UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age. PLoS Med 12(3): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779
Kategorie: Health in Action
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. Clayton D, McKeigue PM (2001). Epidemiological methods for studying genes and environmental factors in complex diseases. Lancet 358: 1356–1360. 11684236

2. Willett WC, Blot WJ, Colditz GA, Folsom AR, Henderson BE, Stampfer MJ (2007). Merging and emerging cohorts: not worth the wait. Nature 445: 257–258. 17230171

3. Collins FS, Manolio TA (2007). Merging and emerging cohorts: necessary but not sufficient. Nature 445: 259. 17230172

4. Doll R, Peto R (1981). The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 66: 1191–1308. 7017215

5. Ollier W, Sprosen T, Peakman T (2005). UK Biobank: from concept to reality. Pharmacogenomics 6: 639–646. 16143003

6. UK Biobank (2006). Protocol for a large-scale prospective epidemiological resource. www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/resources/.

7. Burton PR, Hansell AL, Fortier I, Manolio TA, Khoury MJ, et al (2009). Size matters: just how big is BIG?: Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 38: 263–273. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn147 18676414

8. Hattersley AT, McCarthy MI (2005). What makes a good genetic association study? Lancet 366: 1315–1323. 16214603

9. Collins R (2012). What makes UK Biobank special? Lancet 379:1173–1174. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60404-8 22463865

10. Elliott P, Peakman TC (2008). The UK Biobank sample handling and storage protocol for the collection, processing and archiving of human blood and urine. Int J Epidemiol 37: 234–244. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym276 18381398

11. Liu B, Young H, Crowe FL, Benson VS, Spencer EA, et al (2011). Development and evaluation of the Oxford WebQ: a low cost web-based method for assessment of previous 24 hour dietary intake in large prospective studies. Public Health Nutrition June: 1–8.

12. Clarke R, Shipley M, Lewington S, Youngman L, Collins R, et al (1999). Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies. Am J Epidemiol 150: 341–353. 10453810

13. University of Leicester. About the 1958 Birth Cohort Study. http://www2.le.ac.uk/projects/birthcohort/1958bc/about. Accessed 12 October 2014

14. Sax Institute. 45 and up study. https://www.saxinstitute.org.au/our-work/45-up-study/. Accessed 12 October 2014

15. Pell J, Valentine J, Inskip H (2014). One in 30 people in the UK take part in cohort studies. Lancet 383: 1015–1016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60412-8 24656186

16. Downey P, Peakman TC (2008). Design and implementation of a high-throughput biological sample processing facility using modern manufacturing principles. Int J Epidemiol 37 (Suppl 1): i46–i50. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn031 18381393

17. Manolio TA (2008). Biorepositories—at the bleeding edge. Int J Epidemiol 37: 231–233. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym282 18381397

18. Barbour V (2003). UK Biobank: a project in search of a protocol? Lancet 361: 1734–1738.

19. UK Biobank (2007). Ethics and Governance Framework. www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/resources/. Accessed 12 October 2014.

20. UK Biobank (2011). Access Procedures: Application and review procedures for access to the UK Biobank Resource. www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/resources/. Accessed 12 October 2014.

21. Manolio TA, Collins R (2010). Enhancing the feasibility of large cohort studies. JAMA 304: 2290–2291. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1686 21098774