Comparative Oncogenomic Analysis of Copy Number Alterations in Human and Zebrafish Tumors Enables Cancer Driver Discovery
The identification of cancer drivers is a major goal of current cancer research. Finding driver genes within large chromosomal events is especially challenging because such alterations encompass many genes. Previously, we demonstrated that zebrafish malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are highly aneuploid, much like human tumors. In this study, we examined 147 zebrafish MPNSTs by massively parallel sequencing and identified both large and focal copy number alterations (CNAs). Given the low degree of conserved synteny between fish and mammals, we reasoned that comparative analyses of CNAs from fish versus human MPNSTs would enable elimination of a large proportion of passenger mutations, especially on large CNAs. We established a list of orthologous genes between human and zebrafish, which includes approximately two-thirds of human protein-coding genes. For the subset of these genes found in human MPNST CNAs, only one quarter of their orthologues were co-gained or co-lost in zebrafish, dramatically narrowing the list of candidate cancer drivers for both focal and large CNAs. We conclude that zebrafish-human comparative analysis represents a powerful, and broadly applicable, tool to enrich for evolutionarily conserved cancer drivers.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Comparative Oncogenomic Analysis of Copy Number Alterations in Human and Zebrafish Tumors Enables Cancer Driver Discovery. PLoS Genet 9(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003734
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003734
Souhrn
The identification of cancer drivers is a major goal of current cancer research. Finding driver genes within large chromosomal events is especially challenging because such alterations encompass many genes. Previously, we demonstrated that zebrafish malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are highly aneuploid, much like human tumors. In this study, we examined 147 zebrafish MPNSTs by massively parallel sequencing and identified both large and focal copy number alterations (CNAs). Given the low degree of conserved synteny between fish and mammals, we reasoned that comparative analyses of CNAs from fish versus human MPNSTs would enable elimination of a large proportion of passenger mutations, especially on large CNAs. We established a list of orthologous genes between human and zebrafish, which includes approximately two-thirds of human protein-coding genes. For the subset of these genes found in human MPNST CNAs, only one quarter of their orthologues were co-gained or co-lost in zebrafish, dramatically narrowing the list of candidate cancer drivers for both focal and large CNAs. We conclude that zebrafish-human comparative analysis represents a powerful, and broadly applicable, tool to enrich for evolutionarily conserved cancer drivers.
Zdroje
1. StrattonMR, CampbellPJ, FutrealPA (2009) The cancer genome. Nature 458: 719–724.
2. MeyersonM, GabrielS, GetzG (2010) Advances in understanding cancer genomes through second-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 11: 685–696.
3. PinkelD, AlbertsonDG (2005) Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer. Nat Genet 37 Suppl: S11–17.
4. BeroukhimR, MermelCH, PorterD, WeiG, RaychaudhuriS, et al. (2010) The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463: 899–905.
5. SaweyET, ChanrionM, CaiC, WuG, ZhangJ, et al. (2011) Identification of a therapeutic strategy targeting amplified FGF19 in liver cancer by Oncogenomic screening. Cancer Cell 19: 347–358.
6. BaudisM (2007) Genomic imbalances in 5918 malignant epithelial tumors: an explorative meta-analysis of chromosomal CGH data. BMC Cancer 7: 226.
7. KimTM, XiR, LuquetteLJ, ParkRW, JohnsonMD, et al. (2013) Functional genomic analysis of chromosomal aberrations in a compendium of 8000 cancer genomes. Genome Res 23: 217–227.
8. GarrawayLA, LanderES (2013) Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell 153: 17–37.
9. VogelsteinB, PapadopoulosN, VelculescuVE, ZhouS, DiazLAJr, et al. (2013) Cancer genome landscapes. Science 339: 1546–1558.
10. FrohlingS, DohnerH (2008) Chromosomal abnormalities in cancer. N Engl J Med 359: 722–734.
11. LinWM, BakerAC, BeroukhimR, WincklerW, FengW, et al. (2008) Modeling genomic diversity and tumor dependency in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 68: 664–673.
12. WeirBA, WooMS, GetzG, PernerS, DingL, et al. (2007) Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 450: 893–898.
13. ChinL, GrayJW (2008) Translating insights from the cancer genome into clinical practice. Nature 452: 553–563.
14. ZenderL, LoweSW (2008) Integrative oncogenomic approaches for accelerated cancer-gene discovery. Curr Opin Oncol 20: 72–76.
15. MacleodKF, JacksT (1999) Insights into cancer from transgenic mouse models. The Journal of pathology 187: 43–60.
16. KimM, GansJD, NogueiraC, WangA, PaikJH, et al. (2006) Comparative oncogenomics identifies NEDD9 as a melanoma metastasis gene. Cell 125: 1269–1281.
17. MaserRS, ChoudhuryB, CampbellPJ, FengB, WongKK, et al. (2007) Chromosomally unstable mouse tumours have genomic alterations similar to diverse human cancers. Nature 447: 966–971.
18. TangJ, LeS, SunL, YanX, ZhangM, et al. (2010) Copy number abnormalities in sporadic canine colorectal cancers. Genome Res 20: 341–350.
19. ZenderL, SpectorMS, XueW, FlemmingP, Cordon-CardoC, et al. (2006) Identification and validation of oncogenes in liver cancer using an integrative oncogenomic approach. Cell 125: 1253–1267.
20. WallaceMD, PfefferleAD, ShenL, McNairnAJ, CeramiEG, et al. (2012) Comparative oncogenomics implicates the neurofibromin 1 gene (NF1) as a breast cancer driver. Genetics 192: 385–396.
21. KazmiSJ, ByerSJ, EckertJM, TurkAN, HuijbregtsRP, et al. (2013) Transgenic Mice Overexpressing Neuregulin-1 Model Neurofibroma-Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Progression and Implicate Specific Chromosomal Copy Number Variations in Tumorigenesis. Am J Pathol 182 ((3)): 646–67.
22. PostlethwaitJH, YanYL, GatesMA, HorneS, AmoresA, et al. (1998) Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat Genet 18: 345–349.
23. KasaharaM, NaruseK, SasakiS, NakataniY, QuW, et al. (2007) The medaka draft genome and insights into vertebrate genome evolution. Nature 447: 714–719.
24. CatchenJM, ConeryJS, PostlethwaitJH (2009) Automated identification of conserved synteny after whole-genome duplication. Genome Res 19: 1497–1505.
25. MioneMC, TredeNS (2010) The zebrafish as a model for cancer. Dis Model Mech 3: 517–523.
26. ZhuS, LeeJS, GuoF, ShinJ, Perez-AtaydeAR, et al. (2012) Activated ALK collaborates with MYCN in neuroblastoma pathogenesis. Cancer Cell 21: 362–373.
27. AmsterdamA, SadlerKC, LaiK, FarringtonS, BronsonRT, et al. (2004) Many ribosomal protein genes are cancer genes in zebrafish. PLoS Biol 2: E139.
28. BerghmansS, MurpheyRD, WienholdsE, NeubergD, KutokJL, et al. (2005) tp53 mutant zebrafish develop malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 407–412.
29. FaucherreA, TaylorGS, OvervoordeJ, DixonJE, HertogJ (2008) Zebrafish pten genes have overlapping and non-redundant functions in tumorigenesis and embryonic development. Oncogene 27: 1079–1086.
30. LangenauDM, TraverD, FerrandoAA, KutokJL, AsterJC, et al. (2003) Myc-induced T cell leukemia in transgenic zebrafish. Science 299: 887–890.
31. LangenauDM, KeefeMD, StorerNY, GuyonJR, KutokJL, et al. (2007) Effects of RAS on the genesis of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Genes & development 21: 1382–1395.
32. PattonEE, WidlundHR, KutokJL, KopaniKR, AmatrudaJF, et al. (2005) BRAF mutations are sufficient to promote nevi formation and cooperate with p53 in the genesis of melanoma. Curr Biol 15: 249–254.
33. ShinJ, PadmanabhanA, de GrohED, LeeJS, HaidarS, et al. (2012) Zebrafish neurofibromatosis type 1 genes have redundant functions in tumorigenesis and embryonic development. Dis Model Mech 5: 881–894.
34. RudnerLA, BrownKH, DobrinskiKP, BradleyDF, GarciaMI, et al. (2011) Shared acquired genomic changes in zebrafish and human T-ALL. Oncogene 30: 4289–4296.
35. LaiK, AmsterdamA, FarringtonS, BronsonRT, HopkinsN, et al. (2009) Many ribosomal protein mutations are associated with growth impairment and tumor predisposition in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 238: 76–85.
36. MacInnesAW, AmsterdamA, WhittakerCA, HopkinsN, LeesJA (2008) Loss of p53 synthesis in zebrafish tumors with ribosomal protein gene mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 10408–10413.
37. CichowskiK, ShihTS, SchmittE, SantiagoS, ReillyK, et al. (1999) Mouse models of tumor development in neurofibromatosis type 1. Science 286: 2172–2176.
38. Jimenez-HeffernanJA, Lopez-FerrerP, VicandiB, HardissonD, GamalloC, et al. (1999) Cytologic features of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Acta Cytol 43: 175–183.
39. WoodruffJM (1999) Pathology of tumors of the peripheral nerve sheath in type 1 neurofibromatosis. Am J Med Genet 89: 23–30.
40. NielsenGP, Stemmer-RachamimovAO, InoY, MollerMB, RosenbergAE, et al. (1999) Malignant transformation of neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis 1 is associated with CDKN2A/p16 inactivation. Am J Pathol 155: 1879–1884.
41. BeertE, BremsH, DanielsB, De WeverI, Van CalenberghF, et al. (2011) Atypical neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis type 1 are premalignant tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 50: 1021–1032.
42. NielsenGP, BurnsKL, RosenbergAE, LouisDN (1998) CDKN2A gene deletions and loss of p16 expression occur in osteosarcomas that lack RB alterations. Am J Pathol 153: 159–163.
43. ZhangG, HoerschS, AmsterdamA, WhittakerCA, LeesJA, et al. (2010) Highly aneuploid zebrafish malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors have genetic alterations similar to human cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 16940–16945.
44. BrekkeHR, RibeiroFR, KolbergM, AgesenTH, LindGE, et al. (2010) Genomic changes in chromosomes 10, 16, and X in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors identify a high-risk patient group. J Clin Oncol 28: 1573–1582.
45. BrownKH, DobrinskiKP, LeeAS, GokcumenO, MillsRE, et al. (2012) Extensive genetic diversity and substructuring among zebrafish strains revealed through copy number variant analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 529–534.
46. KavumpurathS, PandianTJ (1990) Induction of triploidy in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio (Hamilton). Aquaculture Research 21: 299–306.
47. BeroukhimR, GetzG, NghiemphuL, BarretinaJ, HsuehT, et al. (2007) Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 20007–20012.
48. Sanchez-GarciaF, AkaviaUD, MozesE, Pe'erD (2010) JISTIC: identification of significant targets in cancer. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 189.
49. JohnsonSL, AfricaD, HorneS, PostlethwaitJH (1995) Half-tetrad analysis in zebrafish: mapping the ros mutation and the centromere of linkage group I. Genetics 139: 1727–1735.
50. JohnsonSL, GatesMA, JohnsonM, TalbotWS, HorneS, et al. (1996) Centromere-linkage analysis and consolidation of the zebrafish genetic map. Genetics 142: 1277–1288.
51. KauffmanEJ, GestlEE, KimDJ, WalkerC, HiteJM, et al. (1995) Microsatellite-centromere mapping in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Genomics 30: 337–341.
52. MohideenMA, MooreJL, ChengKC (2000) Centromere-linked microsatellite markers for linkage groups 3, 4, 6, 7, 13, and 20 of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Genomics 67: 102–106.
53. StreisingerG, SingerF, WalkerC, KnauberD, DowerN (1986) Segregation analyses and gene-centromere distances in zebrafish. Genetics 112: 311–319.
54. StephensPJ, GreenmanCD, FuB, YangF, BignellGR, et al. (2011) Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144: 27–40.
55. YuJ, DeshmukhH, PaytonJE, DunhamC, ScheithauerBW, et al. (2011) Array-based comparative genomic hybridization identifies CDK4 and FOXM1 alterations as independent predictors of survival in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Clin Cancer Res 17: 1924–1934.
56. WatsonMA, PerryA, TihanT, PraysonRA, GuhaA, et al. (2004) Gene expression profiling reveals unique molecular subtypes of Neurofibromatosis Type I-associated and sporadic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Brain Pathol 14: 297–303.
57. SchmidtH, TaubertH, MeyeA, WurlP, BacheM, et al. (2000) Gains in chromosomes 7, 8q, 15q and 17q are characteristic changes in malignant but not in benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors from patients with Recklinghausen's disease. Cancer letters 155: 181–190.
58. KresseSH, SkarnM, OhnstadHO, NamlosHM, BjerkehagenB, et al. (2008) DNA copy number changes in high-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors by array CGH. Mol Cancer 7: 48.
59. NakagawaY, YoshidaA, NumotoK, KunisadaT, WaiD, et al. (2006) Chromosomal imbalances in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor detected by metaphase and microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Oncology reports 15: 297–303.
60. AmoresA, ForceA, YanYL, JolyL, AmemiyaC, et al. (1998) Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282: 1711–1714.
61. ForceA, LynchM, PickettFB, AmoresA, YanYL, et al. (1999) Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151: 1531–1545.
62. TautzD, Domazet-LosoT (2011) The evolutionary origin of orphan genes. Nat Rev Genet 12: 692–702.
63. HulsebosTJ, PlompAS, WoltermanRA, Robanus-MaandagEC, BaasF, et al. (2007) Germline mutation of INI1/SMARCB1 in familial schwannomatosis. Am J Hum Genet 80: 805–810.
64. McClatcheyAI (2007) Neurofibromatosis. Annu Rev Pathol 2: 191–216.
65. GregorianC, NakashimaJ, DrySM, NghiemphuPL, SmithKB, et al. (2009) PTEN dosage is essential for neurofibroma development and malignant transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 19479–19484.
66. JiangQ, WangY, HaoY, JuanL, TengM, et al. (2009) miR2Disease: a manually curated database for microRNA deregulation in human disease. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D98–104.
67. AmsterdamA, NissenRM, SunZ, SwindellEC, FarringtonS, et al. (2004) Identification of 315 genes essential for early zebrafish development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 12792–12797.
68. McClatcheyAI, SaotomeI, MercerK, CrowleyD, GusellaJF, et al. (1998) Mice heterozygous for a mutation at the Nf2 tumor suppressor locus develop a range of highly metastatic tumors. Genes Dev 12: 1121–1133.
69. PhillipsRB, AmoresA, MoraschMR, WilsonC, PostlethwaitJH (2006) Assignment of zebrafish genetic linkage groups to chromosomes. Cytogenet Genome Res 114: 155–162.
70. Mitelman F, Johansson B, Mertens FE (2013) Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer (2013). Mitelman F, Johansson B and Mertens F (Eds.), http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman.
71. BakhoumSF, DanilovaOV, KaurP, LevyNB, ComptonDA (2011) Chromosomal instability substantiates poor prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 17: 7704–7711.
72. CarterSL, EklundAC, KohaneIS, HarrisLN, SzallasiZ (2006) A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers. Nat Genet 38: 1043–1048.
73. WaltherA, HoulstonR, TomlinsonI (2008) Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Gut 57: 941–950.
74. RoesslerS, LongEL, BudhuA, ChenY, ZhaoX, et al. (2012) Integrative genomic identification of genes on 8p associated with hepatocellular carcinoma progression and patient survival. Gastroenterology 142: 957–966 e912.
75. ShefferM, BacolodMD, ZukO, GiardinaSF, PincasH, et al. (2009) Association of survival and disease progression with chromosomal instability: a genomic exploration of colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 7131–7136.
76. SmidM, HoesM, SieuwertsAM, SleijferS, ZhangY, et al. (2011) Patterns and incidence of chromosomal instability and their prognostic relevance in breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 128: 23–30.
77. McGranahanN, BurrellRA, EndesfelderD, NovelliMR, SwantonC (2012) Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges. EMBO Rep 13: 528–538.
78. XueW, KitzingT, RoesslerS, ZuberJ, KrasnitzA, et al. (2012) A cluster of cooperating tumor-suppressor gene candidates in chromosomal deletions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 8212–8217.
79. TorresKE, ZhuQS, BillK, LopezG, GhadimiMP, et al. (2011) Activated MET is a molecular prognosticator and potential therapeutic target for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Clin Cancer Res 17: 3943–3955.
80. DaiC, SantagataS, TangZ, ShiJ, CaoJ, et al. (2012) Loss of tumor suppressor NF1 activates HSF1 to promote carcinogenesis. J Clin Invest 122: 3742–3754.
81. DemestreM, HerzbergJ, HoltkampN, HagelC, ReussD, et al. (2010) Imatinib mesylate (Glivec) inhibits Schwann cell viability and reduces the size of human plexiform neurofibroma in a xenograft model. J Neurooncol 98: 11–19.
82. HoltkampN, OkuducuAF, MuchaJ, AfanasievaA, HartmannC, et al. (2006) Mutation and expression of PDGFRA and KIT in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and its implications for imatinib sensitivity. Carcinogenesis 27: 664–671.
83. ZietschJ, ZiegenhagenN, HeppnerFL, ReussD, von DeimlingA, et al. (2010) The 4q12 amplicon in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: consequences on gene expression and implications for sunitinib treatment. PLoS One 5: e11858.
84. StorlazziCT, BrekkeHR, MandahlN, BrosjoO, SmelandS, et al. (2006) Identification of a novel amplicon at distal 17q containing the BIRC5/SURVIVIN gene in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. J Pathol 209: 492–500.
85. GhadimiMP, YoungED, BelousovR, ZhangY, LopezG, et al. (2012) Survivin is a viable target for the treatment of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Clin Cancer Res 18: 2545–2557.
86. DillonLW, BurrowAA, WangYH (2010) DNA instability at chromosomal fragile sites in cancer. Curr Genomics 11: 326–337.
87. AqeilanRI, CalinGA, CroceCM (2010) miR-15a and miR-16-1 in cancer: discovery, function and future perspectives. Cell Death Differ 17: 215–220.
88. ChaiG, LiuN, MaJ, LiH, OblingerJL, et al. (2010) MicroRNA-10b regulates tumorigenesis in neurofibromatosis type 1. Cancer Sci 101: 1997–2004.
89. AmsterdamA, VarshneyGK, BurgessSM (2011) Retroviral-mediated Insertional Mutagenesis in Zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 104: 59–82.
90. VenkatramanES, OlshenAB (2007) A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23: 657–663.
91. KozomaraA, Griffiths-JonesS (2011) miRBase: integrating microRNA annotation and deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D152–157.
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2013 Číslo 8
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Chromosomal Copy Number Variation, Selection and Uneven Rates of Recombination Reveal Cryptic Genome Diversity Linked to Pathogenicity
- Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Reveals Persistent Hypomethylation of Interferon Genes and Compositional Changes to CD4+ T-cell Populations
- Associations of Mitochondrial Haplogroups B4 and E with Biliary Atresia and Differential Susceptibility to Hydrophobic Bile Acid
- A Role for CF1A 3′ End Processing Complex in Promoter-Associated Transcription