Drift and Genome Complexity Revisited
article has not abstract
Vyšlo v časopise:
Drift and Genome Complexity Revisited. PLoS Genet 7(6): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002092
Kategorie:
Viewpoints
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002092
Souhrn
article has not abstract
Zdroje
1. WhitneyKDGarlandTJr
2010
Did genetic drift drive increases in genome
complexity?
PLoS Genet
6
e1001080
doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001080
2. LynchMConeryJS
2003
The origins of genome complexity.
Science
302
1401
1404
3. LynchM
2011
Statistical inference on the mechanisms of genome
evolution.
PLoS Genet
7
e1001389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001389
4. GarlandTJrBennettAFRezendeEL
2005
Phylogenetic approaches in comparative
physiology.
J Exp Biol
208
3015
3035
5. GarlandTMidfordPEIvesAR
1999
An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods,
with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral
values.
Am Zool
39
374
388
6. LynchMConeryJS
2004b
Testing genome complexity - response.
Science
304
390
7. BlombergSPGarlandTIvesAR
2003
Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral
traits are more labile.
Evolution
57
717
745
8. FreckletonRPHarveyPHPagelM
2002
Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of
evidence.
Am Nat
160
712
726
9. LavinSRKarasovWHIvesARMiddletonKMGarlandT
2008
Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of
nonflying mammals: A phylogenetic approach.
Physiol Zool
81
526
550
10. HueyRBDeutschCATewksburyJJVittLJHertzPE
2009
Why tropical forest lizards are vulnerable to climate
warming.
Proc Biol Sci
276
1939
1948
11. SwansonDLGarlandT
2009
The evolution of high summit metabolism and cold tolerance in
birds and its impact on present-day distributions.
Evolution
63
184
194
12. RicklefsREStarckJM
1996
Applications of phylogenetically independent contrasts: A mixed
progress report.
Oikos
77
167
172
13. RohlfFJ
2006
A comment on phylogenetic correction.
Evolution
60
1509
1515
14. IvesARMidfordPEGarlandT
2007
Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic
comparative methods.
Syst Biol
56
252
270
15. Diaz-UriarteRGarlandT
1998
Effects of branch length errors on the performance of
phylogenetically independent contrasts.
Syst Biol
47
654
672
16. HutcheonJMGarlandT
2004
Are megabats big?
J Mammal Evol
11
257
276
17. AdoutteABalavoineGLartillotNLespinetOPrud'hommeB
2000
The new animal phylogeny: Reliability and
implications.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
97
4453
4456
18. DelsucFBrinkmannHChourroutDPhilippeH
2006
Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living
relatives of vertebrates.
Nature
439
965
968
19. DunnCWHejnolAMatusDQPangKBrowneWE
2008
Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal
tree of life.
Nature
452
745-U745
20. PhilippeHDerelleRLopezPPickKBorchielliniC
2009
Phylogenomics revives traditional views on deep animal
relationships.
Curr Biol
19
706
712
21. FelsensteinJ
1988
Phylogenies and quantitative characters.
Annu Rev Ecol Syst
19
445
471
22. LynchM
2007
The origins of genome architecture.
Sunderland (Massachusetts)
Sinauer Associates
23. GarlandTIvesAR
2000
Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for
regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods.
Am Nat
155
346
364
24. ChappellR
1989
Fitting bent lines to data, with applications to
allometry.
J Theor Biol
138
235
256
25. WhitneyKDBaackEJHamrickJLGodtMJWBarringerBC
2010
A role for nonadaptive processes in plant genome size
evolution?
Evolution
64
2097
2109
26. KuoCHMoranNAOchmanH
2009
The consequences of genetic drift for bacterial genome
complexity.
Genome Res
19
1450
1454
27. DaubinVMoranNA
2004
Comment on "The origins of genome complexity".
Science
306
978a
28. YangZHBielawskiJP
2000
Statistical methods for detecting molecular
adaptation.
Trends Ecol Evol
15
496
503
29. KuoCHOchmanH
2009
Deletional bias across the three domains of life.
Genome Biol Evol
1
145
152
30. LynchMConeryJS
2004a
Response to comment on "The origins of genome
complexity".
Science
306
978a
31. DenverDRMorrisKLynchMThomasWK
2004
High mutation rate and predominance of insertions in the
Caenorhabditis elegans nuclear genome.
Nature
430
679
682
32. NilssonAIKoskiniemiSErikssonSKugelbergEHintonJCD
2005
Bacterial genome size reduction by experimental
evolution.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
102
12112
12116
33. CharlesworthBBartonN
2004
Genome size: Does bigger mean worse?
Curr Biol
14
R233
R235
34. KembelSWCowanPDHelmusMRCornwellWKMorlonH
2010
Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and
ecology.
Bioinformatics
26
1463
1464
35. R Development Core Team
2010
R: A language and environment for statistical
computing.
Version 2.11.1
Vienna
R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2011 Číslo 6
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Statistical Inference on the Mechanisms of Genome Evolution
- Recurrent Chromosome 16p13.1 Duplications Are a Risk Factor for Aortic Dissections
- Chromosomal Macrodomains and Associated Proteins: Implications for DNA Organization and Replication in Gram Negative Bacteria
- Maps of Open Chromatin Guide the Functional Follow-Up of Genome-Wide Association Signals: Application to Hematological Traits