#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

A Genome-Wide Analysis of Promoter-Mediated Phenotypic Noise in


Gene expression is subject to random perturbations that lead to fluctuations in the rate of protein production. As a consequence, for any given protein, genetically identical organisms living in a constant environment will contain different amounts of that particular protein, resulting in different phenotypes. This phenomenon is known as “phenotypic noise.” In bacterial systems, previous studies have shown that, for specific genes, both transcriptional and translational processes affect phenotypic noise. Here, we focus on how the promoter regions of genes affect noise and ask whether levels of promoter-mediated noise are correlated with genes' functional attributes, using data for over 60% of all promoters in Escherichia coli. We find that essential genes and genes with a high degree of evolutionary conservation have promoters that confer low levels of noise. We also find that the level of noise cannot be attributed to the evolutionary time that different genes have spent in the genome of E. coli. In contrast to previous results in eukaryotes, we find no association between promoter-mediated noise and gene expression plasticity. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that, in bacteria, natural selection can act to reduce gene expression noise and that some of this noise is controlled through the sequence of the promoter region alone.


Vyšlo v časopise: A Genome-Wide Analysis of Promoter-Mediated Phenotypic Noise in. PLoS Genet 8(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002443
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002443

Souhrn

Gene expression is subject to random perturbations that lead to fluctuations in the rate of protein production. As a consequence, for any given protein, genetically identical organisms living in a constant environment will contain different amounts of that particular protein, resulting in different phenotypes. This phenomenon is known as “phenotypic noise.” In bacterial systems, previous studies have shown that, for specific genes, both transcriptional and translational processes affect phenotypic noise. Here, we focus on how the promoter regions of genes affect noise and ask whether levels of promoter-mediated noise are correlated with genes' functional attributes, using data for over 60% of all promoters in Escherichia coli. We find that essential genes and genes with a high degree of evolutionary conservation have promoters that confer low levels of noise. We also find that the level of noise cannot be attributed to the evolutionary time that different genes have spent in the genome of E. coli. In contrast to previous results in eukaryotes, we find no association between promoter-mediated noise and gene expression plasticity. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that, in bacteria, natural selection can act to reduce gene expression noise and that some of this noise is controlled through the sequence of the promoter region alone.


Zdroje

1. ElowitzMBLevineAJSiggiaEDSwainPS 2002 Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297 1183 1186

2. SwainPSElowitzMBSiggiaED 2002 Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 12795 12800

3. BlakeWJKaernMCantorCRCollinsJJ 2003 Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422 633 637

4. RaserJMO'sheaEK 2004 Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304 1811 1814

5. AckermannMStecherBFreedNESonghetPHardtWD 2008 Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise. Nature 454 987 990

6. FreedNESilanderOKStecherBBohmAHardtWD 2008 A Simple Screen to Identify Promoters Conferring High Levels of Phenotypic Noise. Plos Genetics 4 e1000307

7. RajAPeskinCSTranchinaDVargasDYTyagiS 2006 Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. Plos Biology 4 1707 1719

8. RifkinSAKimJWhiteKP 2003 Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Nature Genetics 33 138 144

9. LemosBMeiklejohnCDCaceresMHartlDL 2005 Rates of divergence in gene expression profiles of primates, mice, and flies: Stabilizing selection and variability among functional categories. Evolution 59 126 137

10. GiladYOshlackARifkinSA 2006 Natural selection on gene expression. Trends in Genetics 22 456 461

11. BedfordTHartlDL 2009 Optimization of gene expression by natural selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106 1133 1138

12. DenverDRMorrisKStreelmanJTKimSKLynchM 2005 The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Genetics 37 544 548

13. KussellEKishonyRBalabanNQLeiblerS 2005 Bacterial persistence: A model of survival in changing environments. Genetics 169 1807 1814

14. KussellELeiblerS 2005 Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309 2075 2078

15. DavidsonCJSuretteMG 2008 Individuality in Bacteria. Annual Review of Genetics 42 253 268

16. Donaldson-MatasciMCLachmannMBergstromCT 2008 Phenotypic diversity as an adaptation to environmental uncertainty. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10 493 515

17. VeeningJWSmitsWKKuipersOP 2008 Bistability, Epigenetics, and Bet-Hedging in Bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 62 193 210

18. BishopALRabFASumnerERAverySV 2007 Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in ‘stress-sensitive’ yeast populations. Molecular Microbiology 63 507 520

19. AcarMMettetalJTvan OudenaardenA 2008 Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments. Nature Genetics 40 471 475

20. BeaumontHJEGallieJKostCFergusonGCRaineyPB 2009 Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 462 90 U97

21. BlakeWJBalazsiGKohanskiMAIsaacsFJMurphyKF 2006 Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. Molecular Cell 24 853 865

22. BrandaSSGonzalez-PastorJEBen-YehudaSLosickRKolterR 2001 Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 11621 11626

23. TaniguchiYChoiPJLiG-WChenHBabuM 2010 Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells. Science 329 533 538

24. NewmanJRSGhaemmaghamiSIhmelsJBreslowDKNobleM 2006 Single-cell proteomic analysis of S-cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441 840 846

25. LehnerB 2008 Selection to minimise noise in living systems and its implications for the evolution of gene expression. Molecular Systems Biology 4 170

26. LehnerB 2010 Conflict between Noise and Plasticity in Yeast. Plos Genetics 6 e1001185

27. ZaslaverABrenARonenMItzkovitzSKikoinI 2006 A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli. Nature Methods 3 623 628

28. Lobner-OlesenA 1999 Distribution of minichromosomes in individual Escherichia coli cells: implications for replication control. Embo Journal 18 1712 1721

29. PetersonJPhillipsGJ 2008 New pSC101-derivative cloning vectors with elevated copy numbers. Plasmid 59 193 201

30. SalisHMMirskyEAVoigtCA 2009 Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nature Biotechnology 27 946 U112

31. KudlaGMurrayAWTollerveyDPlotkinJB 2009 Coding-Sequence Determinants of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324 255 258

32. Bar-EvenAPaulssonJMaheshriNCarmiMO'SheaE 2006 Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance. Nature Genetics 38 636 643

33. RaserJMO'sheaEK 2005 Noise in gene expression: Origins, consequences, and control. Science 309 2010 2013

34. OzbudakEMThattaiMKurtserIGrossmanADvan OudenaardenA 2002 Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nature Genetics 31 69 73

35. RosenfeldNYoungJWAlonUSwainPSElowitzMB 2005 Gene regulation at the single-cell level. Science 307 1962 1965

36. BollenbachTKishonyR 2011 Resolution of Gene Regulatory Conflicts Caused by Combinations of Antibiotics. Molecular Cell 42 413 425

37. KatoJIHashimotoM 2007 Construction of consecutive deletions of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Molecular Systems Biology 3 132

38. Gama-CastroSJimenez-JacintoVPeralta-GilMSantos-ZavaletaAPenaloza-SpinolaMI 2008 RegulonDB (version 6.0): gene regulation model of Escherichia coli K-12 beyond transcription, active (experimental) annotated promoters and Textpresso navigation. Nucleic Acids Research 36 D120 D124

39. JordanIKRogozinIBWolfYIKooninEV 2002 Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. Genome Research 12 962 968

40. KrylovDMWolfYIRogozinIBKooninEV 2003 Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Research 13 2229 2235

41. ArkinARossJMcAdamsHH 1998 Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics 149 1633 1648

42. BattistuzziFUFeijaoAHedgesSB 2004 A genomic timescale of prokaryote evolution: insights into the origin of methanogenesis, phototrophy, and the colonization of land. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 4 44

43. RaganMAHarlowTJBeikoRG 2006 Do different surrogate methods detect lateral genetic transfer events of different relative ages? Trends in Microbiology 14 4 8

44. TouchonMHoedeCTenaillonOBarbeVrBaeriswylS 2009 Organised Genome Dynamics in the Escherichia coli Species Results in Highly Diverse Adaptive Paths. Plos Genetics 5 e1000344

45. DaubinVOchmanH 2004 Bacterial Genomes as new gene homes: The genealogy of ORFans in E-coli. Genome Research 14 1036 1042

46. ConwayT 2009 Oklahoma University E. Coli Gene Expression Database. http://genexpdb.ou.edu/main/

47. GaschAPEisenMB 2002 Exploring the conditional coregulation of yeast gene expression through fuzzy k-means clustering. Genome Biology 3 research0059 research0059.22

48. SerresMHRileyM 2000 MultiFun, a multifunctional classification scheme for Escherichia coli K-12 gene products. Microb Comp Genomics 5 205 222

49. KovacsKHurstLDPappB 2009 Stochasticity in Protein Levels Drives Colinearity of Gene Order in Metabolic Operons of Escherichia coli. Plos Biology 7 e1000115

50. LevineEHwaT 2007 Stochastic fluctuations in metabolic pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 9224 9229

51. ThattaiMvan OudenaardenA 2004 Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics 167 523 530

52. BoothIR 2002 Stress and the single cell: Intrapopulation diversity is a mechanism to ensure survival upon exposure to stress. International Journal of Food Microbiology 78 19 30

53. SumnerERAverySV 2002 Phenotypic heterogeneity: differential stress resistance among individual cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology-Sgm 148 345 351

54. SalisHM 2010 Genome-wide predicitions: translation initiation rates. https://salis.psu.edu/GenomeWidePredictions.shtml

55. BernsteinJAKhodurskyABLinPHLin-ChaoSCohenSN 2002 Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 9697 9702

56. McAdamsHHArkinA 1997 Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94 814 819

57. PaulssonJEhrenbergM 2001 Noise in a minimal regulatory network: plasmid copy number control. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 34 1 59

58. ThattaiMvan OudenaardenA 2001 Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 8614 8619

59. RaoCVWolfDMArkinAP 2002 Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise. Nature 420 231 237

60. WangZZhangJZ 2011 Impact of gene expression noise on organismal fitness and the efficacy of natural selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108 E67 E76

61. AlonUSuretteMGBarkaiNLeiblerS 1999 Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397 168 171

62. BatadaNNHurstLD 2007 Evolution of chromosome organization driven by selection for reduced gene expression noise. Nature Genetics 39 945 949

63. TiroshIWeinbergerACarmiMBarkaiN 2006 A genetic signature of interspecies variations in gene expression. Nature Genetics 38 830 834

64. KaernMElstonTCBlakeWJCollinsJJ 2005 Stochasticity in gene expression: From theories to phenotypes. Nature Reviews Genetics 6 451 464

65. McKenzieGJCraigNL 2006 Fast, easy and efficient: site-specific insertion of transgenes into Enterobacterial chromosomes using Tn7 without need for selection of the insertion event. Bmc Microbiology 6

66. R Development Core Team 2007 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing

67. SilvermanBW 1986 Density Estimation London Chapman and Hall

68. HahneFLeMeurNBrinkmanRREllisBHaalandP 2009 flowCore: a Bioconductor package for high throughput flow cytometry. Bmc Bioinformatics 10

69. WallDPFraserHBHirshAE 2003 Detecting putative orthologs. Bioinformatics 19 1710 1711

70. SilanderOKAckermannM 2009 The constancy of gene conservation across divergent bacterial orders. BMC Research Notes 2 2

71. ThielH 1950 A rank-invariant mathod of linear and ploynomial regression analysis III. Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen 1897 1912

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2012 Číslo 1
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#