Chromosome Painting Reveals Asynaptic Full Alignment of Homologs and HIM-8–Dependent Remodeling of Chromosome Territories during Meiosis
During early meiotic prophase, a nucleus-wide reorganization leads to sorting of chromosomes into homologous pairs and to establishing associations between homologous chromosomes along their entire lengths. Here, we investigate global features of chromosome organization during this process, using a chromosome painting method in whole-mount Caenorhabditis elegans gonads that enables visualization of whole chromosomes along their entire lengths in the context of preserved 3D nuclear architecture. First, we show that neither spatial proximity of premeiotic chromosome territories nor chromosome-specific timing is a major factor driving homolog pairing. Second, we show that synaptonemal complex-independent associations can support full lengthwise juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes. Third, we reveal a prominent elongation of chromosome territories during meiotic prophase that initiates prior to homolog association and alignment. Mutant analysis indicates that chromosome movement mediated by association of chromosome pairing centers (PCs) with mobile patches of the nuclear envelope (NE)–spanning SUN-1/ZYG-12 protein complexes is not the primary driver of territory elongation. Moreover, we identify new roles for the X chromosome PC (X-PC) and X-PC binding protein HIM-8 in promoting elongation of X chromosome territories, separable from their role(s) in mediating local stabilization of pairing and association of X chromosomes with mobile SUN-1/ZYG-12 patches. Further, we present evidence that HIM-8 functions both at and outside of PCs to mediate chromosome territory elongation. These and other data support a model in which synapsis-independent elongation of chromosome territories, driven by PC binding proteins, enables lengthwise juxtaposition of chromosomes, thereby facilitating assessment of their suitability as potential pairing partners.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Chromosome Painting Reveals Asynaptic Full Alignment of Homologs and HIM-8–Dependent Remodeling of Chromosome Territories during Meiosis. PLoS Genet 7(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002231
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002231
Souhrn
During early meiotic prophase, a nucleus-wide reorganization leads to sorting of chromosomes into homologous pairs and to establishing associations between homologous chromosomes along their entire lengths. Here, we investigate global features of chromosome organization during this process, using a chromosome painting method in whole-mount Caenorhabditis elegans gonads that enables visualization of whole chromosomes along their entire lengths in the context of preserved 3D nuclear architecture. First, we show that neither spatial proximity of premeiotic chromosome territories nor chromosome-specific timing is a major factor driving homolog pairing. Second, we show that synaptonemal complex-independent associations can support full lengthwise juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes. Third, we reveal a prominent elongation of chromosome territories during meiotic prophase that initiates prior to homolog association and alignment. Mutant analysis indicates that chromosome movement mediated by association of chromosome pairing centers (PCs) with mobile patches of the nuclear envelope (NE)–spanning SUN-1/ZYG-12 protein complexes is not the primary driver of territory elongation. Moreover, we identify new roles for the X chromosome PC (X-PC) and X-PC binding protein HIM-8 in promoting elongation of X chromosome territories, separable from their role(s) in mediating local stabilization of pairing and association of X chromosomes with mobile SUN-1/ZYG-12 patches. Further, we present evidence that HIM-8 functions both at and outside of PCs to mediate chromosome territory elongation. These and other data support a model in which synapsis-independent elongation of chromosome territories, driven by PC binding proteins, enables lengthwise juxtaposition of chromosomes, thereby facilitating assessment of their suitability as potential pairing partners.
Zdroje
1. Mlynarczyk-EvansSVilleneuveAM 2010 Homologous Chromosome Pairing and Synapsis during Oogenesis. VerlhacMVilleneuveAM Oogenesis: The Universal Process Hoboken, NJ WILEY 117 140
2. HiraokaYDernburgAF 2009 The SUN rises on meiotic chromosome dynamics. Dev Cell 17 598 605
3. ChikashigeYHaraguchiTHiraokaY 2007 Another way to move chromosomes. Chromosoma 116 497 505
4. GoldmanASHultenMA 1992 Chromosome in situ suppression hybridisation in human male meiosis. J Med Genet 29 98 102
5. BarlowALHultenMA 1996 Combined immunocytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic analysis of meiosis I human spermatocytes. Chromosome Res 4 562 573
6. ScherthanHEilsRTrelles-StickenEDietzelSCremerT 1998 Aspects of three-dimensional chromosome reorganization during the onset of human male meiotic prophase. J Cell Sci 111 2337 2351
7. SchwarzacherT 1997 Three stages of meiotic homologous chromosome pairing in wheat: cognition, alignment and synapsis. Sexual Plant Reproduction 10 324 331
8. Martinez-PerezEShawPReaderSAragon-AlcaideLMillerT 1999 Homologous chromosome pairing in wheat. J Cell Sci 112 1761 1769
9. BassHWRiera-LizarazuOAnanievEVBordoliSJRinesHW 2000 Evidence for the coincident initiation of homolog pairing and synapsis during the telomere-clustering (bouquet) stage of meiotic prophase. J Cell Sci 113 1033 1042
10. ScherthanHWeichSSchweglerHHeytingCHarleM 1996 Centromere and telomere movements during early meiotic prophase of mouse and man are associated with the onset of chromosome pairing. J Cell Biol 134 1109 1125
11. PrietoPShawPMooreG 2004 Homologue recognition during meiosis is associated with a change in chromatin conformation. Nat Cell Biol 6 906 908
12. PrietoPMooreGReaderS 2005 Control of conformation changes associated with homologue recognition during meiosis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111 505 510
13. ColasIShawPPrietoPWanousMSpielmeyerW 2008 Effective chromosome pairing requires chromatin remodeling at the onset of meiosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 6075 6080
14. SchedlT 1997 Developmental genetics of the germ line. RiddleDLBlumenthalTMeyerBJPriessJR C elegans II Cold Spring Harbor, NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 241 269
15. AlbertsonDGRoseAMVilleneuveAM 1997 Chromsome organization, mitosis, and meiosis. RiddleDLBlumenthalTMeyerBJPriessJR C elegans II Cold Spring Harbor, NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 47 78
16. ZetkaM 2009 Homologue pairing, recombination and segregation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Dyn 5 43 55
17. McKimKSPetersKRoseAM 1993 Two types of sites required for meiotic chromosome pairing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 134 749 768
18. VilleneuveAM 1994 A cis-acting locus that promotes crossing over between X chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 136 887 902
19. MacQueenAJColaiacovoMPMcDonaldKVilleneuveAM 2002 Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans. Genes Dev 16 2428 2442
20. MacQueenAJPhillipsCMBhallaNWeiserPVilleneuveAM 2005 Chromosome sites play dual roles to establish homologous synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Cell 123 1037 1050
21. PhillipsCMWongCBhallaNCarltonPMWeiserP 2005 HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis. Cell 123 1051 1063
22. PhillipsCMDernburgAF 2006 A family of zinc-finger proteins is required for chromosome-specific pairing and synapsis during meiosis in C. elegans. Dev Cell 11 817 829
23. PhillipsCMMengXZhangLChretienJHUrnovFD 2009 Identification of chromosome sequence motifs that mediate meiotic pairing and synapsis in C. elegans. Nat Cell Biol 11 934 942
24. PenknerATangLNovatchkovaMLadurnerMFridkinA 2007 The Nuclear Envelope Protein Matefin/SUN-1 Is Required for Homologous Pairing in C. elegans Meiosis. Dev Cell 12 873 885
25. SatoAIsaacBPhillipsCMRilloRCarltonPM 2009 Cytoskeletal Forces Span the Nuclear Envelope to Coordinate Meiotic Chromosome Pairing and Synapsis. Cell 139 907 919
26. PenknerAMFridkinAGloggnitzerJBaudrimontAMachacekT 2009 Meiotic Chromosome Homology Search Involves Modifications of the Nuclear Envelope Protein Matefin/SUN-1. Cell 139 920 933
27. Martinez-PerezEVilleneuveAM 2005 HTP-1-dependent constraints coordinate homolog pairing and synapsis and promote chiasma formation during C. elegans meiosis. Genes Dev 19 2727 2743
28. CouteauFZetkaM 2005 HTP-1 coordinates synaptonemal complex assembly with homolog alignment during meiosis in C. elegans. Genes Dev 19 2744 2756
29. DernburgAFMcDonaldKMoulderGBarsteadRDresserM 1998 Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell 94 387 398
30. MacQueenAJVilleneuveAM 2001 Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. Genes Dev 15 1674 1687
31. NabeshimaKVilleneuveAMHillersKJ 2004 Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes. Genetics 168 1275 1292
32. CouteauFNabeshimaKVilleneuveAZetkaM 2004 A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axes at the interface of homolog alignment, synapsis, nuclear reorganization, and recombination. Curr Biol 14 585 592
33. JantschVTangLPasierbekPPenknerANayakS 2007 Caenorhabditis elegans prom-1 Is Required for Meiotic Prophase Progression and Homologous Chromosome Pairing. Mol Biol Cell 18 4911 4920
34. SmolikovSSchild-PruertKColaiacovoMP 2008 CRA-1 Uncovers a Double-Strand Break-Dependent Pathway Promoting the Assembly of Central Region Proteins on Chromosome Axes During C. elegans Meiosis. PLoS Genet 4 e1000088 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000088
35. PasierbekPJantschMMelcherMSchleifferASchweizerD 2001 A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev 15 1349 1360
36. ZetkaMCKawasakiIStromeSMullerF 1999 Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation. Genes Dev 13 2258 2270
37. BaudrimontAPenknerAWoglarAMachacekTWegrostekC 2010 Leptotene/Zygotene Chromosome Movement Via the SUN/KASH Protein Bridge in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet 6 e1001219 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001219
38. BrovermanSAMeneelyPM 1994 Meiotic mutants that cause a polar decrease in recombination on the X chromosome in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 136 119 127
39. SunHNelmsBLSleimanSFChamberlinHMHanna-RoseW 2007 Modulation of Caenorhabditis elegans transcription factor activity by HIM-8 and the related Zinc-Finger ZIM proteins. Genetics 177 1221 1226
40. McKimKSHayashi-HagiharaA 1998 mei-W68 in Drosophila melanogaster encodes a Spo11 homolog: evidence that the mechanism for initiating meiotic recombination is conserved. Genes Dev 12 2932 2942
41. VilleneuveAMHillersKJ 2001 Whence meiosis? Cell 106 647 650
42. GongWJMcKimKSHawleyRS 2005 All paired up with no place to go: pairing, synapsis, and DSB formation in a balancer heterozygote. PLoS Genet 1 e67 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010067
43. SherizenDJangJKBhagatRKatoNMcKimKS 2005 Meiotic Recombination in Drosophila Females Depends on Chromosome Continuity Between Genetically Defined Boundaries. Genetics 169 767 781
44. ScherthanHLoidlJSchusterTSchweizerD 1992 Meiotic chromosome condensation and pairing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae studied by chromosome painting. Chromosoma 101 590 595
45. Trelles-StickenELoidlJScherthanH 1999 Bouquet formation in budding yeast: initiation of recombination is not required for meiotic telomere clustering. J Cell Sci 112 651 658
46. LoidlJScherthanH 2004 Organization and pairing of meiotic chromosomes in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. J Cell Sci 117 5791 5801
47. DaweRKSedatJWAgardDACandeWZ 1994 Meiotic chromosome pairing in maize is associated with a novel chromatin organization. Cell 76 901 912
48. KellyWGSchanerCEDernburgAFLeeM-HKimSK 2002 X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development 129 479 492
49. ZicklerD 1977 Development of the synaptonemal complex and the “recombination nodules” during meiotic prophase in seven bivalents of fungus Sordaria macrospora Auersw. Chromosoma 61 289 316
50. SymMEngebrechtJARoederGS 1993 ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 72 365 378
51. de VriesFAde BoerEvan den BoschMBaarendsWMOomsM 2005 Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation. Genes Dev 19 1376 1389
52. ZicklerDKlecknerN 1999 Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu Rev Genet 33 603 754
53. de BoerEHeytingC 2006 The diverse roles of transverse filaments of synaptonemal complexes in meiosis. Chromosoma 115 220 234
54. LoidlJPasierbekPRoseAM 2004 Conservation and variability of meiotic processes - Lessons from the unconventional meiosis of C. elegans. SchmidM Chromosomes Today, Vol 14 Dordrecht Springer 93 101
55. BrennerS 1974 The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77 71 94
56. ChenHHughesDDChanTASedatJWAgardDA 1996 IVE (Image Visualization Environment): a software platform for all three-dimensional microscopy applications. J Struct Biol 116 56 60
57. NabeshimaKVilleneuveAMColaiacovoMP 2005 Crossing over is coupled to late meiotic prophase bivalent differentiation through asymmetric disassembly of the SC. J Cell Biol 168 683 689
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2011 Číslo 8
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- An EMT–Driven Alternative Splicing Program Occurs in Human Breast Cancer and Modulates Cellular Phenotype
- Chromosome Painting Reveals Asynaptic Full Alignment of Homologs and HIM-8–Dependent Remodeling of Chromosome Territories during Meiosis
- Discovery of Sexual Dimorphisms in Metabolic and Genetic Biomarkers
- Regulation of p53/CEP-1–Dependent Germ Cell Apoptosis by Ras/MAPK Signaling