Text messaging and brief phone calls for weight loss in overweight and obese English- and Spanish-speaking adults: A 1-year, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial

English version

Autoři: Job G. Godino ^aff001; Natalie M. Golaszewski ^aff001; Greg J. Norman ^aff001; Cheryl L. Rock ^aff001; William G. Griswold ^aff004; Elva Arredondo ^aff005; Simon Marshall ^aff001; Julie Kolodziejczyk ^aff001; Lindsay Dillon ^aff001; Fred Raab ^aff001; Sonia Jain ^aff001; Maggie Crawford ^aff001; Gina Merchant ^aff001; Kevin Patrick ^aff001
Působiště autorů: Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America ^aff001; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America ^aff002; Exercise and Physical Activity Resource Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America ^aff003; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America ^aff004; Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America ^aff005
Vyšlo v časopise: Text messaging and brief phone calls for weight loss in overweight and obese English- and Spanish-speaking adults: A 1-year, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 16(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002917
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002917

Souhrn

Background

Weight loss interventions based solely on text messaging (short message service [SMS]) have been shown to be modestly effective for short periods of time and in some populations, but limited evidence is available for positive longer-term outcomes and for efficacy in Hispanic populations. Also, little is known about the comparative efficacy of weight loss interventions that use SMS coupled with brief, technology-mediated contact with health coaches, an important issue when considering the scalability and cost of interventions. We examined the efficacy of a 1-year intervention designed to reduce weight among overweight and obese English- and Spanish-speaking adults via SMS alone (ConTxt) or in combination with brief, monthly health-coaching calls. ConTxt offered 2–4 SMS/day that were personalized, tailored, and interactive. Content was theory- and evidence-based and focused on reducing energy intake and increasing energy expenditure. Monthly health-coaching calls (5–10 minutes’ duration) focused on goal-setting, identifying barriers to achieving goals, and self-monitoring.

Methods and findings

English- and Spanish-speaking adults were recruited from October 2011 to March 2013. A total of 298 overweight (body mass index [BMI] 27.0 to 39.9 kg/m²) adults (aged 21–60 years; 77% female; 41% Hispanic; 21% primarily Spanish speaking; 44% college graduates or higher; 22% unemployed) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ConTxt only (n = 101), ConTxt plus health-coaching calls (n = 96), or standard print materials on weight reduction (control group, n = 101). We used computer-based permuted-block randomization with block sizes of three or six, stratified by sex and Spanish-speaking status. Participants, study staff, and investigators were masked until the intervention was assigned. The primary outcome was objectively measured percent of weight loss from baseline at 12 months. Differences between groups were evaluated using linear mixed-effects regression within an intention-to-treat framework. A total of 261 (87.2%) and 253 (84.9%) participants completed 6- and 12-month visits, respectively. Loss to follow-up did not differ by study group. Mean (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) percent weight loss at 12 months was −0.61 (−1.99 to 0.77) in the control group, −1.68 (−3.08 to −0.27) in ConTxt only, and −3.63 (−5.05 to −2.81) in ConTxt plus health-coaching calls. At 12 months, mean (95% CI) percent weight loss, adjusted for baseline BMI, was significantly different between ConTxt plus health-coaching calls and the control group (−3.0 [−4.99 to −1.04], p = 0.003) but not between the ConTxt-only and the control group (−1.07 [−3.05 to 0.92], p = 0.291). Differences between ConTxt plus health-coaching calls and ConTxt only were not significant (−1.95 [−3.96 to 0.06], p = 0.057). These findings were consistent across other weight-related secondary outcomes, including changes in absolute weight, BMI, and percent body fat at 12 months. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that Spanish speakers responded more favorably to ConTxt plus health-coaching calls than English speakers (Spanish contrast: −7.90 [−11.94 to −3.86], p < 0.001; English contrast: −1.82 [−4.03 to 0.39], p = 0.107). Limitations include the unblinded delivery of the intervention and recruitment of a predominantly female sample from a single site.

Conclusions

A 1-year intervention that delivered theory- and evidence-based weight loss content via daily personalized, tailored, and interactive SMS was most effective when combined with brief, monthly phone calls.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01171586

Klíčová slova:

Body Mass Index – Physical activity – Bioenergetics – Obesity – Behavioral and social aspects of health – Weight loss – Adipose tissue – Hispanic people

Zdroje

1. Ryan D, Heaner M. Guidelines (2013) for managing overweight and obesity in adults. Preface to the full report. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jul;22 Suppl 2:S1–3.

2. Kim DD, Basu A. Estimating the Medical Care Costs of Obesity in the United States: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Empirical Analysis. Value Health. 2016 Aug;19(5):602–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.008 27565277

3. Harvey JR, Ogden D. Obesity Treatment in Disadvantaged Population Groups: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do? Prev Med [Internet]. 2014 Nov [cited 2018 Aug 13];68:71–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452994/ 24878585

4. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Nov;(219):1–8. 26633046

5. Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Hong PS, Tsai AG. Behavioral treatment of obesity in patients encountered in primary care settings: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014 Nov 5;312(17):1779–91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14173 25369490

6. Siopis G, Chey T, Allman-Farinelli M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions for weight management using text messaging. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28 Suppl 2:1–15.

7. U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: UNITED STATES [Internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 20]. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217

8. Union IT. Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people). World Telecommunication/ICT; 2017.

9. Hall AK, Cole-Lewis H, Bernhardt JM. Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:393–415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122855 25785892

10. Patrick K, Raab F, Adams MA, Dillon L, Zabinski M, Rock CL, et al. A Text Message–Based Intervention for Weight Loss: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2009 Jan 13 [cited 2018 Aug 15];11(1). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2729073/

11. Job JR, Fjeldsoe BS, Eakin EG, Reeves MM. Effectiveness of extended contact interventions for weight management delivered via text messaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2018 Apr;19(4):538–49. doi: 10.1111/obr.12648 29243354

12. Head KJ, Noar SM, Iannarino NT, Grant Harrington N. Efficacy of text messaging-based interventions for health promotion: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:41–8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.003 24161087

13. Shaw RJ, Bosworth HB, Silva SS, Lipkus IM, Davis LL, Sha RS, et al. Mobile health messages help sustain recent weight loss. Am J Med. 2013 Nov;126(11):1002–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.07.001 24050486

14. Spark LC, Fjeldsoe BS, Eakin EG, Reeves MM. Efficacy of a Text Message-Delivered Extended Contact Intervention on Maintenance of Weight Loss, Physical Activity, and Dietary Behavior Change. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Sep 15;3(3):e88. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4114 26373696

15. Thomas JG, Wing RR. Health-e-call, a smartphone-assisted behavioral obesity treatment: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013 Apr 17;1(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2164 25100672

16. Zwickert K, Rieger E, Swinbourne J, Manns C, McAulay C, Gibson AA, et al. High or low intensity text-messaging combined with group treatment equally promote weight loss maintenance in obese adults. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Dec;10(6):680–91. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2016.01.001 26992569

17. Donaldson EL, Fallows S, Morris M. A text message based weight management intervention for overweight adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Apr;27 Suppl 2:90–7.

18. Partridge SR, McGeechan K, Hebden L, Balestracci K, Wong AT, Denney-Wilson E, et al. Effectiveness of a mHealth Lifestyle Program With Telephone Support (TXT2BFiT) to Prevent Unhealthy Weight Gain in Young Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Jun 15;3(2):e66. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4530 26076688

19. Mao AY, Chen C, Magana C, Caballero Barajas K, Olayiwola JN. A Mobile Phone-Based Health Coaching Intervention for Weight Loss and Blood Pressure Reduction in a National Payer Population: A Retrospective Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth [Internet]. 2017 Jun 8 [cited 2018 Aug 28];5(6). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5481661/

20. Pew Research Center. January 8-February 7 2019 –Who owns cellphones and smartphones. [Internet]. 2019. http://www.pewresearch.org

21. Pew Research Center. October 3–27, 2014 –Pew Research Center American Trends Panel survey. [Internet]. 2014. http://www.pewresearch.org

22. Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Dec;17(4):338–45. 1330274

23. Kolodziejczyk JK, Norman GJ, Rock CL, Arredondo EM, Madanat H, Roesch SC, et al. Strategies that predict weight loss among overweight/obese young adults. American journal of health behavior. 2014;38(6):871–880. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.6.9 25207513

24. Kolodziejczyk JK, Norman GJ, Roesch SC, Rock CL, Arredondo EM, Madanat H, et al. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and demographic correlate models of the strategies for weight management measure for overweight or obese adults. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2015;29(4):e147–e157. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130731-QUAN-391 24670075

25. Jensen Michael D., Ryan Donna H., Apovian Caroline M., Ard Jamy D., Comuzzie Anthony G., Donato Karen A., et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. Circulation [Internet]. 2014 Jun 24 [cited 2019 Jul 5];129(25_suppl_2):S102–38. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.cir.0000437739.71477.ee 24222017

26. Stephens J, Allen J. Mobile phone interventions to increase physical activity and reduce weight: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2013 Aug;28(4):320–9. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318250a3e7 22635061

27. Sherrington A, Newham JJ, Bell R, Adamson A, McColl E, Araujo-Soares V. Systematic review and meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions providing personalized feedback for weight loss in overweight and obese adults. Obes Rev. 2016;17(6):541–51. doi: 10.1111/obr.12396 26948257

28. Bennett GG, Steinberg DM, Stoute C, Lanpher M, Lane I, Askew S, et al. Electronic health (eHealth) interventions for weight management among racial/ethnic minority adults: a systematic review. Obesity Reviews [Internet]. [cited 2018 Sep 17];15(S4):146–58. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/obr.12218

29. Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Behav Med Pract Policy Res [Internet]. 2017 Jun 1 [cited 2018 Nov 27];7(2):254–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1

30. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol [Internet]. 2001 Jun 1 [cited 2019 Jan 6];30(3):427–32. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/30/3/427/736897 11416056

31. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 3;344(18):1343–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801 11333990

32. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. The New England journal of medicine. 2002;346(6):393–403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512 11832527

33. Losing Weight | Healthy Weight | CDC [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 14]. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/losing_weight/index.html