Specific Missense Alleles of the Arabidopsis Jasmonic Acid Co-Receptor COI1 Regulate Innate Immune Receptor Accumulation and Function
Plants utilize proteins containing nucleotide binding site (NB) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains as intracellular innate immune receptors to recognize pathogens and initiate defense responses. Since mis-activation of defense responses can lead to tissue damage and even developmental arrest, proper regulation of NB–LRR protein signaling is critical. RAR1, SGT1, and HSP90 act as regulatory chaperones of pre-activation NB–LRR steady-state proteins. We extended our analysis of mutants derived from a rar1 suppressor screen and present two allelic rar1 suppressor (rsp) mutations of Arabidopsis COI1. Like all other coi1 mutations, coi1rsp missense mutations impair Jasmonic Acid (JA) signaling resulting in JA–insensitivity. However, unlike previously identified coi1 alleles, both coi1rsp alleles lack a male sterile phenotype. The coi1rsp mutants express two sets of disease resistance phenotypes. The first, also observed in coi1-1 null allele, includes enhanced basal defense against the virulent bacterial pathogen Pto DC3000 and enhanced effector-triggered immunity (ETI) mediated by the NB–LRR RPM1 protein in both rar1 and wild-type backgrounds. These enhanced disease resistance phenotypes depend on the JA signaling function of COI1. Additionally, the coi1rsp mutants showed a unique inability to properly regulate RPM1 accumulation and HR, exhibited increased RPM1 levels in rar1, and weakened RPM1-mediated HR in RAR1. Importantly, there was no change in the steady-state levels or HR function of RPM1 in coi1-1. These results suggest that the coi1rsp proteins regulate NB–LRR protein accumulation independent of JA signaling. Based on the phenotypic similarities and genetic interactions among coi1rsp, sgt1b, and hsp90.2rsp mutants, our data suggest that COI1 affects NB–LRR accumulation via two NB–LRR co-chaperones, SGT1b and HSP90. Together, our data demonstrate a role for COI1 in disease resistance independent of JA signaling and provide a molecular link between the JA and NB–LRR signaling pathways.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Specific Missense Alleles of the Arabidopsis Jasmonic Acid Co-Receptor COI1 Regulate Innate Immune Receptor Accumulation and Function. PLoS Genet 8(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003018
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003018
Souhrn
Plants utilize proteins containing nucleotide binding site (NB) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains as intracellular innate immune receptors to recognize pathogens and initiate defense responses. Since mis-activation of defense responses can lead to tissue damage and even developmental arrest, proper regulation of NB–LRR protein signaling is critical. RAR1, SGT1, and HSP90 act as regulatory chaperones of pre-activation NB–LRR steady-state proteins. We extended our analysis of mutants derived from a rar1 suppressor screen and present two allelic rar1 suppressor (rsp) mutations of Arabidopsis COI1. Like all other coi1 mutations, coi1rsp missense mutations impair Jasmonic Acid (JA) signaling resulting in JA–insensitivity. However, unlike previously identified coi1 alleles, both coi1rsp alleles lack a male sterile phenotype. The coi1rsp mutants express two sets of disease resistance phenotypes. The first, also observed in coi1-1 null allele, includes enhanced basal defense against the virulent bacterial pathogen Pto DC3000 and enhanced effector-triggered immunity (ETI) mediated by the NB–LRR RPM1 protein in both rar1 and wild-type backgrounds. These enhanced disease resistance phenotypes depend on the JA signaling function of COI1. Additionally, the coi1rsp mutants showed a unique inability to properly regulate RPM1 accumulation and HR, exhibited increased RPM1 levels in rar1, and weakened RPM1-mediated HR in RAR1. Importantly, there was no change in the steady-state levels or HR function of RPM1 in coi1-1. These results suggest that the coi1rsp proteins regulate NB–LRR protein accumulation independent of JA signaling. Based on the phenotypic similarities and genetic interactions among coi1rsp, sgt1b, and hsp90.2rsp mutants, our data suggest that COI1 affects NB–LRR accumulation via two NB–LRR co-chaperones, SGT1b and HSP90. Together, our data demonstrate a role for COI1 in disease resistance independent of JA signaling and provide a molecular link between the JA and NB–LRR signaling pathways.
Zdroje
1. JonesJDG, DanglJL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444: 323–329.
2. DoddsPN, RathjenJP (2010) Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Genet 11: 539–548.
3. MaekawaT, KuferTA, Schulze-LefertP (2011) NLR functions in plant and animal immune systems: so far and yet so close. Nat Immunol 12: 817–826.
4. MudgettMB (2005) New Insights to The Function of Phytopathogenic Bacterial Type III Effectors in Plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56: 509–531.
5. NimchukZ, EulgemT, HoltBF3rd, DanglJL (2003) RECOGNITION AND RESPONSE IN THE PLANT IMMUNE SYSTEM. Annual Review of Genetics 37: 579–609.
6. TingJPY, WillinghamSB, BergstralhDT (2008) NLRs at the intersection of cell death and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 8: 372–379.
7. BelkhadirY, NimchukZ, HubertDA, MackeyD, DanglJL (2004) Arabidopsis RIN4 Negatively Regulates Disease Resistance Mediated by RPS2 and RPM1 Downstream or Independent of the NDR1 Signal Modulator and Is Not Required for the Virulence Functions of Bacterial Type III Effectors AvrRpt2 or AvrRpm1. The Plant Cell 16: 2822–2835.
8. MackeyD, HoltBF, WiigA, DanglJL (2002) RIN4 Interacts with Pseudomonas syringae Type III Effector Molecules and Is Required for RPM1-Mediated Resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell 108: 743–754.
9. LiX, ClarkeJD, ZhangY, DongX (2001) Activation of an EDS1-Mediated R-Gene Pathway in the snc1 Mutant Leads to Constitutive, NPR1-Independent Pathogen Resistance. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 14: 1131–1139.
10. ShirasuK, LahayeT, TanM-W, ZhouF, AzevedoC, et al. (1999) A Novel Class of Eukaryotic Zinc-Binding Proteins Is Required for Disease Resistance Signaling in Barley and Development in C. elegans. Cell 99: 355–366.
11. WarrenRF, MerrittPM, HolubE, InnesRW (1999) Identification of Three Putative Signal Transduction Genes Involved in R Gene-Specified Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis. Genetics 152: 401–412.
12. AustinMJ, MuskettP, KahnK, FeysBJ, JonesJDG, et al. (2002) Regulatory Role of SGT1 in Early R Gene-Mediated Plant Defenses. Science 295: 2077–2080.
13. AzevedoC, SadanandomA, KitagawaK, FreialdenhovenA, ShirasuK, et al. (2002) The RAR1 Interactor SGT1, an Essential Component of R Gene-Triggered Disease Resistance. Science 295: 2073–2076.
14. HubertDA, TorneroP, BelkhadirY, KrishnaP, TakahashiA, et al. (2003) Cytosolic HSP90 associates with and modulates the Arabidopsis RPM1 disease resistance protein. EMBO J 22: 5679–5689.
15. MuskettPR, KahnK, AustinMJ, MoisanLJ, SadanandomA, et al. (2002) Arabidopsis RAR1 Exerts Rate-Limiting Control of R Gene–Mediated Defenses against Multiple Pathogens. The Plant Cell 14: 979–992.
16. TakahashiA, CasaisC, IchimuraK, ShirasuK (2003) HSP90 interacts with RAR1 and SGT1 and is essential for RPS2-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 11777–11782.
17. TörM, GordonP, CuzickA, EulgemT, SinapidouE, et al. (2002) Arabidopsis SGT1b Is Required for Defense Signaling Conferred by Several Downy Mildew Resistance Genes. The Plant Cell 14: 993–1003.
18. TorneroP, MerrittP, SadanandomA, ShirasuK, InnesRW, et al. (2002) RAR1 and NDR1 Contribute Quantitatively to Disease Resistance in Arabidopsis, and Their Relative Contributions Are Dependent on the R Gene Assayed. The Plant Cell 14: 1005–1015.
19. ShirasuK (2009) The HSP90-SGT1 Chaperone Complex for NLR Immune Sensors. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60: 139–164.
20. KadotaY, ShirasuK, GueroisR (2010) NLR sensors meet at the SGT1 HSP90 crossroad. Trends in biochemical sciences 35: 199–207.
21. HubertDA, HeY, McNultyBC, TorneroP, DanglJL (2009) Specific Arabidopsis HSP90.2 alleles recapitulate RAR1 cochaperone function in plant NB–LRR disease resistance protein regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 9556–9563.
22. ZhangM, KadotaY, ProdromouC, ShirasuK, PearlLH (2010) Structural Basis for Assembly of Hsp90-Sgt1-CHORD Protein Complexes: Implications for Chaperoning of NLR Innate Immunity Receptors. Molecular Cell 39: 269–281.
23. da Silva CorreiaJ, MirandaY, LeonardN, UlevitchR (2007) SGT1 is essential for Nod1 activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 6764–6769.
24. MayorA, MartinonF, De SmedtT, PetrilliV, TschoppJ (2007) A crucial function of SGT1 and HSP90 in inflammasome activity links mammalian and plant innate immune responses. Nat Immunol 8: 497–503.
25. HoltBF3rd, BelkhadirY, DanglJL (2005) Antagonistic control of disease resistance protein stability in the plant immune system. Science 309: 929–932.
26. BrowseJ (2009) Jasmonate Passes Muster: A Receptor and Targets for the Defense Hormone. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60: 183–205.
27. NomuraK, MelottoM, HeS-Y (2005) Suppression of host defense in compatible plant-Pseudomonas syringae interactions. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 361–368.
28. ChiniA, FonsecaS, FernandezG, AdieB, ChicoJM, et al. (2007) The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature 448: 666–671.
29. ThinesB, KatsirL, MelottoM, NiuY, MandaokarA, et al. (2007) JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCFCOI1 complex during jasmonate signalling. Nature 448: 661–665.
30. KatsirL, SchilmillerAL, StaswickPE, HeSY, HoweGA (2008) COI1 is a critical component of a receptor for jasmonate and the bacterial virulence factor coronatine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 7100–7105.
31. SheardLB, TanX, MaoH, WithersJ, Ben-NissanG, et al. (2010) Jasmonate perception by inositol-phosphate-potentiated COI1-JAZ co-receptor. Nature 468: 400–405.
32. XieD-X, FeysBF, JamesS, Nieto-RostroM, TurnerJG (1998) COI1: An Arabidopsis Gene Required for Jasmonate-Regulated Defense and Fertility. Science 280: 1091–1094.
33. FeysBJF, BenedettiCE, PenfoldCN, TurnerJG (1994) Arabidopsis Mutants Selected for Resistance to the Phytotoxin Coronatine Are Male Sterile, Insensitive to Methyl Jasmonate, and Resistant to a Bacterial Pathogen. The Plant Cell 6: 751–759.
34. ThommaBPHJ, EggermontK, PenninckxIAMA, Mauch-ManiB, VogelsangR, et al. (1998) Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense-response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 15107–15111.
35. McDowellJM, CuzickA, CanC, BeynonJ, DanglJL, et al. (2000) Downy mildew (Peronospora parasitica) resistance genes in Arabidopsis vary in functional requirements for NDR1, EDS1, NPR1 and salicylic acid accumulation. The Plant Journal 22: 523–529.
36. Norman-SetterbladC, VidalS, PalvaET (2000) Interacting Signal Pathways Control Defense Gene Expression in Arabidopsis in Response to Cell Wall-Degrading Enzymes from Erwinia carotovora. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 13: 430–438.
37. KloekAP, VerbskyML, SharmaSB, SchoelzJE, VogelJ, et al. (2001) Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae conferred by an Arabidopsis thaliana coronatine-insensitive (coi1) mutation occurs through two distinct mechanisms. The Plant Journal 26: 509–522.
38. MelottoM, MeceyC, NiuY, ChungHS, KatsirL, et al. (2008) A critical role of two positively charged amino acids in the Jas motif of Arabidopsis JAZ proteins in mediating coronatine- and jasmonoyl isoleucine-dependent interactions with the COI1 F-box protein. The Plant Journal 55: 979–988.
39. ThatcherLF, MannersJM, KazanK (2009) Fusarium oxysporum hijacks COI1-mediated jasmonate signaling to promote disease development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 58: 927–939.
40. LorenzoO, ChicoJM, Sánchez-SerranoJJ, SolanoR (2004) JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE1 Encodes a MYC Transcription Factor Essential to Discriminate between Different Jasmonate-Regulated Defense Responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16: 1938–1950.
41. VijayanP, ShockeyJ, LévesqueCA, CookRJ, BrowseJ (1998) A role for jasmonate in pathogen defense of Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 7209–7214.
42. XuL, LiuF, LechnerE, GenschikP, CrosbyWL, et al. (2002) The SCFCOI1 Ubiquitin-Ligase Complexes Are Required for Jasmonate Response in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 14: 1919–1935.
43. YanJ, ZhangC, GuM, BaiZ, ZhangW, et al. (2009) The Arabidopsis CORONATINE INSENSITIVE1 Protein Is a Jasmonate Receptor. The Plant Cell 21: 2220–2236.
44. Fernández-CalvoP, ChiniA, Fernández-BarberoG, ChicoJM, Gimenez-IbanezS, et al. (2011) The Arabidopsis bHLH Transcription Factors MYC3 and MYC4 Are Targets of JAZ Repressors and Act Additively with MYC2 in the Activation of Jasmonate Responses. The Plant Cell 23: 701–715.
45. EllisC, TurnerJ (2002) A conditionally fertile coi1 allele indicates cross-talk between plant hormone signalling pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana seeds and young seedlings. Planta 215: 549–556.
46. BelangerKD, KennaMA, WeiS, DavisLI (1994) Genetic and physical interactions between Srp1p and nuclear pore complex proteins Nup1p and Nup2p. J Cell Biol 126: 619–630.
47. LarkinJC, WalkerJD, Bolognesi-WinfieldAC, GrayJC, WalkerAR (1999) Allele-Specific Interactions Between ttg and gl1 During Trichome Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 151: 1591–1604.
48. Van Der BiezenEA, FreddieCT, KahnK, ParkerJE, JonesJDG (2002) Arabidopsis RPP4 is a member of the RPP5 multigene family of TIR-NB–LRR genes and confers downy mildew resistance through multiple signalling components. The Plant Journal 29: 439–451.
49. BieriS, MauchS, ShenQ-H, PeartJ, DevotoA, et al. (2004) RAR1 Positively Controls Steady State Levels of Barley MLA Resistance Proteins and Enables Sufficient MLA6 Accumulation for Effective Resistance. The Plant Cell 16: 3480–3495.
50. BoyesDC, NamJ, DanglJL (1998) The Arabidopsis thaliana RPM1 disease resistance gene product is a peripheral plasma membrane protein that is degraded coincident with the hypersensitive response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 15849–15854.
51. KachrooA, LapchykL, FukushigeH, HildebrandD, KlessigD, et al. (2003) Plastidial Fatty Acid Signaling Modulates Salicylic Acid– and Jasmonic Acid–Mediated Defense Pathways in the Arabidopsis ssi2 Mutant. The Plant Cell 15: 2952–2965.
52. ShiranoY, KachrooP, ShahJ, KlessigDF (2002) A Gain-of-Function Mutation in an Arabidopsis Toll Interleukin1 Receptor–Nucleotide Binding Site–Leucine-Rich Repeat Type R Gene Triggers Defense Responses and Results in Enhanced Disease Resistance. The Plant Cell 14: 3149–3162.
53. YangS, HuaJ (2004) A Haplotype-Specific Resistance Gene Regulated by BONZAI1 Mediates Temperature-Dependent Growth Control in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 16: 1060–1071.
54. GrayWM, MuskettPR, ChuangH-w, ParkerJE (2003) Arabidopsis SGT1b Is Required for SCFTIR1-Mediated Auxin Response. The Plant Cell 15: 1310–1319.
55. KunkelBN, BrooksDM (2002) Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 325–331.
56. ZipfelC, RobatzekS, NavarroL, OakeleyEJ, JonesJDG, et al. (2004) Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 428: 764–767.
57. ChungE-H, da CunhaL, WuA-J, GaoZ, CherkisK, et al. (2011) Specific Threonine Phosphorylation of a Host Target by Two Unrelated Type III Effectors Activates a Host Innate Immune Receptor in Plants. Cell Host & Microbe 9: 125–136.
58. PauwelsL, GoossensA (2011) The JAZ proteins: a crucial interface in the jasmonate signaling cascade. The Plant Cell 23: 3089–3100.
59. LongJA, OhnoC, SmithZR, MeyerowitzEM (2006) TOPLESS Regulates Apical Embryonic Fate in Arabidopsis. Science 312: 1520–1523.
60. DieavartA, DalalM, TaxFE, LaceyAD, HuttlyA, et al. (2003) CLAVATA1 Dominant-Negative Alleles Reveal Functional Overlap between Multiple Receptor Kinases That Regulate Meristem and Organ Development. The Plant Cell 15: 1198–1211.
61. SijacicP, WangW, LiuZ (2011) Recessive Antimorphic Alleles Overcome Functionally Redundant Loci to Reveal TSO1 Function in Arabidopsis Flowers and Meristems. PLoS Genet 7: e1002352 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002352
62. WürschumT, Groß-HardtR, LauxT (2006) APETALA2 Regulates the Stem Cell Niche in the Arabidopsis Shoot Meristem. The Plant Cell 18: 295–307.
63. KimT-s, KimWY, FujiwaraS, KimJ, ChaJ-Y, et al. (2011) HSP90 functions in the circadian clock through stabilization of the client F-box protein ZEITLUPE. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 16843–16848.
64. LiuY, SchiffM, SerinoG, DengXW, Dinesh-KumarSP (2002) Role of SCF ubiquitin-ligase and the COP9 signalosome in the N gene-mediated resistance response to Tobacco mosaic virus. The Plant Cell 14: 1483–1496.
65. LyapinaS, CopeG, ShevchenkoA, SerinoG, TsugeT, et al. (2001) Promotion of NEDD8-CUL1 Conjugate Cleavage by COP9 Signalosome. Science 292: 1382–1385.
66. ChengYT, LiY, HuangS, HuangY, DongX, et al. (2011) Stability of plant immune-receptor resistance proteins is controlled by SKP1-CULLIN1-F-box (SCF)-mediated protein degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 14694–14699.
67. GrantMR, GodiardL, StraubeE, AshfieldT, LewaldJ, et al. (1995) Structure of the Arabidopsis RPM1 gene enabling dual specificity disease resistance. Science 269: 843–846.
68. WarrenRF, HenkA, MoweryP, HolubE, InnesRW (1998) A Mutation within the Leucine-Rich Repeat Domain of the Arabidopsis Disease Resistance Gene RPS5 Partially Suppresses Multiple Bacterial and Downy Mildew Resistance Genes. The Plant Cell 10: 1439–1452.
69. MindrinosM, KatagiriF, YuG-L, AusubelFM (1994) The A. thaliana disease resistance gene RPS2 encodes a protein containing a nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats. Cell 78: 1089–1099.
70. NakagawaT, KuroseT, HinoT, TanakaK, KawamukaiM, et al. (2007) Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 104: 34–41.
71. RitterC, DanglJL (1996) Interference between Two Specific Pathogen Recognition Events Mediated by Distinct Plant Disease Resistance Genes. The Plant Cell 8: 251–257.
72. TorneroP, DanglJL (2001) A high-throughput method for quantifying growth of phytopathogenic bacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 28: 475–481.
73. CaoY, DaiY, CuiS, MaL (2008) Histone H2B Monoubiquitination in the Chromatin of FLOWERING LOCUS C Regulates Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20: 2586–2602.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2012 Číslo 10
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- A Mutation in the Gene Causes Alternative Splicing Defects and Deafness in the Bronx Waltzer Mouse
- Classical Genetics Meets Next-Generation Sequencing: Uncovering a Genome-Wide Recombination Map in
- Mutations in (Hhat) Perturb Hedgehog Signaling, Resulting in Severe Acrania-Holoprosencephaly-Agnathia Craniofacial Defects
- Regulation of ATG4B Stability by RNF5 Limits Basal Levels of Autophagy and Influences Susceptibility to Bacterial Infection