#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study


Background:
There is strong evidence showing that male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In Rwanda, where adult HIV prevalence is 3%, MC is not a traditional practice. The Rwanda National AIDS Commission modelled cost and effects of MC at different ages to inform policy and programmatic decisions in relation to introducing MC. This study was necessary because the MC debate in Southern Africa has focused primarily on MC for adults. Further, this is the first time, to our knowledge, that a cost-effectiveness study on MC has been carried out in a country where HIV prevalence is below 5%.

Methods and Findings:
A cost-effectiveness model was developed and applied to three hypothetical cohorts in Rwanda: newborns, adolescents, and adult men. Effectiveness was defined as the number of HIV infections averted, and was calculated as the product of the number of people susceptible to HIV infection in the cohort, the HIV incidence rate at different ages, and the protective effect of MC; discounted back to the year of circumcision and summed over the life expectancy of the circumcised person. Direct costs were based on interviews with experienced health care providers to determine inputs involved in the procedure (from consumables to staff time) and related prices. Other costs included training, patient counselling, treatment of adverse events, and promotion campaigns, and they were adjusted for the averted lifetime cost of health care (antiretroviral therapy [ART], opportunistic infection [OI], laboratory tests). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the main inputs of the model, and thresholds were calculated at which each intervention is no longer cost-saving and at which an intervention costs more than one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per life-year gained. Results: Neonatal MC is less expensive than adolescent and adult MC (US$15 instead of US$59 per procedure) and is cost-saving (the cost-effectiveness ratio is negative), even though savings from infant circumcision will be realized later in time. The cost per infection averted is US$3,932 for adolescent MC and US$4,949 for adult MC. Results for infant MC appear robust. Infant MC remains highly cost-effective across a reasonable range of variation in the base case scenario. Adolescent MC is highly cost-effective for the base case scenario but this high cost-effectiveness is not robust to small changes in the input variables. Adult MC is neither cost-saving nor highly cost-effective when considering only the direct benefit for the circumcised man.

Conclusions:
The study suggests that Rwanda should be simultaneously scaling up circumcision across a broad range of age groups, with high priority to the very young. Infant MC can be integrated into existing health services (i.e., neonatal visits and vaccination sessions) and over time has better potential than adolescent and adult circumcision to achieve the very high coverage of the population required for maximal reduction of HIV incidence. In the presence of infant MC, adolescent and adult MC would evolve into a “catch-up” campaign that would be needed at the start of the program but would eventually become superfluous.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Vyšlo v časopise: Male Circumcision at Different Ages in Rwanda: A Cost-Effectiveness Study. PLoS Med 7(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000211

Souhrn

Background:
There is strong evidence showing that male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV infection and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). In Rwanda, where adult HIV prevalence is 3%, MC is not a traditional practice. The Rwanda National AIDS Commission modelled cost and effects of MC at different ages to inform policy and programmatic decisions in relation to introducing MC. This study was necessary because the MC debate in Southern Africa has focused primarily on MC for adults. Further, this is the first time, to our knowledge, that a cost-effectiveness study on MC has been carried out in a country where HIV prevalence is below 5%.

Methods and Findings:
A cost-effectiveness model was developed and applied to three hypothetical cohorts in Rwanda: newborns, adolescents, and adult men. Effectiveness was defined as the number of HIV infections averted, and was calculated as the product of the number of people susceptible to HIV infection in the cohort, the HIV incidence rate at different ages, and the protective effect of MC; discounted back to the year of circumcision and summed over the life expectancy of the circumcised person. Direct costs were based on interviews with experienced health care providers to determine inputs involved in the procedure (from consumables to staff time) and related prices. Other costs included training, patient counselling, treatment of adverse events, and promotion campaigns, and they were adjusted for the averted lifetime cost of health care (antiretroviral therapy [ART], opportunistic infection [OI], laboratory tests). One-way sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the main inputs of the model, and thresholds were calculated at which each intervention is no longer cost-saving and at which an intervention costs more than one gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per life-year gained. Results: Neonatal MC is less expensive than adolescent and adult MC (US$15 instead of US$59 per procedure) and is cost-saving (the cost-effectiveness ratio is negative), even though savings from infant circumcision will be realized later in time. The cost per infection averted is US$3,932 for adolescent MC and US$4,949 for adult MC. Results for infant MC appear robust. Infant MC remains highly cost-effective across a reasonable range of variation in the base case scenario. Adolescent MC is highly cost-effective for the base case scenario but this high cost-effectiveness is not robust to small changes in the input variables. Adult MC is neither cost-saving nor highly cost-effective when considering only the direct benefit for the circumcised man.

Conclusions:
The study suggests that Rwanda should be simultaneously scaling up circumcision across a broad range of age groups, with high priority to the very young. Infant MC can be integrated into existing health services (i.e., neonatal visits and vaccination sessions) and over time has better potential than adolescent and adult circumcision to achieve the very high coverage of the population required for maximal reduction of HIV incidence. In the presence of infant MC, adolescent and adult MC would evolve into a “catch-up” campaign that would be needed at the start of the program but would eventually become superfluous.

: Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary


Zdroje

1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization (WHO) 2007 Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability Geneva UNAIDS/WHO

2. Department of Statistics, in the Ministry of Economics (MINECOFIN) and MEASURE DHS Interim Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey (2007–2008) Kigali, Rwanda Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning

3. GrayRH

KigoziG

SerwaddaD

MakumbiF

WatyaS

2007 Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 369 657 666

4. BaileyRC

MosesS

ParkerCB

AgotK

MacleanI

2007 Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 369 643 656

5. AuvertB

TaljaardD

LagardeE

Sobngwi-TambekouJ

SittaR

2005 Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2 e298 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298

6. WeissHA

ThomasSL

MunabiSK

HayesRJ

2006 Male circumcision and risk of syphilis, chancroid and genital herpes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Inf 82 101 110

7. TobiasAR

SerwaddaD

QuinnTC

KigoziG

CravittPE

2009 Male circumcision for the prevention of HSV-2 and HPV infections and syphilis. N Engl J Med 360 1298 1309

8. Singh-GrewalD

MacdessiJ

CraigJ

2005 Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. Arch Dis Child 90 853 858

9. WHO, UNAIDS, UNFPA, UNICEF, The World Bank 2007 Information package on male circumcision and HIV prevention. Insert 3 Geneva WHO/UNAIDS

10. WHO, UNAIDS, JHPIEGO 2007 Manual for male circumcision under local anaesthesia. Version 2.5B Geneva WHO

11. Department of Statistics, in the Ministry of Economics (MINECOFIN) and MEASURE DHS 2005 Rwanda demographic and health survey III Kigali, Rwanda Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning

12. USAID I Health Policy Initiative 2007 Costing male circumcision in Lesotho and implications for the cost-effectiveness of circumcision as an HIV intervention Washington (D.C.) USAID

13. USAID I Health Policy Initiative 2007 Costing male circumcision in Swaziland and implications for the cost-effectiveness of circumcision as an HIV intervention Washington (D.C.) USAID

14. GrayRH

2005 Reducing HIV transmission: lessons from Rakai and other African studies. International AIDS Society. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Reported in UNAIDS and WHO (2007) Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety and acceptability Geneva UNAIDS/WHO

15. KahnJG

MarseilleE

AuvertB

2006 Cost-effectiveness of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a South African setting. PLoS Med 3 e517 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030517

16. WhiteRG

GlynnJR

OrrothKK

2008 Male circumcision for HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: who, what and when? AIDS 22 1841 1850

17. WHO 2006 Life tables. Available: http://www.who.int/whosis. Accessed 25 September 2008

18. UNAIDS 2007 Safe, voluntary, informed male circumcision and comprehensive HIV Prevention: programming guidance for decision-makers on human rights, ethical and legal considerations. Available: http://data.unaids.org/pub/Manual/2007/070613_humanrightsethicallegalguidance_en.pdf. Accessed 25 September 2008

19. CNLS, TRAC Plus, NIS, MOH, UNAIDS, WHO, USAID/Health Policy Initiative 2008 HIV-AIDS in Rwanda. 2008 Epidemic update. Available: http://www.cnls.gov.rw. Accessed 9 February 2009

20. World Health Organization 2002 The world health report, 2002 - Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Technical considerations for cost-effectiveness analysis. Chapter 5 Geneva World Health Organization

21. UNAIDS 2009 Available: http://www.unaids.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/HIVData/Epidemiology/. Accessed 12 June 2009

22. WalenskyRP

PaltielAD

LosinaE

MercincavageLM

SchackmanBR

2006 The survival benefits of AIDS treatment in the United States. J Infect Dis 194 11 19

23. NACC/CNLS 2007 Dataset to estimate the amount of financial resources needed to implement the National Strategic Plan on HIV (2005–2009). An application of the Goal and Resource Needs Model, Rwanda Kigali, Rwanda USAID/Health Policy Initiative

24. CNLS Plan National de Prevention 2005–2009, VCT unit cost (Annex 4) Kigali, Rwanda CNLS

25. WHO/INSP global costing exercise for Sub-Saharan African and Agence Européenne pour le Développement et la Santé (AEDS), 2005. Etude sur le coût de la prise en charge des PVVIH - Projet INT/107 Initiative ESTHER - LUX Development - December 2004 - Mars 2005. AEDS

26. TRAC 2007 Report on the evaluation of clinical and immunologic outcomes from the national antiretroviral treatment program in Rwanda, 2004–2005.

27. International Monetary Fund 2008 World Economic Outlook Database Washington (D.C.) International Monetary Fund

Štítky
Interné lekárstvo

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Medicine


2010 Číslo 1
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#