Condensin II Subunit dCAP-D3 Restricts Retrotransposon Mobilization in Somatic Cells

English version České info

Retrotransposon sequences are positioned throughout the genome of almost every eukaryote that has been sequenced. As mobilization of these elements can have detrimental effects on the transcriptional regulation and stability of an organism's genome, most organisms have evolved mechanisms to repress their movement. Here, we identify a novel role for the Drosophila melanogaster Condensin II subunit, dCAP-D3 in preventing the mobilization of retrotransposons located in somatic cell euchromatin. dCAP-D3 regulates transcription of euchromatic gene clusters which contain or are proximal to retrotransposon sequence. ChIP experiments demonstrate that dCAP-D3 binds to these loci and is important for maintaining a repressed chromatin structure within the boundaries of the retrotransposon and for repressing retrotransposon transcription. We show that dCAP-D3 prevents accumulation of double stranded DNA breaks within retrotransposon sequence, and decreased dCAP-D3 levels leads to a precise loss of retrotransposon sequence at some dCAP-D3 regulated gene clusters and a gain of sequence elsewhere in the genome. Homologous chromosomes exhibit high levels of pairing in Drosophila somatic cells, and our FISH analyses demonstrate that retrotransposon-containing euchromatic loci are regions which are actually less paired than euchromatic regions devoid of retrotransposon sequences. Decreased dCAP-D3 expression increases pairing of homologous retrotransposon-containing loci in tissue culture cells. We propose that the combined effects of dCAP-D3 deficiency on double strand break levels, chromatin structure, transcription and pairing at retrotransposon-containing loci may lead to 1) higher levels of homologous recombination between repeats flanking retrotransposons in dCAP-D3 deficient cells and 2) increased retrotransposition. These findings identify a novel role for the anti-pairing activities of dCAP-D3/Condensin II and uncover a new way in which dCAP-D3/Condensin II influences local chromatin structure to help maintain genome stability.

Vyšlo v časopise: Condensin II Subunit dCAP-D3 Restricts Retrotransposon Mobilization in Somatic Cells. PLoS Genet 9(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003879
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003879

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. GerlichD, HirotaT, KochB, PetersJM, EllenbergJ (2006) Condensin I stabilizes chromosomes mechanically through a dynamic interaction in live cells. Curr Biol 16 : 333–344.

2. OnoT, LosadaA, HiranoM, MyersMP, NeuwaldAF, et al. (2003) Differential contributions of condensin I and condensin II to mitotic chromosome architecture in vertebrate cells. Cell 115 : 109–121.

3. SteffensenS, CoelhoPA, CobbeN, VassS, CostaM, et al. (2001) A role for Drosophila SMC4 in the resolution of sister chromatids in mitosis. Curr Biol 11 : 295–307.

4. HirotaT, GerlichD, KochB, EllenbergJ, PetersJM (2004) Distinct functions of condensin I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly. J Cell Sci 117 : 6435–6445.

5. Bazett-JonesDP, KimuraK, HiranoT (2002) Efficient supercoiling of DNA by a single condensin complex as revealed by electron spectroscopic imaging. Mol Cell 9 : 1183–1190.

6. StrickTR, KawaguchiT, HiranoT (2004) Real-time detection of single-molecule DNA compaction by condensin I. Curr Biol 14 : 874–880.

7. LongworthMS, HerrA, JiJY, DysonNJ (2008) RBF1 promotes chromatin condensation through a conserved interaction with the Condensin II protein dCAP-D3. Genes Dev 22 : 1011–1024.

8. LongworthMS, WalkerJA, AnderssenE, MoonNS, GladdenA, et al. (2012) A shared role for RBF1 and dCAP-D3 in the regulation of transcription with consequences for innate immunity. PLoS Genet 8: e1002618.

9. BusterDW, DanielSG, NguyenHQ, WindlerSL, SkwarekLC, et al. (2013) SCFSlimb ubiquitin ligase suppresses condensin II-mediated nuclear reorganization by degrading Cap-H2. J Cell Biol 201 : 49–63.

10. ShintomiK, HiranoT (2011) The relative ratio of condensin I to II determines chromosome shapes. Genes Dev 25 : 1464–1469.

11. OnoT, YamashitaD, HiranoT (2013) Condensin II initiates sister chromatid resolution during S phase. J Cell Biol 200 : 429–441.

12. XuY, LeungCG, LeeDC, KennedyBK, CrispinoJD (2006) MTB, the murine homolog of condensin II subunit CAP-G2, represses transcription and promotes erythroid cell differentiation. Leukemia 20 : 1261–1269.

13. SakamotoT, InuiYT, UraguchiS, YoshizumiT, MatsunagaS, et al. (2011) Condensin II alleviates DNA damage and is essential for tolerance of boron overload stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23 : 3533–3546.

14. BauerCR, HartlTA, BoscoG (2012) Condensin II promotes the formation of chromosome territories by inducing axial compaction of polyploid interphase chromosomes. PLoS Genet 8: e1002873.

15. JoyceEF, WilliamsBR, XieT, WuCT (2012) Identification of genes that promote or antagonize somatic homolog pairing using a high-throughput FISH-based screen. PLoS Genet 8: e1002667.

16. HartlTA, SmithHF, BoscoG (2008) Chromosome alignment and transvection are antagonized by condensin II. Science 322 : 1384–1387.

17. BatemanJR, LarschanE, D'SouzaR, MarshallLS, DempseyKE, et al. (2012) A genome-wide screen identifies genes that affect somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda) 2 : 731–740.

18. FinneganDJ (1989) Eukaryotic transposable elements and genome evolution. Trends Genet 5 : 103–107.

19. McDonaldJF (1993) Evolution and consequences of transposable elements. Curr Opin Genet Dev 3 : 855–864.

20. CordauxR, BatzerMA (2009) The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat Rev Genet 10 : 691–703.

21. TreangenTJ, AbrahamAL, TouchonM, RochaEP (2009) Genesis, effects and fates of repeats in prokaryotic genomes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33 : 539–571.

22. HedgesDJ, DeiningerPL (2007) Inviting instability: Transposable elements, double-strand breaks, and the maintenance of genome integrity. Mutat Res 616 : 46–59.

23. HoangML, TanFJ, LaiDC, CelnikerSE, HoskinsRA, et al. (2010) Competitive repair by naturally dispersed repetitive DNA during non-allelic homologous recombination. PLoS Genet 6: e1001228.

24. Perez-GonzalezCE, BurkeWD, EickbushTH (2003) R1 and R2 retrotransposition and deletion in the rDNA loci on the X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 165 : 675–685.

25. KazazianHHJr (2004) Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science 303 : 1626–1632.

26. GasiorSL, WakemanTP, XuB, DeiningerPL (2006) The human LINE-1 retrotransposon creates DNA double-strand breaks. J Mol Biol 357 : 1383–1393.

27. LanderES, LintonLM, BirrenB, NusbaumC, ZodyMC, et al. (2001) Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409 : 860–921.

28. KonkelMK, BatzerMA (2010) A mobile threat to genome stability: The impact of non-LTR retrotransposons upon the human genome. Semin Cancer Biol 20 : 211–221.

29. LeeE, IskowR, YangL, GokcumenO, HaseleyP, et al. (2012) Landscape of somatic retrotransposition in human cancers. Science 337 : 967–971.

30. van de LagemaatLN, GagnierL, MedstrandP, MagerDL (2005) Genomic deletions and precise removal of transposable elements mediated by short identical DNA segments in primates. Genome Res 15 : 1243–1249.

31. PrestonCR, EngelsW, FloresC (2002) Efficient repair of DNA breaks in Drosophila: evidence for single-strand annealing and competition with other repair pathways. Genetics 161 : 711–720.

32. BelancioVP, Roy-EngelAM, DeiningerPL (2010) All y'all need to know 'bout retroelements in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 20 : 200–210.

33. BrenneckeJ, AravinAA, StarkA, DusM, KellisM, et al. (2007) Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila. Cell 128 : 1089–1103.

34. MaloneCD, BrenneckeJ, DusM, StarkA, McCombieWR, et al. (2009) Specialized piRNA pathways act in germline and somatic tissues of the Drosophila ovary. Cell 137 : 522–535.

35. ChungWJ, OkamuraK, MartinR, LaiEC (2008) Endogenous RNA interference provides a somatic defense against Drosophila transposons. Curr Biol 18 : 795–802.

36. KhuranaJS, TheurkaufW (2010) piRNAs, transposon silencing, and Drosophila germline development. J Cell Biol 191 : 905–913.

37. SaitoK, SiomiMC (2010) Small RNA-mediated quiescence of transposable elements in animals. Dev Cell 19 : 687–697.

38. SentmanatMF, ElginSC (2012) Ectopic assembly of heterochromatin in Drosophila melanogaster triggered by transposable elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109 : 14104–14109.

39. AllshireRC, KarpenGH (2008) Epigenetic regulation of centromeric chromatin: old dogs, new tricks? Nat Rev Genet 9 : 923–937.

40. SienskiG, DonertasD, BrenneckeJ (2012) Transcriptional silencing of transposons by Piwi and maelstrom and its impact on chromatin state and gene expression. Cell 151 : 964–980.

41. Le ThomasA, RogersAK, WebsterA, MarinovGK, LiaoSE, et al. (2013) Piwi induces piRNA-guided transcriptional silencing and establishment of a repressive chromatin state. Genes Dev 27 : 390–399.

42. CzechB, MaloneCD, ZhouR, StarkA, SchlingeheydeC, et al. (2008) An endogenous small interfering RNA pathway in Drosophila. Nature 453 : 798–802.

43. GhildiyalM, SeitzH, HorwichMD, LiC, DuT, et al. (2008) Endogenous siRNAs derived from transposons and mRNAs in Drosophila somatic cells. Science 320 : 1077–1081.

44. KawamuraY, SaitoK, KinT, OnoY, AsaiK, et al. (2008) Drosophila endogenous small RNAs bind to Argonaute 2 in somatic cells. Nature 453 : 793–797.

45. OkamuraK, ChungWJ, RubyJG, GuoH, BartelDP, et al. (2008) The Drosophila hairpin RNA pathway generates endogenous short interfering RNAs. Nature 453 : 803–806.

46. CabotEL, DoshiP, WuML, WuCI (1993) Population genetics of tandem repeats in centromeric heterochromatin: unequal crossing over and chromosomal divergence at the Responder locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 135 : 477–487.

47. SinnottP, CollierS, CostiganC, DyerPA, HarrisR, et al. (1990) Genesis by meiotic unequal crossover of a de novo deletion that contributes to steroid 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87 : 2107–2111.

48. MadiganJP, ChotkowskiHL, GlaserRL (2002) DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res 30 : 3698–3705.

49. KruhlakMJ, CelesteA, NussenzweigA (2006) Spatio-temporal dynamics of chromatin containing DNA breaks. Cell Cycle 5 : 1910–1912.

50. DownsJA, AllardS, Jobin-RobitailleO, JavaheriA, AugerA, et al. (2004) Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 16 : 979–990.

51. ZivY, BielopolskiD, GalantyY, LukasC, TayaY, et al. (2006) Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM -⁠ and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat Cell Biol 8 : 870–876.

52. XieM, HongC, ZhangB, LowdonRF, XingX, et al. (2013) DNA hypomethylation within specific transposable element families associates with tissue-specific enhancer landscape. Nat Genet 45 : 836–841.

53. RongYS, GolicKG (2003) The homologous chromosome is an effective template for the repair of mitotic DNA double-strand breaks in Drosophila. Genetics 165 : 1831–1842.

54. TsaiCJ, MetsDG, AlbrechtMR, NixP, ChanA, et al. (2008) Meiotic crossover number and distribution are regulated by a dosage compensation protein that resembles a condensin subunit. Genes Dev 22 : 194–211.

55. HartlTA, SweeneySJ, KneplerPJ, BoscoG (2008) Condensin II resolves chromosomal associations to enable anaphase I segregation in Drosophila male meiosis. PLoS Genet 4: e1000228.

56. SmithHF, RobertsMA, NguyenHQ, PetersonM, HartlTA, et al. (2013) Maintenance of Interphase Chromosome Compaction and Homolog Pairing in Drosophila Is Regulated by the Condensin Cap-H2 and Its Partner Mrg15. Genetics 195 : 127–46 127–46. doi: 10.1534/genetics

57. HerzogS, Nagarkar JaiswalS, UrbanE, RiemerA, FischerS, et al. (2013) Functional dissection of the Drosophila melanogaster condensin subunit Cap-G reveals its exclusive association with condensin I. PLoS Genet 9: e1003463.

58. KassisJA (2002) Pairing-sensitive silencing, polycomb group response elements, and transposon homing in Drosophila. Adv Genet 46 : 421–438.

59. FloydSR, PacoldME, HuangQ, ClarkeSM, LamFC, et al. (2013) The bromodomain protein Brd4 insulates chromatin from DNA damage signalling. Nature 498 : 246–250.

60. TanakaA, TanizawaH, SriswasdiS, IwasakiO, ChatterjeeAG, et al. (2012) Epigenetic regulation of condensin-mediated genome organization during the cell cycle and upon DNA damage through histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation. Mol Cell 48 : 532–546.

61. SamoshkinA, DulevS, LoukinovD, RosenfeldJA, StrunnikovAV (2012) Condensin dysfunction in human cells induces nonrandom chromosomal breaks in anaphase, with distinct patterns for both unique and repeated genomic regions. Chromosoma 121 : 191–199.

62. KoemanJM, RussellRC, TanMH, PetilloD, WestphalM, et al. (2008) Somatic pairing of chromosome 19 in renal oncocytoma is associated with deregulated EGLN2-mediated [corrected] oxygen-sensing response. PLoS Genet 4: e1000176.

63. AtkinNB, JacksonZ (1996) Evidence for somatic pairing of chromosome 7 and 10 homologs in a follicular lymphoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 89 : 129–131.

64. O'ConnorCM, MurphyEA (2012) A myeloid progenitor cell line capable of supporting human cytomegalovirus latency and reactivation, resulting in infectious progeny. J Virol 86 : 9854–9865.

65. GrimaudC, BantigniesF, Pal-BhadraM, GhanaP, BhadraU, et al. (2006) RNAi components are required for nuclear clustering of Polycomb group response elements. Cell 124 : 957–971.