When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?

English version České info

Noor Giesbertz and colleagues consider different re-contact policy designs that could be used by biobanks to obtain permission for the continued use of samples collected from children.

Vyšlo v časopise: When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?. PLoS Med 13(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001959
Kategorie: Policy Forum
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001959

Souhrn

Noor Giesbertz and colleagues consider different re-contact policy designs that could be used by biobanks to obtain permission for the continued use of samples collected from children.

Zdroje

1. Henderson GE, Cadigan RJ, Edwards TP, Conlon I, Nelson AG, Evans JP, et al. Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey. Genome Med. 2013 Jan 25. 5:3. doi: 10.1186/gm407 23351549

2. Kaiser J. Genetics. U.S. hospital launches large biobank of children’s DNA. Science. 2006;312: 1584–1585.

3. Salvaterra E, Giorda R, Bassi MT, Borgatti R, Knudsen LE, Martinuzzi A, et al. Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries. Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2012;10: 29–36. doi: 10.1089/bio.2011.0037 24849751

4. Hens K, Cassiman JJ, Nys H, Dierickx K. Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19: 735–739. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.29 21386873

5. Burke W, Diekema DS. Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J Pediatr. 2006;149: S34–S38. 16829241

6. Resnik D. Re-consent upon reaching the age of majority: ethical issues. Journal of clinical research best practices. 2014;10: 2. http://firstclinical.com/journal/2014/1402_Reconsent.pdf.

7. Ries NM, LeGrandeur J, Caulfield T. Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11: doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-4

8. Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group. Parent/guardian information leaflet. 2013. https://www.securecloudhost.co.uk/cclg.org.uk/dynamic_files/PIS%20V2_0%2024%20May%202013%20(watermarked).pdf

9. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM. Consent procedures in pediatric biobanks. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23: 1129–1134. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.267 25537361

10. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS; 2002.

11. World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Fortaleza: WMA; 2013.

12. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K. Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17: 979–990. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.9 19223929

13. Helgesson G. Children, longitudinal studies, and informed consent. Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8: 307–313. 16283493

14. Berlin I. Two concepts of liberty. In: Berlin I, editor. Four Essays on Liberty. London, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 1969. p. 118–172.

15. Bredenoord AL, Onland-Moret NC, van Delden JJM. Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy. Hum Mutat. 2011;32: 861–867. doi: 10.1002/humu.21518 21538687

16. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM. Inclusion of residual tissue in biobanks: opt-in or opt-out? PLoS Biol. 2012;10: e1001373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001373 22899893

17. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Respect for autonomy. In: Beauchamp TL, Childress JF, editors. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 99–148.

18. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden H. The right to an open future concerning genetic information. Am J Bioeth. 2014;14: 21–23.

19. Bredenoord AL, Kroes HY, Cuppen E, Parker M, van Delden JJM. Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered. Trends Genet. 2011;27: 41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.004 21190750

20. Hens K, Van El CE, Borry P, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cornel MC, Forzano F, et al. Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21: 2–7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.99 22713814

21. Bredenoord AL, de Vries MC, van Delden JJM. Next-generation sequencing: does the next generation still have a right to an open future? Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14: 306. 23729034

22. Goldenberg AJ, Hull SC, Botkin JR, Wilfond BS. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. J Pediatr. 2009;155: 578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.034 19595370

23. Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013;339: 321–324. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566 23329047

24. Nissenbaum H. Privacy in Context. 1st ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2010.

25. Wolf LE, Bouley TA, McCulloch CE. Genetic research with stored biological materials: ethics and practice. IRB. 2010;32: 7–18.

26. Gurwitz D, Fortier I, Lunshof JE, Knoppers BM. Children and population biobanks. Science. 2009;325: 818–819. doi: 10.1126/science.1173284

27. Gurwitz D. Data re-identification: protect the children. Science. 2013;339: 1033.

28. Hens K, Wright J, Dierickx K. Biobanks: oversight offers protection. Science. 2009;326: 798–799.

29. Hansson MG, Maschke KJ. Biobanks: questioning distinctions. Science. 2009;326: 797.

30. Brothers KB, Clayton EW. Biobanks: too long to wait for consent. Science. 2009;326: 798.

31. Árnason V. Scientific citizenship, benefit, and protection in population-based research. In: Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann B, editors. The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer Science + Buiness Media, LLC; 2009. pp. 131–141.

32. Linabery AM, Slater ME, Spector LG, Olshan AF, Stork SK, Roesler MA, et al. Feasibility of neonatal dried blood spot retrieval amid evolving state policies (2009–2010): a Children’s Oncology Group study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25: 549–558. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01228.x 21980944

33. Parker L. Using human tissue: when do we need consent? J Med Ethics. 2011;37: 759–761. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100043

34. Holm S. Informed consent and the biobanking of materials from children. Genomics, Society and Policy. 2005;1: 16–26.

35. Giesbertz NAA, Bredenoord AL, van Delden JJM. Clarifying assent in pediatric research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014;22: 266–269. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.119 23756442