Mutation and Fetal Ethanol Exposure Synergize to Produce Midline Signaling Defects and Holoprosencephaly Spectrum Disorders in Mice

English version České info

Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is a remarkably common congenital anomaly characterized by failure to define the midline of the forebrain and midface. HPE is associated with heterozygous mutations in Sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway components, but clinical presentation is extremely variable and many mutation carriers are unaffected. It has been proposed that these observations are best explained by a multiple-hit model, in which the penetrance and expressivity of an HPE mutation is enhanced by a second mutation or the presence of cooperating, but otherwise silent, modifier genes. Non-genetic risk factors are also implicated in HPE, and gene–environment interactions may provide an alternative multiple-hit model to purely genetic multiple-hit models; however, there is little evidence for this contention. We report here a mouse model in which there is dramatic synergy between mutation of a bona fide HPE gene (Cdon, which encodes a SHH co-receptor) and a suspected HPE teratogen, ethanol. Loss of Cdon and in utero ethanol exposure in 129S6 mice give little or no phenotype individually, but together produce defects in early midline patterning, inhibition of SHH signaling in the developing forebrain, and a broad spectrum of HPE phenotypes. Our findings argue that ethanol is indeed a risk factor for HPE, but genetically predisposed individuals, such as those with SHH pathway mutations, may be particularly susceptible. Furthermore, gene–environment interactions are likely to be important in the multifactorial etiology of HPE.

Vyšlo v časopise: Mutation and Fetal Ethanol Exposure Synergize to Produce Midline Signaling Defects and Holoprosencephaly Spectrum Disorders in Mice. PLoS Genet 8(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002999
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002999

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. Muenke M, Beachy PA (2001) Holoprosencephaly. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The Metabolic & Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. Eighth Edition ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 6203–6230.

2. OrioliIM, CastillaEE (2010) Epidemiology of holoprosencephaly: Prevalence and risk factors. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 13–21.

3. ShiotaK, YamadaS (2010) Early pathogenesis of holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 22–28.

4. CohenMMJr (2006) Holoprosencephaly: clinical, anatomic, and molecular dimensions. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol 76: 658–673.

5. KraussRS (2007) Holoprosencephaly: new models, new insights. Expert Rev Mol Med 9: 1–17.

6. RoesslerE, MuenkeM (2010) The molecular genetics of holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 52–61.

7. SolomonBD, MercierS, VélezJI, Pineda-AlvarezDE, WyllieA, et al. (2010) Analysis of genotype-phenotype correlations in human holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 133–141.

8. RibeiroLA, QuieziRG, NascimentoA, BertolaciniCP, Richieri-CostaA (2010) Holoprosencephaly and holoprosencephaly-like phenotype and GAS1 DNA sequence changes: Report of four Brazilian patients. Am J Med Genet A 152A: 1688–1694.

9. BaeGU, DomenéS, RoesslerE, SchachterK, KangJS, et al. (2011) Mutations in CDON, Encoding a Hedgehog Receptor, Result in Holoprosencephaly and Defective Interactions with Other Hedgehog Receptors. Am J Hum Genet 89: 231–240.

10. Pineda-AlvarezDE, RoesslerE, HuP, SrivastavaK, SolomonBD, et al. (2012) Missense substitutions in the GAS1 protein present in holoprosencephaly patients reduce the affinity for its ligand, SHH. Hum Genet 131: 301–310.

11. RibeiroLA, MurrayJC, Richieri-CostaA (2006) PTCH mutations in four Brazilian patients with holoprosencephaly and in one with holoprosencephaly-like features and normal MRI. Am J Med Genet A 140: 2584–2586.

12. MingJE, MuenkeM (2002) Multiple hits during early embryonic development: digenic diseases and holoprosencephaly. Am J Hum Genet 71: 1017–1032.

13. MercierS, DubourgC, GarcelonN, Campillo-GimenezB, GicquelI, et al. (2011) New findings for phenotype-genotype correlations in a large European series of holoprosencephaly cases. J Med Genet 48: 752–760.

14. RoesslerE, VélezJI, ZhouN, MuenkeM (2012) Utilizing prospective sequence analysis of SHH, ZIC2, SIX3 and TGIF in holoprosencephaly probands to describe the parameters limiting the observed frequency of mutant gene×gene interactions. Mol Genet Metab 105: 658–664.

15. JohnsonCY, RasmussenSA (2010) Non-genetic risk factors for holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 73–85.

16. MillerEA, RasmussenSA, Siega-RizAM, FríasJL, HoneinMA, et al. (2010) Risk factors for non-syndromic holoprosencephaly in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 62–72.

17. AotoK, ShikataY, HigashiyamaD, ShiotaK, MotoyamaJ (2008) Fetal ethanol exposure activates protein kinase A and impairs Shh expression in prechordal mesendoderm cells in the pathogenesis of holoprosencephaly. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 82: 224–231.

18. DowningC, Balderrama-DurbinC, BroncuciaH, GilliamD, JohnsonTE (2009) Ethanol teratogenesis in five inbred strains of mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 33: 1238–1245.

19. HigashiyamaD, SaitsuH, KomadaM, TakigawaT, IshibashiM, et al. (2007) Sequential developmental changes in holoprosencephalic mouse embryos exposed to ethanol during the gastrulation period. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 79: 513–523.

20. LipinskiRJ, GodinEA, O'leary-MooreSK, ParnellSE, SulikKK (2010) Genesis of teratogen-induced holoprosencephaly in mice. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 29–42.

21. LoucksEJ, AhlgrenSC (2009) Deciphering the role of Shh signaling in axial defects produced by ethanol exposure. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 85: 556–567.

22. LiYX, YangHT, ZdanowiczM, SicklickJK, QiY, et al. (2007) Fetal alcohol exposure impairs Hedgehog cholesterol modification and signaling. Lab Invest 87: 231–240.

23. KangJ-S, MulieriPJ, HuY, TalianaL, KraussRS (2002) BOC, an Ig superfamily member, associates with CDO to positively regulate myogenic differentiation. EMBO J 21: 114–124.

24. OkadaA, CharronF, MorinS, ShinDS, WongK, et al. (2006) Boc is a receptor for sonic hedgehog in the guidance of commissural axons. Nature 444: 369–373.

25. TenzenT, AllenBL, ColeF, KangJ-S, KraussRS, et al. (2006) The cell surface membrane proteins Cdo and Boc are components and targets of the hedgehog signaling pathway and feedback network in mice. Dev Cell 10: 647–656.

26. YaoS, LumL, BeachyP (2006) The ihog cell-surface proteins bind Hedgehog and mediate pathway activation. Cell 125: 343–357.

27. ZhangW, HongM, BaeG-U, KangJ-S, KraussRS (2011) Boc modifies the holoprosencephaly spectrum of Cdo mutant mice. Dis Model Mech 4: 368–380.

28. ZhangW, KangJ-S, ColeF, YiMJ, KraussRS (2006) Cdo functions at multiple points in the Sonic Hedgehog pathway, and Cdo-deficient mice accurately model human holoprosencephaly. Dev Cell 10: 657–665.

29. RosenfeldJA, BallifBC, MartinDM, AylsworthAS, BejjaniBA, et al. (2010) Clinical characterization of individuals with deletions of genes in holoprosencephaly pathways by aCGH refines the phenotypic spectrum of HPE. Hum Genet 127: 421–440.

30. ColeF, KraussRS (2003) Microform holoprosencephaly in mice that lack the Ig superfamily member Cdon. Curr Biol 13: 411–415.

31. SulikKK, JohnstonMC, WebbMA (1981) Fetal alcohol syndrome: embryogenesis in a mouse model. Science 214: 936–938.

32. WebsterWS, WalshDA, McEwenSE, LipsonAH (1983) Some teratogenic properties of ethanol and acetaldehyde in C57BL/6J mice: implications for the study of the fetal alcohol syndrome. Teratology 27: 231–243.

33. SchimmentiLA, de la CruzJ, LewisRA, KarkeraJD, ManligasGS, et al. (2003) Novel mutation in sonic hedgehog in non-syndromic colobomatous microphthalmia. Am J Med Genet A 116A: 215–221.

34. JeongJ, MaoJ, TenzenT, KottmannAH, McMahonAP (2004) Hedgehog signaling in the neural crest cells regulates the patterning and growth of facial primordia. Genes & Dev 18: 937–951.

35. KauvarEF, SolomonBD, CurryCJ, van EssenAJ, JanssenN, et al. (2010) Holoprosencephaly and agnathia spectrum: Presentation of two new patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 154C: 158–169.

36. MuenkeM, BeachyPA (2000) Genetics of ventral forebrain development and holoprosencephaly. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10: 262–269.

37. CorderoD, MarcucioR, HuD, GaffieldW, TapadiaM, et al. (2004) Temporal perturbations in sonic hedgehog signaling elicit the spectrum of holoprosencephaly phenotypes. J Clin Invest 114: 485–494.

38. MarcucioRS, CorderoDR, HuD, HelmsJA (2005) Molecular interactions coordinating the development of the forebrain and face. Dev Biol 284: 48–61.

39. GengX, SpeirsC, LagutinO, InbalA, LiuW, et al. (2008) Haploinsufficiency of Six3 fails to activate Sonic hedgehog expression in the ventral forebrain and causes holoprosencephaly. Dev Cell 15: 236–247.

40. JeongY, LeskowFC, El-JaickK, RoesslerE, MuenkeM, et al. (2008) Regulation of a remote Shh forebrain enhancer by the Six3 homeoprotein. Nat Genet 40: 1348–1353.

41. OhkuboY, ChiangC, RubensteinJL (2002) Coordinate regulation and synergistic actions of BMP4, SHH and FGF8 in the rostral prosencephalon regulate morphogenesis of the telencephalic and optic vesicles. Neuroscience 111: 1–17.

42. RamosC, RobertB (2005) msh/Msx gene family in neural development. Trends Genet 21: 624–632.

43. DessaudE, McMahonAP, BriscoeJ (2008) Pattern formation in the vertebrate neural tube: a sonic hedgehog morphogen-regulated transcriptional network. Development 135: 2489–2503.

44. RoesslerE, PeiW, OuspenskaiaMV, KarkeraJD, VelézJI, et al. (2009) Cumulative ligand activity of NODAL mutations and modifiers are linked to human heart defects and holoprosencephaly. Mol Genet Metab 98: 225–234.

45. AngSL, RossantJ (1994) HNF-3ß is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development. Cell 78: 561–574.

46. BeloJA, LeynsL, YamadaG, De RobertisEM (1998) The prechordal midline of the chondrocranium is defective in Goosecoid-1 mouse mutants. Mech Dev 72: 15–25.

47. FilosaS, Rivera-PérezJA, GómezAP, GansmullerA, SasakiH, et al. (1997) Goosecoid and HNF-3ß genetically interact to regulate neural tube patterning during mouse embryogenesis. Development 124: 2843–2854.

48. AnderssonO, ReissmannE, JörnvallH, IbáñezCF (2006) Synergistic interaction between Gdf1 and Nodal during anterior axis development. Dev Biol 293: 370–381.

49. VincentSD, DunnNR, HayashiS, NorrisDP, RobertsonEJ (2003) Cell fate decisions within the mouse organizer are governed by graded Nodal signals. Genes Dev 17: 1646–1662.

50. YangYP, AndersonRM, KlingensmithJ (2010) BMP antagonism protects Nodal signaling in the gastrula to promote the tissue interactions underlying mammalian forebrain and craniofacial patterning. Hum Mol Genet 19: 3030–3042.

51. ChiangC, LitingtungY, LeeE, YoungKE, CordenJL, et al. (1996) Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 383: 407–413.

52. IzziL, LévesqueM, MorinS, LanielD, WilkesBC, et al. (2011) Boc and Gas1 each form distinct Shh receptor complexes with Ptch1 and are required for Shh-mediated cell proliferation. Dev Cell 20: 788–801.

53. KraussRS (2010) Regulation of promyogenic signal transduction by cell-cell contact and adhesion. Exp Cell Res 316: 3042–3049.

54. LuM, KraussRS (2010) N-cadherin ligation, but not Sonic hedgehog binding, initiates Cdo-dependent p38α/ß MAPK signaling in skeletal myoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 107: 4212–4217.

55. AhlgrenSC, ThakurV, Bronner-FraserM (2002) Sonic hedgehog rescues cranial neural crest from cell death induced by ethanol exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 99: 10476–10481.

56. Centers for Disease Control website. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/fasd/index.html. Accessed 2012 August 31.

57. JeongJ, McMahonAP (2005) Growth and pattern of the mammalian neural tube are governed by partially overlapping feedback activities of the hedgehog antagonists patched 1 and Hhip1. Development 132: 143–154.

58. MulieriPM, KangJ-S, SassoonDA, KraussRS (2002) Expression of the boc gene during murine embryogenesis. Dev Dyn 223: 379–388.

59. FaureS, de Santa BarbaraP, RobertsDJ, WhitmanM (2002) Endogenous patterns of BMP signaling during early chick development. Dev Biol 244: 44–65.

60. YangYP, KlingensmithJ (2006) Roles of organizer factors and BMP antagonism in mammalian forebrain establishment. Dev Biol 296: 458–475.

61. TribioliC, LufkinT (1999) The murine Bapx1 homeobox gene plays a critical role in embryonic development of the axial skeleton and spleen. Development 126: 5699–5711.

62. ZhangY, RathN, HannenhalliS, WangZ, CappolaT, et al. (2007) GATA and Nkx factors synergistically regulate tissue-specific gene expression and development in vivo. Development 134: 189–198.