A Comparison of Midwife-Led and Medical-Led Models of Care and Their Relationship to Adverse Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study in New Zealand
In a retrospective study of routinely collected medical data, Ellie Wernham and colleagues compare adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes associated with midwife-led and medical-led models of care.
Vyšlo v časopise:
A Comparison of Midwife-Led and Medical-Led Models of Care and Their Relationship to Adverse Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study in New Zealand. PLoS Med 13(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002134
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002134
Souhrn
In a retrospective study of routinely collected medical data, Ellie Wernham and colleagues compare adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes associated with midwife-led and medical-led models of care.
Zdroje
1. Rowland T, McLeod D, Froese-Burns N. Report: Comparative study of maternity systems. Wellington: Malatest International; 2012.
2. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5
3. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Intrapartum Care: Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. United Kingdom: Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014.
4. Stapleton S, Osborne C, Illuzzi J. Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013;58(1):3–14. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12003 23363029
5. Tracy SK, Hartz DL, Tracy MB, Allen J, Forti A, Hall B, et al. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9906):1723–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61406-3 24050808
6. Health Funding Authority. Maternity Services: A Reference Document. Wellington: Health Funding Authority; 2000.
7. Ministry of Health. Report on Maternity 2012. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2015.
8. Ministry of Health. National Maternity Collection (MAT): Data Mart Data Dictionary. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2011.
9. Ministry of Health. National Minimum Dataset (hospital inpatient events): Data Mart Data Dictionary. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2012.
10. Ministry of Health. Mortality Collection: Data Dictionary. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2009.
11. Thorngren-Jerneck K, Herbst A. Low 5-Minute APGAR Score: A Population-Based Register Study of 1 Million Term Births. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(1):65–70. 11430958
12. Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee. Sixth Annual Report of the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee: Reporting mortality 2010. Wellington: Health Quality & Safety Commission; 2012.
13. Lipsitch M, Tchetgen ET, Cohen T. Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2010 Mar;21(3):383.
14. Salmond C, Atkinson J. NZDep2006 index of deprivation. Wellington: University of Otago (Department of Public Health); 2007.
15. Statistics New Zealand. Statistical Standard for Ethnicity. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand; 1997.
16. Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis A. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ. 2013;346: f108. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f108 23349424
17. Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee. Eighth Annual Report of the Perinatal and Maternal Mortality Review Committee: Reporting mortality 2012. Wellington: Health Quality & Safety Commission; 2014.
18. Kristensen J, Vestergaard M, Wisborg K, Kesmodel U, Secher NJ. Pre-pregnancy weight and the risk of stillbirth and neonatal death. BJOG. 2005;112:403–08. 15777435
19. Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JM, Alessandri LM, O'Sullivan F, Burton P. Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case-control study. BMJ. 1998;317:1554–58. 9836653
20. Bai J, Wong FW, Bauman A, Mohsin M. Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;186(2):274–78. 11854649
21. Greenland S. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias. Epidemiology. 2003;14(3):300–06. 12859030
22. Janssen PA, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Klein MC, Reime B. Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia. Birth. 2007;34(2):140–47. 17542818
23. Suzuki S, Hiraizumi Y, Satomi M, Miyaki H. Midwife-led care unit for ‘low risk’ pregnant women in a Japanese hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Aug;24(8):1046–50. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.545912 21231841
24. Symon A, Winter C, Inkster M, Donnan PT. Outcomes for births booked under an independent midwife and births in NHS maternity units: matched comparison study. BMJ. 2009;338: b2060. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2060 19520729
25. Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, Linsell L, Macfarlane A, McCourt C, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d7400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7400 22117057
26. Gottvall K, Grunewald C, Waldenström U. Safety of birth centre care: perinatal mortality over a 10-year period. BJOG. 2004;111(1):71–78. 14687055
27. Dixon L, Prileszky G, Guilliland K, Miller S, Anderson J. Place of birth and outcomes for a cohort of low risk women in New Zealand: A comparison with Birthplace England. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 2014;50.
28. Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, Nikkels PG, Boon J, van Egmond-Linden A. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:c5639. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5639 21045050
29. Wiegerinck MM, van der Goes BY, Ravelli AC, van der Post JA, Klinkert J, Brandenbarg J, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal mortality in primary midwife-led and secondary obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study. Midwifery. 2015 Dec 31;31(12):1168–76. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.08.007 26386517
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2016 Číslo 9
- Statiny indukovaná myopatie: Jak na diferenciální diagnostiku?
- MUDr. Dana Vondráčková: Hepatopatie sú pri liečbe metamizolom väčším strašiakom ako agranulocytóza
- Vztah mezi statiny a rizikem vzniku nádorových onemocnění − metaanalýza
- Nech brouka žít… Ať žije astma!
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Sex Differences in Tuberculosis Burden and Notifications in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- International Criteria for Acute Kidney Injury: Advantages and Remaining Challenges
- Potential for Controlling Cholera Using a Ring Vaccination Strategy: Re-analysis of Data from a Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial
- Tenofovir Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women at Risk of HIV Infection: The Time is Now