Molecular Specificity, Convergence and Constraint Shape Adaptive Evolution in Nutrient-Poor Environments
One of the central goals of evolutionary biology is to explain and predict the molecular basis of adaptive evolution. We studied the evolution of genetic networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) populations propagated for more than 200 generations in different nitrogen-limiting conditions. We find that rapid adaptive evolution in nitrogen-poor environments is dominated by the de novo generation and selection of copy number variants (CNVs), a large fraction of which contain genes encoding specific nitrogen transporters including PUT4, DUR3 and DAL4. The large fitness increases associated with these alleles limits the genetic heterogeneity of adapting populations even in environments with multiple nitrogen sources. Complete identification of acquired point mutations, in individual lineages and entire populations, identified heterogeneity at the level of genetic loci but common themes at the level of functional modules, including genes controlling phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate metabolism and vacuole biogenesis. Adaptive strategies shared with other nutrient-limited environments point to selection of genetic variation in the TORC1 and Ras/PKA signaling pathways as a general mechanism underlying improved growth in nutrient-limited environments. Within a single population we observed the repeated independent selection of a multi-locus genotype, comprised of the functionally related genes GAT1, MEP2 and LST4. By studying the fitness of individual alleles, and their combination, as well as the evolutionary history of the evolving population, we find that the order in which these mutations are acquired is constrained by epistasis. The identification of repeatedly selected variation at functionally related loci that interact epistatically suggests that gene network polymorphisms (GNPs) may be a frequent outcome of adaptive evolution. Our results provide insight into the mechanistic basis by which cells adapt to nutrient-limited environments and suggest that knowledge of the selective environment and the regulatory mechanisms important for growth and survival in that environment greatly increase the predictability of adaptive evolution.
Vyšlo v časopise:
Molecular Specificity, Convergence and Constraint Shape Adaptive Evolution in Nutrient-Poor Environments. PLoS Genet 10(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004041
Kategorie:
Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004041
Souhrn
One of the central goals of evolutionary biology is to explain and predict the molecular basis of adaptive evolution. We studied the evolution of genetic networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) populations propagated for more than 200 generations in different nitrogen-limiting conditions. We find that rapid adaptive evolution in nitrogen-poor environments is dominated by the de novo generation and selection of copy number variants (CNVs), a large fraction of which contain genes encoding specific nitrogen transporters including PUT4, DUR3 and DAL4. The large fitness increases associated with these alleles limits the genetic heterogeneity of adapting populations even in environments with multiple nitrogen sources. Complete identification of acquired point mutations, in individual lineages and entire populations, identified heterogeneity at the level of genetic loci but common themes at the level of functional modules, including genes controlling phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate metabolism and vacuole biogenesis. Adaptive strategies shared with other nutrient-limited environments point to selection of genetic variation in the TORC1 and Ras/PKA signaling pathways as a general mechanism underlying improved growth in nutrient-limited environments. Within a single population we observed the repeated independent selection of a multi-locus genotype, comprised of the functionally related genes GAT1, MEP2 and LST4. By studying the fitness of individual alleles, and their combination, as well as the evolutionary history of the evolving population, we find that the order in which these mutations are acquired is constrained by epistasis. The identification of repeatedly selected variation at functionally related loci that interact epistatically suggests that gene network polymorphisms (GNPs) may be a frequent outcome of adaptive evolution. Our results provide insight into the mechanistic basis by which cells adapt to nutrient-limited environments and suggest that knowledge of the selective environment and the regulatory mechanisms important for growth and survival in that environment greatly increase the predictability of adaptive evolution.
Zdroje
1. DeanAM, ThorntonJW (2007) Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 675–688 doi:10.1038/nrg2160
2. ThomsonJM, GaucherEA, BurganMF, De KeeDW, LiT, et al. (2005) Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nature genetics 37: 630–635 doi:10.1038/ng1553
3. BridghamJT, OrtlundEA, ThorntonJW (2009) An epistatic ratchet constrains the direction of glucocorticoid receptor evolution. Nature 461: 515–519 doi:10.1038/nature08249
4. ElenaSF, LenskiRE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 457–469 doi:10.1038/nrg1088
5. NovickA, SzilardL (1950) Description of the chemostat. Science 112: 715–716.
6. MonodJ (1950) La technique de culture continue. Théorie et applications. Ann Inst Pasteur 79: 390–410.
7. LenskiRE, TravisanoM (1994) Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91: 6808–6814.
8. LangGI, BotsteinD, DesaiMM (2011) Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Genetics 188: 647–661 doi:10.1534/genetics.111.128942
9. GreshamD, DesaiMM, TuckerCM, JenqHT, PaiDA, et al. (2008) The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet 4: e1000303 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000303.t005
10. GreshamD, UsaiteR, GermannSM, LisbyM, BotsteinD, et al. (2010) Adaptation to diverse nitrogen-limited environments by deletion or extrachromosomal element formation of the GAP1 locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 18551–18556 doi:10.1073/pnas.1014023107
11. FerenciT (2007) Bacterial physiology, regulation and mutational adaptation in a chemostat environment. Advances in microbial physiology 53: 169–315 doi:10.1016/S0065-2911(07)53003-1
12. KaoKC, SherlockG (2008) Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature genetics 40: 1499–1504 doi:10.1038/ng.280
13. KvitekDJ, SherlockG (2011) Reciprocal sign epistasis between frequently experimentally evolved adaptive mutations causes a rugged fitness landscape. PLoS Genet 7: e1002056 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002056
14. WengerJW, PiotrowskiJ, NagarajanS, ChiottiK, SherlockG, et al. (2011) Hunger artists: yeast adapted to carbon limitation show trade-offs under carbon sufficiency. PLoS Genet 7: e1002202 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002202
15. MagasanikB, KaiserCA (2002) Nitrogen regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 290: 1–18 doi:10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00558-9
16. CooperTG (2002) Transmitting the signal of excess nitrogen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae from the Tor proteins to the GATA factors: connecting the dots. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26: 223–238 doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00612.x
17. BrownCJ, ToddKM, RosenzweigRF (1998) Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol Biol Evol 15: 931–942.
18. DunhamMJ, BadraneH, FereaT, AdamsJ, BrownPO, et al. (2002) Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 16144–16149 doi:10.1073/pnas.242624799
19. ZhongS, KhodurskyA, DykhuizenDE, DeanAM (2004) Evolutionary genomics of ecological specialization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 11719 doi:10.1073/pnas.0404397101
20. ZhangH, ZeidlerAFB, SongW, PucciaCM, MalcE, et al. (2013) Gene copy-number variation in haploid and diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 193: 785–801 doi:10.1534/genetics.112.146522
21. DorseyM, PetersonC, BrayK, PaquinCE (1992) Spontaneous amplification of the ADH4 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132: 943–950.
22. RancatiG, PavelkaN, FlehartyB, NollA, TrimbleR, et al. (2008) Aneuploidy underlies rapid adaptive evolution of yeast cells deprived of a conserved cytokinesis motor. Cell 135: 879–893 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.039
23. GersteinAC, OttoSP (2011) Cryptic fitness advantage: diploids invade haploid populations despite lacking any apparent advantage as measured by standard fitness assays. PloS one 6: e26599 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026599
24. TorresEM, SokolskyT, TuckerCM, ChanLY, BoselliM, et al. (2007) Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317: 916–924 doi:10.1126/science.1142210
25. LynchM, SungW, MorrisK, CoffeyN, LandryCR, et al. (2008) A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 9272–9277 doi:10.1073/pnas.0803466105
26. ArayaCL, PayenC, DunhamMJ, FieldsS (2010) Whole-genome sequencing of a laboratory-evolved yeast strain. BMC Genomics 11: 88 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-88
27. DettmanJR, RodrigueN, MelnykAH, WongA, BaileySF, et al. (2012) Evolutionary insight from whole-genome sequencing of experimentally evolved microbes. Mol Ecol 21: 2058–2077 doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05484.x
28. Notley-McRobbL, SeetoS, FerenciT (2003) The influence of cellular physiology on the initiation of mutational pathways in Escherichia coli populations. Proc Biol Sci 270: 843–848 doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2295
29. HerronMD, DoebeliM (2013) Parallel Evolutionary Dynamics of Adaptive Diversification in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol 11: e1001490 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001490
30. MaharjanR, SeetoS, Notley-McRobbL, FerenciT (2006) Clonal adaptive radiation in a constant environment. Science 313: 514–517 doi:10.1126/science.1129865
31. MaharjanRP, FerenciT, ReevesPR, LiY, LiuB, et al. (2012) The multiplicity of divergence mechanisms in a single evolving population. Genome Biology 13: R41 doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r41
32. JinN, ChowCY, LiuL, ZolovSN, BronsonR, et al. (2008) VAC14 nucleates a protein complex essential for the acute interconversion of PI3P and PI(3,5)P(2) in yeast and mouse. The EMBO Journal 27: 3221–3234 doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.248
33. Notley-McRobbL, KingT, FerenciT (2002) rpoS mutations and loss of general stress resistance in Escherichia coli populations as a consequence of conflict between competing stress responses. Journal of bacteriology 184: 806–811 doi:10.1128/JB.184.3.806-811.2002
34. ScherensB, FellerA, VierendeelsF, MessenguyF, DuboisE (2006) Identification of direct and indirect targets of the Gln3 and Gat1 activators by transcriptional profiling in response to nitrogen availability in the short and long term. FEMS Yeast Research 6: 777–791 doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00060.x
35. RobergKJ, BickelS, RowleyN, KaiserCA (1997) Control of amino acid permease sorting in the late secretory pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by SEC13, LST4, LST7 and LST8. Genetics 147: 1569–1584.
36. CostanzoM, BaryshnikovaA, BellayJ, KimY, SpearED, et al. (2010) The Genetic Landscape of a Cell. Science 327: 425–431 doi:10.1126/science.1180823
37. PaquinC, AdamsJ (1983) Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature 302: 495–500.
38. PaquinCE, AdamsJ (1983) Relative fitness can decrease in evolving asexual populations of S. cerevisiae. Nature 306: 368–370.
39. FereaTL, BotsteinD, BrownPO, RosenzweigRF (1999) Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 9721–9726 doi:10.1073/pnas.96.17.9721
40. GreshamD, RuderferDM, PrattSC, SchachererJ, DunhamMJ, et al. (2006) Genome-wide detection of polymorphisms at nucleotide resolution with a single DNA microarray. Science 311: 1932–1936 doi:10.1126/science.1123726
41. KubitschekHE (1970) Introduction to research with continuous cultures. Prentice Hall 195.
42. RudgeSA, AndersonDM, EmrSD (2004) Vacuole size control: regulation of PtdIns(3,5)P2 levels by the vacuole-associated Vac14-Fig4 complex, a PtdIns(3,5)P2-specific phosphatase. Molecular Biology of the Cell 15: 24–36 doi:10.1091/mbc.E03-05-0297
43. DoveSK, McEwenRK, MayesA, HughesDC, BeggsJD, et al. (2002) Vac14 controls PtdIns (3, 5) P2 synthesis and Fab1-dependent protein trafficking to the multivesicular body. Curr Biol 12: 885–893 doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00891-6
44. WeismanLS (2003) Yeast vacuole inheritance and dynamics. Annu Rev Genet 37: 435–460 doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.050203.103207
45. LiSC, KanePM (2009) The yeast lysosome-like vacuole: endpoint and crossroads. Biochim Biophys Acta 1793: 650–663 doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.08.003
46. CardenasME, CutlerNS, LorenzMC, Di ComoCJ, HeitmanJ (1999) The TOR signaling cascade regulates gene expression in response to nutrients. Genes Dev 13: 3271–3279 doi:10.1101/gad.13.24.3271
47. TamanoiF (2011) Ras signaling in yeast. Genes Cancer 2: 210–215 doi:10.1177/1947601911407322
48. CameroniE, HuloN, RoosenJ, WinderickxJ, De VirgilioC (2004) The novel yeast PAS kinase Rim15 orchestrates G0-associated antioxidant defense mechanisms. Cell Cycle 3: 460–466 doi:10.4161/cc.3.4.791
49. SwinnenE, WankeV, RoosenJ, SmetsB, DuboulozF, et al. (2006) Rim15 and the crossroads of nutrient signalling pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Div 1: 3 doi:10.1186/1747-1028-1-3
50. FerenciT (2003) What is driving the acquisition of mutS and rpoS polymorphisms in Escherichia coli? Trends Microbiol 11: 457–461 doi:10.1016/j.tim.2003.08.003
51. WangL, SpiraB, ZhouZ, FengL, MaharjanRP, et al. (2010) Divergence involving global regulatory gene mutations in an Escherichia coli population evolving under phosphate limitation. Genome Biol Evol 2: 478–487 doi:10.1093/gbe/evq035
52. DunnB, PaulishT, StanberyA, PiotrowskiJ, KonigesG, et al. (2013) Recurrent Rearrangement during Adaptive Evolution in an Interspecific Yeast Hybrid Suggests a Model for Rapid Introgression. PLoS Genet 9: e1003366 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003366
53. Rubio-TexeiraM, KaiserCA (2006) Amino acids regulate retrieval of the yeast general amino acid permease from the vacuolar targeting pathway. Molecular Biology of the Cell 17: 3031–3050 doi:10.1091/mbc.E05-07-0669
54. LeeM-C, MarxCJ (2013) Synchronous waves of failed soft sweeps in the laboratory: remarkably rampant clonal interference of alleles at a single locus. Genetics 193: 943–952 doi:10.1534/genetics.112.148502
55. GerkeJ, LorenzK, CohenB (2009) Genetic interactions between transcription factors cause natural variation in yeast. Science 323: 498–501 doi:10.1126/science.1166426
56. SteinerCC, WeberJN, HoekstraHE (2007) Adaptive variation in beach mice produced by two interacting pigmentation genes. PLoS Biol 5: e219 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050219.g001
57. HittingerCT, GonçalvesP, SampaioJP, DoverJ, JohnstonM, et al. (2010) Remarkably ancient balanced polymorphisms in a multi-locus gene network. Nature 464: 54–58 doi:10.1038/nature08791
58. GietzRD, SchiestlRH (2007) High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nature protocols 2: 31–34 doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.13
59. BrauerMJ, HuttenhowerC, AiroldiEM, RosensteinR, MateseJC, et al. (2008) Coordination of Growth Rate, Cell Cycle, Stress Response, and Metabolic Activity in Yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell 19: 352–367 doi:10.1091/mbc.E07-08-0779
60. KahmM, HasenbrinkG, Lichtenberg-FratéH, LudwigJ, KschischoM (2010) grofit: fitting biological growth curves with R. Journal of Statistical Software 33: 1–21.
61. VenkatramanES, OlshenAB (2007) A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23: 657–663 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl646
62. LiH, DurbinR (2010) Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26: 589–595 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698
63. LiH, HandsakerB, WysokerA, FennellT, RuanJ, et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
64. AlbersCA, LunterG, MacArthurDG, McVeanG, OuwehandWH, et al. (2011) Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data. Genome Res 21: 961–973 doi:10.1101/gr.112326.110
65. WeiZ, WangW, HuP, LyonGJ, HakonarsonH (2011) SNVer: a statistical tool for variant calling in analysis of pooled or individual next-generation sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research 39: e132 doi:10.1093/nar/gkr599
66. AndréassonC, NeveEPA, LjungdahlPO (2004) Four permeases import proline and the toxic proline analogue azetidine-2-carboxylate into yeast. Yeast 21: 193–199 doi:10.1002/yea.1052
67. SchureEG, RielNA, VerripsCT (2000) The role of ammonia metabolism in nitrogen catabolite repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 24: 67–83 doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00533.x
68. LõokeM, KristjuhanK, KristjuhanA (2011) Extraction of genomic DNA from yeasts for PCR-based applications. BioTechniques 50: 325–328 doi:10.2144/000113672
69. GeB, GurdS, GaudinT, DoreC, LepageP, et al. (2005) Survey of allelic expression using EST mining. Genome Res 15: 1584–1591 doi:10.1101/gr.4023805
70. JuliusD, BlairL, BrakeA, SpragueG, ThornerJ (1983) Yeast alpha factor is processed from a larger precursor polypeptide: the essential role of a membrane-bound dipeptidyl aminopeptidase. Cell 32: 839–852.
71. GodardP, UrrestarazuA, VissersS, KontosK, BontempiG, et al. (2007) Effect of 21 different nitrogen sources on global gene expression in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular and Cellular Biology 27: 3065–3086 doi:10.1128/MCB.01084-06
72. ArnoldK, KieferF, KoppJ, BatteyJND, PodvinecM, et al. (2009) The Protein Model Portal. J Struct Funct Genomics 10: 1–8 doi:10.1007/s10969-008-9048-5
73. DrotschmannK (1999) Mutator phenotypes of yeast strains heterozygous for mutations in the MSH2 gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96: 2970–2975 doi:10.1073/pnas.96.6.2970
74. BarrickJE, LenskiRE (2009) Genome-wide mutational diversity in an evolving population of Escherichia coli. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 74: 119–129 doi:10.1101/sqb.2009.74.018
Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicínaČlánok vyšiel v časopise
PLOS Genetics
2014 Číslo 1
- Je „freeze-all“ pro všechny? Odborníci na fertilitu diskutovali na virtuálním summitu
- Gynekologové a odborníci na reprodukční medicínu se sejdou na prvním virtuálním summitu
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
- GATA6 Is a Crucial Regulator of Shh in the Limb Bud
- Large Inverted Duplications in the Human Genome Form via a Fold-Back Mechanism
- Down-Regulation of eIF4GII by miR-520c-3p Represses Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Development
- Genome Sequencing Highlights the Dynamic Early History of Dogs