Psychological, social, and welfare interventions for torture survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Autoři:
Aseel Hamid aff001; Nimisha Patel aff002; Amanda C. de C. Williams aff001
Působiště autorů:
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
aff001; Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, University of East London, London, United Kingdom
aff002; International Centre for Health & Human Rights, London, United Kingdom
aff003
Vyšlo v časopise:
Psychological, social, and welfare interventions for torture survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS Med 16(9): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002919
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002919
Souhrn
Background
Torture and other forms of ill treatment have been reported in at least 141 countries, exposing a global crisis. Survivors face multiple physical, psychological, and social difficulties. Psychological consequences for survivors are varied, and evidence on treatment is mixed. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the benefits and harms of psychological, social, and welfare interventions for torture survivors.
Methods and findings
We updated a 2014 review with published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for adult survivors of torture comparing any psychological, social, or welfare intervention against treatment as usual or active control from 1 January 2014 through 22 June 2019. Primary outcome was post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms or caseness, and secondary outcomes were depression symptoms, functioning, quality of life, and adverse effects, after treatment and at follow-up of at least 3 months. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios were estimated using meta-analysis with random effects. The Cochrane tool was used to derive risk of bias. Fifteen RCTs were included, with data from 1,373 participants (589 females and 784 males) in 10 countries (7 trials in Europe, 5 in Asia, and 3 in Africa). No trials of social or welfare interventions were found. Compared to mostly inactive (waiting list) controls, psychological interventions reduced PTSD symptoms by the end of treatment (SMD −0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.52 to −0.09, p = 0.005), but PTSD symptoms at follow-up were not significantly reduced (SMD −0.34, 95% CI −0.74 to 0.06, p = 0.09). No significant improvement was found for PTSD caseness at the end of treatment, and there was possible worsening at follow-up from one study (n = 28). Interventions showed no benefits for depression symptoms at end of treatment (SMD −0.23, 95% CI −0.50 to 0.03, p = 0.09) or follow-up (SMD −0.23, 95% CI −0.70 to 0.24, p = 0.34). A significant improvement in functioning for psychological interventions compared to control was found at end of treatment (SMD −0.38, 95% CI −0.58 to −0.18, p = 0.0002) but not at follow-up from only one study. No significant improvement emerged for quality of life at end of treatment (SMD 0.38, 95% CI −0.28 to 1.05, p = 0.26) with no data available at follow-up. The main study limitations were the difficulty in this field of being certain of capturing all eligible studies, the lack of modelling of maintenance of treatment gains, and the low precision of most SMDs making findings liable to change with the addition of further studies as they are published.
Conclusions
Our findings show evidence that psychological interventions improve PTSD symptoms and functioning at the end of treatment, but it is unknown whether this is maintained at follow-up, with a possible worsening of PTSD caseness at follow-up from one study. Further interventions in this population should address broader psychological needs beyond PTSD while taking into account the effect of multiple daily stressors. Additional studies, including social and welfare interventions, will improve precision of estimates of effect, particularly over the longer term.
Klíčová slova:
Quality of life – Systematic reviews – Culture – Depression – Post-traumatic stress disorder – Social welfare – Welfare (social security)
Zdroje
1. United Nations General Assembly. Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Constitution. 1984 Dec;5(7):5.
2. Amnesty International. Torture in 2014: 30 years of broken promises. Amnesty International. 2014. http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ACT40/004/2014/en. [cited 21 June 2019].
3. Allansson M, Melander E, Themnér L. Organized violence, 1989–2016. J Peace Res. 2017 Jul;54(4):574–87.
4. Patel N, Granville-Chapman C. Health Assessments with Survivors of Torture: Good Practice Clinical Guidelines. 2010. Joint publication of Medical Foundation, London and Department of Health, United Kingdom.
5. Song SJ, Subica A, Kaplan C, Tol W, de Jong J. Predicting the mental health and functioning of torture survivors. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018 Jan 1;206(1):33–9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000678 28350563
6. Jaranson JM, Quiroga J. Evaluating the services of torture rehabilitation programmes. Torture. 2011;21(2):98–140. 21715958
7. Williams AC, Amris K. Treatment of persistent pain from torture: review and commentary. Med Confl Surviv. 2017 Jan 2;33(1):60–81. doi: 10.1080/13623699.2016.1242050 27737567
8. Miller KE, Rasmussen A. War exposure, daily stressors, and mental health in conflict and post-conflict settings: bridging the divide between trauma-focused and psychosocial frameworks. Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan 1;70(1):7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.029 19854552
9. Porter M, Haslam N. Predisplacement and postdisplacement factors associated with mental health of refugees and internally displaced persons: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005 Aug 3;294(5):602–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.5.602 16077055
10. Esala JJ, Vukovich MM, Hanbury A, Kashyap S, Joscelyne A. Collaborative care for refugees and torture survivors: Key findings from the literature. Traumatology. 2018 Sep;24(3):168.
11. Shannon PJ, Wieling E, Simmelink-McCleary J, Becher E. Beyond stigma: Barriers to discussing mental health in refugee populations. J Loss Trauma. 2015 May 4;20(3):281–96.
12. Patel N, Kellezi B, de C Williams AC. Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well‐being of torture survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(11): Art. No.: CD009317.
13. Morina N, Malek M, Nickerson A, Bryant RA. Meta‐analysis of interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in adult survivors of mass violence in low‐and middle‐income countries. Depress Anxiety. 2017 Aug;34(8):679–91. doi: 10.1002/da.22618 28419625
14. Weiss WM, Ugueto AM, Mahmooth Z, Murray LK, Hall BJ, Nadison M, et al. Mental health interventions and priorities for research for adult survivors of torture and systematic violence: a review of the literature. Torture. 2016;26(1):17–44. 27857003
15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072
16. Higgins JP. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1. 0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org 2011.
17. Bass J, Murray SM, Mohammed TA, Bunn M, Gorman W, Ahmed AM, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a trauma-informed support, skills, and psychoeducation intervention for survivors of torture and related trauma in Kurdistan, Northern Iraq. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Sep 28;4(3):452–66. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00017 27609624
18. Bolton P, Lee C, Haroz EE, Murray L, Dorsey S, Robinson C, et al. A transdiagnostic community-based mental health treatment for comorbid disorders: development and outcomes of a randomized controlled trial among Burmese refugees in Thailand. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 11;11(11):e1001757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001757 25386945
19. Esala JJ, Taing S. Testimony therapy with ritual: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Stress. 2017 Feb;30(1):94–8. doi: 10.1002/jts.22163 28084662
20. Puvimanasinghe TS, Price IR. Healing through giving testimony: An empirical study with Sri Lankan torture survivors. Transcult Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;53(5):531–50. doi: 10.1177/1363461516651361 27330026
21. Wang SJ, Bytyçi A, Izeti S, Kallaba M, Rushiti F, Montgomery E, et al. A novel bio-psycho-social approach for rehabilitation of traumatized victims of torture and war in the post-conflict context: a pilot randomized controlled trial in Kosovo. Confl Health. 2016 Dec;10(1):34.
22. Weiss WM, Murray LK, Zangana GA, Mahmooth Z, Kaysen D, Dorsey S, et al. Community-based mental health treatments for survivors of torture and militant attacks in Southern Iraq: a randomized control trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;15(1):249.
23. Bichescu D, Neuner F, Schauer M, Elbert T. Narrative exposure therapy for political imprisonment-related chronic posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Sep 1;45(9):2212–20. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.12.006 17288990
24. Hensel-Dittmann D, Schauer M, Ruf M, Catani C, Odenwald M, Elbert T, et al. Treatment of traumatized victims of war and torture: a randomized controlled comparison of narrative exposure therapy and stress inoculation training. Psychother Psychosom. 2011;80(6):345–52. doi: 10.1159/000327253 21829046
25. Igreja V, Kleijn WC, Schreuder BJ, Van Dijk JA, Verschuur M. Testimony method to ameliorate post-traumatic stress symptoms: Community-based intervention study with Mozambican civil war survivors. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;184(3):251–7.
26. Neuner F, Kurreck S, Ruf M, Odenwald M, Elbert T, Schauer M. Can asylum-seekers with posttraumatic stress disorder be successfully treated? A randomized controlled pilot study. Cogn Behav Ther. 2010 Jan 1;39(2):81–91. doi: 10.1080/16506070903121042 19816834
27. Paunovic N, Öst LG. Cognitive-behavior therapy vs exposure therapy in the treatment of PTSD in refugees. Behav Res Ther. 2001 Oct 1;39(10):1183–97. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00093-0 11579988
28. Pokhariyal GP, Rono R, Munywoki S. Analysis of treatment methods for victims of torture in Kenya and East Africa region. Traumatology. 2013 Jun;19(2):107–17.
29. Schauer M, Elbert T, Gotthardt S, Rockstroh B, Odenwald M, Neuner F. Imaginary reliving in psychotherapy modifies mind and brain. Verhaltenstherapie. 2006 Jan 1;16(2):96–103.
30. ter Heide FJ, Mooren T, Kleijn W, de Jongh A, Kleber R. EMDR versus stabilisation in traumatised asylum seekers and refugees: Results of a pilot study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2011 Jan 1;2(1):5881.
31. Yeomans PD, Forman EM, Herbert JD, Yuen E. A randomized trial of a reconciliation workshop with and without PTSD psychoeducation in Burundian sample. J Trauma Stress. 2010 Jun;23(3):305–12. doi: 10.1002/jts.20531 20564362
32. Mollica RF, Caspi-Yavin Y, Bollini P, Truong T, Tor S, Lavelle J. The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire: validating a cross-cultural instrument for measuring torture, trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992 Feb;180(2):111–116. 1737972
33. Priebe S, Gavrilovic JJ, Bremner S, Ajdukovic D, Franciskovic T, Galeazzi GM, et al. Psychological symptoms as long-term consequences of war experiences. Psychopathology. 2013;46(1):45–54. doi: 10.1159/000338640 22890384
34. Miller KE, Rasmussen A. The mental health of civilians displaced by armed conflict: an ecological model of refugee distress. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Apr;26(2):129–38. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000172 27040595
35. Raghavan S, Rasmussen A, Rosenfeld B, Keller AS. Correlates of symptom reduction in treatment-seeking survivors of torture. Psychol Trauma. 2013 Jul;5(4):377.
36. McFarlane CA, Kaplan I. Evidence-based psychological interventions for adult survivors of torture and trauma: a 30-year review. Transcult Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;49(3–4):539–67. doi: 10.1177/1363461512447608 23008355
37. Salo CD, Bray EM. Empirically tested interventions for torture survivors: A systematic review through an ecological lens. Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 2016 Dec;2(4):449.
38. Crumlish N, O'Rourke K. A systematic review of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder among refugees and asylum-seekers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Apr 1;198(4):237–51. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181d61258 20386252
39. Nicholl C, Thompson A. The psychological treatment of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in adult refugees: A review of the current state of psychological therapies. J Ment Health. 2004 Aug 1;13(4):351–62.
40. Bronfenbrenner U. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychol. 1977 Jul;32(7):513.
41. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x 20874835
42. Pilkington K, Boshnakova A, Clarke M, Richardson J. "No language restrictions" in database searches: what does this really mean? J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Feb 1;11(1):205–7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.205 15750383
43. Kieling C, Herrman H, Patel V, Mari JD. Indexation of psychiatric journals from low-and middle-income countries: a survey and a case study. World Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;8(1):40. 19293959
44. Ioannidis JP, Patsopoulos NA, Evangelou E. Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2007 Nov 1;335(7626):914–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39343.408449.80 17974687
45. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539–58. doi: 10.1002/sim.1186 12111919
46. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. IASC guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support in emergency settings. Geneva, Switzerland: IASC 2006.
47. Esala JJ, Vukovich MM, Hanbury A, Kashyap S, Joscelyne A. Collaborative care for refugees and torture survivors: Key findings from the literature. Traumatology. 2018 Sep;24(3):168.
48. Goodkind JR. Promoting Hmong refugees’ well-being through mutual learning: Valuing knowledge, culture, and experience. Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Mar 1;37(1–2):77. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-9003-6 16680538
49. Morley S. Single case methods in clinical psychology: A practical guide. Routledge; 2017 Dec 22.
Štítky
Interné lekárstvoČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Medicine
2019 Číslo 9
- Statiny indukovaná myopatie: Jak na diferenciální diagnostiku?
- MUDr. Dana Vondráčková: Hepatopatie sú pri liečbe metamizolom väčším strašiakom ako agranulocytóza
- Vztah mezi statiny a rizikem vzniku nádorových onemocnění − metaanalýza
- Nech brouka žít… Ať žije astma!
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Evaluation of approaches to strengthen civil registration and vital statistics systems: A systematic review and synthesis of policies in 25 countries
- Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland
- Effect of a scaled-up neonatal resuscitation quality improvement package on intrapartum-related mortality in Nepal: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial
- The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to management of low back pain in general practice: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial