlučových cest.
Klíčová slova:
žlučové cesty – játra – chirurgie – adenomy – von Meyenburg útvary – hamartomy
Authors:
O. Ioannidis 1; F. Iordanidis 2; G. Paraskevas 3; M. Ntoumpara 4; L. Tsigkriki 4; S. Chatzopoulos 1; A. Kotronis 1; N. Papadimitriou 1; A. Konstantara 1; A. Makrantonakis 1; A. Sakkas 4; E. Kakoutis 1
Authors place of work:
First Surgical Department, General Regional Hospital ‘George Papanikolaou’, Thessaloniki, Greece
1; Department of Pathology, General Regional Hospital ‘George Papanikolaou’, Thessaloniki, Greece
2; Department of Anatomy, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
3; Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
4
Published in the journal:
Klin Onkol 2012; 25(6): 468-470
Category:
Kazuistiky
Summary
During routine laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon may encounter the presence of small white subcapsular liver nodules, either solitary or multiple. The lesions may mimic liver metastasis and in many cases are not demonstrated in the preoperative ultrasound or computed tomography. The aim of this article is to familiarize the laparoscopic surgeon with the incidental discovery of these nodules which represent the two types of intrahepatic benign bile duct proliferations and include biliary hamartomas, which are usually multiple benign malformations of the intrahepatic bile ducts, and peribiliary gland hamartoma, which is usually solitary and consists of a benign epithelial tumor of the liver derived from bile duct cells.
Key words:
bile ducts – liver – surgery – adenoma – von Meyenburg complexes – hamartomas
Introduction
Biliary hamartomas (BH) are rare benign malformations of the intrahepatic bile ducts which are usually multiple (also called von Meyenburg complexes) [1,2] while peribiliary gland hamartoma (PGH) is a rare benign epithelial tumor of the liver derived from bile duct cells, which is usually solitary [3]. Both lesions are usually found incidentally during surgery or at autopsy and represent the two types of intrahepatic benign bile duct proliferations [1,3,4]. We report two cases of white subcupsular liver nodules found incidentally during laparoscopic cholecystectomy which proved to be a biliary hamartoma and a peribiliary gland hamartoma.
Case Report 1
During routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a 38 year old male, multiple subcapsular nodules were noticed on the liver surface, which preoperative ultrasound and computed tomography failed to depict. A biopsy specimen was obtained. Histopathological examination showed small, irregular dilated ducts that are embedded in a fibrous stroma and confirmed the diagnosis of biliary hamartoma (Fig. 1A, B).
Case Report 2
During routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a 62-year old female, a nodule of the left lobe was noticed on the liver surface, which preoperative ultrasound failed to depict. A biopsy specimen was received. Histopathological examination showed numerous, tortuous bile ducts in a fibrous stroma with moderate chronic inflammation and established the diagnosis of peribiliary gland hamartoma (Fig. 2A–C).
Discussion
Biliary hamartomas (BH) are also known as von Meyenburg complexes, bile duct hamartomas, hepatic hamartoma, microhamartoma, cholangioadenoma, minute bile duct adenomas, multiple adenomas, adenomata, fibroadenomata and intracapsular aberrant bile ducts [5]. BH are benign biliary malformations, usually discovered during autopsy or incidentally during surgery, with an incidence between 0.6 and 5.6% [6]. BH may be located intraparenchymally or subcapsularly and are usually multiple well circumscribed small (usually less than 1 cm) focal lesions scattered throughout both liver lobes, while solitary lesions can also occur [1,5].
The pathogenesis of BH remains speculative but they are generally considered to be developmental disorders rather than true neoplasms and represent ductal plate malformation of the small interlobular ducts [1,5,6]. BH are related to other congenital disorders, including Caroli’s disease, polycystic liver disease, congenital hepatic fibrosis, mesenchymal hamartomas, bile duct atresia and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease [5,6]. Failure of embryonic bile ducts involution is one of the most common theories while a disruptive or ischemic factor during bile duct lamina remodeling has also been proposed [1,6]. BH are divided into three classes depending on the degree of bile ducts cystic dilatation within the lesions: 1) predominantly solid, 2) intermediate lesion with both solid and cystic foci and 3) predominantly cystic [1]. BH do not seem to predispose to malignant transformation, although in a few cases there was a coexisting cholangiocarcinoma [6,7]. Also, another classification divides BH in two types: 1) BH connected to the draining bile ducts, and 2) BH without any connection to the bile ducts [8].
Macroscopically, BH are small white to green round to irregular nodules, usually well-defined but without true capsule [1,5]. Microscopical examination reveals proliferation of small irregular, disorganized or dilated, bile ducts lined by normal cuboidal to low columnar epithelium, without cellular atypia, embedded in abundant fibrocollagenous stroma containing proteinaceous fluid and sometimes inspissated bile [1,2,5,6,9]. BH in most cases do not communicate with the biliary system but communication with the normal terminal bile ducts in the adjacent portal trial can also be noted [1,5,6].
In a minority of cases, BH can be seen by imaging techniques [7]. Ultrasound of BH demonstrates small discrete hypoechoic, hyperechoic and mixed echoic nodules [1,6]. Computed tomography shows multiple irregular hypodense cystoid lesions without enhancement uniformly distributed in the liver [1,6]. Magnetic resonance imaging reveals hypointense lesions on T1-weighed images and strongly hyperintense lesions on T2 weighed images [1,2,6].
BH are almost always asymptomatic; only a few cases have been reported to cause jaundice, fever, epigastric pain and cholangitis [10]. In asymptomatic patients, no treatment or follow-up is necessary [10].
Differential diagnosis of BH includes PGH liver metastases, hepatic cysts, microabscesses, dilated bile ducts and primary sclerosing cholangitis [1,2,8].
PGH is also known as intrahepatic bile duct adenoma, cholangioma, benign cholangioma, cholangioadenoma and simply bile duct adenoma [2,11,12]. PGH is a rare benign epithelial hepatic tumor originating from bile duct cells usually discovered incidentally at autopsy or laparotomy with an incidence 1.3% [3, 11]. PGH is most commonly located on the liver surface or subcapsularly and is a well circumscribed small lesion (usually less than 1 cm) usually solitary, but may also present as multiple nodules throughout the liver [3,11,13].
The pathogenesis of PGH is still unclear but it is considered a reactive process to a focal bile ductular injury caused by trauma or inflammation rather than a true neoplasm based on immunohistochemical studies [3,11,12]. In PGH because of absence of appropriate mesenchymal epithelial signaling, the acini and tubules fail to organize into a mature gland draining into a bile duct [3,13]. PGH has benign behavior and show limited growth potential but cases of suspected malignant transformation have been reported [3,11,12].
Macroscopically, PGH is small, white to gray or tan, firm, flat or slightly elevated, well defined but without true capsule [3,11]. Microscopic examination demonstrates confluent proliferation of disorganized mature ductules and peribiliary gland acini lined by low columnar or cuboidal cells containing light colored transparent cytoplasm, without cellular atypia and with low mitotic activity, in a connective tissue stroma showing varying degrees of chronic inflammation and collegenization [3,11]. PGH does not usually invade the portal tract but in some cases portal vein and arterioles are lost [11].
PGH may not be seen by imaging techniques and is difficult to detect due to small size and peripheral location [3,11]. Ultrasound shows an echogenic nodule with or without a hypoechoic rim. Computed tomography demonstrates hyperdense areas within the lesion and magnetic resonance imaging usually reveals hypointensity in T1-weighed images and hyperintensity in T2 weighed images but hyperintensity both on T1 and T2 as well as hyperintensiity both on T1 and T2 has been reported [3,11,12]. Also, in contrast, enhanced CT and MRI PGH show delayed or prolonged enhancement [11,12].
PGH is asymptomatic and no symptoms or signs are attributed to the lesion [11]. It can occur at any age but the mean age of presentation is 55 years and presents no sex predilection or maybe a slightly male predominance [3,11].
Differential diagnosis of PGH includes BH, mesenchymal hamartoma, metastatic liver tumor, inflammatory pseudotumor, cholangiocarcinoma, hepatic abscess, hepatic granuloma, epithelioid hamangioendiotheloma and tuberculosis [3,11,12]. PGH is distinguished from BH microscopically by the lack of intraluminal bile and the compact nature of its proliferation without cystic changes [3,12]. Macroscopically, diagnosis of both lesions is difficult. An intraoperative biopsy should be performed in all cases of incidental finding during an abdominal operation, which would give the definite diagnosis.
Orestis Ioannidis, M.D.
Alexandrou Mihailidi 13
546 40 Thessaloniki
Greece
e-mail: telonakos@hotmail.com
Submitted: 5. 5. 2012
Accepted: 15. 11. 2012
Zdroje
1. Cheung YC, Tan CF, Wan YL et al. MRI of multiple biliary hamartomas. Br J Radiol 1997; 70(833): 527–529.
2. Tohmé-Noun C, Cazals D, Noun R et al. Multiple biliary hamartomas: magnetic resonance features with histopathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 2008; 18(3): 493–499.
3. Kim YS, Rha SE, Oh SN et al. Imaging findings of intrahepatic bile duct adenoma (peribiliary gland hamartoma): a case report and literature review. Korean J Radiol 2010; 11(5): 560–565.
4. Albores-Saavedra J, Hoang MP, Murakata LA et al. Atypical bile duct adenoma, clear cell type: a previously undescribed tumor of the liver. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25(7): 956–960.
5. Semelka RC, Hussain SM, Marcos HB et al. Biliary hamartomas: solitary and multiple lesions shown on current MR techniques including gadolinium enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10(2): 196–201.
6. Liu CH, Yen RF, Liu KL et al. Biliary hamartomas with delayed 99mTc-diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid clearance. J Gastroenterol 2005; 40(5): 540–544.
7. Panaro F, Gauff G, Dong G et al. Images of interest. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: multiple biliary hamartomas (von Meyenburg complex). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 19(4): 463.
8. Wohlgemuth WA, Böttger J, Bohndorf K. MRI, CT, US and ERCP in the evaluation of bile duct hamartomas (von Meyenburg complex): a case report. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(9): 1623–1626.
9. Zheng RQ, Zhang B, Kudo M et al. Imaging findings of biliary hamartomas. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(40): 6354–6359.
10. Quentin M, Scherer A. The „von Meyenburg complex“. Hepatology 2010; 52(3): 1167–1168.
11. Tajima T, Honda H, Kuroiwa T et al. Radiologic features of intrahepatic bile duct adenoma: a look at the surface of the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23(5): 690–695.
12. Maeda E, Uozumi K, Kato N et al. Magnetic resonance findings of bile duct adenoma with calcification. Radiat Med 2006; 24(6): 459–462.
13. Bhathal PS, Hughes NR, Goodman ZD. The so-called bile duct adenoma is a peribiliary gland hamartoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1996; 20(7): 858–864.
Štítky
Detská onkológia Chirurgia všeobecná OnkológiaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
Klinická onkologie
2012 Číslo 6
- Metamizol jako analgetikum první volby: kdy, pro koho, jak a proč?
- Nejasný stín na plicích – kazuistika
- Fixní kombinace paracetamol/kodein nabízí synergické analgetické účinky
- Kombinace metamizol/paracetamol v léčbě pooperační bolesti u zákroků v rámci jednodenní chirurgie
- Tramadol a paracetamol v tlumení poextrakční bolesti
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Hodnocení jaterní funkce v onkologické praxi
- Porovnání nákladů u režimů XELOX a FOLFOX-4 v léčbě kolorektálního karcinomu
- Bílé subkapsulární jaterní uzly objevené náhodně během laparoskopické operace: žlučové hamartomy a peribiliární žlázový hamartom
- Kazuistika: Podpůrná léčba u pacientky s rozsáhlým tumorem ovaria