Genetic Circuits that Govern Bisexual and Unisexual Reproduction in

English version České info

Cryptococcus neoformans is a human fungal pathogen with a defined sexual cycle. Nutrient-limiting conditions and pheromones induce a dimorphic transition from unicellular yeast to multicellular hyphae and the production of infectious spores. Sexual reproduction involves cells of either opposite (bisexual) or one (unisexual) mating type. Bisexual and unisexual reproduction are governed by shared components of the conserved pheromone-sensing Cpk1 MAPK signal transduction cascade and by Mat2, the major transcriptional regulator of the pathway. However, the downstream targets of the pathway are largely unknown, and homology-based approaches have failed to yield downstream transcriptional regulators or other targets. In this study, we applied insertional mutagenesis via Agrobacterium tumefaciens transkingdom DNA delivery to identify mutants with unisexual reproduction defects. In addition to elements known to be involved in sexual development (Crg1, Ste7, Mat2, and Znf2), three key regulators of sexual development were identified by our screen: Znf3, Spo11, and Ubc5. Spo11 and Ubc5 promote sporulation during both bisexual and unisexual reproduction. Genetic and phenotypic analyses provide further evidence implicating both genes in the regulation of meiosis. Phenotypic analysis of sexual development showed that Znf3 is required for hyphal development during unisexual reproduction and also plays a central role during bisexual reproduction. Znf3 promotes cell fusion and pheromone production through a pathway parallel to and independent of the pheromone signaling cascade. Surprisingly, Znf3 participates in transposon silencing during unisexual reproduction and may serve as a link between RNAi silencing and sexual development. Our studies illustrate the power of unbiased genetic screens to reveal both novel and conserved circuits that operate sexual reproduction.

Vyšlo v časopise: Genetic Circuits that Govern Bisexual and Unisexual Reproduction in. PLoS Genet 9(8): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003688
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003688

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. Lin X, Heitman J (2007) Mechanisms of homothallism in fungi–transitions between heterothallism and homothallism. In: J. Heitman, J.W. Kronstad, J.W. Taylor, and L.A. Casselton, editor. Sex in Fungi: molecular determination and evolutionary implications. Washington, DC: ASM Press. pp. pp. 35–58.

2. MadhaniHD, FinkGR (1998) The control of filamentous differentiation and virulence in fungi. Trends Cell Biol 8: 348–353.

3. LiuHP, StylesCA, FinkGR (1993) Elements of the yeast pheromone response pathway required for filamentous growth of diploids. Science 262: 1741–1744.

4. RobertsRL, FinkGR (1994) Elements of a single MAP kinase cascade in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mediate two developmental programs in the same cell type: mating and invasive growth. Genes & Dev 8: 2974–2985.

5. RuppS, SummersE, LoHJ, MadhaniH, FinkG (1999) MAP kinase and cAMP filamentation signaling pathways converge on the unusually large promoter of the yeast FLO11 gene. EMBO Journal 18: 1257–1269.

6. Heitman J, Kozel TR, Kwon-Chung KJ, Perfect JR, Casadevall A (2011) Cryptococcus: from human pathogen to model yeast: ASM Press.

7. Kwon-ChungKJ (1975) A new genus, Filobasidiella, the perfect state of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycologia 67: 1197–1200.

8. Kwon-ChungKJ (1976) Morphogenesis of Filobasidiella neoformans, the sexual state of Cryptococcus neoformans. Mycologia 68: 821–833.

9. HeitmanJ, AllenB, AlspaughJA, Kwon-ChungKJ (1999) On the origins of the congenic MATalpha and MATa strains of the pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal Genet Biol 28: 1–5.

10. HullCM, HeitmanJ (2002) Genetics of Cryptococcus neoformans. Annu Rev Genet 36: 557–615.

11. IdnurmA, BahnYS, NielsenK, LinX, FraserJA, et al. (2005) Deciphering the model pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 753–764.

12. Kwon-ChungKJ (1976) A new species of Filobasidiella, the sexual state of Cryptococcus neoformans B and C serotypes. Mycologia 68: 943–946.

13. NielsenK, CoxGM, WangP, ToffalettiDL, PerfectJR, et al. (2003) Sexual cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and virulence of congenic a and α isolates. Infect Immun 71: 4831–4841.

14. FraserJA, SubaranRL, NicholsCB, HeitmanJ (2003) Recapitulation of the sexual cycle of the primary fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans variety gattii: implications for an outbreak on Vancouver Island. Eukaryot Cell 2: 1036–1045.

15. VelagapudiR, HsuehYP, Geunes-BoyerS, WrightJR, HeitmanJ (2009) Spores as infectious propagules of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun 77: 4345–4355.

16. GilesSS, DagenaisTR, BottsMR, KellerNP, HullCM (2009) Elucidating the pathogenesis of spores from the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun 77: 3491–3500.

17. WickesBL, MayorgaME, EdmanU, EdmanJC (1996) Dimorphism and haploid fruiting in Cryptococcus neoformans: association with the α-mating type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 7327–7331.

18. LinX, HullCM, HeitmanJ (2005) Sexual reproduction between partners of the same mating type in Cryptococcus neoformans. Nature 434: 1017–1021.

19. SiaRA, LengelerKB, HeitmanJ (2000) Diploid strains of the pathogenic basidiomycete Cryptococcus neoformans are thermally dimorphic. Fungal Genet Biol 29: 153–163.

20. AlbyK, SchaeferD, BennettRJ (2009) Homothallic and heterothallic mating in the opportunistic pathogen Candida albicans. Nature 460: 890–893.

21. DavidsonRC, NicholsCB, CoxGM, PerfectJR, HeitmanJ (2003) A MAP kinase cascade composed of cell type specific and non-specific elements controls mating and differentiation of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 49: 469–485.

22. NicholsCB, FraserJA, HeitmanJ (2004) PAK kinases Ste20 and Pak1 govern cell polarity at different stages of mating in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Biol Cell 15: 4476–4489.

23. WangP, NicholsCB, LengelerKB, CardenasME, CoxGM, et al. (2002) Mating-type-specific and nonspecific PAK kinases play shared and divergent roles in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot Cell 1: 257–272.

24. WickesBL, EdmanU, EdmanJC (1997) The Cryptococcus neoformans STE12α gene: a putative Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE12 homologue that is mating type specific. Mol Microbiol 26: 951–960.

25. ChangYC, WickesBL, MillerGF, PenoyerLA, Kwon-ChungKJ (2000) Cryptococcus neoformans STE12α regulates virulence but is not essential for mating. J Exp Med 191: 871–882.

26. LinX, JacksonJC, FeretzakiM, XueC, HeitmanJ (2010) Transcription factors Mat2 and Znf2 operate cellular circuits orchestrating opposite- and same-sex mating in Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS Genet 6: e1000953.

27. KruzelEK, GilesSS, HullCM (2012) Analysis of Cryptococcus neoformans sexual development reveals rewiring of the pheromone-response network by a change in transcription factor identity. Genetics 191: 435–449.

28. KlostermanSJ, PerlinMH, Garcia-PedrajasM, CovertSF, GoldSE (2007) Genetics of morphogenesis and pathogenic development of Ustilago maydis. Adv Genet 57: 1–47.

29. IdnurmA, ReedyJL, NussbaumJC, HeitmanJ (2004) Cryptococcus neoformans virulence gene discovery through insertional mutagenesis. Eukaryot Cell 3: 420–429.

30. IdnurmA, HeitmanJ (2005) Light controls growth and development via a conserved pathway in the fungal kingdom. PLoS Biol 3: e95.

31. ChunCD, MadhaniHD (2010) Ctr2 links copper homeostasis to polysaccharide capsule formation and phagocytosis inhibition in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. PLoS One 5: e12503.

32. KeeneyS, GirouxCN, KlecknerN (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375–384.

33. SeufertW, JentschS (1990) Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UBC4 and UBC5 mediate selective degradation of short-lived and abnormal proteins. EMBO J 9: 543–550.

34. WaltonFJ, IdnurmA, HeitmanJ (2005) Novel gene functions required for melanization of the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 57: 1381–1396.

35. FuJ, MaresC, LizcanoA, LiuY, WickesBL (2011) Insertional mutagenesis combined with an inducible filamentation phenotype reveals a conserved STE50 homologue in Cryptococcus neoformans that is required for monokaryotic fruiting and sexual reproduction. Mol Microbiol 79: 990–1007.

36. LinX, HuangJ, MitchellT, HeitmanJ (2006) Virulence attributes and hyphal growth of C. neoformans are quantitative traits and the MATα allele enhances filamentation. PLoS Genet 2: e187.

37. LeeSC, HeitmanJ (2012) Function of Cryptococcus neoformans KAR7 (SEC66) in karyogamy during unisexual and opposite-sex mating. Eukaryot Cell 11: 783–794.

38. LoftusBJ, FungE, RoncagliaP, RowleyD, AmedeoP, et al. (2005) The genome of the basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Science 307: 1321–1324.

39. LuYK, SunKH, ShenWC (2005) Blue light negatively regulates the sexual filamentation via the Cwc1 and Cwc2 proteins in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Microbiol 56: 480–491.

40. LengelerKB, FoxDS, FraserJA, AllenA, ForresterK, et al. (2002) Mating-type locus of Cryptococcus neoformans: a step in the evolution of sex chromosomes. Eukaryot Cell 1: 704–718.

41. AlonsoJM, StepanovaAN, LeisseTJ, KimCJ, ChenH, et al. (2003) Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 301: 653–657.

42. HullCM, DavidsonRC, HeitmanJ (2002) Cell identity and sexual development in Cryptococcus neoformans are controlled by the mating-type-specific homeodomain protein Sxi1α. Genes Dev 16: 3046–3060.

43. BrefortT, MullerP, KahmannR (2005) The high-mobility-group domain transcription factor Rop1 is a direct regulator of PRF1 in Ustilago maydis. Eukaryot Cell 4: 379–391.

44. WangX, HsuehYP, LiW, FloydA, SkalskyR, et al. (2010) Sex-induced silencing defends the genome of Cryptococcus neoformans via RNAi. Genes Dev 24: 2566–2582.

45. WangX, DarwicheS, HeitmanJ (2013) Sex-induced silencing operates during opposite-sex and unisexual reproduction in Cryptococcus neoformans. Genetics 193: 1163–1174.

46. JanbonG, MaengS, YangDH, KoYJ, JungKW, et al. (2010) Characterizing the role of RNA silencing components in Cryptococcus neoformans. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 1070–1080.

47. JinR, DobryCJ, McCownPJ, KumarA (2008) Large-scale analysis of yeast filamentous growth by systematic gene disruption and overexpression. Mol Biol Cell 19: 284–296.

48. EnyenihiAH, SaundersWS (2003) Large-scale functional genomic analysis of sporulation and meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 163: 47–54.

49. BishopDK, ParkD, XuL, KlecknerN (1992) DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69: 439–456.

50. RoseMD (1996) Nuclear fusion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12: 663–695.

51. RomanienkoPJ, Camerini-OteroRD (2000) The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell 6: 975–987.

52. CaoL, AlaniE, KlecknerN (1990) A pathway for generation and processing of double-strand breaks during meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell 61: 1089–1101.

53. KlapholzS, WaddellCS, EspositoRE (1985) The role of the SPO11 gene in meiotic recombination in yeast. Genetics 110: 187–216.

54. ThorneLW, ByersB (1993) Stage-specific effects of X-irradiation on yeast meiosis. Genetics 134: 29–42.

55. CelerinM, MerinoST, StoneJE, MenzieAM, ZolanME (2000) Multiple roles of Spo11 in meiotic chromosome behavior. EMBO J 19: 2739–2750.

56. MadhaniHD, FinkGR (1997) Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling. Science 275: 1314–1317.

57. LalouxI, JacobsE, DuboisE (1994) Involvement of SRE element of Ty1 transposon in TEC1-dependent transcriptional activation. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 999–1005.

58. Hwang-ShumJJ, HagenDC, JarvisEE, WestbyCA, SpragueGFJr (1991) Relative contributions of MCM1 and STE12 to transcriptional activation of a- and alpha-specific genes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 227: 197–204.

59. SchurkoAM, LogsdonJMJr (2008) Using a meiosis detection toolkit to investigate ancient asexual “scandals” and the evolution of sex. BioEssays 30: 579–589.

60. WanL, de los SantosT, ZhangC, ShokatK, HollingsworthNM (2004) Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic double strand break repair in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 15: 11–23.

61. ShinoharaA, GasiorS, OgawaT, KlecknerN, BishopDK (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells 2: 615–629.

62. HenryJM, CamahortR, RiceDA, FlorensL, SwansonSK, et al. (2006) Mnd1/Hop2 facilitates Dmc1-dependent interhomolog crossover formation in meiosis of budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 26: 2913–2923.

63. NovakJE, Ross-MacdonaldPB, RoederGS (2001) The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics 158: 1013–1025.

64. BuonomoSB, ClyneRK, FuchsJ, LoidlJ, UhlmannF, et al. (2000) Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin. Cell 103: 387–398.

65. SherwoodRK, BennettRJ (2009) Fungal meiosis and parasexual reproduction–lessons from pathogenic yeast. Curr Opin Microbiol 12: 599–607.

66. ReedyJL, FloydAM, HeitmanJ (2009) Mechanistic plasticity of sexual reproduction and meiosis in the Candida pathogenic species complex. Curr Biol 19: 891–899.

67. HollomanWK, SchirawskiJ, HollidayR (2008) The homologous recombination system of Ustilago maydis. Fungal Genet Biol 45 Suppl 1: S31–39.

68. McCullaghE, SeshanA, El-SamadH, MadhaniHD Coordinate control of gene expression noise and interchromosomal interactions in a MAP kinase pathway. Nat Cell Biol 12: 954–962.

69. PitkinJW, PanaccioneDG, WaltonJD (1996) A putative cyclic peptide efflux pump encoded by the TOXA gene of the plant-pathogenic fungus Cochliobolus carbonum. Microbiology 142: 1557–1565.

70. DavidsonRC, BlankenshipJR, KrausPR, BerriosMd, HullCM, et al. (2002) A PCR-based strategy to generate integrative targeting alleles with large regions of homology. Microbiology 148: 2607–2615.

71. DavidsonRC, CruzMC, SiaRAL, AllenBM, AlspaughJA, et al. (2000) Gene disruption by biolistic transformation in serotype D strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. Fung Genet Biol 29: 38–48.

72. XueC, BahnYS, CoxGM, HeitmanJ (2006) G protein-coupled receptor Gpr4 senses amino acids and activates the cAMP-PKA pathway in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol Biol Cell 17: 667–679.

73. HsuehYP, IdnurmA, HeitmanJ (2006) Recombination hotspots flank the Cryptococcus mating-type locus: implications for the evolution of a fungal sex chromosome. PLoS Genet 2: e184.

74. KoYJ, YuYM, KimGB, LeeGW, MaengPJ, et al. (2009) Remodeling of global transcription patterns of Cryptococcus neoformans genes mediated by the stress-activated HOG signaling pathways. Eukaryot Cell 8: 1197–1217.

75. Smyth GK (2005) Limma: limear models for microarray data. In: R. Gentleman VC, S. Dudoit, R. Irizarry, W. Huber editor. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor: Springer. pp. pp. 397–420.

76. GentlemanRC, CareyVJ, BatesDM, BolstadB, DettlingM, et al. (2004) Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5: R80.

77. BenjaminiY, HockbergY (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series 57: 289–300.