Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders – Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Paraclinical Findings

Česká verzia

Authors: P. Nytrová ¹; P. Kleinová ¹; J. Preiningerová Lízrová ¹; V. Král ²; M. Hinďoš ³; M. Vaněčková ⁴; E. Havrdová ¹; D. Horáková ¹
Authors place of work: Neurologická klinika a Centrum klinických neurověd, 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze ¹; Centrum imunologie a mikrobiologie, Zdravotní ústav se sídlem v Ústí nad Labem ²; Laboratoř klinické imunologie a alergologie, Ústav lékařské biochemie a laboratorní diagnostiky, 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze ³; Oddělení magnetické rezonance, Radiodiagnostická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze ⁴
Published in the journal: Cesk Slov Neurol N 2015; 78/111(1): 72-77
Category: Short Communication
doi: https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn201572

Summary

Aim:
The aim of this study was to describe the clinical picture of patients with NMO spectrum disorders (NMO SD) in the Czech Republic, including comparison of patients with disease onset before and after 50 years of age in the context of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) and optic nerve involvement. Another objective was to evaluate cerebrospinal fluid samples and aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) seropositivity.

Methods:
A systematic retrospective analysis of clinical and paraclinical findings in 32 patients with NMO SD was performed. The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in each eye was measured with optical coherence tomography. Severity of neurological deficit was expressed by the EDSS score.

Results:
NMO SD are more frequent in women (8 : 1). Median age of disease onset was 36 years. Median disease duration was 10.5 years. Median EDSS score was 4.5 (range 1.0–8.5) and median disease duration 10.5 years (range 0.5–24). AQP4-IgG were found in the serum of 31 out of the 32 patients and their titer positively correlated with the EDSS score. The RNFL thickness of the right eye (median 63 µm) and the left eye (median 58 µm) was below the lower limit of normal (97 µm) in 57% and 64% of patients, respectively. The RNFL thickness correlated with the disease duration. Myelitis as the first manifestation of the disease was more frequent in patients older than 50 years (p < 0.05). Compared to remission, patients with a relapse had increased protein levels and element count in the cerebrospinal fluid (p < 0.001 for both parameters).

Conclusion:
LETM is typically the first clinical manifestation of NMO patients older than 50 years and is associated with severe neurological deficit at the early stages of the disease.

Key words:
neuromyelitis optica – antibodies against aquaporin-4 – longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis

The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.

The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE “uniform requirements” for biomedical papers.

Zdroje

1. Wingerchuk DM. Diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica. Neurologist 2007; 13(1): 2– 11.

2. Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O‘Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic‘s syndrome). Neurology 1999; 53(5): 1107– 1114.

3. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Fujihara K et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004; 364(9451): 2106– 2112.

4. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SROV. IgG marker of optic‑ spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin‑4 water channel. J Exp Med 2005; 202(4): 473– 477.

5. Waters P, Jarius S, Littleton E, Leite MI, Jacob S, Gray B et al. Aquaporin‑4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Arch Neurol 2008; 65(7): 913– 919. doi: 10.1001/ archneur.65.7.913.

6. Lucchinetti CF, Mandler RN, McGavern D, Bruck W, Gleich G, Ransohoff RM et al. A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic‘s neuromyelitis optica. Brain 2002; 125(7): 1450– 1461.

7. Collongues N, Marignier R, Jacob A, Leite M, Siva A,Paul F et al. Characterization of neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients with a late onset. Mult Scler 2013 [online]. Available from URL: http:/ / msj.sagepub.com/ content/ early/ 2013/ 12/ 09/ 1352458513515085.full.pdf+html.

8. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2006; 66(10): 1485– 1489.

9. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33(11): 1444– 1452.

10. Kitley J, Leite MI, Nakashima I, Waters P, McNeillis B, Brown R et al. Prognostic factors and disease course in aquaporin‑4 antibody‑ positive patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder from the United Kingdom and Japan. Brain 2012; 135(6): 1834– 1849. doi: 10.1093/ brain/ aws109.

11. Blau CW, Cowley TR, O‘Sullivan J, Grehan B, Browne TC, Kelly L et al. The age‑related deficit in LTP is associated with changes in perfusion and blood‑ brain barrier permeability. Neurobiol Aging 2012; 33(5): e1023– e1035. doi: 10.1016/ j.neurobiolaging.2011.09.035.

12. Zavada J, Nytrova P, Wandinger KP, Jarius S, Svobodova R, Probst C et al. Seroprevalence and specificity of NMO‑ IgG (anti‑aquaporin 4 antibodies) in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 2013; 33(1): 259– 263. doi: 10.1007/ s00296‑ 011‑ 2176‑ 4.

13. Vaněčková M, Horáková D, Havrdová E, Nytrová P, Němcová J, Seidl Z. Retrospektivní studie nálezů na magnetické rezonanci míchy a mozku u pacientů s diagnózou neuromyelitis optica. Cesk Slov Neurol N 2010; 73/ 106(2): 164– 168.

14. Jarius S, Paul F, Franciotta D, Ruprecht K, Ringelstein M, Bergamaschi R et al. Cerebrospinal fluid findings in aquaporin‑4 antibody positive neuromyelitis optica: results from 211 lumbar punctures. J Neurol Sci 2011; 306(1– 2): 82– 90. doi: 10.1016/ j.jns.2011.03.038.

15. Sellner J, Boggild M, Clanet M, Hintzen RQ, Illes Z, Montalban X et al. EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and management of neuromyelitis optica. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17(8): 1019– 1032. doi: 10.1111/ j.1468‑ 1331.2010.03066.x.