Cofilin-1: A Modulator of Anxiety in Mice
The genes involved in conferring susceptibility to anxiety remain obscure. We developed a new method to identify genes at quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in a population of heterogeneous stock mice descended from known progenitor strains. QTLs were partitioned into intervals that can be summarized by a single phylogenetic tree among progenitors and intervals tested for consistency with alleles influencing anxiety at each QTL. By searching for common Gene Ontology functions in candidate genes positioned within those intervals, we identified actin depolymerizing factors (ADFs), including cofilin-1 (Cfl1), as genes involved in regulating anxiety in mice. There was no enrichment for function in the totality of genes under each QTL, indicating the importance of phylogenetic filtering. We confirmed experimentally that forebrain-specific inactivation of Cfl1 decreased anxiety in knockout mice. Our results indicate that similarity of function of mammalian genes can be used to recognize key genetic regulators of anxiety and potentially of other emotional behaviours.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Cofilin-1: A Modulator of Anxiety in Mice. PLoS Genet 8(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002970
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002970
Souhrn
The genes involved in conferring susceptibility to anxiety remain obscure. We developed a new method to identify genes at quantitative trait loci (QTLs) in a population of heterogeneous stock mice descended from known progenitor strains. QTLs were partitioned into intervals that can be summarized by a single phylogenetic tree among progenitors and intervals tested for consistency with alleles influencing anxiety at each QTL. By searching for common Gene Ontology functions in candidate genes positioned within those intervals, we identified actin depolymerizing factors (ADFs), including cofilin-1 (Cfl1), as genes involved in regulating anxiety in mice. There was no enrichment for function in the totality of genes under each QTL, indicating the importance of phylogenetic filtering. We confirmed experimentally that forebrain-specific inactivation of Cfl1 decreased anxiety in knockout mice. Our results indicate that similarity of function of mammalian genes can be used to recognize key genetic regulators of anxiety and potentially of other emotional behaviours.
Zdroje
1. FlintJ, MackayTF (2009) Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans. Genome Res 19: 723–733.
2. FlintJ, MottR (2008) Applying mouse complex-trait resources to behavioural genetics. Nature 456: 724–727.
3. FlintJ, ValdarW, ShifmanS, MottR (2005) Strategies for mapping and cloning quantitative trait genes in rodents. Nat Rev Genet 6: 271–286.
4. ValdarW, SolbergLC, GauguierD, BurnettS, KlenermanP, et al. (2006) Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice. Nat Genet 38: 879–887.
5. BannermanDM, DeaconRM, OffenS, FriswellJ, GrubbM, et al. (2002) Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus: spatial memory and hyponeophagia. Behav Neurosci 116: 884–901.
6. BannermanDM, GrubbM, DeaconRM, YeeBK, FeldonJ, et al. (2003) Ventral hippocampal lesions affect anxiety but not spatial learning. Behav Brain Res 139: 197–213.
7. McHughSB, FillenzM, LowryJP, RawlinsJN, BannermanDM (2010) Brain tissue oxygen amperometry in behaving rats demonstrates functional dissociation of dorsal and ventral hippocampus during spatial processing and anxiety. Eur J Neurosci 33: 322–337.
8. McHughSB, DeaconRM, RawlinsJN, BannermanDM (2004) Amygdala and ventral hippocampus contribute differentially to mechanisms of fear and anxiety. Behav Neurosci 118: 63–78.
9. KjelstrupKG, TuvnesFA, SteffenachHA, MurisonR, MoserEI, et al. (2002) Reduced fear expression after lesions of the ventral hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 10825–10830.
10. TurriMG, DattaSR, DeFriesJ, HendersonND, FlintJ (2001) QTL analysis identifies multiple behavioral dimensions in ethological tests of anxiety in laboratory mice. Curr Biol 11: 725–734.
11. PetersLL, RobledoRF, BultCJ, ChurchillGA, PaigenBJ, et al. (2007) The mouse as a model for human biology: a resource guide for complex trait analysis. Nat Rev Genet 8: 58–69.
12. HitzemannR, MalmangerB, CooperS, CoulombeS, ReedC, et al. (2002) Multiple cross mapping (MCM) markedly improves the localization of a QTL for ethanol-induced activation. Genes Brain Behav 1: 214–222.
13. YalcinB, FlintJ, MottR (2005) Using progenitor strain information to identify quantitative trait nucleotides in outbred mice. Genetics 171: 673–681.
14. GohKI, CusickME, ValleD, ChildsB, VidalM, et al. (2007) The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 8685–8690.
15. AshburnerM, BallCA, BlakeJA, BotsteinD, ButlerH, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25: 25–29.
16. KeaneTM, GoodstadtL, DanecekP, WhiteMA, WongK, et al. (2011) Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289–294.
17. YalcinB, FullertonJ, MillerS, KeaysDA, BradyS, et al. (2004) Unexpected complexity in the haplotypes of commonly used inbred strains of laboratory mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9734–9739.
18. SheX, ChengZ, ZollnerS, ChurchDM, EichlerEE (2008) Mouse segmental duplication and copy number variation. Nat Genet 40: 909–914.
19. GurniakCB, PerlasE, WitkeW (2005) The actin depolymerizing factor n-cofilin is essential for neural tube morphogenesis and neural crest cell migration. Dev Biol 278: 231–241.
20. BellenchiGC, GurniakCB, PerlasE, MiddeiS, Ammassari-TeuleM, et al. (2007) N-cofilin is associated with neuronal migration disorders and cell cycle control in the cerebral cortex. Genes Dev 21: 2347–2357.
21. RustMB, GurniakCB, RennerM, VaraH, MorandoL, et al. (2010) Learning, AMPA receptor mobility and synaptic plasticity depend on n-cofilin-mediated actin dynamics. EMBO J 29: 1889–1902.
22. KuczeraT, StillingRM, HsiaHE, Bahari-JavanS, IrnigerS, et al. (2011) The anaphase promoting complex is required for memory function in mice. Learn Mem 18: 49–57.
23. MinichielloL, KorteM, WolferD, KuhnR, UnsickerK, et al. (1999) Essential role for TrkB receptors in hippocampus-mediated learning. Neuron 24: 401–414.
24. Gray JA, McNaughton N (2000) The Neuropsychology of Anxiety. Oxford: OUP.
25. Gray JA (1982) The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: an Enquiry into the Function of the Septo-hippocampal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. PrutL, BelzungC (2003) The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol 463: 3–33.
27. HandleySL, McBlaneJW (1993) An assessment of the elevated X-maze for studying anxiety and anxiety-modulating drugs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 29: 129–138.
28. MottR, TalbotCJ, TurriMG, CollinsAC, FlintJ (2000) A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 12649–12654.
29. YalcinB, NicodJ, BhomraA, DavidsonS, CleakJ, et al. (2010) Commercially available outbred mice for genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet 6: e1001085 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001085
30. AylorDL, ValdarW, Foulds-MathesW, BuusRJ, VerdugoRA, et al. (2011) Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res 21: 1213–1222.
31. PhilipVM, SokoloffG, Ackert-BicknellCL, StrizM, BranstetterL, et al. (2011) Genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross breeding population. Genome Res 21: 1223–1238.
32. YangJ, BenyaminB, McEvoyBP, GordonS, HendersAK, et al. (2010) Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet 42: 565–569.
33. HuangGJ, ShifmanS, ValdarW, JohannessonM, YalcinB, et al. (2009) High resolution mapping of expression QTLs in heterogeneous stock mice in multiple tissues. Genome Res 19: 1133–1140.
34. BannermanDM, RawlinsJN, McHughSB, DeaconRM, YeeBK, et al. (2004) Regional dissociations within the hippocampus–memory and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28: 273–283.
35. PhillipsRG, LeDouxJE (1992) Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. Behavioral Neuroscience 106: 274–285.
36. BannermanDM, LemaireM, YeeBK, IversenSD, OswaldCJ, et al. (2002) Selective cytotoxic lesions of the retrohippocampal region produce a mild deficit in social recognition memory. Exp Brain Res 142: 395–401.
37. BarkusC, McHughSB, SprengelR, SeeburgPH, RawlinsJN, et al. (2010) Hippocampal NMDA receptors and anxiety: at the interface between cognition and emotion. Eur J Pharmacol 626: 49–56.
38. WatanabeY, GouldE, McEwenBS (1992) Stress induces atrophy of apical dendrites of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons. Brain Res 588: 341–345.
39. WatanabeY, GouldE, CameronHA, DanielsDC, McEwenBS (1992) Phenytoin prevents stress- and corticosterone-induced atrophy of CA3 pyramidal neurons. Hippocampus 2: 431–435.
40. SoetantoA, WilsonRS, TalbotK, UnA, SchneiderJA, et al. (2010) Association of anxiety and depression with microtubule-associated protein 2- and synaptopodin-immunolabeled dendrite and spine densities in hippocampal CA3 of older humans. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67: 448–457.
41. HotulainenP, LlanoO, SmirnovS, TanhuanpaaK, FaixJ, et al. (2009) Defining mechanisms of actin polymerization and depolymerization during dendritic spine morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 185: 323–339.
42. YusteR, BonhoefferT (2001) Morphological changes in dendritic spines associated with long-term synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 1071–1089.
43. NimchinskyEA, SabatiniBL, SvobodaK (2002) Structure and function of dendritic spines. Annu Rev Physiol 64: 313–353.
44. SegalM (2005) Dendritic spines and long-term plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 277–284.
45. MaXM, KiralyDD, GaierED, WangY, KimEJ, et al. (2008) Kalirin-7 is required for synaptic structure and function. J Neurosci 28: 12368–12382.
46. MuchaM, SkrzypiecAE, SchiavonE, AttwoodBK, KucerovaE, et al. (2011) Lipocalin-2 controls neuronal excitability and anxiety by regulating dendritic spine formation and maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 18436–18441.
47. KangHM, ZaitlenNA, WadeCM, KirbyA, HeckermanD, et al. (2008) Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178: 1709–1723.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2012 Číslo 10
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A Mutation in the Gene Causes Alternative Splicing Defects and Deafness in the Bronx Waltzer Mouse
- Mutations in (Hhat) Perturb Hedgehog Signaling, Resulting in Severe Acrania-Holoprosencephaly-Agnathia Craniofacial Defects
- Classical Genetics Meets Next-Generation Sequencing: Uncovering a Genome-Wide Recombination Map in
- Regulation of ATG4B Stability by RNF5 Limits Basal Levels of Autophagy and Influences Susceptibility to Bacterial Infection