Cascades of Genetic Instability Resulting from Compromised Break-Induced Replication

English version České info

Break-induced replication (BIR) is a mechanism to repair double-strand breaks (DSBs) that possess only a single end that can find homology in the genome. This situation can result from the collapse of replication forks or telomere erosion. BIR frequently produces various genetic instabilities including mutations, loss of heterozygosity, deletions, duplications, and template switching that can result in copy-number variations (CNVs). An important type of genomic rearrangement specifically linked to BIR is half-crossovers (HCs), which result from fusions between parts of recombining chromosomes. Because HC formation produces a fused molecule as well as a broken chromosome fragment, these events could be highly destabilizing. Here we demonstrate that HC formation results from the interruption of BIR caused by a damaged template, defective replisome or premature onset of mitosis. Additionally, we document that checkpoint failure promotes channeling of BIR into half-crossover-initiated instability cascades (HCC) that resemble cycles of non-reciprocal translocations (NRTs) previously described in human tumors. We postulate that HCs represent a potent source of genetic destabilization with significant consequences that mimic those observed in human diseases, including cancer.

Vyšlo v časopise: Cascades of Genetic Instability Resulting from Compromised Break-Induced Replication. PLoS Genet 10(2): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004119
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004119

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. San FilippoJ, SungP, KleinH (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annual review of biochemistry 77: 229–257.

2. PaquesF, HaberJE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 349–404.

3. LlorenteB, SmithCE, SymingtonLS (2008) Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7: 859–864.

4. MalkovaA, HaberJE (2012) Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks. Annu Rev Genet 46: 455–473.

5. SakofskyCJ, AyyarS, MalkovaA (2012) Break-Induced Replication and Genome Stability. Biomolecules 2: 483–504.

6. MalkovaA, IraG (2013) Break-induced replication: functions and molecular mechanism. Curr Opin Genet Dev 23: 271–279.

7. JainS, SugawaraN, LydeardJ, VazeM, Tanguy Le GacN, et al. (2009) A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 23: 291–303.

8. McMurrayMA, GottschlingDE (2003) An age-induced switch to a hyper-recombinational state. Science 301: 1908–1911.

9. MalkovaA, NaylorML, YamaguchiM, IraG, HaberJE (2005) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion. Mol Cell Biol 25: 933–944.

10. LydeardJR, Lipkin-MooreZ, SheuYJ, StillmanB, BurgersPM, et al. (2010) Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for pre-RC assembly. Genes Dev 24: 1133–1144.

11. LydeardJR, JainS, YamaguchiM, HaberJE (2007) Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448: 820–823.

12. DeemA, BarkerK, VanhulleK, DowningB, VaylA, et al. (2008) Defective break-induced replication leads to half-crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 1845–1860.

13. SmithCE, LamAF, SymingtonLS (2009) Aberrant double-strand break repair resulting in half crossovers in mutants defective for Rad51 or the DNA polymerase delta complex. Mol Cell Biol 29: 1432–1441.

14. SainiN, RamakrishnanS, ElangoR, AyyarS, ZhangY, et al. (2013) Migrating bubble during break-induced replication drives conservative DNA synthesis. Nature 502: 389–392.

15. WilsonMA, KwonY, XuY, ChungWH, ChiP, et al. (2013) Pif1 helicase and Poldelta promote recombination-coupled DNA synthesis via bubble migration. Nature 502: 393–396.

16. DonnianniRA, SymingtonLS (2013) Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 33: 13475–13480.

17. ChanJE, KolodnerRD (2011) A genetic and structural study of genome rearrangements mediated by high copy repeat Ty1 elements. PLoS Genet 7: e1002089.

18. DeemA, KeszthelyiA, BlackgroveT, VaylA, CoffeyB, et al. (2011) Break-induced replication is highly inaccurate. PLoS Biol 9: e1000594.

19. HoangML, TanFJ, LaiDC, CelnikerSE, HoskinsRA, et al. (2010) Competitive repair by naturally dispersed repetitive DNA during non-allelic homologous recombination. PLoS Genet 6: e1001228.

20. MorrowDM, ConnellyC, HieterP (1997) “Break copy” duplication: a model for chromosome fragment formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147: 371–382.

21. VanhulleK, LemoineFJ, NarayananV, DowningB, HullK, et al. (2007) Inverted DNA repeats channel repair of distant double-strand breaks into chromatid fusions and chromosomal rearrangements. Mol Cell Biol 27: 2601–2614.

22. PardoB, AguileraA (2012) Complex chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replication involve structure-selective endonucleases. PLoS Genet 8: e1002979.

23. HastingsPJ, IraG, LupskiJR (2009) A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet 5: e1000327.

24. HastingsPJ, LupskiJR, RosenbergSM, IraG (2009) Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat Rev Genet 10: 551–564.

25. PayenC, KoszulR, DujonB, FischerG (2008) Segmental duplications arise from Pol32-dependent repair of broken forks through two alternative replication-based mechanisms. PLoS Genet 4: e1000175.

26. HaberJE, HearnM (1985) Rad52-independent mitotic gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae frequently results in chromosomal loss. Genetics 111: 7–22.

27. CoicE, FeldmanT, LandmanAS, HaberJE (2008) Mechanisms of Rad52-independent spontaneous and UV-induced mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179: 199–211.

28. MalkovaA, IvanovEL, HaberJE (1996) Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 7131–7136.

29. ArguesoJL, WestmorelandJ, MieczkowskiPA, GawelM, PetesTD, et al. (2008) Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 11845–11850.

30. SabatierL, RicoulM, PottierG, MurnaneJP (2005) The loss of a single telomere can result in instability of multiple chromosomes in a human tumor cell line. Mol Cancer Res 3: 139–150.

31. PavlovYI, ShcherbakovaPV, KunkelTA (2001) In vivo consequences of putative active site mutations in yeast DNA polymerases alpha, epsilon, delta, and zeta. Genetics 159: 47–64.

32. BaranovskiyAG, BabayevaND, ListonVG, RogozinIB, KooninEV, et al. (2008) X-ray structure of the complex of regulatory subunits of human DNA polymerase delta. Cell Cycle 7: 3026–3036.

33. GordeninDA, MalkovaAL, PeterzenA, KulikovVN, PavlovYI, et al. (1992) Transposon Tn5 excision in yeast: influence of DNA polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon and repair genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 3785–3789.

34. KokoskaRJ, StefanovicL, TranHT, ResnickMA, GordeninDA, et al. (1998) Destabilization of yeast micro- and minisatellite DNA sequences by mutations affecting a nuclease involved in Okazaki fragment processing (rad27) and DNA polymerase delta (pol3-t). Mol Cell Biol 18: 2779–2788.

35. MorrisonA, ArakiH, ClarkAB, HamatakeRK, SuginoA (1990) A third essential DNA polymerase in S. cerevisiae. Cell 62: 1143–1151.

36. PizzagalliA, ValsasniniP, PlevaniP, LucchiniG (1988) DNA polymerase I gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: nucleotide sequence, mapping of a temperature-sensitive mutation, and protein homology with other DNA polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 3772–3776.

37. WyattMD, PittmanDL (2006) Methylating agents and DNA repair responses: Methylated bases and sources of strand breaks. Chem Res Toxicol 19: 1580–1594.

38. MaW, ResnickMA, GordeninDA (2008) Apn1 and Apn2 endonucleases prevent accumulation of repair-associated DNA breaks in budding yeast as revealed by direct chromosomal analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 1836–1846.

39. BlackKA, SmithGJ, GrishamJW (1991) Effects of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide on population growth, cell-cycle compartmentalization and viability in human lymphoblastoid cells. Toxicol In Vitro 5: 193–200.

40. HarrisonJC, HaberJE (2006) Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 40: 209–235.

41. DowningB, MorganR, VanHulleK, DeemA, MalkovaA (2008) Large inverted repeats in the vicinity of a single double-strand break strongly affect repair in yeast diploids lacking Rad51. Mutat Res 645: 9–18.

42. LemoineFJ, DegtyarevaNP, LobachevK, PetesTD (2005) Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120: 587–598.

43. LazzaroF, SapountziV, GranataM, PellicioliA, VazeM, et al. (2008) Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single-stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. EMBO J 27: 1502–1512.

44. ChenX, CuiD, PapushaA, ZhangX, ChuCD, et al. (2012) The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489: 576–580.

45. ZhuZ, ChungWH, ShimEY, LeeSE, IraG (2008) Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134: 981–994.

46. MimitouEP, SymingtonLS (2008) Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770–774.

47. GravelS, ChapmanJR, MagillC, JacksonSP (2008) DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes Dev 22: 2767–2772.

48. ChungWH, ZhuZ, PapushaA, MalkovaA, IraG (2010) Defective resection at DNA double-strand breaks leads to de novo telomere formation and enhances gene targeting. PLoS Genet 6: e1000948.

49. NegriniS, GorgoulisVG, HalazonetisTD (2010) Genomic instability–an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 11: 220–228.

50. HalazonetisTD, GorgoulisVG, BartekJ (2008) An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319: 1352–1355.

51. WachA, BrachatA, PohlmannR, PhilippsenP (1994) New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10: 1793–1808.

52. KingsburyJM, GoldsteinAL, McCuskerJH (2006) Role of nitrogen and carbon transport, regulation, and metabolism genes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae survival in vivo. Eukaryot Cell 5: 816–824.

53. Guthrie C, Fink G (1991) Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology. San Diego: Academic Press.

54. ZhangH, ZeidlerAF, SongW, PucciaCM, MalcE, et al. (2013) Gene copy-number variation in haploid and diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 193: 785–801.

55. HolmesAM, HaberJE (1999) Double-strand break repair in yeast requires both leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases. Cell 96: 415–424.