The Insulator Homie Promotes Expression and Protects the Adjacent Gene from Repression by Polycomb Spreading

English version České info

Insulators can block the action of enhancers on promoters and the spreading of repressive chromatin, as well as facilitating specific enhancer-promoter interactions. However, recent studies have called into question whether the activities ascribed to insulators in model transgene assays actually reflect their functions in the genome. The Drosophila even skipped (eve) gene is a Polycomb (Pc) domain with a Pc-group response element (PRE) at one end, flanked by an insulator, an arrangement also seen in other genes. Here, we show that this insulator has three major functions. It blocks the spreading of the eve Pc domain, preventing repression of the adjacent gene, TER94. It prevents activation of TER94 by eve regulatory DNA. It also facilitates normal eve expression. When Homie is deleted in the context of a large transgene that mimics both eve and TER94 regulation, TER94 is repressed. This repression depends on the eve PRE. Ubiquitous TER94 expression is “replaced” by expression in an eve pattern when Homie is deleted, and this effect is reversed when the PRE is also removed. Repression of TER94 is attributable to spreading of the eve Pc domain into the TER94 locus, accompanied by an increase in histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 27. Other PREs can functionally replace the eve PRE, and other insulators can block PRE-dependent repression in this context. The full activity of the eve promoter is also dependent on Homie, and other insulators can promote normal eve enhancer-promoter communication. Our data suggest that this is not due to preventing promoter competition, but is likely the result of the insulator organizing a chromosomal conformation favorable to normal enhancer-promoter interactions. Thus, insulator activities in a native context include enhancer blocking and enhancer-promoter facilitation, as well as preventing the spread of repressive chromatin.

Vyšlo v časopise: The Insulator Homie Promotes Expression and Protects the Adjacent Gene from Repression by Polycomb Spreading. PLoS Genet 9(10): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003883
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003883

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. DuncanIW (2002) Transvection effects in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet 36: 521–556.

2. KennisonJA, SouthworthJW (2002) Transvection in Drosophila. Adv Genet 46: 399–420.

3. PirrottaV (1999) Transvection and chromosomal trans-interaction effects. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1424: M1–8.

4. WilliamsA, SpilianakisCG, FlavellRA (2010) Interchromosomal association and gene regulation in trans. Trends Genet 26: 188–197.

5. SchuettengruberB, CavalliG (2009) Recruitment of polycomb group complexes and their role in the dynamic regulation of cell fate choice. Development 136: 3531–3542.

6. SchwartzYB, PirrottaV (2008) Polycomb complexes and epigenetic states. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20: 266–273.

7. SimonJA, KingstonRE (2009) Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10: 697–708.

8. KassisJA, BrownJL (2013) Polycomb group response elements in Drosophila and vertebrates. Adv Genet 81: 83–118.

9. BusheyAM, DormanER, CorcesVG (2008) Chromatin insulators: regulatory mechanisms and epigenetic inheritance. Mol Cell 32: 1–9.

10. GhirlandoR, GilesK, GowherH, XiaoT, XuZ, et al. (2012) Chromatin domains, insulators, and the regulation of gene expression. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1819: 644–651.

11. RaabJR, KamakakaRT (2010) Insulators and promoters: closer than we think. Nature Reviews Genetics 11: 439–446.

12. YangJ, CorcesVG (2012) Insulators, long-range interactions, and genome function. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22: 86–92.

13. KharchenkoPV, AlekseyenkoAA, SchwartzYB, MinodaA, RiddleNC, et al. (2011) Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471: 480–485.

14. SchuettengruberB, GanapathiM, LeblancB, PortosoM, JaschekR, et al. (2009) Functional anatomy of polycomb and trithorax chromatin landscapes in Drosophila embryos. PLoS Biol 7: e13.

15. SchwartzYB, KahnTG, NixDA, LiXY, BourgonR, et al. (2006) Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 38: 700–705.

16. SchwartzYB, KahnTG, StenbergP, OhnoK, BourgonR, et al. (2010) Alternative epigenetic chromatin states of polycomb target genes. PLoS Genet 6: e1000805.

17. TolhuisB, de WitE, MuijrersI, TeunissenH, TalhoutW, et al. (2006) Genome-wide profiling of PRC1 and PRC2 Polycomb chromatin binding in Drosophila melanogaster.[erratum appears in Nat Genet. 2006 Jul;38(7):850]. Nat Genet 38: 694–699.

18. SigristCJ, PirrottaV (1997) Chromatin insulator elements block the silencing of a target gene by the Drosophila polycomb response element (PRE) but allow trans interactions between PREs on different chromosomes. Genetics 147: 209–221.

19. DevidoSK, KwonD, BrownJL, KassisJA (2008) The role of Polycomb-group response elements in regulation of engrailed transcription in Drosophila. Development 135: 669–676.

20. JeonY, LeeJT (2011) YY1 tethers Xist RNA to the inactive X nucleation center. Cell 146: 119–133.

21. LeeJT (2012) Epigenetic regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Science 338: 1435–1439.

22. ZhaoJ, SunBK, ErwinJA, SongJ-J, LeeJT (2008) Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science 322: 750–756.

23. MaedaRK, KarchF (2006) The ABC of the BX-C: the bithorax complex explained. Development 133: 1413–1422.

24. MaedaRK, KarchF (2007) Making connections: boundaries and insulators in Drosophila. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 394–399.

25. MaedaRK, KarchF (2009) The bithorax complex of Drosophila an exceptional Hox cluster. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 88: 1–33.

26. IampietroC, GummallaM, MuteroA, KarchF, MaedaRK (2010) Initiator elements function to determine the activity state of BX-C enhancers. PLoS Genet 6: e1001260.

27. CelnikerSE, DillonLAL, GersteinMB, GunsalusKC, HenikoffS, et al. (2009) Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 459: 927–930.

28. BartkuhnM, StraubT, HeroldM, HerrmannM, RathkeC, et al. (2009) Active promoters and insulators are marked by the centrosomal protein 190. EMBO J 28: 877–888.

29. BusheyAM, RamosE, CorcesVG (2009) Three subclasses of a Drosophila insulator show distinct and cell type-specific genomic distributions. Genes Dev 23: 1338–1350.

30. FilionGJ, van BemmelJG, BraunschweigU, TalhoutW, KindJ, et al. (2010) Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143: 212–224.

31. HolohanEE, KwongC, AdryanB, BartkuhnM, HeroldM, et al. (2007) CTCF genomic binding sites in Drosophila and the organisation of the bithorax complex. PLoS Genet 3: e112.

32. NegreN, BrownCD, MaL, BristowCA, MillerSW, et al. (2011) A cis-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome. Nature 471: 527–531.

33. NegreN, BrownCD, ShahPK, KheradpourP, MorrisonCA, et al. (2010) A Comprehensive Map of Insulator Elements for the Drosophila Genome. PLoS Genet 6: e1000814.

34. SchwartzYB, Linder-BassoD, KharchenkoPV, TolstorukovMY, KimM, et al. (2012) Nature and function of insulator protein binding sites in the Drosophila genome.[Erratum appears in Genome Res. 2013 Feb;23(2):409]. Genome Res 22: 2188–2198.

35. SmithST, WickramasingheP, OlsonA, LoukinovD, LinL, et al. (2009) Genome wide ChIP-chip analyses reveal important roles for CTCF in Drosophila genome organization. Dev Biol 328: 518–528.

36. Van BortleK, RamosE, TakenakaN, YangJ, WahiJE, et al. (2012) Drosophila CTCF tandemly aligns with other insulator proteins at the borders of H3K27me3 domains. Genome Res 22: 2176–2187.

37. van BemmelJG, PagieL, BraunschweigU, BrugmanW, MeulemanW, et al. (2010) The insulator protein SU(HW) fine-tunes nuclear lamina interactions of the Drosophila genome. PLoS ONE 5: e15013.

38. SoshnevAA, HeB, BaxleyRM, JiangN, HartCM, et al. (2012) Genome-wide studies of the multi-zinc finger Drosophila Suppressor of Hairy-wing protein in the ovary. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 5415–5431.

39. WoodAM, Van BortleK, RamosE, TakenakaN, RohrbaughM, et al. (2011) Regulation of chromatin organization and inducible gene expression by a Drosophila insulator. Mol Cell 44: 29–38.

40. JiangN, EmberlyE, CuvierO, HartCM (2009) Genome-wide mapping of boundary element-associated factor (BEAF) binding sites in Drosophila melanogaster links BEAF to transcription. Molecular & Cellular Biology 29: 3556–3568.

41. SextonT, YaffeE, KenigsbergE, BantigniesF, LeblancB, et al. (2012) Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148: 458–472.

42. HeroldM, BartkuhnM, RenkawitzR (2012) CTCF: insights into insulator function during development. Development 139: 1045–1057.

43. HouC, CorcesVG (2012) Throwing transcription for a loop: expression of the genome in the 3D nucleus. Chromosoma 121: 107–116.

44. KimA, DeanA (2012) Chromatin loop formation in the -globin locus and its role in globin gene transcription. Molecules & Cells 34: 1–5.

45. BellAC, WestAG, FelsenfeldG (1999) The protein CTCF is required for the enhancer blocking activity of vertebrate insulators. Cell 98: 387–396.

46. HouC, ZhaoH, TanimotoK, DeanA (2008) CTCF-dependent enhancer-blocking by alternative chromatin loop formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 20398–20403.

47. BellAC, FelsenfeldG (2000) Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene.[see comment]. Nature 405: 482–485.

48. HarkAT, SchoenherrCJ, KatzDJ, IngramRS, LevorseJM, et al. (2000) CTCF mediates methylation-sensitive enhancer-blocking activity at the H19/Igf2 locus.[see comment]. Nature 405: 486–489.

49. KanduriC, PantV, LoukinovD, PugachevaE, QiCF, et al. (2000) Functional association of CTCF with the insulator upstream of the H19 gene is parent of origin-specific and methylation-sensitive. Curr Biol 10: 853–856.

50. DuraJM, InghamP (1988) Tissue- and stage-specific control of homeotic and segmentation gene expression in Drosophila embryos by the polyhomeotic gene. Development 103: 733–741.

51. FujiokaM, YusibovaGL, ZhouJ, JaynesJB (2008) The DNA-binding Polycomb-group protein Pleiohomeotic maintains both active and repressed transcriptional states through a single site. Development 135: 4131–4139.

52. KimSN, ShimHP, JeonB-N, ChoiW-I, HurM-W, et al. (2011) The pleiohomeotic functions as a negative regulator of Drosophila even-skipped gene during embryogenesis. Molecules & Cells 32: 549–554.

53. McKeonJ, SladeE, SinclairDA, ChengN, CoulingM, et al. (1994) Mutations in some Polycomb group genes of Drosophila interfere with regulation of segmentation genes. Molecular & General Genetics 244: 474–483.

54. SmouseD, GoodmanC, MahowaldA, PerrimonN (1988) polyhomeotic: a gene required for the embryonic development of axon pathways in the central nervous system of Drosophila. Genes Dev 2: 830–842.

55. FujiokaM, WuX, JaynesJB (2009) A chromatin insulator mediates transgene homing and very long-range enhancer-promoter communication. Development 136: 3077–3087.

56. FujiokaM, Emi-SarkerY, YusibovaGL, GotoT, JaynesJB (1999) Analysis of an even-skipped rescue transgene reveals both composite and discrete neuronal and early blastoderm enhancers, and multi-stripe positioning by gap gene repressor gradients. Development 126: 2527–2538.

57. GotoT, MacdonaldP, ManiatisT (1989) Early and late periodic patterns of even skipped expression are controlled by distinct regulatory elements that respond to different spatial cues. Cell 57: 413–422.

58. HardingK, HoeyT, WarriorR, LevineM (1989) Autoregulatory and gap gene response elements of the even-skipped promoter of Drosophila. The EMBO Journal 8: 1205–1212.

59. SackersonC, FujiokaM, GotoT (1999) The even-skipped locus is contained in a 16-kb chromatin domain. Dev Biol 211: 39–52.

60. LeonA, McKearinD (1999) Identification of TER94, an AAA ATPase protein, as a Bam-dependent component of the Drosophila fusome. Molecular Biology of the Cell 10: 3825–3834.

61. PinterM, JekelyG, SzepesiRJ, FarkasA, TheopoldU, et al. (1998) TER94, a Drosophila homolog of the membrane fusion protein CDC48/p97, is accumulated in nonproliferating cells: in the reproductive organs and in the brain of the imago. Insect Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 28: 91–98.

62. RudenDM, SollarsV, WangX, MoriD, AltermanM, et al. (2000) Membrane fusion proteins are required for oskar mRNA localization in the Drosophila egg chamber. Dev Biol 218: 314–325.

63. BatemanJR, LeeAM, WuCT (2006) Site-specific transformation of Drosophila via phiC31 integrase-mediated cassette exchange. Genetics 173: 769–777.

64. RaabJR, ChiuJ, ZhuJ, KatzmanS, KurukutiS, et al. (2012) Human tRNA genes function as chromatin insulators. EMBO J 31: 330–350.

65. BrockHW, van LohuizenM (2001) The Polycomb group–no longer an exclusive club? Curr Opin Genet Dev 11: 175–181.

66. YasuharaJC, WakimotoBT (2006) Oxymoron no more: the expanding world of heterochromatic genes. Trends Genet 22: 330–338.

67. Garcia-FernandezJ (2005) The genesis and evolution of homeobox gene clusters. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 881–892.

68. VasanthiD, AnantM, SrivastavaS, MishraRK (2010) A functionally conserved boundary element from the mouse HoxD locus requires GAGA factor in Drosophila. Development 137: 4239–4247.

69. WooCJ, KharchenkoPV, DaheronL, ParkPJ, KingstonRE (2010) A region of the human HOXD cluster that confers polycomb-group responsiveness. Cell 140: 99–110.

70. HoggaI, MihalyJ, BargesS, KarchF (2001) Replacement of Fab-7 by the gypsy or scs insulator disrupts long-distance regulatory interactions in the Abd-B gene of the bithorax complex. Mol Cell 8: 1145–1151.

71. IampietroC, CleardF, GyurkovicsH, MaedaRK, KarchF (2008) Boundary swapping in the Drosophila Bithorax complex. Development 135: 3983–3987.

72. CometI, SchuettengruberB, SextonT, CavalliG (2011) A chromatin insulator driving three-dimensional Polycomb response element (PRE) contacts and Polycomb association with the chromatin fiber. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 2294–2299.

73. ErokhinM, ParshikovA, GeorgievP, ChetverinaD (2010) E(y)2/Sus1 is required for blocking PRE silencing by the Wari insulator in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 119: 243–253.

74. KahnTG, SchwartzYB, DellinoGI, PirrottaV (2006) Polycomb complexes and the propagation of the methylation mark at the Drosophila ubx gene. J Biol Chem 281: 29064–29075.

75. MallinDR, MyungJS, PattonJS, GeyerPK (1998) Polycomb group repression is blocked by the Drosophila suppressor of Hairy-wing [su(Hw)] insulator. Genetics 148: 331–339.

76. ErokhinM, DavydovaA, KyrchanovaO, ParshikovA, GeorgievP, et al. (2011) Insulators form gene loops by interacting with promoters in Drosophila. Development 138: 4097–4106.

77. GrothAC, FishM, NusseR, CalosMP (2004) Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 166: 1775–1782.

78. GeyerPK, CorcesVG (1992) DNA position-specific repression of transcription by a Drosophila zinc finger protein. Genes Dev 6: 1865–1873.

79. GyurkovicsH, GauszJ, KummerJ, KarchF (1990) A new homeotic mutation in the Drosophila bithorax complex removes a boundary separating two domains of regulation. EMBO J 9: 2579–2585.

80. HagstromK, MullerM, SchedlP (1996) Fab-7 functions as a chromatin domain boundary to ensure proper segment specification by the Drosophila bithorax complex. Genes Dev 10: 3202–3215.

81. KarchF, GalloniM, SiposL, GauszJ, GyurkovicsH, et al. (1994) Mcp and Fab-7: molecular analysis of putative boundaries of cis-regulatory domains in the bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 3138–3146.

82. MihalyJ, HoggaI, GauszJ, GyurkovicsH, KarchF (1997) In situ dissection of the Fab-7 region of the bithorax complex into a chromatin domain boundary and a Polycomb-response element. Development 124: 1809–1820.

83. BargesS, MihalyJ, GalloniM, HagstromK, MullerM, et al. (2000) The Fab-8 boundary defines the distal limit of the bithorax complex iab-7 domain and insulates iab-7 from initiation elements and a PRE in the adjacent iab-8 domain. Development 127: 779–790.

84. ZhouJ, AsheH, BurksC, LevineM (1999) Characterization of the transvection mediating region of the abdominal-B locus in Drosophila. Development 126: 3057–3065.

85. BlantonJ, GasznerM, SchedlP (2003) Protein:protein interactions and the pairing of boundary elements in vivo. Genes Dev 17: 664–675.

86. KellumR, SchedlP (1991) A position-effect assay for boundaries of higher order chromosomal domains. Cell 64: 941–950.

87. AmericoJ, WhiteleyM, BrownJL, FujiokaM, JaynesJB, et al. (2002) A complex array of DNA-binding proteins required for pairing-sensitive silencing by a polycomb group response element from the Drosophila engrailed gene. Genetics 160: 1561–1571.

88. FritschC, BrownJL, KassisJA, MullerJ (1999) The DNA-binding polycomb group protein pleiohomeotic mediates silencing of a Drosophila homeotic gene. Development 126: 3905–3913.