The Role of Open Access in Reducing Waste in Medical Research

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: The Role of Open Access in Reducing Waste in Medical Research. PLoS Med 11(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001651
Kategorie: Editorial
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001651

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. AltmanDG (1994) The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ 308: 283.

2. Goldacre B (2012) Bad pharma: how drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients. London: Fourth Estate.

3. ChalmersI, GlasziouP (2009) Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374: 86–89 Available: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2809%2960329-9/fulltext. Accessed 23 April 2014.

4. MacleodMR, MichieS, RobertsI, DirnaglU, ChalmersI, et al. (2014) Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 6736: 1–6.

5. JosephH (2013) The open access movement grows up: taking stock of a revolution. PLoS Biol 11: e1001686 Available:http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001686. Accessed 23 April 2014.

6. GlasziouP, AltmanDG, BossuytP, BoutronI, ClarkeM, et al. (2014) Research: increasing value, reducing waste 5 Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 383: 267–276.

7. BarbourV, PeiperlL (2014) Comment on PMID 24411647: Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. PubMed Commons Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/ginny.barbour.1/comments/. Accessed 28 April 2014.

8. HoffmannT, EruetiC, ThorningS, GlasziouP (2012) The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties. BMJ 3223: 1–9 doi:10.1136/bmj.e3223

9. GlasziouP, HaynesRB (2005) The paths from research to improved health outcomes. Evid Based Med 10: 4–7.