Comparative Genomics of Plant Fungal Pathogens: The - Paradigm

article has not abstract

Vyšlo v časopise: Comparative Genomics of Plant Fungal Pathogens: The - Paradigm. PLoS Pathog 10(7): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004218
Kategorie: Pearls
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004218

Souhrn

article has not abstract

Zdroje

1. HaliskyPM (1965) Physiologic specialization and genetics of the smut fungi III. Bot Rev 31: 114–150.

2. Christensen JJ (1963) Corn smut caused by Ustilago maydis. Monograph 2. St. Paul (Minnesota): American Phytopathological Society. pp. 1–40.

3. KämperJ, KahmannR, BölkerM, MaLJ, BrefortT, et al. (2006) Insights from the genome of the biotrophic fungal plant pathogen Ustilago maydis. Nature 444: 97–101.

4. SchirawskiJ, MannhauptG, MünchK, BrefortT, SchipperK, et al. (2010) Pathogenicity determinants in smut fungi revealed by genome comparison. Science 330: 1546–1548.

5. LaurieJD, AliS, LinningR, MannhauptG, WongP, et al. (2012) Genome comparison of barley and maize smut fungi reveals targeted loss of RNA silencing components and species-specific presence of transposable elements. Plant Cell 24: 1733–1745.

6. DoehlemannG, WahlR, HorstRJ, VollLM, UsadelB, et al. (2008) Reprogramming a maize plant: transcriptional and metabolic changes induced by the fungal biotroph Ustilago maydis. Plant J 56: 181–195.

7. HoltonCS, HoffmanJA (1968) Variation in the smut fungi. Annual Rev Phytopathol 6: 213–242.

8. Begerow D, Göker M, Lutz M, Stoll M (2004) On the evolution of smut fungi on their hosts. In: Agerer R, Blanz P, Piepenbring M, editors. Frontiers in Basidiomycete Mycology. Eching, Germany: IHW-Verlag. pp. 81–98.

9. BakkerenG, KronstadJW (1994) Linkage of mating-type loci distinguishes bipolar from tetrapolar mating in basidiomycetous smut fungi. PNAS 91: 7085–7089.

10. PuhallaJE (1968) Compatibility reactions on solid medium and interstrain inhibition in Ustilago maydis. Genetics 60: 461–474.

11. SnetselaarKM, MimsCW (1992) Sporidial fusion and infection of maize seedlings by the smut fungus Ustilago maydis. Mycologia 84: 193–203.

12. HannaWF (1929) Studies in the physiology and cytology of Ustilago zeae and Sorosporium reilianum. Phytopathol 19: 415–442.

13. SchirawskiJ, HeinzeB, WagenknechtM, KahmannR (2005) Mating type loci of Sporisorium reilianum: Novel pattern with three a and multiple b specificities. Euk Cell 4: 1317–1327.

14. KellnerR, VollmeisterE, FeldbrüggeM, BegerowD (2011) Interspecific sex in grass smuts and the genetic diversity of their pheromone-receptor system. PLoS Genet 7: e1002436 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002436

15. FeldbrüggeM, KämperJ, SteinbergG, KahmannR (2004) Regulation of mating and pathogenic development in Ustilago maydis. Curr Opin Microbiol 7: 666–672.

16. ZhaoZ, LiuH, WangC, XuJR (2013) Comparative analysis of fungal genomes reveals different plant cell wall degrading capacity in fungi. BMC Genomics 14: 274 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-274

17. BrefortT, TanakaS, NeidigN, DoehlemannG, VinconV, et al. (2014) Characterization of the largest effector gene cluster of Ustilago maydis. PLoS Path 10: e1003866.

18. GhareebH, BeckerA, IvenT, FeussnerI, SchirawskiJ (2011) Sporisorium reilianum infection changes inflorescence and branching architectures of maize. Plant Physiol 156: 2037–2052.

19. BakkerenG, JiangG, WarrenRL, ButterfieldY, ShinH, et al. (2006) Mating factor linkage and genome evolution in basidiomycetous pathogens of cereals. Fungal Genet Biol 43: 655–666.

20. KämperJ, ReichmannM, RomeisT, BölkerM, KahmannR (1995) Multiallelic recognition: Nonself-dependent dimerization of the bE and bW homeodomain proteins in Ustilago maydis. Cell 81: 73–83.

21. DrinnenbergIA, FinkGR, BartelDP (2011) Compatibility with killer explains the rise of RNAi-deficient fungi. Science 333: 1592.