#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Which ethics for medical ethics? Homage to Hans Jonas, 1903–1993


Authors: prof. MUDr. Marta Munzarová, CSc.
Published in the journal: Čas. Lék. čes. 2014; 153: 251-254
Category: Special Articles

Summary

Hans Jonas, one of the greatest philosophers of the 20th century, devoted several studies to the ethics in context with medicine and/or to the new biomedical research. His main thoughts in this field are presented (death and dying, mortality, reflections on experimenting with human subjects – nontherapeutic research, cloning, chimaeras). He was a man of wisdom and his humanity and moral sensibility are a matter of admiration. His ethics is in full consent with ethics and the dignity of medical profession. His ideas are compared (and contrasted) with those of the new bio“ethics“.

Keywords:
Hans Jonas – medical ethics – bioethics


Zdroje

1. Munzarová M. Zdravotnická etika od A do Z. Praha: Grada Publishing 2005.

2. Callahan D. Judging the future: Whose fault will it be? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000; 25: 677–687.

3. Jonsen AR. Why has bioethics become so boring? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000; 25: 689–699.

4. Pellegrino ED. Bioethics at century’s turn: can normative ethics be retrieved? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2000; 25: 655–675.

5. Jonas H. Princip odpovědnosti. Praha: Oikoymenh 1997. (Originál: Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1984.)

6. Jonas H. Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. Daedalus 1969; 98: 219–247.

7. Munzarová M. Filozofické úvahy o experimentování s účastí lidských subjektů (podle Hanse Jonase). Prakt. Lék. 2001; 81: 228–231.

8. Jonas H. The right to die. In: Shannon TA (ed.) Bioethics – basic writings on the key ethical questions that surround the major, modern biological possibilities and problems (third edition). Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist Press 1987; 195–208.

9. Jonas H. The burden and blessing of mortality. Hastings Center Report 1992: 34–40.

10. Jonas H. Philosophical Essays: From ancient creed to technological man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1980; 155–163.

11. Jonas H. Ethics and biogenetic art. Social research. Autumn 1985; 52: 491–504.

12. Slabý A, Slabý J. Spor o status lidské osoby v bioetice. Trendy v medicíně 2000; 2: 107–112.

13. Munzarová M. Stanovisko osob s postižením k bioetice a k lidským právům (aneb Jak učit lékařskou etiku). Prakt. Lék. 2003; 83: 101–104.

14. Giubilini A., Minerva F. After-birth abortion: why should the baby live? Journal of Medical Ethics. Published Online First 2012; http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03/01/medethics-2011-100411.full

15. Munzarová M. Proč NE eutanazii. Filosofický časopis 2012; 60: 403–420.

16. Abbott A. Regulations proposed for animal-human chimaeras. Nature, published online 21 July 2011. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110721/full/475438a.html

17. Neuhaus RJ. The return of eugenics. Commentary 1988: 15–26.

18. Neuhaus RJ. The way they were, the way we are. In: When medicine went mad. Bioethics and the Holocaust. Ed. Caplan AL. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press 1992; 211–230.

Štítky
Addictology Allergology and clinical immunology Angiology Audiology Clinical biochemistry Dermatology & STDs Paediatric gastroenterology Paediatric surgery Paediatric cardiology Paediatric neurology Paediatric ENT Paediatric psychiatry Paediatric rheumatology Diabetology Pharmacy Vascular surgery Pain management Dental Hygienist

Článok vyšiel v časopise

Journal of Czech Physicians

Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#