Uracil-Containing DNA in : Stability, Stage-Specific Accumulation, and Developmental Involvement
Base-excision repair and control of nucleotide pools safe-guard against permanent uracil accumulation in DNA relying on two key enzymes: uracil–DNA glycosylase and dUTPase. Lack of the major uracil–DNA glycosylase UNG gene from the fruit fly genome and dUTPase from fruit fly larvae prompted the hypotheses that i) uracil may accumulate in Drosophila genomic DNA where it may be well tolerated, and ii) this accumulation may affect development. Here we show that i) Drosophila melanogaster tolerates high levels of uracil in DNA; ii) such DNA is correctly interpreted in cell culture and embryo; and iii) under physiological spatio-temporal control, DNA from fruit fly larvae, pupae, and imago contain greatly elevated levels of uracil (200–2,000 uracil/million bases, quantified using a novel real-time PCR–based assay). Uracil is accumulated in genomic DNA of larval tissues during larval development, whereas DNA from imaginal tissues contains much less uracil. Upon pupation and metamorphosis, uracil content in DNA is significantly decreased. We propose that the observed developmental pattern of uracil–DNA is due to the lack of the key repair enzyme UNG from the Drosophila genome together with down-regulation of dUTPase in larval tissues. In agreement, we show that dUTPase silencing increases the uracil content in DNA of imaginal tissues and induces strong lethality at the early pupal stages, indicating that tolerance of highly uracil-substituted DNA is also stage-specific. Silencing of dUTPase perturbs the physiological pattern of uracil–DNA accumulation in Drosophila and leads to a strongly lethal phenotype in early pupal stages. These findings suggest a novel role of uracil-containing DNA in Drosophila development and metamorphosis and present a novel example for developmental effects of dUTPase silencing in multicellular eukaryotes. Importantly, we also show lack of the UNG gene in all available genomes of other Holometabola insects, indicating a potentially general tolerance and developmental role of uracil–DNA in this evolutionary clade.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Uracil-Containing DNA in : Stability, Stage-Specific Accumulation, and Developmental Involvement. PLoS Genet 8(6): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002738
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002738
Souhrn
Base-excision repair and control of nucleotide pools safe-guard against permanent uracil accumulation in DNA relying on two key enzymes: uracil–DNA glycosylase and dUTPase. Lack of the major uracil–DNA glycosylase UNG gene from the fruit fly genome and dUTPase from fruit fly larvae prompted the hypotheses that i) uracil may accumulate in Drosophila genomic DNA where it may be well tolerated, and ii) this accumulation may affect development. Here we show that i) Drosophila melanogaster tolerates high levels of uracil in DNA; ii) such DNA is correctly interpreted in cell culture and embryo; and iii) under physiological spatio-temporal control, DNA from fruit fly larvae, pupae, and imago contain greatly elevated levels of uracil (200–2,000 uracil/million bases, quantified using a novel real-time PCR–based assay). Uracil is accumulated in genomic DNA of larval tissues during larval development, whereas DNA from imaginal tissues contains much less uracil. Upon pupation and metamorphosis, uracil content in DNA is significantly decreased. We propose that the observed developmental pattern of uracil–DNA is due to the lack of the key repair enzyme UNG from the Drosophila genome together with down-regulation of dUTPase in larval tissues. In agreement, we show that dUTPase silencing increases the uracil content in DNA of imaginal tissues and induces strong lethality at the early pupal stages, indicating that tolerance of highly uracil-substituted DNA is also stage-specific. Silencing of dUTPase perturbs the physiological pattern of uracil–DNA accumulation in Drosophila and leads to a strongly lethal phenotype in early pupal stages. These findings suggest a novel role of uracil-containing DNA in Drosophila development and metamorphosis and present a novel example for developmental effects of dUTPase silencing in multicellular eukaryotes. Importantly, we also show lack of the UNG gene in all available genomes of other Holometabola insects, indicating a potentially general tolerance and developmental role of uracil–DNA in this evolutionary clade.
Zdroje
1. DuncanBKWarnerHR 1977 Metabolism of uracil-containing DNA: degradation of bacteriophage PBS2 DNA in Bacillus subtilis. J Virol 22 835 838
2. KiljunenSHakalaKPintaEHuttunenSPlutaP 2005 Yersiniophage phiR1-37 is a tailed bacteriophage having a 270 kb DNA genome with thymidine replaced by deoxyuridine. Microbiology 151 4093 4102
3. LindahlT 1993 Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA [see comments]. Nature 362 709 715
4. KrokanHEDrablosFSlupphaugG 2002 Uracil in DNA–occurrence, consequences and repair. Oncogene 21 8935 8948
5. VisnesTDosethBPettersenHSHagenLSousaMM 2008 Review. Uracil in DNA and its processing by different DNA glycosylases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
6. VertessyBGTothJ 2009 Keeping uracil out of DNA: physiological role, structure and catalytic mechanism of dUTPases. Acc Chem Res 42 97 106
7. AndersenSHeineTSneveRKonigIKrokanHE 2005 Incorporation of dUMP into DNA is a major source of spontaneous DNA damage, while excision of uracil is not required for cytotoxicity of fluoropyrimidines in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Carcinogenesis 26 547 555
8. LariSUChenCYVertessyBGMorreJBennettSE 2006 Quantitative determination of uracil residues in Escherichia coli DNA: Contribution of ung, dug, and dut genes to uracil avoidance. DNA Repair (Amst) 5 1407 1420
9. LuoYWallaMWyattMD 2008 Uracil incorporation into genomic DNA does not predict toxicity caused by chemotherapeutic inhibition of thymidylate synthase. DNA Repair (Amst) 7 162 169
10. HorvathAVertessyBG 2010 A one-step method for quantitative determination of uracil in DNA by real-time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 38 e196
11. el-HajjHHWangLWeissB 1992 Multiple mutant of Escherichia coli synthesizing virtually thymineless DNA during limited growth. J Bacteriol 174 4450 4456
12. GadsdenMHMcIntoshEMGameJCWilsonPJHaynesRH 1993 dUtp pyrophosphatase is an essential enzyme in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Embo J 12 4425 4431
13. DenggMGarcia-MuseTGillSGAshcroftNBoultonSJ 2006 Abrogation of the CLK-2 checkpoint leads to tolerance to base-excision repair intermediates. EMBO Rep 7 1046 1051
14. GuilletMVan Der KempPABoiteuxS 2006 dUTPase activity is critical to maintain genetic stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 34 2056 2066
15. PettersenHSSundheimOGilljamKMSlupphaugGKrokanHE 2007 Uracil–DNA glycosylases SMUG1 and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of base excision repair by distinct mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res 35 3879 3892
16. HardelandUBenteleMJiricnyJScharP 2003 The versatile thymine DNA-glycosylase: a comparative characterization of the human, Drosophila and fission yeast orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 31 2261 2271
17. SousaMMKrokanHESlupphaugG 2007 DNA-uracil and human pathology. Mol Aspects Med 28 276 306
18. AdamsMDCelnikerSEHoltRAEvansCAGocayneJD 2000 The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287 2185 2195
19. TakacsEBarabasOPetoukhovMVSvergunDIVertessyBG 2009 Molecular shape and prominent role of beta-strand swapping in organization of dUTPase oligomers. FEBS Lett 583 865 871
20. FiserAVertessyBG 2000 Altered Subunit Communication in Subfamilies of Trimeric dUTPases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279 534 542
21. BekesiAZagyvaIHunyadi-GulyasEPongraczVKovariJ 2004 Developmental Regulation of dUTPase in Drosophila melanogaster. J Biol Chem 279 22362 22370
22. KovariJBarabasOTakacsEBekesiADubrovayZ 2004 Altered active site flexibility and a structural metal-binding site in eukaryotic dUTPase: kinetic characterization, folding, and crystallographic studies of the homotrimeric Drosophila enzyme. J Biol Chem 279 17932 17944
23. RichTAShepardRCMosleyST 2004 Four decades of continuing innovation with fluorouracil: current and future approaches to fluorouracil chemoradiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 22 2214 2232
24. MerenyiGKovariJTothJTakacsEZagyvaI 2011 Cellular response to efficient dUTPase RNAi silencing in stable HeLa cell lines perturbs expression levels of genes involved in thymidylate metabolism. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 30 369 390
25. WangZMosbaughDW 1988 Uracil–DNA glycosylase inhibitor of bacteriophage PBS2: cloning and effects of expression of the inhibitor gene in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 170 1082 1091
26. SeipleLJarugaPDizdarogluMStiversJT 2006 Linking uracil base excision repair and 5-fluorouracil toxicity in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 34 140 151
27. KumarSAninatCMichauxGMorelF 2010 Anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil induces reproductive and developmental defects in Caenorhabditis elegans. Reprod Toxicol 29 415 420
28. TinkelenbergBAFazzoneWLynchFJLadnerRD 2003 Identification of sequence determinants of human nuclear dUTPase isoform localization. Exp Cell Res 287 39 46
29. BozokyZRonaGKlementEMedzihradszkyKFMerenyiG 2011 Calpain-catalyzed proteolysis of human dUTPase specifically removes the nuclear localization signal peptide. PLoS ONE 6 e19546 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019546
30. MerenyiGKonyaEVertessyBG 2010 Drosophila proteins involved in metabolism of uracil–DNA possess different types of nuclear localization signals. FEBS J 277 2142 2156
31. MuhaVZagyvaIVenkeiZSzabadJVertessyBG 2009 Nuclear localization signal-dependent and -independent movements of Drosophila melanogaster dUTPase isoforms during nuclear cleavage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 381 271 275
32. DietzlGChenDSchnorrerFSuKCBarinovaY 2007 A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448 151 156
33. HsuYCChernJJCaiYLiuMChoiKW 2007 Drosophila TCTP is essential for growth and proliferation through regulation of dRheb GTPase. Nature 445 785 788
34. LopezTVLappinTRMaxwellPShiZLopez-MarureR 2011 Autocrine/paracrine erythropoietin signalling promotes JAK/STAT-dependent proliferation of human cervical cancer cells. Int J Cancer 129 2566 2576
35. BainbridgeSPBownesM 1981 Staging the metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster. J Embryol Exp Morphol 66 57 80
36. MinakhinaSStewardR 2006 Melanotic mutants in Drosophila: pathways and phenotypes. Genetics 174 253 263
37. CapdevilaJGuerreroI 1994 Targeted expression of the signaling molecule decapentaplegic induces pattern duplications and growth alterations in Drosophila wings. EMBO J 13 4459 4468
38. MorrisEJMichaudWAJiJYMoonNSRoccoJW 2006 Functional identification of Api5 as a suppressor of E2F-dependent apoptosis in vivo. PLoS Genet 2 e196 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020196
39. LeeSBChoKSKimEChungJ 2003 blistery encodes Drosophila tensin protein and interacts with integrin and the JNK signaling pathway during wing development. Development 130 4001 4010
40. Vicente-CrespoMPascualMFernandez-CostaJMGarcia-LopezAMonferrerL 2008 Drosophila muscleblind is involved in troponin T alternative splicing and apoptosis. PLoS ONE 3 e1613 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001613
41. MadiganJPChotkowskiHLGlaserRL 2002 DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res 30 3698 3705
42. JiYClarkDV 2006 The purine synthesis gene Prat2 is required for Drosophila metamorphosis, as revealed by inverted-repeat-mediated RNA interference. Genetics 172 1621 1631
43. HollandCLipsettDBClarkDV 2011 A Link Between Impaired Purine Nucleotide Synthesis and Apoptosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 188 359 367
44. HoffmannJSCazauxC 1998 DNA synthesis, mismatch repair and cancer. Int J Oncol 12 377 382
45. LykoFRamsahoyeBHKashevskyHTudorMMastrangeloMA 1999 Mammalian (cytosine-5) methyltransferases cause genomic DNA methylation and lethality in Drosophila. Nat Genet 23 363 366
46. WeissmannFMuyrers-ChenIMuschTStachDWiesslerM 2003 DNA hypermethylation in Drosophila melanogaster causes irregular chromosome condensation and dysregulation of epigenetic histone modifications. Mol Cell Biol 23 2577 2586
47. BekesiAPukancsikMHaaszPFelfoldiLLevelesI 2011 Association of RNA with the uracil–DNA-degrading factor has major conformational effects and is potentially involved in protein folding. FEBS J 278 295 315
48. BekesiAPukancsikMMuhaVZagyvaILevelesI 2007 A novel fruitfly protein under developmental control degrades uracil–DNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 355 643 648
49. GelbartWEmmertD 2010 Flybase High Throughput Expression Pattern Data Beta Version. Flybase
50. WellsBSJohnstonLA 2012 Maintenance of imaginal disc plasticity and regenerative potential in Drosophila by p53. Dev Biol 361 263 276
51. MillardTHMartinP 2008 Dynamic analysis of filopodial interactions during the zippering phase of Drosophila dorsal closure. Development 135 621 626
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2012 Číslo 6
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Rumors of Its Disassembly Have Been Greatly Exaggerated: The Secret Life of the Synaptonemal Complex at the Centromeres
- The NSL Complex Regulates Housekeeping Genes in
- Tipping the Balance in the Powerhouse of the Cell to “Protect” Colorectal Cancer
- Interplay between Synaptonemal Complex, Homologous Recombination, and Centromeres during Mammalian Meiosis