#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Normal DNA Methylation Dynamics in DICER1-Deficient Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells


Reduced DNA methylation has been reported in DICER1-deficient mouse ES cells. Reductions seen at pericentric satellite repeats have suggested that siRNAs are required for the proper assembly of heterochromatin. More recent studies have postulated that the reduced methylation is an indirect effect: the loss of Mir290 cluster miRNAs leads to upregulation of the transcriptional repressor RBL2 that targets the downregulation of DNA methyltransferase (Dnmt) genes. However, the observations have been inconsistent. We surmised that the inconsistency could be related to cell line “age,” given that DNA methylation is lost progressively with passage in DNMT-deficient ES cells. We therefore subjected Dicer1−/− ES cells to two experimental regimes to rigorously test the level of functional DNMT activity. First, we cultured them for a prolonged period. If DNMT activity was reduced, further losses of methylation would occur. Second, we measured their DNMT activity in a rebound DNA methylation assay: DNA methylation was stripped from Cre/loxP conditionally mutant Dicer1 ES cells using a shRNA targeting Dnmt1 mRNA. Cre expression then converted these cells to Dicer1−/−, allowing for DNMT1 recovery and forcing the cells to remethylate in the absence of RNAi. In both cases, we found functional DNMT activity to be normal. Finally, we also show that the level of RBL2 protein is not at excess levels in Dicer1−/− ES cells as has been assumed. These studies reveal that reduced functional DNMT activity is not a salient feature of DICER1-deficient ES cells. We suggest that the reduced DNA methylation sometimes observed in these cells could be due to stochastic alterations in DNA methylation patterns that could offer growth or survival advantages in culture, or to the dysregulation of pathways acting in opposition to the DNMT pathway.


Vyšlo v časopise: Normal DNA Methylation Dynamics in DICER1-Deficient Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells. PLoS Genet 8(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002919
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002919

Souhrn

Reduced DNA methylation has been reported in DICER1-deficient mouse ES cells. Reductions seen at pericentric satellite repeats have suggested that siRNAs are required for the proper assembly of heterochromatin. More recent studies have postulated that the reduced methylation is an indirect effect: the loss of Mir290 cluster miRNAs leads to upregulation of the transcriptional repressor RBL2 that targets the downregulation of DNA methyltransferase (Dnmt) genes. However, the observations have been inconsistent. We surmised that the inconsistency could be related to cell line “age,” given that DNA methylation is lost progressively with passage in DNMT-deficient ES cells. We therefore subjected Dicer1−/− ES cells to two experimental regimes to rigorously test the level of functional DNMT activity. First, we cultured them for a prolonged period. If DNMT activity was reduced, further losses of methylation would occur. Second, we measured their DNMT activity in a rebound DNA methylation assay: DNA methylation was stripped from Cre/loxP conditionally mutant Dicer1 ES cells using a shRNA targeting Dnmt1 mRNA. Cre expression then converted these cells to Dicer1−/−, allowing for DNMT1 recovery and forcing the cells to remethylate in the absence of RNAi. In both cases, we found functional DNMT activity to be normal. Finally, we also show that the level of RBL2 protein is not at excess levels in Dicer1−/− ES cells as has been assumed. These studies reveal that reduced functional DNMT activity is not a salient feature of DICER1-deficient ES cells. We suggest that the reduced DNA methylation sometimes observed in these cells could be due to stochastic alterations in DNA methylation patterns that could offer growth or survival advantages in culture, or to the dysregulation of pathways acting in opposition to the DNMT pathway.


Zdroje

1. EhrlichM, Gama-SosaMA, HuangLH, MidgettRM, KuoKC, et al. (1982) Amount and distribution of 5-methylcytosine in human DNA from different types of tissues of cells. Nucleic Acids Res 10: 2709–2721.

2. PetersAH, O'CarrollD, ScherthanH, MechtlerK, SauerS, et al. (2001) Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107: 323–337.

3. LehnertzB, UedaY, DerijckAA, BraunschweigU, Perez-BurgosL, et al. (2003) Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr Biol 13: 1192–1200.

4. YoderJA, WalshCP, BestorTH (1997) Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet 13: 335–340.

5. WalshCP, ChailletJR, BestorTH (1998) Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation. Nat Genet 20: 116–117.

6. JonesPA (2012) Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet doi:10.1038/nrg3230.

7. ArnaudP (2010) Genomic imprinting in germ cells: imprints are under control. Reproduction 140: 411–423.

8. BlewittME, GendrelAV, PangZ, SparrowDB, WhitelawN, et al. (2008) SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation. Nat Genet 40: 663–669.

9. KanellopoulouC, MuljoSA, KungAL, GanesanS, DrapkinR, et al. (2005) Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev 19: 489–501.

10. GrewalSI (2010) RNAi-dependent formation of heterochromatin and its diverse functions. Curr Opin Genet Dev 20: 134–141.

11. LejeuneE, AllshireRC (2011) Common ground: small RNA programming and chromatin modifications. Curr Opin Cell Biol 23: 258–265.

12. BenettiR, GonzaloS, JacoI, MunozP, GonzalezS, et al. (2008) A mammalian microRNA cluster controls DNA methylation and telomere recombination via Rbl2-dependent regulation of DNA methyltransferases. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15: 268–279.

13. MurchisonEP, PartridgeJF, TamOH, CheloufiS, HannonGJ (2005) Characterization of Dicer-deficient murine embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 12135–12140.

14. CalabreseJM, SeilaAC, YeoGW, SharpPA (2007) RNA sequence analysis defines Dicer's role in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 18097–18102.

15. SinkkonenL, HugenschmidtT, BerningerP, GaidatzisD, MohnF, et al. (2008) MicroRNAs control de novo DNA methylation through regulation of transcriptional repressors in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15: 259–267.

16. NesterovaTB, PopovaBC, CobbBS, NortonS, SennerCE, et al. (2008) Dicer regulates Xist promoter methylation in ES cells indirectly through transcriptional control of Dnmt3a. Epigenetics Chromatin 1: 2.

17. MatzkeM, KannoT, HuettelB, DaxingerL, MatzkeAJ (2007) Targets of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10: 512–519.

18. MattiskeDM, HanL, MannJR (2009) Meiotic maturation failure induced by DICER1 deficiency is derived from primary oocyte ooplasm. Reproduction 137: 625–632.

19. PfeiferGP, SteigerwaldSD, HansenRS, GartlerSM, RiggsAD (1990) Polymerase chain reaction-aided genomic sequencing of an X chromosome-linked CpG island: methylation patterns suggest clonal inheritance, CpG site autonomy, and an explanation of activity state stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 8252–8256.

20. LiangG, ChanMF, TomigaharaY, TsaiYC, GonzalesFA, et al. (2002) Cooperativity between DNA methyltransferases in the maintenance methylation of repetitive elements. Mol Cell Biol 22: 480–491.

21. ChenT, UedaY, DodgeJE, WangZ, LiE (2003) Establishment and maintenance of genomic methylation patterns in mouse embryonic stem cells by Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5594–5605.

22. LairdCD, PleasantND, ClarkAD, SneedenJL, HassanKM, et al. (2004) Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 204–209.

23. SuetakeI, ShinozakiF, MiyagawaJ, TakeshimaH, TajimaS (2004) DNMT3L stimulates the DNA methylation activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b through a direct interaction. J Biol Chem 279: 27816–27823.

24. ChenZX, RiggsAD (2005) Maintenance and regulation of DNA methylation patterns in mammals. Biochem Cell Biol 83: 438–448.

25. ChenZX, MannJR, HsiehCL, RiggsAD, ChédinF (2005) Physical and functional interactions between the human DNMT3L protein and members of the de novo methyltransferase family. J Cell Biochem 95: 902–917.

26. TsumuraA, HayakawaT, KumakiY, TakebayashiS, SakaueM, et al. (2006) Maintenance of self-renewal ability of mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Genes Cells 11: 805–814.

27. OoiSK, WolfD, HartungO, AgarwalS, DaleyGQ, et al. (2010) Dynamic instability of genomic methylation patterns in pluripotent stem cells. Epigenetics Chromatin 3: 17.

28. FrommerM, McDonaldLE, MillarDS, CollisCM, WattF, et al. (1992) A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 1827–1831.

29. EhrichM, NelsonMR, StanssensP, ZabeauM, LiloglouT, et al. (2005) Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 15785–15790.

30. FouseSD, ShenY, PellegriniM, ColeS, MeissnerA, et al. (2008) Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation. Cell Stem Cell 2: 160–169.

31. SzabóP, MannJR (1994) Expression and methylation of imprinted genes during in vitro differentiation of mouse parthenogenetic and androgenetic embryonic stem cell lines. Development 120: 1651–1660.

32. TuckerKL, BeardC, DausmannJ, Jackson-GrusbyL, LairdPW, et al. (1996) Germ-line passage is required for establishment of methylation and expression patterns of imprinted but not of nonimprinted genes. Genes Dev 10: 1008–1020.

33. TangSH, SilvaFJ, TsarkWM, MannJR (2002) A Cre/loxP-deleter transgenic line in mouse strain 129S1/SvImJ. Genesis 32: 199–202.

34. ZhengGD, HidakaK, MorisakiT (2005) Stable and uniform gene suppression by site-specific integration of siRNA expression cassette in murine embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 23: 1028–1034.

35. VenturaA, MeissnerA, DillonCP, McManusM, SharpPA, et al. (2004) Cre-lox-regulated conditional RNA interference from transgenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 10380–10385.

36. GantierMP, McCoyCE, RusinovaI, SaulepD, WangD, et al. (2011) Analysis of microRNA turnover in mammalian cells following Dicer1 ablation. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 5692–5703.

37. WernigM, MeissnerA, ForemanR, BrambrinkT, KuM, et al. (2007) In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 448: 318–324.

38. OkanoM, BellDW, HaberDA, LiE (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99: 247–257.

39. YamadaT, FischleW, SugiyamaT, AllisCD, GrewalSI (2005) The nucleation and maintenance of heterochromatin by a histone deacetylase in fission yeast. Mol Cell 20: 173–185.

40. ProbstAV, OkamotoI, CasanovaM, El MarjouF, Le BacconP, AlmouzniG (2010) A strand-specific burst in transcription of pericentric satellites is required for chromocenter formation and early mouse development. Dev Cell 19: 625–638.

41. FukagawaT, NogamiM, YoshikawaM, IkenoM, OkazakiT, et al. (2004) Dicer is essential for formation of the heterochromatin structure in vertebrate cells. Nat Cell Biol 6: 784–791.

42. GiraultI, TozluS, LidereauR, BiècheI (2003) Expression analysis of DNA methyltransferases 1, 3A, and 3B in sporadic breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 9: 4415–4422.

43. AraiE, KanaiY, UshijimaS, FujimotoH, MukaiK, HirohashiS (2006) Regional DNA hypermethylation and DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) 1 protein overexpression in both renal tumors and corresponding nontumorous renal tissues. Int J Cancer 119: 288–296.

44. RollJD, RivenbarkAG, JonesWD, ColemanWB (2008) DNMT3b overexpression contributes to a hypermethylator phenotype in human breast cancer cell lines. Mol Cancer 7: 15.

45. ZvetkovaI, ApedaileA, RamsahoyeB, MermoudJE, CromptonLA, et al. (2005) Global hypomethylation of the genome in XX embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 37: 1274–1279.

46. WangY, BaskervilleS, ShenoyA, BabiarzJE, BaehnerL, BlellochR (2008) Embryonic stem cell-specific microRNAs regulate the G1-S transition and promote rapid proliferation. Nat Genet 40: 1478–1483.

47. ChenZX, RiggsAD (2011) DNA methylation and demethylation in mammals. J Biol Chem 286: 18347–18353.

48. MannJR (2001) Deriving and propagating mouse embryonic stem cell lines for studying genomic imprinting. Methods Mol Biol 181: 21–39.

49. ArakiK, ImaizumiT, OkuyamaK, OikeY, YamamuraK (1997) Efficiency of recombination by Cre transient expression in embryonic stem cells: comparison of various promoters. J Biochem 122: 977–982.

50. SzabóPE, HanL, Hyo-JungJ, MannJR (2006) Mutagenesis in mice of nuclear hormone receptor binding sites in the Igf2/H19 imprinting control region. Cytogenet Genome Res 113: 238–246.

51. DengC, CapecchiMR (1992) Reexamination of gene targeting frequency as a function of the extent of homology between the targeting vector and the target locus. Mol Cell Biol 12: 3365–3371.

52. JinSG, MannJR (2005) Synthetic neomycin-kanamycin phosphotransferase, type II coding sequence for gene targeting in mammalian cells. Genesis 42: 207–209.

53. LefèvreC, MannJR (2008) RNA expression microarray analysis in mouse prospermatogonia: identification of candidate epigenetic modifiers. Dev Dyn 237: 1082–1089.

54. KalitsisP, FowlerKJ, EarleE, GriffithsB, HowmanE, et al. (2003) Partially functional Cenpa-GFP fusion protein causes increased chromosome missegregation and apoptosis during mouse embryogenesis. Chromosome Res 11: 345–357.

55. PertileMD, GrahamAN, ChooKH, KalitsisP (2009) Rapid evolution of mouse Y centromere repeat DNA belies recent sequence stability. Genome Res 19: 2202–2213.

56. WongNC, AshleyD, ChattertonZ, Parkinson-BatesM, NgHK, et al. (2012) A distinct DNA methylation signature defines pediatric pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Epigenetics 7: 535–541.

57. UrenAG, WongL, PakuschM, FowlerKJ, BurrowsFJ, et al. (2000) Survivin and the inner centromere protein INCENP show similar cell-cycle localization and gene knockout phenotype. Curr Biol 10: 1319–1328.

58. WongLH, SafferyR, AndersonMA, EarleE, QuachJM, et al. (2005) Analysis of mitotic and expression properties of human neocentromere-based transchromosomes in mice. J Biol Chem 280: 3954–3962.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2012 Číslo 9
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#