#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements


Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that reside in the germline. Three independent studies recently showed that transposase proteins of the DDE/DDD superfamily are indispensible for DNA processing in three distantly related ciliates. In the spirotrich Oxytricha trifallax, high copy-number germline-limited transposons mediate their own excision from the somatic genome but also contribute to programmed genome rearrangement through a remarkable transposon mutualism with the host. By contrast, the genomes of two oligohymenophorean ciliates, Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia, encode homologous PiggyBac-like transposases as single-copy genes in both their germline and somatic genomes. These domesticated transposases are essential for deletion of thousands of different internal sequences in these species. This review contrasts the events underlying somatic genome reduction in three different ciliates and considers their evolutionary origins and the relationships among their distinct mechanisms for genome remodeling.


Vyšlo v časopise: Transposon Domestication versus Mutualism in Ciliate Genome Rearrangements. PLoS Genet 9(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659
Kategorie: Review
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003659

Souhrn

Ciliated protists rearrange their genomes dramatically during nuclear development via chromosome fragmentation and DNA deletion to produce a trimmer and highly reorganized somatic genome. The deleted portion of the genome includes potentially active transposons or transposon-like sequences that reside in the germline. Three independent studies recently showed that transposase proteins of the DDE/DDD superfamily are indispensible for DNA processing in three distantly related ciliates. In the spirotrich Oxytricha trifallax, high copy-number germline-limited transposons mediate their own excision from the somatic genome but also contribute to programmed genome rearrangement through a remarkable transposon mutualism with the host. By contrast, the genomes of two oligohymenophorean ciliates, Tetrahymena thermophila and Paramecium tetraurelia, encode homologous PiggyBac-like transposases as single-copy genes in both their germline and somatic genomes. These domesticated transposases are essential for deletion of thousands of different internal sequences in these species. This review contrasts the events underlying somatic genome reduction in three different ciliates and considers their evolutionary origins and the relationships among their distinct mechanisms for genome remodeling.


Zdroje

1. OrgelLE, CrickFH (1980) Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature 284: 604–607.

2. KazazianHHJr (2004) Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science 303: 1626–1632.

3. VolffJN (2006) Turning junk into gold: domestication of transposable elements and the creation of new genes in eukaryotes. Bioessays 28: 913–922.

4. SinzelleL, IzsvakZ, IvicsZ (2009) Molecular domestication of transposable elements: from detrimental parasites to useful host genes. Cell Mol Life Sci 66: 1073–1093.

5. KapitonovVV, JurkaJ (2005) RAG1 core and V(D)J recombination signal sequences were derived from Transib transposons. PLoS Biol 3: e181 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030181

6. AgrawalA, EastmanQM, SchatzDG (1998) Transposition mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 and its implications for the evolution of the immune system. Nature 394: 744–751.

7. BarsoumE, MartinezP, AstromSU (2010) Alpha3, a transposable element that promotes host sexual reproduction. Genes Dev 24: 33–44.

8. ReddyKC, VilleneuveAM (2004) C. elegans HIM-17 links chromatin modification and competence for initiation of meiotic recombination. Cell 118: 439–452.

9. BaudryC, MalinskyS, RestituitoM, KapustaA, RosaS, et al. (2009) PiggyMac, a domesticated piggyBac transposase involved in programmed genome rearrangements in the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Genes Dev 23: 2478–2483.

10. NowackiM, HigginsBP, MaquilanGM, SwartEC, DoakTG, et al. (2009) A functional role for transposases in a large eukaryotic genome. Science 324: 935–938.

11. ChengCY, VogtA, MochizukiK, YaoMC (2010) A domesticated piggyBac transposase plays key roles in heterochromatin dynamics and DNA cleavage during programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Biol Cell 21: 1753–1762.

12. GouldSJ, VrbaES (1982) Exaptation - a Missing Term in the Science of Form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.

13. Baroin-TourancheauA, DelgadoP, PerassoR, AdoutteA (1992) A broad molecular phylogeny of ciliates: identification of major evolutionary trends and radiations within the phylum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 9764–9768.

14. PrescottDM (1994) The DNA of ciliated protozoa. Microbiol Rev 58: 233–267.

15. MochizukiK (2010) DNA rearrangements directed by non-coding RNAs in ciliates. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 1: 376–387.

16. JahnCL, KlobutcherLA (2002) Genome remodeling in ciliated protozoa. Annu Rev Microbiol 56: 489–520.

17. SwartEC, BrachtJR, MagriniV, MinxP, ChenX, et al. (2013) The Oxytricha trifallax macronuclear genome: a complex eukaryotic genome with 16,000 tiny chromosomes. PLoS Biol 11: e1001473 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001473

18. AuryJM, JaillonO, DuretL, NoelB, JubinC, et al. (2006) Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444: 171–178.

19. EisenJA, CoyneRS, WuM, WuD, ThiagarajanM, et al. (2006) Macronuclear genome sequence of the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila, a model eukaryote. PLoS Biol 4: e286 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040286

20. MeyerE, CaronF, BaroinA (1985) Macronuclear structure of the G surface antigen gene of Paramecium primaurelia and direct expression of its repeated epitopes in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell Biol 5: 2414–2422.

21. KatzLA, KovnerAM (2010) Alternative processing of scrambled genes generates protein diversity in the ciliate Chilodonella uncinata. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol 314: 480–488.

22. NowackiM, ShettyK, LandweberLF (2011) RNA-mediated epigenetic programming of genome rearrangements. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 12: 367–389.

23. HunterDJ, WilliamsK, CartinhourS, HerrickG (1989) Precise excision of telomere-bearing transposons during Oxytricha fallax macronuclear development. Genes Dev 3: 2101–2112.

24. WilliamsK, DoakTG, HerrickG (1993) Developmental precise excision of Oxytricha trifallax telomere-bearing elements and formation of circles closed by a copy of the flanking target duplication. EMBO J 12: 4593–4601.

25. KlobutcherLA, HerrickG (1997) Developmental genome reorganization in ciliated protozoa: the transposon link. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 56: 1–62.

26. DoakTG, DoerderFP, JahnCL, HerrickG (1994) A proposed superfamily of transposase genes: transposon-like elements in ciliated protozoa and a common “D35E” motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: 942–946.

27. WitherspoonDJ, DoakTG, WilliamsKR, SeegmillerA, SegerJ, et al. (1997) Selection on the protein-coding genes of the TBE1 family of transposable elements in the ciliates Oxytricha fallax and O. trifallax. Mol Biol Evol 14: 696–706.

28. Le MouelA, ButlerA, CaronF, MeyerE (2003) Developmetnally regulated chromosome fragmentation is linked to imprecise elimination of repeated sequences in paramecia. Eukaryot Cell 2: 1076–1090.

29. ArnaizO, MathyN, BaudryC, MalinskyS, AuryJ-M, et al. (2012) The Paramecium germline genome provides a niche for intragenic parasitic DNA: evolutionary dynamics of internal eliminated sequences. PLoS Genetics 8: e1002984 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002984

30. GratiasA, BetermierM (2001) Developmentally programmed excision of internal DNA sequences in Paramecium aurelia. Biochimie 83: 1009–1022.

31. KlobutcherLA, HerrickG (1995) Consensus inverted terminal repeat sequence of Paramecium IESs: resemblance to termini of Tc1-related and Euplotes Tec transposons. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 2006–2013.

32. GratiasA, BetermierM (2003) Processing of double-strand breaks is involved in the precise excision of Paramecium internal eliminated sequences. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7152–7162.

33. van LuenenHG, CollomsSD, PlasterkRH (1994) The mechanism of transposition of Tc3 in C. elegans. Cell 79: 293–301.

34. SavelievSV, CoxMM (1996) Developmentally programmed DNA deletion in Tetrahymena thermophila by a transposition-like reaction pathway. EMBO J 15: 2858–2869.

35. SchoeberlUE, KurthHM, NotoT, MochizukiK (2012) Biased transcription and selective degradation of small RNAs shape the pattern of DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Genes Dev 26: 1729–1742.

36. CoyneRS, StoverNA, MiaoW (2012) Whole genome studies of Tetrahymena. Methods Cell Biol 109: 53–81.

37. FassJN, JoshiNA, CouvillionMT, BowenJ, GorovskyMA, et al. (2011) Genome-scale analysis of programmed DNA elimination sites in Tetrahymena thermophila. G3 (Bethesda) 1: 515–522.

38. FillinghamJS, ThingTA, VythilingumN, KeuroghlianA, BrunoD, et al. (2004) A non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon family is restricted to the germ line micronucleus of the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell 3: 157–169.

39. MitraR, Fain-ThorntonJ, CraigNL (2008) PiggyBac can bypass DNA synthesis during cut and paste transposition. EMBO J 27: 1097–1109.

40. MadireddiMT, CoyneRS, SmothersJF, MickeyKM, YaoMC, et al. (1996) Pdd1p, a novel chromodomain-containing protein, links heterochromatin assembly and DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Cell 87: 75–84.

41. LiuY, TavernaSD, MuratoreTL, ShabanowitzJ, HuntDF, et al. (2007) RNAi-dependent H3K27 methylation is required for heterochromatin formation and DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Genes Dev 21: 1530–1545.

42. TavernaSD, CoyneRS, AllisCD (2002) Methylation of histone h3 at lysine 9 targets programmed DNA elimination in Tetrahymena. Cell 110: 701–711.

43. KidwellMG, LischDR (2001) Perspective: transposable elements, parasitic DNA, and genome evolution. Evolution 55: 1–24.

44. LinIT, ChaoJL, YaoMC (2012) An essential role for the DNA breakage-repair protein Ku80 in programmed DNA rearrangements in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Biol Cell 23: 2213–2225.

45. KapustaA, MatsudaA, MarmignonA, KuM, SilveA, et al. (2011) Highly precise and developmentally programmed genome assembly in Paramecium requires ligase IV–dependent end joining. PLoS Genet 7: e1002049 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002049

46. RileyJL, KatzLA (2001) Widespread distribution of extensive chromosomal fragmentation in ciliates. Mol Biol Evol 18: 1372–1377.

47. YuanaY-W, WesslerSR (2011) The catalytic domain of all eukaryotic cut-and-paste transposase superfamilies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 7884–7889.

48. HuelsenbeckJP, RonquistF (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.

49. PuntaM, CoggillPC, EberhardtRY, MistryJ, TateJ, et al. (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D290–301.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2013 Číslo 8
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#