#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Implicates Tyrosine-Sulfated Peptide Signaling in Susceptibility and Resistance to Root Infection


In the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, multiple quantitative trait loci (QTLs), including RFO2, account for the strong resistance of accession Columbia-0 (Col-0) and relative susceptibility of Taynuilt-0 (Ty-0) to the vascular wilt fungus Fusarium oxysporum forma specialis matthioli. We find that RFO2 corresponds to diversity in receptor-like protein (RLP) genes. In Col-0, there is a tandem pair of RLP genes: RFO2/At1g17250 confers resistance while RLP2 does not. In Ty-0, the highly diverged RFO2 locus has one RLP gene conferring weaker resistance. While the endogenous RFO2 makes a modest contribution to resistance, transgenic RFO2 provides strong pathogen-specific resistance. The extracellular leucine-rich repeats (eLRRs) in RFO2 and RLP2 are interchangeable for resistance and remarkably similar to eLRRs in the receptor-like kinase PSY1R, which perceives tyrosine-sulfated peptide PSY1. Reduced infection in psy1r and mutants of related phytosulfokine (PSK) receptor genes PSKR1 and PSKR2 shows that tyrosine-sulfated peptide signaling promotes susceptibility. The related eLRRs in RFO2 and PSY1R are not interchangeable; and expression of the RLP nPcR, in which eLRRs in RFO2 are replaced with eLRRs in PSY1R, results in constitutive resistance. Counterintuitively, PSY1 signaling suppresses nPcR because psy1r nPcR is lethal. The fact that PSK signaling does not similarly affect nPcR argues that PSY1 signaling directly downregulates the expression of nPcR. Our results support a speculative but intriguing model to explain RFO2's role in resistance. We propose that F. oxysporum produces an effector that inhibits the normal negative feedback regulation of PSY1R, which stabilizes PSY1 signaling and induces susceptibility. However, RFO2, acting as a decoy receptor for PSY1R, is also stabilized by the effector and instead induces host immunity. Overall, the quantitative resistance of RFO2 is reminiscent of the better-studied monogenic resistance traits.


Vyšlo v časopise: Implicates Tyrosine-Sulfated Peptide Signaling in Susceptibility and Resistance to Root Infection. PLoS Genet 9(5): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003525
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003525

Souhrn

In the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, multiple quantitative trait loci (QTLs), including RFO2, account for the strong resistance of accession Columbia-0 (Col-0) and relative susceptibility of Taynuilt-0 (Ty-0) to the vascular wilt fungus Fusarium oxysporum forma specialis matthioli. We find that RFO2 corresponds to diversity in receptor-like protein (RLP) genes. In Col-0, there is a tandem pair of RLP genes: RFO2/At1g17250 confers resistance while RLP2 does not. In Ty-0, the highly diverged RFO2 locus has one RLP gene conferring weaker resistance. While the endogenous RFO2 makes a modest contribution to resistance, transgenic RFO2 provides strong pathogen-specific resistance. The extracellular leucine-rich repeats (eLRRs) in RFO2 and RLP2 are interchangeable for resistance and remarkably similar to eLRRs in the receptor-like kinase PSY1R, which perceives tyrosine-sulfated peptide PSY1. Reduced infection in psy1r and mutants of related phytosulfokine (PSK) receptor genes PSKR1 and PSKR2 shows that tyrosine-sulfated peptide signaling promotes susceptibility. The related eLRRs in RFO2 and PSY1R are not interchangeable; and expression of the RLP nPcR, in which eLRRs in RFO2 are replaced with eLRRs in PSY1R, results in constitutive resistance. Counterintuitively, PSY1 signaling suppresses nPcR because psy1r nPcR is lethal. The fact that PSK signaling does not similarly affect nPcR argues that PSY1 signaling directly downregulates the expression of nPcR. Our results support a speculative but intriguing model to explain RFO2's role in resistance. We propose that F. oxysporum produces an effector that inhibits the normal negative feedback regulation of PSY1R, which stabilizes PSY1 signaling and induces susceptibility. However, RFO2, acting as a decoy receptor for PSY1R, is also stabilized by the effector and instead induces host immunity. Overall, the quantitative resistance of RFO2 is reminiscent of the better-studied monogenic resistance traits.


Zdroje

1. Beckman CH (1987) The nature of wilt diseases of plants. St. Paul: American Phytopathological Society.

2. BeckmanCH, RobertsEM (1995) On the nature and genetic basis for resistance and tolerance to fungal wilt diseases of plants. Adv Bot Res 21: 35–77.

3. Mace ME, Bell AA, Beckman CH, editors (1981) Fungal wilt diseases of plants. New York: Academic Press.

4. TalboysPW (1972) Resistance to vascular wilt fungi. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 181: 319–332.

5. LiuJ, BellAA, WheelerMH, StipanovicRD, PuckhaberLS (2011) Phylogeny and pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum isolates from cottonseed imported from Australia into California for dairy cattle feed. Can J Microbiol 57: 874–886.

6. FourieG, SteenkampET, GordonTR, ViljoenA (2009) Evolutionary relationships among the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense vegetative compatibility groups. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 4770–4781.

7. KistlerHC (1997) Genetic diversity in the plant-pathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Phytopathology 87: 474–479.

8. BakerKF (1948) Fusarium wilt of garden stock (Mathiola incana). Phytopathology 38: 399–403.

9. DienerAC, AusubelFM (2005) RESISTANCE TO FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM 1, a dominant Arabidopsis disease-resistance gene, is not race specific. Genetics 171: 305–321.

10. KoornneefM, MeinkeD (2010) The development of Arabidopsis as a model plant. Plant J 61: 909–921.

11. BoslandPW, WilliamsPH (1987) An evaluation of Fusarium oxysporum from crucifers based on pathogenicity isozyme polymorphism, vegetative compatibility and geographic origin. Can J Bot 65: 2067–2073.

12. KendrickJB, SnyderWC (1942) Fusarium wilt of radish. Phytopathology 32: 1031–1033.

13. JosephC, GilmanJC (1916) Cabbage Yellows and the Relation of Temperature to Its Occurrence. Ann Mo Bot Gard 3: 25–84.

14. SherbakoffCD (1949) Breeding for resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium wilts. Bot Rev 15: 377–422.

15. LaineA-L, BurdonJJ, DoddsPN, ThrallPH (2011) Spatial variation in disease resistance: from molecules to metapopulations. J Ecol 99: 96–112.

16. GoicoecheaN (2009) To what extent are soil amendments useful to control Verticillium wilt? Pest Manag Sci 65: 831–839.

17. MichielseCB, RepM (2009) Pathogen profile update: Fusarium oxysporum. Mol Plant Pathol 10: 311–324.

18. AndersonJP, BadruzsaufariE, SchenkPM, MannersJM, DesmondOJ, et al. (2004) Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16: 3460–3479.

19. TrusovY, RookesJE, ChakravortyD, ArmourD, SchenkPM, et al. (2006) Heterotrimeric G proteins facilitate Arabidopsis resistance to necrotrophic pathogens and are involved in jasmonate signaling. Plant Physiol 140: 210–220.

20. BoydLA, RidoutC, O'SullivanDM, LeachJE, LeungH (2012) Plant-pathogen interactions: disease resistance in modern agriculture. Trends Genet doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.10.011

21. St ClairDA (2010) Quantitative disease resistance and quantitative resistance Loci in breeding. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48: 247–268.

22. RafiqiM, BernouxM, EllisJG, DoddsPN (2009) In the trenches of plant pathogen recognition: Role of NB-LRR proteins. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20: 1017–1024.

23. BentAF, MackeyD (2007) Elicitors, effectors, and R genes: the new paradigm and a lifetime supply of questions. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45: 399–436.

24. KouY, WangS (2012) Toward an understanding of the molecular basis of quantitative disease resistance in rice. J Biotechnol 159: 283–290.

25. ZhangY, LubberstedtT, XuM (2013) The genetic and molecular basis of plant resistance to pathogens. J Genet Genomics 40: 23–35.

26. PolandJS, Balint-KurtiPJ, WisserRJ, PrattRC, NelsonRJ (2009) Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci 14: 21–29.

27. Lehti-ShiuMD, ZouC, HanadaK, ShiuSH (2009) Evolutionary history and stress regulation of plant receptor-like kinase/pelle genes. Plant Physiol 150: 12–26.

28. DienerA (2012) Visualizing and quantifying Fusarium oxysporum in the plant host. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25: 1531–1541.

29. AmanoY, TsubouchiH, ShinoharaH, OgawaM, MatsubayashiY (2007) Tyrosine-sulfated glycopeptide involved in cellular proliferation and expansion in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 18333–18338.

30. MatsubayashiY, OgawaM, KiharaH, NiwaM, SakagamiY (2006) Disruption and overexpression of Arabidopsis phytosulfokine receptor gene affects cellular longevity and potential for growth. Plant Physiol 142: 45–53.

31. WangG, EllendorffU, KempB, MansfieldJW, ForsythA, et al. (2008) A genome-wide functional investigation into the roles of receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 147: 503–517.

32. ThatcherLF, MannersJM, KazanK (2009) Fusarium oxysporum hijacks COI1-mediated jasmonate signaling to promote disease development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 58: 927–939.

33. Fritz-LaylinLK, KrishnamurthyN, TörM, SjölanderKV, JonesJD (2005) Phylogenomic analysis of the receptor-like proteins of rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138: 611–623.

34. JonesDA, JonesJD (1997) The role of leucine-rich repeat proteins in plant defences. Adv Bot Res 24: 89–167.

35. MalikK, WuK, LiXQ, Martin-HellerT, HuM, et al. (2002) A constitutive gene expression system derived from the tCUP cryptic promoter elements. Theor Appl Genet 105: 505–514.

36. CoutuC, BrandleJ, BrownD, BrownK, MikiB, et al. (2007) pORE: a modular binary vector series suited for both monocot and dicot plant transformation. Transgenic Res 16: 771–781.

37. MotoseH, IwamotoK, EndoS, DemuraT, SakagamiY, et al. (2009) Involvement of phytosulfokine in the attenuation of stress response during the transdifferentiation of zinnia mesophyll cells into tracheary elements. Plant Physiol 150: 437–447.

38. KomoriR, AmanoY, Ogawa-OhnishiM, MatsubayashiY (2009) Identification of tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 15067–15072.

39. ZhouW, WeiL, XuJ, ZhaiQ, JiangH, et al. (2010) Arabidopsis Tyrosylprotein sulfotransferase acts in the auxin/PLETHORA pathway in regulating postembryonic maintenance of the root stem cell niche. Plant Cell 22: 3692–3709.

40. BombliesK, LempeJ, EppleP, WarthmannN, LanzC, et al. (2007) Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky-Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol 5: e236 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050236

41. YangS, YangH, GrisafiP, SanchatjateS, FinkGR, et al. (2006) The BON/CPN gene family represses cell death and promotes cell growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J 45: 166–179.

42. YangH, ShiY, LiuJ, GuoL, ZhangX, et al. (2010) A mutant CHS3 protein with TIR-NB-LRR-LIM domains modulates growth, cell death and freezing tolerance in a temperature-dependent manner in Arabidopsis. Plant J 63: 283–296.

43. ZhangY, YangY, FangB, GannonP, DingP, et al. (2010) Arabidopsis snc2-1D activates receptor-like protein-mediated immunity transduced through WRKY70. Plant Cell 22: 3153–3163.

44. BleckmannA, Weidtkamp-PetersS, SeidelCA, SimonR (2010) Stem cell signaling in Arabidopsis requires CRN to localize CLV2 to the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol 152: 166–176.

45. RussinovaE, BorstJW, KwaaitaalM, Caño-DelgadoA, YinY, et al. (2004) Heterodimerization and endocytosis of Arabidopsis brassinosteroid receptors BRI1 and AtSERK3 (BAK1). Plant Cell 16: 3216–3229.

46. LeisterD (2004) Tandem and segmental gene duplication and recombination in the evolution of plant disease resistance gene. Trends Genet 20: 116–122.

47. PanQ, LiuYS, Budai-HadrianO, SelaM, Carmel-GorenL, et al. (2000) Comparative genetics of nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics 155: 309–322.

48. RamonellK, Berrocal-LoboM, KohS, WanJ, EdwardsH, et al. (2005) Loss-of-function mutations in chitin responsive genes show increased susceptibility to the powdery mildew pathogen Erysiphe cichoracearum. Plant Physiol 138: 1027–1036.

49. ZhangY, YangY, FangB, GannonP, DingP, et al. (2010) Arabidopsis snc2-1D activates receptor-like protein-mediated immunity transduced through WRKY70. Plant Cell 22: 3153–3163.

50. WulffBB, ChakrabartiA, JonesDA (2009) Recognitional specificity and evolution in the tomato-Cladosporium fulvum pathosystem. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22: 1191–1202.

51. FradinEF, ZhangZ, Juarez AyalaJC, CastroverdeCD, et al. (2009) Genetic dissection of Verticillium wilt resistance mediated by tomato Ve1. Plant Physiol 150: 320–332.

52. KruijtM, de KockMJ, de WitPJ (2005) Receptor-like proteins involved in plant disease resistance. Mol Plant Pathol 6: 85–97.

53. de JongeR, van EsseHP, MaruthachalamK, BoltonMD, SanthanamP, et al. (2012) Tomato immune receptor Ve1 recognizes effector of multiple fungal pathogens uncovered by genome and RNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 5110–5115.

54. MalnoyM, XuM, Borejsza-WysockaE, KorbanSS, AldwinckleHS (2008) Two receptor-like genes, Vfa1 and Vfa2, confer resistance to the fungal pathogen Venturia inaequalis inciting apple scab disease. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 21: 448–458.

55. RonM, AvniA (2004) The receptor for the fungal elicitor ethylene-inducing xylanase is a member of a resistance-like gene family in tomato. Plant Cell 16: 1604–1615.

56. RouxelT, BalesdentM-H (2013) From model to crop plant–pathogen interactions: cloning of the first resistance gene to Leptosphaeria maculans in Brassica napus. New Phytol 197: 356–358.

57. ThommaBP, NürnbergerT, JoostenMH (2011) Of PAMPs and effectors: the blurred PTI-ETI dichotomy. Plant Cell 23: 4–15.

58. IgarashiD, TsudaK, KatagiriF (2012) The peptide growth factor, phytosulfokine, attenuates pattern-triggered immunity. Plant J 71: 194–204.

59. YamakawaS, MatsubayashiY, SakagamiY, KamadaH, SatohS (1999) Promotive effects of the peptidyl plant growth factor, phytosulfokine-alpha, on the growth and chlorophyll content of Arabidopsis seedlings under high night-time temperature conditions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 63: 2240–2243.

60. MatsuzakiY, Ogawa-OhnishiM, MoriA, MatsubayashiY (2010) Secreted peptide signals required for maintenance of root stem cell niche in Arabidopsis. Science 329: 1065–1067.

61. WangGL, RuanDL, SongWY, SiderisS, ChenL, et al. (1998) Xa21D encodes a receptor-like molecule with a leucine-rich repeat domain that determines race-specific recognition and is subject to adaptive evolution. Plant Cell 10: 765–779.

62. GoodsteinDM, ShuS, HowsonR, NeupaneR, HayesRD, et al. (2012) Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D1178–1186.

63. van der HoornRA, KamounS (2008) From Guard to Decoy: a new model for perception of plant pathogen effectors. Plant Cell 20: 2009–2017.

64. ShinoharaH, OgawaM, SakagamiY, MatsubayashiY (2007) Identification of ligand binding site of phytosulfokine receptor by on-column photoaffinity labeling. J Biol Chem 282: 124–131.

65. WangG, LongY, ThommaBP, de WitPJ, AngenentGC, et al. (2010) Functional analyses of the CLAVATA2-like proteins and their domains that contribute to CLAVATA2 specificity. Plant Physiol 152: 320–331.

66. LiY, PenningtonBO, HuaJ (2009) Multiple R-like genes are negatively regulated by BON1 and BON3 in arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22: 840–848.

67. YangS, YangH, GrisafiP, SanchatjateS, FinkGR, et al. (2006) The BON/CPN gene family represses cell death and promotes cell growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J 45: 166–179.

68. AltenbachD, RobatzekS (2007) Pattern recognition receptors: from the cell surface to intracellular dynamics. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20: 1031–1039.

69. RobatzekS, ChinchillaD, BollerT (2006) Ligand-induced endocytosis of the pattern recognition receptor FLS2 in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev 20: 537–542.

70. LuD, LinW, GaoX, WuS, ChengC, et al. (2011) Direct ubiquitination of pattern recognition receptor FLS2 attenuates plant innate immunity. Science 332: 1439–1442.

71. HorvathH, RostoksN, BrueggemanR, SteffensonB, von WettsteinD, KleinhofsA (2003) Genetically engineered stem rust resistance in barley using the Rpg1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 364–369.

72. WhalenMC (2005) Host defence in a developmental context. Mol Plant Pathol 6: 347–360.

73. HaughnGW, SomervilleC (1986) Sulfonylurea-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 204: 430–434.

74. KistlerHC, MomolEA, BennyU (1991) Repetitive genomic sequences for determining relatedness among strains of Fusarium oxysporum. Phytopathology 81: 331–336.

75. HajdukiewiczP, SvabZ, MaligaP (1994) The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 25: 989–994.

76. NoéL, KucherovG (2005) YASS: enhancing the sensitivity of DNA similarity search. Nucleic Acids Res 33: W540–543.

77. CelenzaJLJr, GrisafiPL, FinkGR (1995) A pathway for lateral root formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev 9: 2131–2142.

78. CloughSJ, BentAF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16: 735–743.

79. TamuraK, PetersonD, PetersonN, StecherG, NeiM, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2013 Číslo 5
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#