#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Noise Genetics: Inferring Protein Function by Correlating Phenotype with Protein Levels and Localization in Individual Human Cells


Inferring the function of proteins and the role they play in cellular processes is essential for our understanding of cell biology, genetics and biology in general. Standard genetic approaches use large perturbations to cells such as gene knockout, knockdown or over expression of genes. Such methods are powerful, but have the drawback of taking the cell far from its normal working point. Here, we provide a new and much milder approach, which uses the natural cell-cell variation in protein level and expression pattern as a source of mild perturbation. We monitor individual live cancer cells under the microscope and correlate their protein levels and localization with phenotype in the same cells. We use the motility of human cancer cells as a model system that is highly important for understanding metastasis in cancer. We find that our approach uncovers most of the known motility proteins, as well as new ones which we validate using knockdown experiments. Our novel approach is widely applicable to any phenotype that can be visualized in individual cells, and for any organism for which one can measure proteins in individual cells.


Vyšlo v časopise: Noise Genetics: Inferring Protein Function by Correlating Phenotype with Protein Levels and Localization in Individual Human Cells. PLoS Genet 10(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004176
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004176

Souhrn

Inferring the function of proteins and the role they play in cellular processes is essential for our understanding of cell biology, genetics and biology in general. Standard genetic approaches use large perturbations to cells such as gene knockout, knockdown or over expression of genes. Such methods are powerful, but have the drawback of taking the cell far from its normal working point. Here, we provide a new and much milder approach, which uses the natural cell-cell variation in protein level and expression pattern as a source of mild perturbation. We monitor individual live cancer cells under the microscope and correlate their protein levels and localization with phenotype in the same cells. We use the motility of human cancer cells as a model system that is highly important for understanding metastasis in cancer. We find that our approach uncovers most of the known motility proteins, as well as new ones which we validate using knockdown experiments. Our novel approach is widely applicable to any phenotype that can be visualized in individual cells, and for any organism for which one can measure proteins in individual cells.


Zdroje

1. EldarA, ElowitzMB (2010) Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits. Nature 467: 167–173.

2. LestasI, VinnicombeG, PaulssonJ (2010) Fundamental limits on the suppression of molecular fluctuations. Nature 467: 174–178.

3. RaserJM, O'SheaEK (2005) Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control. Science 309: 2010–2013.

4. ZengL, SkinnerSO, ZongC, SippyJ, FeissM, et al. (2010) Decision making at a subcellular level determines the outcome of bacteriophage infection. Cell 141: 682–691.

5. RajA, RifkinSA, AndersenE, Oudenaarden Avan (2010) Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance. Nature 463: 913–918.

6. BlakeWJ, KAErnM, CantorCR, CollinsJJ (2003) Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422: 633–637.

7. SigalA, MiloR, CohenA, Geva-ZatorskyN, KleinY, et al. (2006) Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells. Nature 444: 643–646.

8. Stewart-OrnsteinJ, WeissmanJS, El-SamadH (2012) Cellular noise regulons underlie fluctuations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell 45: 483–493.

9. SpudichJL, KoshlandDEJr (1976) Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell. Nature 262: 467–471.

10. KerenK, PincusZ, AllenGM, BarnhartEL, MarriottG, et al. (2008) Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 453: 475–480.

11. DunlopMJ, CoxRS3rd, LevineJH, MurrayRM, ElowitzMB (2008) Regulatory activity revealed by dynamic correlations in gene expression noise. Nat Genet 40: 1493–1498.

12. RidleyAJ (2011) Life at the leading edge. Cell 145: 1012–1022.

13. Weinberg RA (2007) The biology of cancer. New York: Garland Science.

14. Winograd-KatzSE, ItzkovitzS, KamZ, GeigerB (2009) Multiparametric analysis of focal adhesion formation by RNAi-mediated gene knockdown. J Cell Biol 186: 423–436.

15. SimpsonKJ, SelforsLM, BuiJ, ReynoldsA, LeakeD, et al. (2008) Identification of genes that regulate epithelial cell migration using an siRNA screening approach. Nat Cell Biol 10: 1027–1038.

16. NeumannB, WalterT, HérichéJ-K, BulkescherJ, ErfleH, et al. (2010) Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes. Nature 464: 721–727.

17. DanuserG, Waterman-StorerCM (2006) Quantitative fluorescent speckle microscopy of cytoskeleton dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 35: 361–387.

18. CohenAA, Geva-ZatorskyN, EdenE, Frenkel-MorgensternM, IssaevaI, et al. (2008) Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science 322: 1511–1516.

19. SigalA, DanonT, CohenA, MiloR, Geva-ZatorskyN, et al. (2007) Generation of a fluorescently labeled endogenous protein library in living human cells. Nat Protoc 2: 1515–1527.

20. EdenE, Geva-ZatorskyN, IssaevaI, CohenA, DekelE, et al. (2011) Proteome half-life dynamics in living human cells. Science 331: 764–768.

21. ChebiraA, BarbotinY, JacksonC, MerrymanT, SrinivasaG, et al. (2007) A multiresolution approach to automated classification of protein subcellular location images. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 210.

22. BolandMV, MurphyRF (2001) A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. Bioinformatics 17: 1213–1223.

23. Farkash-AmarS, EdenE, CohenA, Geva-ZatorskyN, CohenL, et al. (2012) Dynamic Proteomics of Human Protein Level and Localization across the Cell Cycle. PLoS ONE 7: e48722.

24. WelchMD, DePaceAH, VermaS, IwamatsuA, MitchisonTJ (1997) The human Arp2/3 complex is composed of evolutionarily conserved subunits and is localized to cellular regions of dynamic actin filament assembly. J Cell Biol 138: 375–384.

25. HanG, FanB, ZhangY, ZhouX, WangY, et al. (2008) Positive regulation of migration and invasion by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein via Rac1 pathway in human breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep 20: 929–939.

26. SuetsuguS, MikiH, TakenawaT (1999) Identification of two human WAVE/SCAR homologues as general actin regulatory molecules which associate with the Arp2/3 complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 260: 296–302.

27. NewmanJRS, GhaemmaghamiS, IhmelsJ, BreslowDK, NobleM, et al. (2006) Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441: 840–846.

28. TaniguchiY, ChoiPJ, LiG-W, ChenH, BabuM, et al. (2010) Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329: 533–538.

29. ZaslaverA, BrenA, RonenM, ItzkovitzS, KikoinI, et al. (2006) A comprehensive library of fluorescent transcriptional reporters for Escherichia coli. Nat Methods 3: 623–628.

30. SarovM, MurrayJI, SchanzeK, PozniakovskiA, NiuW, et al. (2012) A genome-scale resource for in vivo tag-based protein function exploration in C. elegans. Cell 150: 855–866.

31. TrinhLA, HochgrebT, GrahamM, WuD, Ruf-ZamojskiF, et al. (2011) A versatile gene trap to visualize and interrogate the function of the vertebrate proteome. Genes Dev 25: 2306–2320.

32. ChanEM, RatanasirintrawootS, ParkI-H, ManosPD, LohY-H, et al. (2009) Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells. Nature Biotechnology 27: 1033–1037.

33. TrcekT, ChaoJA, LarsonDR, ParkHY, ZenklusenD, et al. (2012) Single-mRNA counting using fluorescent in situ hybridization in budding yeast. Nat Protoc 7: 408–419.

34. Shav-TalY, DarzacqX, ShenoySM, FuscoD, JanickiSM, et al. (2004) Dynamics of single mRNPs in nuclei of living cells. Science 304: 1797–1800.

35. ItzkovitzS, LyubimovaA, BlatIC, MaynardM, van EsJ, et al. (2012) Single-molecule transcript counting of stem-cell markers in the mouse intestine. Nat Cell Biol 14: 106–114.

36. ChangHH, HembergM, BarahonaM, IngberDE, HuangS (2008) Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 453: 544–547.

37. EldarA, CharyVK, XenopoulosP, FontesME, LosónOC, et al. (2009) Partial penetrance facilitates developmental evolution in bacteria. Nature 460: 510–514.

38. NachmanI, RegevA, RamanathanS (2007) Dissecting timing variability in yeast meiosis. Cell 131: 544–556.

39. MontanaG, BerkM, EbbelsT (2011) Modelling short time series in metabolomics: a functional data analysis approach. Adv Exp Med Biol 696: 307–315 doi:_10.1007/978-1419-7046-6_31

40. Geva-ZatorskyN, IssaevaI, MayoA, CohenA, DekelE, et al. (2012) Using bleach-chase to measure protein half-lives in living cells. Nat Protoc 7: 801–811.

41. HaralickRM (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceedings of the IEEE 67: 786–804.

42. RivalsI, PersonnazL, TaingL, PotierM-C (2007) Enrichment or depletion of a GO category within a class of genes: which test? Bioinformatics 23: 401–407.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2014 Číslo 3
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#