Improving Research into Models of Maternity Care to Inform Decision Making

In a Perspective, Ank de Jonge and Jane Sandall discuss research on models of maternity care led by midwives.

Vyšlo v časopise: Improving Research into Models of Maternity Care to Inform Decision Making. PLoS Med 13(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002135
Kategorie: Perspective
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002135

Souhrn

In a Perspective, Ank de Jonge and Jane Sandall discuss research on models of maternity care led by midwives.

Zdroje

1. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015;9: CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub4 26370160

2. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;384: 1129–1145. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3 24965816

3. National Maternity Review. Better births—Improving outcomes of maternity services in England. A five year forward view for maternity care. 2016.

4. Wernham E, Gurney J, Stanley J, Ellison-Loschmann L, Sarfati D. A comparison of midwife-led and medical-led models of care and their relationship to adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study in New Zealand. PLoS Med. 2016;13: e1002134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002134

5. Jepsen P, Johnsen SP, Gillman MW, Sørensen HT. Interpretation of observational studies. Heart. 2004;90: 956–60. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.017269 15253985

6. De Jonge A, Mesman JAJM, Manniën J, Zwart JJ, Buitendijk SE, Van Roosmalen J, et al. Severe Adverse Maternal Outcomes among Women in Midwife-Led versus Obstetrician-Led Care at the Onset of Labour in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Cohort Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0126266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126266 25961723

7. Wiegerinck MMJ, Van der Goes BY, Ravelli ACJ, Van der Post JAM, Klinkert J, Brandenbarg J, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal mortality in primary midwife-led and secondary obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study. Midwifery. 2015;31: 1168–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.08.007 26386517

8. Patterson J, Skinner J, Foureur M. Midwives decision making about transfers for “slow” labour in rural New Zealand. Midwifery. 2015;31: 606–612. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.02.005 25765745

9. Ravelli ACJ, Jager KJ, de Groot MH, Erwich JJHM, Rijninks-van Driel GC, Tromp M, et al. Travel time from home to hospital and adverse perinatal outcomes in women at term in the Netherlands. BJOG. England; 2011;118: 457–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02816.x 21138515

10. Patterson JA, Foureur M, Skinner JP. Patterns of transfer in labour and birth in rural New Zealand. Rural Remote Health. Australia; 2011;11: 1710. 21649460

11. Hemminki E, Heino A, Gissler M. Should births be centralised in higher level hospitals? Experiences from regionalised health care in Finland. BJOG. pp. 1186–1195.

12. Grigg CP, Tracy SK, Tracy M, Schmied V, Monk A. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand—timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study. Midwifery. 2015;31: 879–887. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.04.018 26002990

13. Grigg CP, Tracy SK. New Zealand’s unique maternity system. Women Birth. 2013;26: e59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.09.006 23107645