Evidence for Mito-Nuclear and Sex-Linked Reproductive Barriers between the Hybrid Italian Sparrow and Its Parent Species

English version České info

Studies of reproductive isolation between homoploid hybrid species and their parent species have rarely been carried out. Here we investigate reproductive barriers between a recently recognized hybrid bird species, the Italian sparrow Passer italiae and its parent species, the house sparrow P. domesticus and Spanish sparrow P. hispaniolensis. Reproductive barriers can be difficult to study in hybrid species due to lack of geographical contact between taxa. However, the Italian sparrow lives parapatrically with the house sparrow and both sympatrically and parapatrically with the Spanish sparrow. Through whole-transcriptome sequencing of six individuals of each of the two parent species we identified a set of putatively parent species-diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. After filtering for coverage, genotyping success (>97%) and multiple SNPs per gene, we retained 86 species-informative, genic, nuclear and mitochondrial SNP markers from 84 genes for analysis of 612 male individuals. We show that a disproportionately large number of sex-linked genes, as well as the mitochondria and nuclear genes with mitochondrial function, exhibit sharp clines at the boundaries between the hybrid and the parent species, suggesting a role for mito-nuclear and sex-linked incompatibilities in forming reproductive barriers. We suggest that genomic conflict via interactions between mitochondria and sex-linked genes with mitochondrial function (“mother's curse”) at one boundary and centromeric drive at the other may best explain our findings. Hybrid speciation in the Italian sparrow may therefore be influenced by mechanisms similar to those involved in non-hybrid speciation, but with the formation of two geographically separated species boundaries instead of one. Spanish sparrow alleles at some loci have spread north to form reproductive barriers with house sparrows, while house sparrow alleles at different loci, including some on the same chromosome, have spread in the opposite direction to form barriers against Spanish sparrows.

Vyšlo v časopise: Evidence for Mito-Nuclear and Sex-Linked Reproductive Barriers between the Hybrid Italian Sparrow and Its Parent Species. PLoS Genet 10(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004075
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004075

Souhrn

Zdroje

1. The Heliconius Genome Consortium (2012) Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94–98.

2. AbbotR, AlbachD, AnsellS, ArntzenJW, BairdSJE, et al. (2013) Hybridization and speciation. J Evol Biol 26: 229–246.

3. SætreGP (2013) Hybridization is important in evolution, but is speciation? J Evol Biol 26: 256–258.

4. BuerkleCA, MorrisRJ, AsmussenMA, RiesebergLH (2000) The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation. Heredity 84: 441–451.

5. MalletJ (2007) Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279–283.

6. BuerkleCA, RiesebergLH (2008) The rate of genome stabilization in homoploid hybrid species. Evolution 62: 266–275.

7. SætherSA, SætreG-P, BorgeT, WileyC, SvedinN, et al. (2007) Sex chromosome–linked species recognition and evolution of reproductive isolation in flycatchers. Science 318: 95–97.

8. QvarnströmA, BaileyRI (2009) Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 102: 4–15.

9. EllegrenH, SmedsL, BurriR, OlasonPI, BackströmN, et al. (2012) The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers. Nature 491: 756–760.

10. MeyerM, KircherM, GansaugeM-T, LiH, RacimoF, et al. (2012) A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338: 222–226.

11. RiesebergLH, ArcherMA, WayneRK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363–372.

12. CharlesworthB, CoyneJA, BartonNH (1987) The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am Nat 130: 113–146.

13. BaileyRI, EroukhmanoffF, SætreG-P (2013) Hybridization and genome evolution II: Mechanisms of species divergence and their effects on evolution in hybrids. Curr Zool 59: 675–685.

14. HermansenJS, SætherSA, ElgvinTO, BorgeT, HjelleE, et al. (2011) Hybrid speciation in sparrows I: phenotypic intermediacy, genetic admixture and barriers to gene flow. Mol Ecol 20: 3812–3822.

15. ElgvinTO, HermansenJS, FijarczykA, BonnetT, BorgeT, et al. (2011) Hybrid speciation in sparrows II: a role for sex chromosomes? Mol Ecol 20: 3823–3837.

16. Summers-Smith JD (1988) The Sparrows: A study of the genus Passer. Calton: T & AD Poyser. 342 p.

17. BackströmN, LindellJ, ZhangY, PalkopoulouE, QvarnströmA, et al. (2010) A high-density scan of the Z chromosome in Ficedula flycatchers reveals candidate loci for diversifying selection. Evolution 64: 3461–3475.

18. BurtonRS, BarretoFS (2012) A disproportionate role for mtDNA in Dobzhansky– Muller incompatibilities? Mol Ecol 21: 4942–4957.

19. PritchardVL, EdmandsS (2013) The genomic trajectory of hybrid swarms: outcomes of repeated crosses between populations of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 67: 774–791.

20. ToewsDPL, BrelsfordA (2012) The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol Ecol 21: 3907–3930.

21. FrankSA, HurstLD (1996) Mitochondria and male disease. Nature 383: 224.

22. GemmelNJ, MetcalfVJ, AllendorfFW (2004) Mother's curse: the effect of mtDNA on individual fitness and population viability. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 238–244.

23. PayseurBA (2010) Using differential introgression in hybrid zones to identify genomic regions involved in speciation. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 806–820.

24. PritchardJK, StephensM, DonnellyP (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.

25. BartonNH, HewittGM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16: 113–148.

26. BartonNH, HewittGM (1989) Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341: 497–503.

27. Barton NH, Gale KS (1993) Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In Harrison RG, editor. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. pp. 13–45.

28. SzymuraJM, BartonNH (1986) Genetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads, Bombina bombina and B. variegate, near Cracow in southern Poland. Evolution 40: 1141–1159.

29. GompertZ, BuerkleCA (2011) Bayesian estimation of genomic clines. Mol Ecol 20: 2111–2127.

30. FitzpatrickBM (2013) Alternative forms for genomic clines. Ecol Evol 3: 1951–1966.

31. GompertZ, BuerkleCA (2012) bgc: Software for Bayesian estimation of genomic clines. Mol Ecol Resour 12: 1168–1176.

32. GuillotG, EstoupA, MortierF, CossonJF (2005) A spatial statistical model for landscape genetics. Genetics 170: 1261–1280.

33. GuillotG, MortierF, EstoupA (2005) GENELAND: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5: 712–715.

34. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432: 695–716.

35. WarrenWC, ClaytonDF, EllegrenH, ArnoldAP, HillierLW, et al. (2010) The genome of a songbird. Nature 464: 757–762.

36. PagliariniDJ, CalvoSE, ChangB, ShethSA, VafaiSB, et al. (2008) A mitochondrial protein compendium elucidates complex I disease biology. Cell 134: 112–123.

37. AshburnerM, BallCA, BlakeJA, BotsteinD, ButlerH, et al. (2000) Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25: 25–29.

38. RundleHD, NosilP (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecol Lett 8: 336–352.

39. SchluterD (2009) Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323: 737–741.

40. PalaI, HasselquistD, BenschS, HanssonB (2012) Patterns of molecular evolution of an avian neo-sex chromosome. Mol Biol Evol 29: 3741–3754.

41. AgateRJ, ChoeM, ArnoldAP (2004) Sex differences in structure and expression of the sex chromosome genes CHD1Z and CHD1W in zebra finches. Mol Biol Evol 21: 384–396.

42. OkadaM, OkawaK, IsobeT, FukagawaT (2009) CENP-H–containing complex facilitates centromere deposition of CENP-A in cooperation with FACT and CHD1. Mol Biol Cell 20: 3986–3995.

43. HenikoffS, KamiA, MalikSM (2001) The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293: 1098–1102.

44. KowalikD, HallerF, AdamskiJ, MoellerH (2009) In search for function of two human orphan SDR enzymes: Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase like 2 (HSDL2) and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase-orphan (SDR-O). J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 117: 117–124.

45. EllegrenH, ParschJ (2007) The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet 8: 689–698.

46. GoerlichVC, NättD, ElfwingM, MacdonaldB, JensenP (2012) Transgenerational effects of early experience on behavioral, hormonal and gene expression responses to acute stress in the precocial chicken. Horm Behav 61: 711–718.

47. SeehausenO (2004) Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 198–207.

48. ViaS, WestJ (2008) The genetic mosaic suggests a new role for hitchhiking in ecological speciation. Mol Ecol 17: 4334–4345.

49. EroukhmanoffF, HermansenJS, BaileyRI, SætherSA, SætreG-P (2013) Local adaptation within a hybrid species. Heredity 111: 286–292.

50. BartonNH, de CaraMAR (2009) The evolution of strong reproductive isolation. Evolution 63: 1171–1190.

51. CurratM, RuediM, PetitRJ, ExcoffierL (2008) The hidden side of invasions: massive introgression by local genes. Evolution 62: 1908–1920.

52. JigginsCD, SalazarC, LinaresM, MavarezJ (2008) Hybrid trait speciation and Heliconius butterflies. Phil Trans R Soc B 363: 3047–3054.

53. RiesebergLH (1997) Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28: 359–389.

54. GompertZ, BuerkleCA (2010) INTROGRESS: a software package for mapping components of isolation in hybrids. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 378–384.

55. RoussetF (2008) GENEPOP'007: a complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103–106.

56. FollM, GaggiottiO (2008) A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180: 977–993.

57. AntaoT, LopesA, LopesRJ, Beja-PereiraA, LuikartG (2008) LOSITAN: A workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 323.