Coronavirus Cell Entry Occurs through the Endo-/Lysosomal Pathway in a Proteolysis-Dependent Manner
Enveloped viruses need to fuse with a host cell membrane in order to deliver their genome into the host cell. In the present study we investigated the entry of coronaviruses (CoVs). CoVs are important pathogens of animals and man with high zoonotic potential as demonstrated by the emergence of SARS- and MERS-CoVs. Previous studies resulted in apparently conflicting results with respect to CoV cell entry, particularly regarding the fusion-activating requirements of the CoV S protein. By combining cell-biological, infection, and fusion assays we demonstrated that murine hepatitis virus (MHV), a prototypic member of the CoV family, enters cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Moreover, although MHV does not depend on a low pH for fusion, the virus was shown to rely on trafficking to lysosomes for proteolytic cleavage of its spike (S) protein and membrane fusion to occur. Based on these results we predicted and subsequently demonstrated that MERS- and feline CoV require cleavage by different proteases and escape the endo/lysosomal system from different compartments. In conclusion, we elucidated the MHV entry pathway in detail and demonstrate that a proteolytic cleavage site in the S protein of different CoVs is an essential determinant of the intracellular site of fusion.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Coronavirus Cell Entry Occurs through the Endo-/Lysosomal Pathway in a Proteolysis-Dependent Manner. PLoS Pathog 10(11): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004502
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004502
Souhrn
Enveloped viruses need to fuse with a host cell membrane in order to deliver their genome into the host cell. In the present study we investigated the entry of coronaviruses (CoVs). CoVs are important pathogens of animals and man with high zoonotic potential as demonstrated by the emergence of SARS- and MERS-CoVs. Previous studies resulted in apparently conflicting results with respect to CoV cell entry, particularly regarding the fusion-activating requirements of the CoV S protein. By combining cell-biological, infection, and fusion assays we demonstrated that murine hepatitis virus (MHV), a prototypic member of the CoV family, enters cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Moreover, although MHV does not depend on a low pH for fusion, the virus was shown to rely on trafficking to lysosomes for proteolytic cleavage of its spike (S) protein and membrane fusion to occur. Based on these results we predicted and subsequently demonstrated that MERS- and feline CoV require cleavage by different proteases and escape the endo/lysosomal system from different compartments. In conclusion, we elucidated the MHV entry pathway in detail and demonstrate that a proteolytic cleavage site in the S protein of different CoVs is an essential determinant of the intracellular site of fusion.
Zdroje
1. FullerAO, SpearPG (1987) Anti-glycoprotein D antibodies that permit adsorption but block infection by herpes simplex virus 1 prevent virion-cell fusion at the cell surface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84: 5454–5458.
2. SodeikB, EbersoldMW, HeleniusA (1997) Microtubule-mediated transport of incoming herpes simplex virus 1 capsids to the nucleus. The Journal of cell biology 136: 1007–1021.
3. OkadaY (1969) Factors in fusion of cells by HVJ. Current topics in microbiology and immunology 48: 102–128.
4. PermanyerM, BallanaE, EsteJA (2010) Endocytosis of HIV: anything goes. Trends in microbiology 18: 543–551.
5. SteinBS, GowdaSD, LifsonJD, PenhallowRC, BenschKG, et al. (1987) pH-independent HIV entry into CD4-positive T cells via virus envelope fusion to the plasma membrane. Cell 49: 659–668.
6. AuthierF, PosnerBI, BergeronJJ (1996) Endosomal proteolysis of internalized proteins. FEBS letters 389: 55–60.
7. HuotariJ, HeleniusA (2011) Endosome maturation. The EMBO journal 30: 3481–3500.
8. PlemperRK (2011) Cell entry of enveloped viruses. Current opinion in virology 1: 92–100.
9. SieczkarskiSB, WhittakerGR (2003) Differential requirements of Rab5 and Rab7 for endocytosis of influenza and other enveloped viruses. Traffic 4: 333–343.
10. SkehelJJ, BayleyPM, BrownEB, MartinSR, WaterfieldMD, et al. (1982) Changes in the conformation of influenza virus hemagglutinin at the pH optimum of virus-mediated membrane fusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 79: 968–972.
11. CarneiroFA, FerradosaAS, Da PoianAT (2001) Low pH-induced conformational changes in vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein involve dramatic structure reorganization. The Journal of biological chemistry 276: 62–67.
12. WhiteJ, MatlinK, HeleniusA (1981) Cell fusion by Semliki Forest, influenza, and vesicular stomatitis viruses. The Journal of cell biology 89: 674–679.
13. KrzyzaniakMA, ZumsteinMT, GerezJA, PicottiP, HeleniusA (2013) Host cell entry of respiratory syncytial virus involves macropinocytosis followed by proteolytic activation of the F protein. PLoS pathogens 9: e1003309.
14. Wool-LewisRJ, BatesP (1999) Endoproteolytic processing of the ebola virus envelope glycoprotein: cleavage is not required for function. Journal of virology 73: 1419–1426.
15. ZimmerG, BudzL, HerrlerG (2001) Proteolytic activation of respiratory syncytial virus fusion protein. Cleavage at two furin consensus sequences. The Journal of biological chemistry 276: 31642–31650.
16. ChandranK, SullivanNJ, FelborU, WhelanSP, CunninghamJM (2005) Endosomal proteolysis of the Ebola virus glycoprotein is necessary for infection. Science 308: 1643–1645.
17. PeirisJS, LaiST, PoonLL, GuanY, YamLY, et al. (2003) Coronavirus as a possible cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Lancet 361: 1319–1325.
18. ZakiAM, van BoheemenS, BestebroerTM, OsterhausAD, FouchierRA (2012) Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 367: 1814–1820.
19. de HaanCA, RottierPJ (2005) Molecular interactions in the assembly of coronaviruses. Advances in virus research 64: 165–230.
20. BoschBJ, van der ZeeR, de HaanCA, RottierPJ (2003) The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. Journal of virology 77: 8801–8811.
21. InoueY, TanakaN, TanakaY, InoueS, MoritaK, et al. (2007) Clathrin-dependent entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus into target cells expressing ACE2 with the cytoplasmic tail deleted. Journal of virology 81: 8722–8729.
22. WangH, YangP, LiuK, GuoF, ZhangY, et al. (2008) SARS coronavirus entry into host cells through a novel clathrin- and caveolae-independent endocytic pathway. Cell research 18: 290–301.
23. ReganAD, ShraybmanR, CohenRD, WhittakerGR (2008) Differential role for low pH and cathepsin-mediated cleavage of the viral spike protein during entry of serotype II feline coronaviruses. Veterinary microbiology 132: 235–248.
24. Van HammeE, DewerchinHL, CornelissenE, VerhasseltB, NauwynckHJ (2008) Clathrin- and caveolae-independent entry of feline infectious peritonitis virus in monocytes depends on dynamin. The Journal of general virology 89: 2147–2156.
25. NomuraR, KiyotaA, SuzakiE, KataokaK, OheY, et al. (2004) Human coronavirus 229E binds to CD13 in rafts and enters the cell through caveolae. Journal of virology 78: 8701–8708.
26. EifartP, LudwigK, BottcherC, de HaanCA, RottierPJ, et al. (2007) Role of endocytosis and low pH in murine hepatitis virus strain A59 cell entry. Journal of virology 81: 10758–10768.
27. QiuZ, HingleyST, SimmonsG, YuC, Das SarmaJ, et al. (2006) Endosomal proteolysis by cathepsins is necessary for murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus type 2 spike-mediated entry. Journal of virology 80: 5768–5776.
28. StauberR, PfleidereraM, SiddellS (1993) Proteolytic cleavage of the murine coronavirus surface glycoprotein is not required for fusion activity. The Journal of general virology 74 (Pt 2) 183–191.
29. SturmanLS, RicardCS, HolmesKV (1985) Proteolytic cleavage of the E2 glycoprotein of murine coronavirus: activation of cell-fusing activity of virions by trypsin and separation of two different 90K cleavage fragments. Journal of virology 56: 904–911.
30. de HaanCA, StadlerK, GodekeGJ, BoschBJ, RottierPJ (2004) Cleavage inhibition of the murine coronavirus spike protein by a furin-like enzyme affects cell-cell but not virus-cell fusion. Journal of virology 78: 6048–6054.
31. FranaMF, BehnkeJN, SturmanLS, HolmesKV (1985) Proteolytic cleavage of the E2 glycoprotein of murine coronavirus: host-dependent differences in proteolytic cleavage and cell fusion. Journal of virology 56: 912–920.
32. LuytjesW, SturmanLS, BredenbeekPJ, ChariteJ, van der ZeijstBA, et al. (1987) Primary structure of the glycoprotein E2 of coronavirus MHV-A59 and identification of the trypsin cleavage site. Virology 161: 479–487.
33. RicardCS, SturmanLS (1985) Isolation of the subunits of the coronavirus envelope glycoprotein E2 by hydroxyapatite high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of chromatography 326: 191–197.
34. GomboldJL, HingleyST, WeissSR (1993) Fusion-defective mutants of mouse hepatitis virus A59 contain a mutation in the spike protein cleavage signal. Journal of virology 67: 4504–4512.
35. Leparc-GoffartI, HingleyST, ChuaMM, JiangX, LaviE, et al. (1997) Altered pathogenesis of a mutant of the murine coronavirus MHV-A59 is associated with a Q159L amino acid substitution in the spike protein. Virology 239: 1–10.
36. MatsuyamaS, TaguchiF (2009) Two-step conformational changes in a coronavirus envelope glycoprotein mediated by receptor binding and proteolysis. Journal of virology 83: 11133–11141.
37. SimmonsG, GosaliaDN, RennekampAJ, ReevesJD, DiamondSL, et al. (2005) Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 11876–11881.
38. BoschBJ, BartelinkW, RottierPJ (2008) Cathepsin L functionally cleaves the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus class I fusion protein upstream of rather than adjacent to the fusion peptide. Journal of virology 82: 8887–8890.
39. SimmonsG, ReevesJD, RennekampAJ, AmbergSM, PieferAJ, et al. (2004) Characterization of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike glycoprotein-mediated viral entry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 4240–4245.
40. BelouzardS, ChuVC, WhittakerGR (2009) Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 5871–5876.
41. MatsuyamaS, UjikeM, MorikawaS, TashiroM, TaguchiF (2005) Protease-mediated enhancement of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 12543–12547.
42. BelouzardS, MaduI, WhittakerGR (2010) Elastase-mediated activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein at discrete sites within the S2 domain. The Journal of biological chemistry 285: 22758–22763.
43. KamYW, OkumuraY, KidoH, NgLF, BruzzoneR, et al. (2009) Cleavage of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein by airway proteases enhances virus entry into human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. PloS one 4: e7870.
44. BertramS, GlowackaI, MullerMA, LavenderH, GnirssK, et al. (2011) Cleavage and activation of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein by human airway trypsin-like protease. Journal of virology 85: 13363–13372.
45. ShullaA, Heald-SargentT, SubramanyaG, ZhaoJ, PerlmanS, et al. (2011) A transmembrane serine protease is linked to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor and activates virus entry. Journal of virology 85: 873–882.
46. YamadaY, LiuDX (2009) Proteolytic activation of the spike protein at a novel RRRR/S motif is implicated in furin-dependent entry, syncytium formation, and infectivity of coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus in cultured cells. Journal of virology 83: 8744–8758.
47. MatthewsSP, WerberI, DeussingJ, PetersC, ReinheckelT, et al. (2010) Distinct protease requirements for antigen presentation in vitro and in vivo. Journal of immunology 184: 2423–2431.
48. WatanabeR, MatsuyamaS, ShiratoK, MaejimaM, FukushiS, et al. (2008) Entry from the cell surface of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus with cleaved S protein as revealed by pseudotype virus bearing cleaved S protein. Journal of virology 82: 11985–11991.
49. WichtO, BurkardC, de HaanCA, van KuppeveldFJ, RottierPJ, et al. (2014) Identification and characterization of a proteolytically primed form of the murine coronavirus spike proteins after fusion with the target cell. Journal of virology 88: 4943–4952.
50. SnijderB, SacherR, RamoP, LiberaliP, MenchK, et al. (2012) Single-cell analysis of population context advances RNAi screening at multiple levels. Molecular systems biology 8: 579.
51. GouinE, WelchMD, CossartP (2005) Actin-based motility of intracellular pathogens. Current opinion in microbiology 8: 35–45.
52. MayRC (2001) The Arp2/3 complex: a central regulator of the actin cytoskeleton. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS 58: 1607–1626.
53. PfefferSR (2013) Rab GTPase regulation of membrane identity. Current opinion in cell biology 25: 414–419.
54. BalderhaarHJ, UngermannC (2013) CORVET and HOPS tethering complexes - coordinators of endosome and lysosome fusion. Journal of cell science 126: 1307–1316.
55. BonifacinoJS, HurleyJH (2008) Retromer. Current opinion in cell biology 20: 427–436.
56. DeMaliKA, BurridgeK (2003) Coupling membrane protrusion and cell adhesion. Journal of cell science 116: 2389–2397.
57. BagrodiaS, CerioneRA (1999) Pak to the future. Trends in cell biology 9: 350–355.
58. RobinsonLJ, AnientoF, GruenbergJ (1997) NSF is required for transport from early to late endosomes. Journal of cell science 110 (Pt 17) 2079–2087.
59. de HaanCA, van GenneL, StoopJN, VoldersH, RottierPJ (2003) Coronaviruses as vectors: position dependence of foreign gene expression. Journal of virology 77: 11312–11323.
60. VerheijeMH, RaabenM, MariM, Te LinteloEG, ReggioriF, et al. (2008) Mouse hepatitis coronavirus RNA replication depends on GBF1-mediated ARF1 activation. PLoS pathogens 4: e1000088.
61. RaabenM, PosthumaCC, VerheijeMH, te LinteloEG, KikkertM, et al. (2010) The ubiquitin-proteasome system plays an important role during various stages of the coronavirus infection cycle. Journal of virology 84: 7869–7879.
62. HuynhKK, GershenzonE, GrinsteinS (2008) Cholesterol accumulation by macrophages impairs phagosome maturation. The Journal of biological chemistry 283: 35745–35755.
63. BurkardC, BloyetLM, WichtO, van KuppeveldFJ, RottierPJ, et al. (2014) Dissecting Virus Entry: Replication-Independent Analysis of Virus Binding, Internalization, and Penetration Using Minimal Complementation of beta-Galactosidase. PloS one 9: e101762.
64. LangleyKE, VillarejoMR, FowlerAV, ZamenhofPJ, ZabinI (1975) Molecular basis of beta-galactosidase alpha-complementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 72: 1254–1257.
65. EngelS, HegerT, ManciniR, HerzogF, KartenbeckJ, et al. (2011) Role of endosomes in simian virus 40 entry and infection. Journal of virology 85: 4198–4211.
66. BayerN, SchoberD, PrchlaE, MurphyRF, BlaasD, et al. (1998) Effect of bafilomycin A1 and nocodazole on endocytic transport in HeLa cells: implications for viral uncoating and infection. Journal of virology 72: 9645–9655.
67. JohannsdottirHK, ManciniR, KartenbeckJ, AmatoL, HeleniusA (2009) Host cell factors and functions involved in vesicular stomatitis virus entry. Journal of virology 83: 440–453.
68. Le BlancI, LuyetPP, PonsV, FergusonC, EmansN, et al. (2005) Endosome-to-cytosol transport of viral nucleocapsids. Nature cell biology 7: 653–664.
69. MatosPM, MarinM, AhnB, LamW, SantosNC, et al. (2013) Anionic lipids are required for vesicular stomatitis virus G protein-mediated single particle fusion with supported lipid bilayers. The Journal of biological chemistry 288: 12416–12425.
70. SkehelJJ, WileyDC (2000) Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Annual review of biochemistry 69: 531–569.
71. TaniH, KomodaY, MatsuoE, SuzukiK, HamamotoI, et al. (2007) Replication-competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus encoding hepatitis C virus envelope proteins. Journal of virology 81: 8601–8612.
72. WhittMA (2010) Generation of VSV pseudotypes using recombinant DeltaG-VSV for studies on virus entry, identification of entry inhibitors, and immune responses to vaccines. Journal of virological methods 169: 365–374.
73. KonigR, StertzS, ZhouY, InoueA, HoffmannHH, et al. (2010) Human host factors required for influenza virus replication. Nature 463: 813–817.
74. CaretteJE, RaabenM, WongAC, HerbertAS, ObernostererG, et al. (2011) Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1. Nature 477: 340–343.
75. TvetenK, RanheimT, BergeKE, LerenTP, KulsethMA (2009) The effect of bafilomycin A1 and protease inhibitors on the degradation and recycling of a Class 5-mutant LDLR. Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica 41: 246–255.
76. van KasterenSI, BerlinI, ColbertJD, KeaneD, OvaaH, et al. (2011) A multifunctional protease inhibitor to regulate endolysosomal function. ACS chemical biology 6: 1198–1204.
77. WhiteJM, DelosSE, BrecherM, SchornbergK (2008) Structures and mechanisms of viral membrane fusion proteins: multiple variations on a common theme. Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology 43: 189–219.
78. ThomasG (2002) Furin at the cutting edge: from protein traffic to embryogenesis and disease. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 3: 753–766.
79. de HaanCA, HaijemaBJ, BossD, HeutsFW, RottierPJ (2005) Coronaviruses as vectors: stability of foreign gene expression. Journal of virology 79: 12742–12751.
80. GallagherTM (1997) A role for naturally occurring variation of the murine coronavirus spike protein in stabilizing association with the cellular receptor. Journal of virology 71: 3129–3137.
81. KruegerDK, KellySM, LewickiDN, RuffoloR, GallagherTM (2001) Variations in disparate regions of the murine coronavirus spike protein impact the initiation of membrane fusion. Journal of virology 75: 2792–2802.
82. PhillipsJJ, ChuaMM, LaviE, WeissSR (1999) Pathogenesis of chimeric MHV4/MHV-A59 recombinant viruses: the murine coronavirus spike protein is a major determinant of neurovirulence. Journal of virology 73: 7752–7760.
83. PuY, ZhangX (2008) Mouse hepatitis virus type 2 enters cells through a clathrin-mediated endocytic pathway independent of Eps15. Journal of virology 82: 8112–8123.
84. ChoiKS, AizakiH, LaiMM (2005) Murine coronavirus requires lipid rafts for virus entry and cell-cell fusion but not for virus release. Journal of virology 79: 9862–9871.
85. ThorpEB, GallagherTM (2004) Requirements for CEACAMs and cholesterol during murine coronavirus cell entry. Journal of virology 78: 2682–2692.
86. FretzM, JinJ, ConibereR, PenningNA, Al-TaeiS, et al. (2006) Effects of Na+/H+ exchanger inhibitors on subcellular localisation of endocytic organelles and intracellular dynamics of protein transduction domains HIV-TAT peptide and octaarginine. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the Controlled Release Society 116: 247–254.
87. LaganaA, VadnaisJ, LePU, NguyenTN, LapradeR, et al. (2000) Regulation of the formation of tumor cell pseudopodia by the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger NHE1. Journal of cell science 113 (Pt 20) 3649–3662.
88. MeierO, BouckeK, HammerSV, KellerS, StidwillRP, et al. (2002) Adenovirus triggers macropinocytosis and endosomal leakage together with its clathrin-mediated uptake. The Journal of cell biology 158: 1119–1131.
89. WadiaJS, StanRV, DowdySF (2004) Transducible TAT-HA fusogenic peptide enhances escape of TAT-fusion proteins after lipid raft macropinocytosis. Nature medicine 10: 310–315.
90. IvanovAI, NusratA, ParkosCA (2004) Endocytosis of epithelial apical junctional proteins by a clathrin-mediated pathway into a unique storage compartment. Molecular biology of the cell 15: 176–188.
91. KaksonenM, ToretCP, DrubinDG (2006) Harnessing actin dynamics for clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 7: 404–414.
92. HuangIC, BoschBJ, LiF, LiW, LeeKH, et al. (2006) SARS coronavirus, but not human coronavirus NL63, utilizes cathepsin L to infect ACE2-expressing cells. The Journal of biological chemistry 281: 3198–3203.
93. LeeDH, GoldbergAL (1998) Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends in cell biology 8: 397–403.
94. TawaNEJr, OdesseyR, GoldbergAL (1997) Inhibitors of the proteasome reduce the accelerated proteolysis in atrophying rat skeletal muscles. The Journal of clinical investigation 100: 197–203.
95. van KerkhofP, Alves dos SantosCM, SachseM, KlumpermanJ, BuG, et al. (2001) Proteasome inhibitors block a late step in lysosomal transport of selected membrane but not soluble proteins. Molecular biology of the cell 12: 2556–2566.
96. ZaarurN, MeriinAB, BejaranoE, XuX, GabaiVL, et al. (2014) Proteasome failure promotes positioning of lysosomes around the aggresome via local block of microtubule-dependent transport. Molecular and cellular biology 34: 1336–1348.
97. BelouzardS, MilletJK, LicitraBN, WhittakerGR (2012) Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses 4: 1011–1033.
98. KuoL, GodekeGJ, RaamsmanMJ, MastersPS, RottierPJ (2000) Retargeting of coronavirus by substitution of the spike glycoprotein ectodomain: crossing the host cell species barrier. J Virol 74: 1393–1406.
99. van BoheemenS, de GraafM, LauberC, BestebroerTM, RajVS, et al. (2012) Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in humans. mBio 3.
100. BoschBJ, van der ZeeR, de HaanCA, RottierPJ (2003) The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J Virol 77: 8801–8811.
101. DvekslerGS, PensieroMN, CardellichioCB, WilliamsRK, JiangGS, et al. (1991) Cloning of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) receptor: expression in human and hamster cell lines confers susceptibility to MHV. Journal of virology 65: 6881–6891.
102. de HaanCA, HaijemaBJ, MastersPS, RottierPJ (2008) Manipulation of the coronavirus genome using targeted RNA recombination with interspecies chimeric coronaviruses. Methods Mol Biol 454: 229–236.
103. KuoL, GodekeGJ, RaamsmanMJ, MastersPS, RottierPJ (2000) Retargeting of coronavirus by substitution of the spike glycoprotein ectodomain: crossing the host cell species barrier. Journal of virology 74: 1393–1406.
104. VonderheitA, HeleniusA (2005) Rab7 associates with early endosomes to mediate sorting and transport of Semliki forest virus to late endosomes. PLoS biology 3: e233.
105. SchulzeH, KolterT, SandhoffK (2009) Principles of lysosomal membrane degradation: Cellular topology and biochemistry of lysosomal lipid degradation. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1793: 674–683.
Štítky
Hygiena a epidemiológia Infekčné lekárstvo LaboratóriumČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Pathogens
2014 Číslo 11
- Očkování proti virové hemoragické horečce Ebola experimentální vakcínou rVSVDG-ZEBOV-GP
- Parazitičtí červi v terapii Crohnovy choroby a dalších zánětlivých autoimunitních onemocnění
- Koronavirus hýbe světem: Víte jak se chránit a jak postupovat v případě podezření?
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- Coronavirus Cell Entry Occurs through the Endo-/Lysosomal Pathway in a Proteolysis-Dependent Manner
- War and Infectious Diseases: Challenges of the Syrian Civil War
- The Epithelial αvβ3-Integrin Boosts the MYD88-Dependent TLR2 Signaling in Response to Viral and Bacterial Components
- Peculiarities of Prion Diseases