From Mouse to Human: Evolutionary Genomics Analysis of Human Orthologs of Essential Genes

English version České info

: Understanding the core set of genes that are necessary for basic developmental functions is one of the central goals in biology. Studies in model organisms identified a significant fraction of essential genes through the analysis of null-mutations that lead to lethality. Recent large-scale next-generation sequencing efforts have provided unprecedented data on genetic variation in human. However, evolutionary and genomic characteristics of human essential genes have never been directly studied on a genome-wide scale. Here we use detailed phenotypic resources available for the mouse and deep genomics sequencing data from human populations to characterize patterns of genetic variation and mutational burden in a set of 2,472 human orthologs of known essential genes in the mouse. Consistent with the action of strong, purifying selection, these genes exhibit comparatively reduced levels of sequence variation, skew in allele frequency towards more rare, and exhibit increased conservation across the primate and rodent lineages relative to the remainder of genes in the genome. In individual genomes we observed ∼12 rare mutations within essential genes predicted to be damaging. Consistent with the hypothesis that mutations in essential genes are risk factors for neurodevelopmental disease, we show that de novo variants in patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder are more likely to occur in this collection of genes. While incomplete, our set of human orthologs shows characteristics fully consistent with essential function in human and thus provides a resource to inform and facilitate interpretation of sequence data in studies of human disease.

Vyšlo v časopise: From Mouse to Human: Evolutionary Genomics Analysis of Human Orthologs of Essential Genes. PLoS Genet 9(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003484
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003484

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. SandersSJ, MurthaMT, GuptaAR, MurdochJD, RaubesonMJ, et al. (2012) De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature 485: 237–241.

2. NgBG, HackmannK, JonesMA, EroshkinAM, HeP, et al. (2012) Mutations in the glycosylphosphatidylinositol gene PIGL cause CHIME syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 90: 685–688.

3. EmondMJ, LouieT, EmersonJ, ZhaoW, MathiasRA, et al. (2012) Exome sequencing of extreme phenotypes identifies DCTN4 as a modifier of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Nat Genet

4. MortonNE, CrowJF, MullerHJ (1956) An Estimate of the Mutational Damage in Man from Data on Consanguineous Marriages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 42: 855–863.

5. BittlesAH, NeelJV (1994) The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nat Genet 8: 117–121.

6. KondrashovAS (1995) Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over? J Theor Biol 175: 583–594.

7. LohmuellerKE, IndapAR, SchmidtS, BoykoAR, HernandezRD, et al. (2008) Proportionally more deleterious genetic variation in European than in African populations. Nature 451: 994–997.

8. ChongJX, OuwengaR, AndersonRL, WaggonerDJ, OberC (2012) A population-based study of autosomal-recessive disease-causing mutations in a founder population. Am J Hum Genet 91: 608–620.

9. MacArthurDG, BalasubramanianS, FrankishA, HuangN, MorrisJ, et al. (2012) A systematic survey of loss-of-function variants in human protein-coding genes. Science 335: 823–828.

10. FuW, O'ConnorTD, JunG, KangHM, AbecasisG, et al. (2012) Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature

11. KumarP, HenikoffS, NgPC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4: 1073–1081.

12. AdzhubeiIA, SchmidtS, PeshkinL, RamenskyVE, GerasimovaA, et al. (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7: 248–249.

13. BlakeJA, BultCJ, KadinJA, RichardsonJE, EppigJT (2011) The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): premier model organism resource for mammalian genomics and genetics. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D842–848.

14. BradleyA, AnastassiadisK, AyadiA, BatteyJF, BellC, et al. (2012) The Mammalian Gene Function Resource - The International Knockout Mouse Consortium. Mammalian Genome in press.

15. AyadiA, BirlingM-C, BottomleyJ, BussellJ, FuchsH, et al. (2012) Mouse large-scale phenotyping initiatives: Overview of the European mouse disease clinic (EUMODIC) and of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Mouse Genetics Project. Mammalian Genome in press.

16. DickersonJE, ZhuA, RobertsonDL, HentgesKE (2011) Defining the role of essential genes in human disease. PLoS ONE 6: e27368 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027368.

17. ZhangM, ZhuC, JacomyA, LuLJ, JeggaAG (2011) The orphan disease networks. Am J Hum Genet 88: 755–766.

18. AbecasisGR, AutonA, BrooksLD, DePristoMA, DurbinRM, et al. (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491: 56–65.

19. HarrowJ, DenoeudF, FrankishA, ReymondA, ChenCK, et al. (2006) GENCODE: producing a reference annotation for ENCODE. Genome Biol 7 Suppl 1: 1–9, S4, 1-9.

20. StensonPD, MortM, BallEV, HowellsK, PhillipsAD, et al. (2009) The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update. Genome Med 1: 13.

21. DangVT, KassahnKS, MarcosAE, RaganMA (2008) Identification of human haploinsufficient genes and their genomic proximity to segmental duplications. Eur J Hum Genet 16: 1350–1357.

22. de JongeHJ, FehrmannRS, de BontES, HofstraRM, GerbensF, et al. (2007) Evidence based selection of housekeeping genes. PLoS ONE 2: e898 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000898.

23. PollardKS, HubiszMJ, RosenbloomKR, SiepelA (2010) Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res 20: 110–121.

24. KhaitovichP, HellmannI, EnardW, NowickK, LeinweberM, et al. (2005) Parallel patterns of evolution in the genomes and transcriptomes of humans and chimpanzees. Science 309: 1850–1854.

25. HadleyD, MurphyT, ValladaresO, HannenhalliS, UngarL, et al. (2006) Patterns of sequence conservation in presynaptic neural genes. Genome Biol 7: R105.

26. DuretL, MouchiroudD (2000) Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol Biol Evol 17: 68–74.

27. SuAI, WiltshireT, BatalovS, LappH, ChingKA, et al. (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 6062–6067.

28. NelsonMR, WegmannD, EhmMG, KessnerD, St JeanP, et al. (2012) An abundance of rare functional variants in 202 drug target genes sequenced in 14,002 people. Science 337: 100–104.

29. DrmanacR, SparksAB, CallowMJ, HalpernAL, BurnsNL, et al. (2010) Human genome sequencing using unchained base reads on self-assembling DNA nanoarrays. Science 327: 78–81.

30. IossifovI, RonemusM, LevyD, WangZ, HakkerI, et al. (2012) De novo gene disruptions in children on the autistic spectrum. Neuron 74: 285–299.

31. NealeBM, KouY, LiuL, Ma'ayanA, SamochaKE, et al. (2012) Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature 485: 242–245.

32. O'RoakBJ, VivesL, GirirajanS, KarakocE, KrummN, et al. (2012) Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature 485: 246–250.

33. StateMW, LevittP (2011) The conundrums of understanding genetic risks for autism spectrum disorders. Nat Neurosci 14: 1499–1506.

34. RossinEJ, LageK, RaychaudhuriS, XavierRJ, TatarD, et al. (2011) Proteins encoded in genomic regions associated with immune-mediated disease physically interact and suggest underlying biology. PLoS Genet 7: e1001273 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001273.

35. BrownSDM, MooreMW (2012) The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: past and future perspectives on mouse phenotyping. Mammalian Genome in press.

36. LiaoBY, ZhangJ (2008) Null mutations in human and mouse orthologs frequently result in different phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 6987–6992.

37. ZengH, ShenEH, HohmannJG, OhSW, BernardA, et al. (2012) Large-scale cellular-resolution gene profiling in human neocortex reveals species-specific molecular signatures. Cell 149: 483–496.

38. SuAI, CookeMP, ChingKA, HakakY, WalkerJR, et al. (2002) Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 4465–4470.

39. StrandAD, AragakiAK, BaquetZC, HodgesA, CunninghamP, et al. (2007) Conservation of regional gene expression in mouse and human brain. PLoS Genet 3: e59 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030059.

40. StitzielNO, KiezunA, SunyaevS (2011) Computational and statistical approaches to analyzing variants identified by exome sequencing. Genome Biol 12: 227.

41. PradoA, CanalI, FerrusA (1999) The haplolethal region at the 16F gene cluster of Drosophila melanogaster: structure and function. Genetics 151: 163–175.

42. HowellGR, MunroeRJ, SchimentiJC (2005) Transgenic rescue of the mouse t complex haplolethal locus Thl1. Mamm Genome 16: 838–846.

43. TuckerCL, FieldsS (2003) Lethal combinations. Nat Genet 35: 204–205.

44. StateMW, SestanN (2012) Neuroscience. The emerging biology of autism spectrum disorders. Science 337: 1301–1303.

45. SteinJL, ParikshakNN, GeschwindDH (2013) Rare inherited variation in autism: beginning to see the forest and a few trees. Neuron 77: 209–211.

46. LiuX, JianX, BoerwinkleE (2011) dbNSFP: a lightweight database of human nonsynonymous SNPs and their functional predictions. Hum Mutat 32: 894–899.