Genetic Modifiers of Chromatin Acetylation Antagonize the Reprogramming of Epi-Polymorphisms

English version České info

Natural populations are known to differ not only in DNA but also in their chromatin-associated epigenetic marks. When such inter-individual epigenomic differences (or “epi-polymorphisms”) are observed, their stability is usually not known: they may or may not be reprogrammed over time or upon environmental changes. In addition, their origin may be purely epigenetic, or they may result from regulatory variation encoded in the DNA. Studying epi-polymorphisms requires, therefore, an assessment of their nature and stability. Here we estimate the stability of yeast epi-polymorphisms of chromatin acetylation, and we provide a genome-by-epigenome map of their genetic control. A transient epi-drug treatment was able to reprogram acetylation variation at more than one thousand nucleosomes, whereas a similar amount of variation persisted, distinguishing “labile” from “persistent” epi-polymorphisms. Hundreds of genetic loci underlied acetylation variation at 2,418 nucleosomes either locally (in cis) or distantly (in trans), and this genetic control overlapped only partially with the genetic control of gene expression. Trans-acting regulators were not necessarily associated with genes coding for chromatin modifying enzymes. Strikingly, “labile” and “persistent” epi-polymorphisms were associated with poor and strong genetic control, respectively, showing that genetic modifiers contribute to persistence. These results estimate the amount of natural epigenomic variation that can be lost after transient environmental exposures, and they reveal the complex genetic architecture of the DNA–encoded determinism of chromatin epi-polymorphisms. Our observations provide a basis for the development of population epigenetics.

Vyšlo v časopise: Genetic Modifiers of Chromatin Acetylation Antagonize the Reprogramming of Epi-Polymorphisms. PLoS Genet 8(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002958
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002958

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. ZhangX, ShiuS, CalA, BorevitzJO (2008) Global analysis of genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional polymorphisms in Arabidopsis thaliana using whole genome tiling arrays. PLoS Genet 4: e1000032 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000032.

2. VaughnMW, Tanurd IcM, LippmanZ, JiangH, CarrasquilloR, et al. (2007) Epigenetic Natural Variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol 5: e174 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050174.

3. FlanaganJM, PopendikyteV, PozdniakovaiteN, SobolevM, AssadzadehA, et al. (2006) Intra- and interindividual epigenetic variation in human germ cells. Am J Hum Genet 79: 67–84.

4. ZhangD, ChengL, BadnerJA, ChenC, ChenQ, et al. (2010) Genetic control of individual differences in gene-specific methylation in human brain. Am J Hum Genet 86: 411–419.

5. GibbsJR, van der BrugMP, HernandezDG, TraynorBJ, NallsMA, et al. (2010) Abundant quantitative trait loci exist for DNA methylation and gene expression in human brain. PLoS Genet 6: e1000952 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000952.

6. BellJT, PaiAA, PickrellJK, GaffneyDJ, Pique-RegiR, et al. (2011) DNA methylation patterns associate with genetic and gene expression variation in HapMap cell lines. Genome Biol 12: R10.

7. FragaMF, BallestarE, PazMF, RoperoS, SetienF, et al. (2005) Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 10604–10609.

8. EnglerP, HaaschD, PinkertCA, DoglioL, GlymourM, et al. (1991) A strain-specific modifier on mouse chromosome 4 controls the methylation of independent transgene loci. Cell 65: 939–947.

9. Valenza-SchaerlyP, PickardB, WalterJ, JungM, PourcelL, et al. (2001) A dominant modifier of transgene methylation is mapped by QTL analysis to mouse chromosome 13. Genome Res 11: 382–388.

10. McDaniellR, LeeBK, SongL, LiuZ, BoyleAP, et al. (2010) Heritable individual-specific and allele-specific chromatin signatures in humans. Science 328: 235–239.

11. TessadoriF, van ZantenM, PavlovaP, CliftonR, PontvianneF, et al. (2009) Phytochrome B and histone deacetylase 6 control light-induced chromatin compaction in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 5: e1000638 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000638.

12. NagarajanM, VeyrierasJB, de DieuleveultM, BottinH, FehrmannS, et al. (2010) Natural single-nucleosome epi-polymorphisms in yeast. PLoS Genet 6: e1000913 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000913.

13. RandoOJ, VerstrepenKJ (2007) Timescales of genetic and epigenetic inheritance. Cell 128: 655–668.

14. BeckerC, HagmannJ, MullerJ, KoenigD, StegleO, et al. (2011) Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature 480: 245–249.

15. SchmitzRJ, SchultzMD, LewseyMG, O'MalleyRC, UrichMA, et al. (2011) Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants. Science 334: 369–373.

16. TurnerBM (2010) Environmental sensing by chromatin: An epigenetic contribution to evolutionary change. FEBS Lett

17. HeY (2009) Control of the transition to flowering by chromatin modifications. Mol Plant 2: 554–564.

18. PecinkaA, DinhHQ, BaubecT, RosaM, LettnerN, et al. (2010) Epigenetic regulation of repetitive elements is attenuated by prolonged heat stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22: 3118–3129.

19. Tittel-ElmerM, BucherE, BrogerL, MathieuO, PaszkowskiJ, et al. (2010) Stress-induced activation of heterochromatic transcription. PLoS Genet 6: e1001175 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001175.

20. Lang-MladekC, PopovaO, KiokK, BerlingerM, RakicB, et al. (2010) Transgenerational inheritance and resetting of stress-induced loss of epigenetic gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 3: 594–602.

21. KumarSV, WiggePA (2010) H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes mediate the thermosensory response in Arabidopsis. Cell 140: 136–147.

22. MathersJC, MckayJA (2011) Diet induced epigenetic changes and their implications for health. Acta Physiologica 202: 103–118.

23. LiCC, CropleyJE, CowleyMJ, PreissT, MartinDI, et al. (2011) A sustained dietary change increases epigenetic variation in isogenic mice. PLoS Genet 7: e1001380 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001380.

24. CropleyJE, SuterCM, BeckmanKB, MartinDI (2006) Germ-line epigenetic modification of the murine A vy allele by nutritional supplementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 17308–17312.

25. CaroneBR, FauquierL, HabibN, SheaJM, HartCE, et al. (2010) Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals. Cell 143: 1084–1096.

26. FulcoM, SchiltzRL, IezziS, KingMT, ZhaoP, et al. (2003) Sir2 regulates skeletal muscle differentiation as a potential sensor of the redox state. Mol Cell 12: 51–62.

27. RodgersJT, LerinC, HaasW, GygiSP, SpiegelmanBM, et al. (2005) Nutrient control of glucose homeostasis through a complex of PGC-1alpha and SIRT1. Nature 434: 113–118.

28. WellenKE, HatzivassiliouG, SachdevaUM, BuiTV, CrossJR, et al. (2009) ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Science 324: 1076–1080.

29. DoyleK, FitzpatrickFA (2010) Redox signaling, alkylation (carbonylation) of conserved cysteines inactivates class I histone deacetylases 1, 2, and 3 and antagonizes their transcriptional repressor function. J Biol Chem 285: 17417–17424.

30. WaldeckerM, KautenburgerT, DaumannH, BuschC, SchrenkD (2008) Inhibition of histone-deacetylase activity by short-chain fatty acids and some polyphenol metabolites formed in the colon. J Nutr Biochem 19: 587–593.

31. RichardsEJ (2006) Inherited epigenetic variation–revisiting soft inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 7: 395–401.

32. YamaguchiY, NaritaT, InukaiN, WadaT, HandaH (2001) SPT genes: key players in the regulation of transcription, chromatin structure and other cellular processes. J Biochem 129: 185–191.

33. LiuJ, HeY, AmasinoR, ChenX (2004) siRNAs targeting an intronic transposon in the regulation of natural flowering behavior in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 18: 2873–2878.

34. KumariD, UsdinK (2009) Chromatin remodeling in the noncoding repeat expansion diseases. J Biol Chem 284: 7413–7417.

35. ToddPK, OhSY, KransA, PandeyUB, Di ProsperoNA, et al. (2010) Histone deacetylases suppress CGG repeat-induced neurodegeneration via transcriptional silencing in models of fragile X tremor ataxia syndrome. PLoS Genet 6: e1001240 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001240.

36. O'DonnellWT, WarrenST (2002) A decade of molecular studies of fragile X syndrome. Annu Rev Neurosci 25: 315–338.

37. DionMF, KaplanT, KimM, BuratowskiS, FriedmanN, et al. (2007) Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science 315: 1405–1408.

38. YvertG, BremRB, WhittleJ, AkeyJM, FossE, et al. (2003) Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet 35: 57–64.

39. VeyrierasJB, KudaravalliS, KimSY, DermitzakisET, GiladY, et al. (2008) High-resolution mapping of expression-QTLs yields insight into human gene regulation. PLoS Genet 4: e1000214 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000214.

40. LiuCL, KaplanT, KimM, BuratowskiS, SchreiberSL, et al. (2005) Single-nucleosome mapping of histone modifications in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 3: e328 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030328.

41. WuJ, SukaN, CarlsonM, GrunsteinM (2001) TUP1 utilizes histone H3/H2B-specific HDA1 deacetylase to repress gene activity in yeast. Mol Cell 7: 117–126.

42. WatsonAD, EdmondsonDG, BoneJR, MukaiY, YuY, et al. (2000) Ssn6-Tup1 interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev 14: 2737–2744.

43. KeleherCA, ReddMJ, SchultzJ, CarlsonM, JohnsonAD (1992) Ssn6-Tup1 is a general repressor of transcription in yeast. Cell 68: 709–719.

44. ZillOA, RineJ (2008) Interspecies variation reveals a conserved repressor of alpha-specific genes in Saccharomyces yeasts. Genes Dev 22: 1704–1716.

45. GammieAE, StewartBG, ScottCF, RoseMD (1999) The two forms of karyogamy transcription factor Kar4p are regulated by differential initiation of transcription, translation, and protein turnover. Mol Cell Biol 19: 817–825.

46. UnnikrishnanA, GafkenPR, TsukiyamaT (2010) Dynamic changes in histone acetylation regulate origins of DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17: 430–437.

47. SmithEN, KruglyakL (2008) Gene-Environment Interaction in Yeast Gene Expression. PLoS Biol 6: e83 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060083.

48. KuoMH, BrownellJE, SobelRE, RanalliTA, CookRG, et al. (1996) Transcription-linked acetylation by Gcn5p of histones H3 and H4 at specific lysines. Nature 383: 269–272.

49. GrantPA, EberharterA, JohnS, CookRG, TurnerBM, et al. (1999) Expanded lysine acetylation specificity of Gcn5 in native complexes. J Biol Chem 274: 5895–5900.

50. HoweL, AustonD, GrantP, JohnS, CookRG, et al. (2001) Histone H3 specific acetyltransferases are essential for cell cycle progression. Genes Dev 15: 3144–3154.

51. Angus-HillML, DutnallRN, TafrovST, SternglanzR, RamakrishnanV (1999) Crystal structure of the histone acetyltransferase Hpa2: A tetrameric member of the Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase superfamily. J Mol Biol 294: 1311–1325.

52. CarmenAA, GriffinPR, CalaycayJR, RundlettSE, SukaY, et al. (1999) Yeast HOS3 forms a novel trichostatin A-insensitive homodimer with intrinsic histone deacetylase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 12356–12361.

53. RundlettSE, CarmenAA, KobayashiR, BavykinS, TurnerBM, et al. (1996) HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 14503–14508.

54. ImaiS, ArmstrongCM, KaeberleinM, GuarenteL (2000) Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature 403: 795–800.

55. JaroszDF, LindquistS (2010) Hsp90 and environmental stress transform the adaptive value of natural genetic variation. Science 330: 1820–1824.

56. StoreyJD, TibshiraniR (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9440–9445.

57. ServinB, StephensM (2007) Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate regions and quantitative traits. PLoS Genet 3: e114 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030114.