The Role of Autophagy in Genome Stability through Suppression of Abnormal Mitosis under Starvation
The coordination of subcellular processes during adaptation to environmental change is a key feature of biological systems. Starvation of essential nutrients slows cell cycling and ultimately causes G1 arrest, and nitrogen starvation delays G2/M progression. Here, we show that budding yeast cells can be efficiently returned to the G1 phase under starvation conditions in an autophagy-dependent manner. Starvation attenuates TORC1 activity, causing a G2/M delay in a Swe1-dependent checkpoint mechanism, and starvation-induced autophagy assists in the recovery from a G2/M delay by supplying amino acids required for cell growth. Persistent delay of the cell cycle by a deficiency in autophagy causes aberrant nuclear division without sufficient cell growth, leading to an increased frequency in aneuploidy after refeeding the nitrogen source. Our data establish the role of autophagy in genome stability through modulation of cell division under conditions that repress cell growth.
Vyšlo v časopise:
The Role of Autophagy in Genome Stability through Suppression of Abnormal Mitosis under Starvation. PLoS Genet 9(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003245
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003245
Souhrn
The coordination of subcellular processes during adaptation to environmental change is a key feature of biological systems. Starvation of essential nutrients slows cell cycling and ultimately causes G1 arrest, and nitrogen starvation delays G2/M progression. Here, we show that budding yeast cells can be efficiently returned to the G1 phase under starvation conditions in an autophagy-dependent manner. Starvation attenuates TORC1 activity, causing a G2/M delay in a Swe1-dependent checkpoint mechanism, and starvation-induced autophagy assists in the recovery from a G2/M delay by supplying amino acids required for cell growth. Persistent delay of the cell cycle by a deficiency in autophagy causes aberrant nuclear division without sufficient cell growth, leading to an increased frequency in aneuploidy after refeeding the nitrogen source. Our data establish the role of autophagy in genome stability through modulation of cell division under conditions that repress cell growth.
Zdroje
1. TsukadaM, OhsumiY (1993) Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 333: 169–174.
2. ThummM, EgnerR, KochB, SchlumpbergerM, StraubM, et al. (1994) Isolation of autophagocytosis mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 349: 275–280.
3. NakatogawaH, SuzukiK, KamadaY, OhsumiY (2009) Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 458–467.
4. MizushimaN (2007) Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev 21: 2861–2873.
5. OkuM, SakaiY (2008) Pexophagy in Pichia pastoris. Methods Enzymol 451: 217–228.
6. KraftC, DeplazesA, SohrmannM, PeterM (2008) Mature ribosomes are selectively degraded upon starvation by an autophagy pathway requiring the Ubp3p/Bre5p ubiquitin protease. Nat Cell Biol 10: 602–610.
7. MizushimaN (2005) The pleiotropic role of autophagy: from protein metabolism to bactericide. Cell Death Differ 12 Suppl 2: 1535–1541.
8. KomatsuM, WaguriS, UenoT, IwataJ, MurataS, et al. (2005) Impairment of starvation-induced and constitutive autophagy in Atg7-deficient mice. J Cell Biol 169: 425–434.
9. FuruyaT, KimM, LipinskiM, LiJ, KimD, et al. (2010) Negative regulation of Vps34 by Cdk mediated phosphorylation. Mol Cell 38: 500–511.
10. EskelinenEL, PrescottAR, CooperJ, BrachmannSM, WangL, et al. (2002) Inhibition of autophagy in mitotic animal cells. Traffic 3: 878–893.
11. TsukamotoS, KumaA, MurakamiM, KishiC, YamamotoA, et al. (2008) Autophagy is essential for preimplantation development of mouse embryos. Science 321: 117–120.
12. JacintoE, HallMN (2003) Tor signalling in bugs, brain and brawn. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 117–126.
13. LoewithR, JacintoE, WullschlegerS, LorbergA, CrespoJL, et al. (2002) Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol Cell 10: 457–468.
14. PowersT, WalterP (1999) Regulation of ribosome biogenesis by the rapamycin-sensitive TOR-signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10: 987–1000.
15. MartinDE, SoulardA, HallMN (2004) TOR regulates ribosomal protein gene expression via PKA and the Forkhead transcription factor FHL1. Cell 119: 969–979.
16. HonmaY, KitamuraA, ShiodaR, MaruyamaH, OzakiK, et al. (2006) TOR regulates late steps of ribosome maturation in the nucleoplasm via Nog1 in response to nutrients. EMBO J 25: 3832–3842.
17. KamadaY, YoshinoK, KondoC, KawamataT, OshiroN, et al. (2010) Tor directly controls the Atg1 kinase complex to regulate autophagy. Mol Cell Biol 30: 1049–1058.
18. WullschlegerS, LoewithR, HallMN (2006) TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell 124: 471–484.
19. BarbetNC, SchneiderU, HelliwellSB, StansfieldI, TuiteMF, et al. (1996) TOR controls translation initiation and early G1 progression in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 7: 25–42.
20. NakashimaA, MarukiY, ImamuraY, KondoC, KawamataT, et al. (2008) The yeast Tor signaling pathway is involved in G2/M transition via polo-kinase. PLoS ONE 3: e2223 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002223.
21. SmithEM, ProudCG (2008) cdc2-cyclin B regulates eEF2 kinase activity in a cell cycle- and amino acid-dependent manner. EMBO J 27: 1005–1016.
22. HartmuthS, PetersenJ (2009) Fission yeast Tor1 functions as part of TORC1 to control mitotic entry through the stress MAPK pathway following nutrient stress. J Cell Sci 122: 1737–1746.
23. WilkinsonMG, PinoTS, TournierS, BuckV, MartinH, et al. (1999) Sin1: an evolutionarily conserved component of the eukaryotic SAPK pathway. EMBO J 18: 4210–4221.
24. JohnstonGC, PringleJR, HartwellLH (1977) Coordination of growth with cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp Cell Res 105: 79–98.
25. BeckT, HallMN (1999) The TOR signalling pathway controls nuclear localization of nutrient-regulated transcription factors. Nature 402: 689–692.
26. CardenasME, CutlerNS, LorenzMC, Di ComoCJ, HeitmanJ (1999) The TOR signaling cascade regulates gene expression in response to nutrients. Genes Dev 13: 3271–3279.
27. OnoderaJ, OhsumiY (2005) Autophagy is required for maintenance of amino acid levels and protein synthesis under nitrogen starvation. J Biol Chem 280: 31582–31586.
28. YangZ, HuangJ, GengJ, NairU, KlionskyDJ (2006) Atg22 recycles amino acids to link the degradative and recycling functions of autophagy. Mol Biol Cell 17: 5094–5104.
29. CrespoJL, PowersT, FowlerB, HallMN (2002) The TOR-controlled transcription activators GLN3, RTG1, and RTG3 are regulated in response to intracellular levels of glutamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 6784–6789.
30. BonfilsG, JaquenoudM, BontronS, OstrowiczC, UngermannC, et al. (2012) Leucyl-tRNA synthetase controls TORC1 via the EGO complex. Mol Cell 46: 105–110.
31. HanJM, JeongSJ, ParkMC, KimG, KwonNH, et al. (2012) Leucyl-tRNA synthetase is an intracellular leucine sensor for the mTORC1-signaling pathway. Cell 149: 410–424.
32. McMillanJN, SiaRA, LewDJ (1998) A morphogenesis checkpoint monitors the actin cytoskeleton in yeast. J Cell Biol 142: 1487–1499.
33. BarralY, ParraM, BidlingmaierS, SnyderM (1999) Nim1-related kinases coordinate cell cycle progression with the organization of the peripheral cytoskeleton in yeast. Genes Dev 13: 176–187.
34. HarveySL, KelloggDR (2003) Conservation of mechanisms controlling entry into mitosis: budding yeast wee1 delays entry into mitosis and is required for cell size control. Curr Biol 13: 264–275.
35. TheesfeldCL, ZylaTR, BardesEG, LewDJ (2003) A monitor for bud emergence in the yeast morphogenesis checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell 14: 3280–3291.
36. SillerKH, DoeCQ (2009) Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat Cell Biol 11: 365–374.
37. SiaRA, BardesES, LewDJ (1998) Control of Swe1p degradation by the morphogenesis checkpoint. EMBO J 17: 6678–6688.
38. TakeshigeK, BabaM, TsuboiS, NodaT, OhsumiY (1992) Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction. J Cell Biol 119: 301–311.
39. ChanCS, BotsteinD (1993) Isolation and characterization of chromosome-gain and increase-in-ploidy mutants in yeast. Genetics 135: 677–691.
40. BurkeDJ, ChurchD (1991) Protein synthesis requirements for nuclear division, cytokinesis, and cell separation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 11: 3691–3698.
41. WatsonTG (1976) Amino-acid pool composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a function of growth rate and amino-acid nitrogen source. J Gen Microbiol 96: 263–268.
42. PiezKA, EagleH (1958) The free amino acid pool of cultured human cells. J Biol Chem 231: 533–545.
43. ShinCS, HuhWK (2011) Bidirectional regulation between TORC1 and autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy 7: 854–862.
44. FournierML, PaulsonA, PavelkaN, MosleyAL, GaudenzK, et al. (2010) Delayed correlation of mRNA and protein expression in rapamycin-treated cells and a role for Ggc1 in cellular sensitivity to rapamycin. Mol Cell Proteomics 9: 271–284.
45. KimDH, SarbassovDD, AliSM, KingJE, LatekRR, et al. (2002) mTOR interacts with raptor to form a nutrient-sensitive complex that signals to the cell growth machinery. Cell 110: 163–175.
46. ThoreenCC, KangSA, ChangJW, LiuQ, ZhangJ, et al. (2009) An ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor reveals rapamycin-resistant functions of mTORC1. J Biol Chem 284: 8023–8032.
47. PetersenJ, NurseP (2007) TOR signalling regulates mitotic commitment through the stress MAP kinase pathway and the Polo and Cdc2 kinases. Nat Cell Biol 9: 1263–1272.
48. HardwickJS, KuruvillaFG, TongJK, ShamjiAF, SchreiberSL (1999) Rapamycin-modulated transcription defines the subset of nutrient-sensitive signaling pathways directly controlled by the Tor proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 14866–14870.
49. CoxKH, KulkarniA, TateJJ, CooperTG (2004) Gln3 phosphorylation and intracellular localization in nutrient limitation and starvation differ from those generated by rapamycin inhibition of Tor1/2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 10270–10278.
50. NeklesaTK, DavisRW (2009) A genome-wide screen for regulators of TORC1 in response to amino acid starvation reveals a conserved Npr2/3 complex. PLoS Genet 5: e1000515 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000515.
51. LoewithR, HallMN (2011) Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics 189: 1177–1201.
52. BartholomewCR, WooSH, ChungYS, JonesC, HardyCF (2001) Cdc5 interacts with the Wee1 kinase in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 21: 4949–4959.
53. McMillanJN, LongtineMS, SiaRA, TheesfeldCL, BardesES, et al. (1999) The morphogenesis checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cell cycle control of Swe1p degradation by Hsl1p and Hsl7p. Mol Cell Biol 19: 6929–6939.
54. McNultyJJ, LewDJ (2005) Swe1p responds to cytoskeletal perturbation, not bud size, in S. cerevisiae. Curr Biol 15: 2190–2198.
55. MathewR, KongaraS, BeaudoinB, KarpCM, BrayK, et al. (2007) Autophagy suppresses tumor progression by limiting chromosomal instability. Genes Dev 21: 1367–1381.
56. AitaVM, LiangXH, MurtyVV, PincusDL, YuW, et al. (1999) Cloning and genomic organization of beclin 1, a candidate tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 17q21. Genomics 59: 59–65.
57. QuX, YuJ, BhagatG, FuruyaN, HibshooshH, et al. (2003) Promotion of tumorigenesis by heterozygous disruption of the beclin 1 autophagy gene. J Clin Invest 112: 1809–1820.
58. YueZ, JinS, YangC, LevineAJ, HeintzN (2003) Beclin 1, an autophagy gene essential for early embryonic development, is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15077–15082.
59. TakamuraA, KomatsuM, HaraT, SakamotoA, KishiC, et al. (2011) Autophagy-deficient mice develop multiple liver tumors. Genes Dev 25: 795–800.
60. Amberg DC, Burke DJ, Strathern JN, editors (2005) Methods In Yeast Genetics: COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY PRESS.
61. Sambrook J, Russell DW, editors (2001) Molecular Cloning: COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY PRESS.
62. SuzukiK, KirisakoT, KamadaY, MizushimaN, NodaT, et al. (2001) The pre-autophagosomal structure organized by concerted functions of APG genes is essential for autophagosome formation. EMBO J 20: 5971–5981.
63. Hood-DeGrenierJK, BoultonCN, LyoV (2007) Cytoplasmic Clb2 is required for timely inactivation of the mitotic inhibitor Swe1 and normal bud morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 51: 1–18.
64. Sokal RR, Rohlf J (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition: W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
65. ShintaniT, KlionskyDJ (2004) Cargo proteins facilitate the formation of transport vesicles in the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway. J Biol Chem 279: 29889–29894.
66. ShitamukaiA, HirataD, SonobeS, MiyakawaT (2004) Evidence for antagonistic regulation of cell growth by the calcineurin and high osmolarity glycerol pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 3651–3661.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 1
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Function and Regulation of , a Gene Implicated in Autism and Human Evolution
- Comprehensive Methylome Characterization of and at Single-Base Resolution
- Susceptibility Loci Associated with Specific and Shared Subtypes of Lymphoid Malignancies
- An Insertion in 5′ Flanking Region of Causes Blue Eggshell in the Chicken