The Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition Targets Actin to Promote Robustness during Morphogenesis

English version České info

Robustness is a property built into biological systems to ensure stereotypical outcomes despite fluctuating inputs from gene dosage, biochemical noise, and the environment. During development, robustness safeguards embryos against structural and functional defects. Yet, our understanding of how robustness is achieved in embryos is limited. While much attention has been paid to the role of gene and signaling networks in promoting robust cell fate determination, little has been done to rigorously assay how mechanical processes like morphogenesis are designed to buffer against variable conditions. Here we show that the cell shape changes that drive morphogenesis can be made robust by mechanisms targeting the actin cytoskeleton. We identified two novel members of the Vinculin/α-Catenin Superfamily that work together to promote robustness during Drosophila cellularization, the dramatic tissue-building event that generates the primary epithelium of the embryo. We find that zygotically-expressed Serendipity-α (Sry-α) and maternally-loaded Spitting Image (Spt) share a redundant, actin-regulating activity during cellularization. Spt alone is sufficient for cellularization at an optimal temperature, but both Spt plus Sry-α are required at high temperature and when actin assembly is compromised by genetic perturbation. Our results offer a clear example of how the maternal and zygotic genomes interact to promote the robustness of early developmental events. Specifically, the Spt and Sry-α collaboration is informative when it comes to genes that show both a maternal and zygotic requirement during a given morphogenetic process. For the cellularization of Drosophilids, Sry-α and its expression profile may represent a genetic adaptive trait with the sole purpose of making this extreme event more reliable. Since all morphogenesis depends on cytoskeletal remodeling, both in embryos and adults, we suggest that robustness-promoting mechanisms aimed at actin could be effective at all life stages.

Vyšlo v časopise: The Maternal-to-Zygotic Transition Targets Actin to Promote Robustness during Morphogenesis. PLoS Genet 9(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003901
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003901

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. FelixMA, WagnerA (2008) Robustness and evolution: concepts, insights and challenges from a developmental model system. Heredity (Edinb) 100: 132–140.

2. HamdounA, EpelD (2007) Embryo stability and vulnerability in an always changing world. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 1745–1750.

3. BurgaA, CasanuevaMO, LehnerB (2011) Predicting mutation outcome from early stochastic variation in genetic interaction partners. Nature 480: 250–253.

4. GuZ, SteinmetzLM, GuX, ScharfeC, DavisRW, et al. (2003) Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature 421: 63–66.

5. FrankelN, DavisGK, VargasD, WangS, PayreF, et al. (2010) Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers. Nature 466: 490–493.

6. PerryMW, BoettigerAN, BothmaJP, LevineM (2010) Shadow enhancers foster robustness of Drosophila gastrulation. Curr Biol 20: 1562–1567.

7. AlonU, SuretteMG, BarkaiN, LeiblerS (1999) Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature 397: 168–171.

8. BarkaiN, LeiblerS (1997) Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387: 913–917.

9. von DassowG, MeirE, MunroEM, OdellGM (2000) The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406: 188–192.

10. Manu, SurkovaS, SpirovAV, GurskyVV, JanssensH, et al. (2009) Canalization of gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm by gap gene cross regulation. PLOS Biol 7: e1000049.

11. RutherfordSL, LindquistS (1998) Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396: 336–342.

12. SawarkarR, SieversC, ParoR (2012) Hsp90 globally targets paused RNA polymerase to regulate gene expression in response to environmental stimuli. Cell 149: 807–818.

13. SiegalML, RushlowC (2012) Pausing on the path to robustness. Dev Cell 22: 905–906.

14. SpecchiaV, PiacentiniL, TrittoP, FantiL, D'AlessandroR, et al. (2010) Hsp90 prevents phenotypic variation by suppressing the mutagenic activity of transposons. Nature 463: 662–665.

15. LiX, CassidyJJ, ReinkeCA, FischboeckS, CarthewRW (2009) A microRNA imparts robustness against environmental fluctuation during development. Cell 137: 273–282.

16. BraendleC, FelixMA (2008) Plasticity and errors of a robust developmental system in different environments. Dev Cell 15: 714–724.

17. BarkoulasM, van ZonJS, MillozJ, van OudenaardenA, FelixMA (2013) Robustness and epistasis in the C. elegans vulval signaling network revealed by pathway dosage modulation. Dev Cell 24: 64–75.

18. SawyerJM, HarrellJR, ShemerG, Sullivan-BrownJ, Roh-JohnsonM, et al. (2010) Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis. Dev Biol 341: 5–19.

19. ChungMI, Nascone-YoderNM, GroverSA, DrysdaleTA, WallingfordJB (2010) Direct activation of Shroom3 transcription by Pitx proteins drives epithelial morphogenesis in the developing gut. Development 137: 1339–1349.

20. von DassowM, DavidsonLA (2007) Variation and robustness of the mechanics of gastrulation: the role of tissue mechanical properties during morphogenesis. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 81: 253–269.

21. von DassowM, DavidsonLA (2011) Physics and the canalization of morphogenesis: a grand challenge in organismal biology. Phys Biol 8: 045002.

22. SaundersTE, PanKZ, AngelA, GuanY, ShahJV, et al. (2012) Noise reduction in the intracellular pom1p gradient by a dynamic clustering mechanism. Dev Cell 22: 558–572.

23. HowellAS, JinM, WuCF, ZylaTR, ElstonTC, et al. (2012) Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell 149: 322–333.

24. SchejterED, WieschausE (1993) Functional elements of the cytoskeleton in the early Drosophila embryo. Annu Rev Cell Biol 9: 67–99.

25. TadrosW, LipshitzHD (2009) The maternal-to-zygotic transition: a play in two acts. Development 136: 3033–3042.

26. MerrillPT, SweetonD, WieschausE (1988) Requirements for autosomal gene activity during precellular stages of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 104: 495–509.

27. SchweisguthF, LepesantJA, VincentA (1990) The serendipity alpha gene encodes a membrane-associated protein required for the cellularization of the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev 4: 922–931.

28. CaoJ, AlbertsonR, RiggsB, FieldCM, SullivanW (2008) Nuf, a Rab11 effector, maintains cytokinetic furrow integrity by promoting local actin polymerization. J Cell Biol 182: 301–313.

29. SokacAM, WieschausE (2008) Local actin-dependent endocytosis is zygotically controlled to initiate Drosophila cellularization. Dev Cell 14: 775–786.

30. SokacAM, WieschausE (2008) Zygotically controlled F-actin establishes cortical compartments to stabilize furrows during Drosophila cellularization. J Cell Sci 121: 1815–1824.

31. GrosshansJ, WenzlC, HerzHM, BartoszewskiS, SchnorrerF, et al. (2005) RhoGEF2 and the formin Dia control the formation of the furrow canal by directed actin assembly during Drosophila cellularisation. Development 132: 1009–1020.

32. Padash BarmchiM, RogersS, HackerU (2005) DRhoGEF2 regulates actin organization and contractility in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. J Cell Biol 168: 575–585.

33. YanS, LvZ, WinterhoffM, WenzlC, ZobelT, et al. (2013) The F-BAR protein Cip4/Toca-1 antagonizes the formin Diaphanous in membrane stabilization and compartmentalization. J Cell Sci 126: 1796–1805.

34. KelleyLA, SternbergMJ (2009) Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the PHYRE server. Nat Protoc 4: 363–371.

35. ZhangY (2008) I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 40.

36. ZhaoZM, ReynoldsAB, GaucherEA (2011) The evolutionary history of the catenin gene family during metazoan evolution. BMC Evol Biol 11: 198.

37. PeiJ, KimBH, GrishinNV (2008) PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 2295–2300.

38. YangJ, DokurnoP, TonksNK, BarfordD (2001) Crystal structure of the M-fragment of alpha-catenin: implications for modulation of cell adhesion. EMBO J 20: 3645–3656.

39. GuindonS, DufayardJF, LefortV, AnisimovaM, HordijkW, et al. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59: 307–321.

40. JanssensB, StaesK, van RoyF (1999) Human alpha-catulin, a novel alpha-catenin-like molecule with conserved genomic structure, but deviating alternative splicing. Biochim Biophys Acta 1447: 341–347.

41. MartinAC, KaschubeM, WieschausEF (2009) Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 457: 495–499.

42. ZimmerleCT, FriedenC (1986) Effect of temperature on the mechanism of actin polymerization. Biochemistry 25: 6432–6438.

43. RajA, van den BogaardP, RifkinSA, van OudenaardenA, TyagiS (2008) Imaging individual mRNA molecules using multiple singly labeled probes. Nat Methods 5: 877–879.

44. LehnerB (2010) Genes confer similar robustness to environmental, stochastic, and genetic perturbations in yeast. PLOS One 5: e9035.

45. CampelloneKG, WelchMD (2010) A nucleator arms race: cellular control of actin assembly. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 237–251.

46. WieschausE (1996) Embryonic transcription and the control of developmental pathways. Genetics 142: 5–10.

47. De RenzisS, ElementoO, TavazoieS, WieschausEF (2007) Unmasking activation of the zygotic genome using chromosomal deletions in the Drosophila embryo. PLOS Biol 5: e117.

48. BushatiN, StarkA, BrenneckeJ, CohenSM (2008) Temporal reciprocity of miRNAs and their targets during the maternal-to-zygotic transition in Drosophila. Curr Biol 18: 501–506.

49. GiraldezAJ, MishimaY, RihelJ, GrocockRJ, Van DongenS, et al. (2006) Zebrafish MiR-430 promotes deadenylation and clearance of maternal mRNAs. Science 312: 75–79.

50. LundquistEA, ReddienPW, HartwiegE, HorvitzHR, BargmannCI (2001) Three C. elegans Rac proteins and several alternative Rac regulators control axon guidance, cell migration and apoptotic cell phagocytosis. Development 128: 4475–4488.

51. NandadasaS, TaoQ, MenonNR, HeasmanJ, WylieC (2009) N- and E-cadherins in Xenopus are specifically required in the neural and non-neural ectoderm, respectively, for F-actin assembly and morphogenetic movements. Development 136: 1327–1338.

52. StrongTC, ThomasJH (2011) Maternal and zygotic requirements for src64 during Drosophila cellularization. Genesis 49: 912–918.

53. HandelK, GrunfelderCG, RothS, SanderK (2000) Tribolium embryogenesis: a SEM study of cell shapes and movements from blastoderm to serosal closure. Dev Genes Evol 210: 167–179.

54. MiuraT, BraendleC, ShingletonA, SiskG, KambhampatiS, et al. (2003) A comparison of parthenogenetic and sexual embryogenesis of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea). J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 295: 59–81.

55. KanayamaM, Akiyama-OdaY, OdaH (2010) Early embryonic development in the spider Achaearanea tepidariorum: Microinjection verifies that cellularization is complete before the blastoderm stage. Arthropod Struct Dev 39: 436–445.

56. HavelkaJ, LandaV, LandaV (2007) Embryogenesis of Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): Morphological markers for staging of living embryos. Eur J Entomol 104: 81–87.

57. KofronM, SpagnuoloA, KlymkowskyM, WylieC, HeasmanJ (1997) The roles of maternal alpha-catenin and plakoglobin in the early Xenopus embryo. Development 124: 1553–1560.

58. KofronM, HeasmanJ, LangSA, WylieCC (2002) Plakoglobin is required for maintenance of the cortical actin skeleton in early Xenopus embryos and for cdc42-mediated wound healing. J Cell Biol 158: 695–708.

59. TaoQ, LloydB, LangS, HoustonD, ZornA, et al. (2005) A novel G protein-coupled receptor, related to GPR4, is required for assembly of the cortical actin skeleton in early Xenopus embryos. Development 132: 2825–2836.

60. MartinAC, GelbartM, Fernandez-GonzalezR, KaschubeM, WieschausEF (2010) Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination. J Cell Biol 188: 735–749.

61. SkoglundP, RoloA, ChenX, GumbinerBM, KellerR (2008) Convergence and extension at gastrulation require a myosin IIB-dependent cortical actin network. Development 135: 2435–2444.

62. RoloA, SkoglundP, KellerR (2009) Morphogenetic movements driving neural tube closure in Xenopus require myosin IIB. Dev Biol 327: 327–338.

63. ZhouJ, KimHY, WangJH, DavidsonLA (2010) Macroscopic stiffening of embryonic tissues via microtubules, RhoGEF and the assembly of contractile bundles of actomyosin. Development 137: 2785–2794.

64. ZhouJ, KimHY, DavidsonLA (2009) Actomyosin stiffens the vertebrate embryo during crucial stages of elongation and neural tube closure. Development 136: 677–688.

65. GorfinkielN, SchambergS, BlanchardGB (2011) Integrative approaches to morphogenesis: lessons from dorsal closure. Genesis 49: 522–533.

66. SimpsonCL, PatelDM, GreenKJ (2011) Deconstructing the skin: cytoarchitectural determinants of epidermal morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12: 565–580.

67. GouyM, GuindonS, GascuelO (2010) SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 27: 221–224.