#PAGE_PARAMS# #ADS_HEAD_SCRIPTS# #MICRODATA#

The Acid Phosphatase-Encoding Gene Contributes to Soybean Tolerance to Low-Phosphorus Stress


Phosphorus (P) is essential for all living cells and organisms, and low-P stress is a major factor constraining plant growth and yield worldwide. In plants, P efficiency is a complex quantitative trait involving multiple genes, and the mechanisms underlying P efficiency are largely unknown. Combining linkage analysis, genome-wide and candidate-gene association analyses, and plant transformation, we identified a soybean gene related to P efficiency, determined its favorable haplotypes and developed valuable functional markers. First, six major genomic regions associated with P efficiency were detected by performing genome-wide associations (GWAs) in various environments. A highly significant region located on chromosome 8, qPE8, was identified by both GWAs and linkage mapping and explained 41% of the phenotypic variation. Then, a regional mapping study was performed with 40 surrounding markers in 192 diverse soybean accessions. A strongly associated haplotype (P = 10−7) consisting of the markers Sat_233 and BARC-039899-07603 was identified, and qPE8 was located in a region of approximately 250 kb, which contained a candidate gene GmACP1 that encoded an acid phosphatase. GmACP1 overexpression in soybean hairy roots increased P efficiency by 11–20% relative to the control. A candidate-gene association analysis indicated that six natural GmACP1 polymorphisms explained 33% of the phenotypic variation. The favorable alleles and haplotypes of GmACP1 associated with increased transcript expression correlated with higher enzyme activity. The discovery of the optimal haplotype of GmACP1 will now enable the accurate selection of soybeans with higher P efficiencies and improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying P efficiency in plants.


Vyšlo v časopise: The Acid Phosphatase-Encoding Gene Contributes to Soybean Tolerance to Low-Phosphorus Stress. PLoS Genet 10(1): e32767. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004061
Kategorie: Research Article
prolekare.web.journal.doi_sk: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004061

Souhrn

Phosphorus (P) is essential for all living cells and organisms, and low-P stress is a major factor constraining plant growth and yield worldwide. In plants, P efficiency is a complex quantitative trait involving multiple genes, and the mechanisms underlying P efficiency are largely unknown. Combining linkage analysis, genome-wide and candidate-gene association analyses, and plant transformation, we identified a soybean gene related to P efficiency, determined its favorable haplotypes and developed valuable functional markers. First, six major genomic regions associated with P efficiency were detected by performing genome-wide associations (GWAs) in various environments. A highly significant region located on chromosome 8, qPE8, was identified by both GWAs and linkage mapping and explained 41% of the phenotypic variation. Then, a regional mapping study was performed with 40 surrounding markers in 192 diverse soybean accessions. A strongly associated haplotype (P = 10−7) consisting of the markers Sat_233 and BARC-039899-07603 was identified, and qPE8 was located in a region of approximately 250 kb, which contained a candidate gene GmACP1 that encoded an acid phosphatase. GmACP1 overexpression in soybean hairy roots increased P efficiency by 11–20% relative to the control. A candidate-gene association analysis indicated that six natural GmACP1 polymorphisms explained 33% of the phenotypic variation. The favorable alleles and haplotypes of GmACP1 associated with increased transcript expression correlated with higher enzyme activity. The discovery of the optimal haplotype of GmACP1 will now enable the accurate selection of soybeans with higher P efficiencies and improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying P efficiency in plants.


Zdroje

1. Johnston A, Steen I (2000) Understanding phosphorus and its use in agriculture. Brussels: European Fertilizer Manufacturers' Association. 5–7 p.

2. JainA, VasconcelosMJ, RaghothamaK, SahiSV (2007) Molecular mechanisms of plant adaptation to phosphate deficiency. Plant breeding reviews 29: 359–419.

3. NationsFAO (2011) Current world fertilizer trends and outlook to 2015;. Rome Available: http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/publications/detail/tr/item/93486/icode/en/. Accessed 5 December 2013.

4. WissuwaM, YanoM, AeN (1998) Mapping of QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97: 777–783.

5. YanX, LiaoH, BeebeSE, BlairMW, LynchJP (2004) QTL mapping of root hair and acid exudation traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in common bean. Plant and Soil 265: 17–29.

6. WangX, WangY, TianJ, LimB, YanX, et al. (2009) Overexpressing AtPAP15 enhances phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Plant Physiology 151: 233–240.

7. Van Kauwenbergh S. World phosphate rock reserves and resources; 2010. International Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, Alabama.

8. GuoW, ZhaoJ, LiX, QinL, YanX, et al. (2011) A soybean β-expansin gene GmEXPB2 intrinsically involved in root system architecture responses to abiotic stresses. The Plant Journal 66: 541–552.

9. WasakiJ, MaruyamaH, TanakaM, YamamuraT, DatekiH, et al. (2009) Overexpression of the LASAP2 gene for secretory acid phosphatase in white lupin improves the phosphorus uptake and growth of tobacco plants. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 55: 107–113.

10. WangL, LiZ, QianW, GuoW, GaoX, et al. (2011) The Arabidopsis purple acid phosphatase AtPAP10 is predominantly associated with the root surface and plays an important role in plant tolerance to phosphate limitation. Plant Physiology 157: 1283–1299.

11. GamuyaoR, ChinJH, Pariasca-TanakaJ, PesaresiP, CatausanS, et al. (2012) The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature 488: 535–539.

12. LiYD, WangYJ, TongYP, GaoJG, ZhangJS, et al. (2005) QTL mapping of phosphorus deficiency tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Euphytica 142: 137–142.

13. AoJ, FuJ, TianJ, YanX, LiaoH (2010) Genetic variability for root morph-architecture traits and root growth dynamics as related to phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Functional Plant Biology 37: 304–312.

14. ZhangD, ChengH, GengL, KanG, CuiS, et al. (2009) Detection of quantitative trait loci for phosphorus deficiency tolerance at soybean seedling stage. Euphytica 167: 313–322.

15. ZhangD, LiuC, ChengH, KanG, CuiS, et al. (2010) Quantitative trait loci associated with soybean tolerance to low phosphorus stress based on flower and pod abscission. Plant Breeding 129: 243–249.

16. BrachiB, FaureN, HortonM, FlahauwE, VazquezA, et al. (2010) Linkage and association mapping of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering time in nature. PLoS Genetics 6: e1000940.

17. AtwellS, HuangYS, VilhjálmssonBJ, WillemsG, HortonM, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 465: 627–631.

18. HuangX, WeiX, SangT, ZhaoQ, FengQ, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nature genetics 42: 961–967.

19. HuangX, ZhaoY, WeiX, LiC, WangA, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association study of flowering time and grain yield traits in a worldwide collection of rice germplasm. Nature genetics 44: 32–39.

20. KumpKL, BradburyPJ, WisserRJ, BucklerES, BelcherAR, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize nested association mapping population. Nature genetics 43: 163–168.

21. CockramJ, WhiteJ, ZuluagaDL, SmithD, ComadranJ, et al. (2010) Genome-wide association mapping to candidate polymorphism resolution in the unsequenced barley genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 21611–21616.

22. ZhuC, GoreM, BucklerES, YuJ (2008) Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. The plant genome 1: 5–20.

23. ThornsberryJ, GoodmanM, DoebleyJ, KresovichS, NielsenD, et al. (2001) Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nature genetics 28: 286–289.

24. Flint-GarciaS, ThuilletA, YuJ, PressoirG, RomeroS, et al. (2005) Maize association population: a high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant Journal 44: 1054–1064.

25. HirschhornJN, DalyMJ (2005) Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 95–108.

26. ZhaoK, AranzanaMJ, KimS, ListerC, ShindoC, et al. (2007) An Arabidopsis example of association mapping in structured samples. PLoS Genetics 3: e4.

27. NordborgM, WeigelD (2008) Next-generation genetics in plants. Nature 456: 720–723.

28. FamosoAN, ZhaoK, ClarkRT, TungCW, WrightMH, et al. (2011) Genetic architecture of aluminum tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa) determined through genome-wide association analysis and QTL mapping. PLoS Genetics 7: e1002221.

29. MingF, ZhengX, MiG, HeP, ZhuL, et al. (2000) Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting tolerance to low phosphorus in rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Chinese Science Bulletin 45: 520–525.

30. PalaisaK, MorganteM, WilliamsM, RafalskiA (2003) Contrasting effects of selection on sequence diversity and linkage disequilibrium at two phytoene synthase loci. The Plant Cell 15: 1795–1807.

31. VollbrechtE, SpringerP, GohL, BucklerE, MartienssenR (2005) Architecture of floral branch systems in maize and related grasses. Nature 436: 1119–1126.

32. KonishiS, IzawaT, LinS, EbanaK, FukutaY, et al. (2006) An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312: 1392–1396.

33. Gowin S (1997) Phosphorus and potassium effects on soybeans. In: Storey JB, editor. Horticultural crops plant nutrition series. Texas A&M University: Department of Horticultural Science. pp. 44–51.

34. FehrWR, CavinessCE, BurmoodDT, PenningtonJS (1971) Stage of development descriptions for soybeans Glycine Max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science 6: 929–931.

35. HaoD, ChengH, YinZ, CuiS, ZhangD, et al. (2012) Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms and haplotypes associated with yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max) landraces across multiple environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 124: 447–458.

36. BatisticO, KudlaJ (2009) Plant calcineurin B-like proteins and their interacting protein kinases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1793: 985–992.

37. BargmannBOR, MunnikT (2006) The role of phospholipase D in plant stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 9: 515–522.

38. TamuraS, HanadaM, OhnishiM, KatsuraK, SasakiM, et al. (2002) Regulation of stress - activated protein kinase signaling pathways by protein phosphatases. European Journal of Biochemistry 269: 1060–1066.

39. BaldwinJ, KarthikeyanA, RaghothamaK (2001) LEPS2, a phosphorus starvation-induced novel acid phosphatase from tomato. Plant Physiology 125: 728–737.

40. TianJ, VenkatachalamP, LiaoH, YanX, RaghothamaK (2007) Molecular cloning and characterization of phosphorus starvation responsive genes in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Planta 227: 151–165.

41. AravindL, GalperinMY, KooninEV (1998) The catalytic domain of the P-type ATPase has the haloacid dehalogenase fold. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23: 127–138.

42. ThallerMC, SchippaS, RossoliniGM (2008) Conserved sequence motifs among bacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal phosphatases that define a new phosphohydrolase superfamily. Protein Science 7: 1647–1652.

43. ColletJF, StroobantV, PirardM, DelpierreG, Van SchaftingenE (1998) A new class of phosphotransferases phosphorylated on an aspartate residue in an amino-terminal DXDX (T/V) motif. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273: 14107–14112.

44. KeresztA, LiD, IndrasumunarA, NguyenCDT, NontachaiyapoomS, et al. (2007) Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean to study root biology. Nature Protocols 2: 948–952.

45. BradburyPJ, ZhangZ, KroonDE, CasstevensTM, RamdossY, et al. (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23: 2633–2635.

46. LiuY, GaiJ, LvH (2005) Genetic variation of root traits at seedling stage and their relationship with stress tolerances in soybean. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 23: 114–118.

47. AoX, XiePD, ZhangHJ, LiuJQ, HYW (2008) Effect of phosphorus on root traits of soybean cultivars with different phosphorus efficiencies. Soybean Science 27: 787–791.

48. RoseTJ, WissuwaM (2012) 5 Rethinking Internal Phosphorus Utilization Efficiency: A New Approach Is Needed to Improve PUE in Grain Crops. Advances in agronomy 116: 185–217.

49. CaoH-X, ZhangZ-B, SunC-X, ShaoH-B, SongW-Y, et al. (2009) Chromosomal location of traits associated with wheat seedling water and phosphorus use efficiency under different water and phosphorus stresses. International journal of molecular sciences 10: 4116–4136.

50. ZhuJ, KaepplerSM, LynchJP (2005) Mapping of QTLs for lateral root branching and length in maize (Zea mays L.) under differential phosphorus supply. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 688–695.

51. GaxiolaRA, EdwardsM, ElserJJ (2011) A transgenic approach to enhance phosphorus use efficiency in crops as part of a comprehensive strategy for sustainable agriculture. Chemosphere 84: 840–845.

52. ReymondM, SvistoonoffS, LoudetO, NussaumeL, DesnosT (2006) Identification of QTL controlling root growth response to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant, cell & environment 29: 115–125.

53. SuJ-Y, ZhengQ, LiH-W, LiB, JingR-L, et al. (2009) Detection of QTLs for phosphorus use efficiency in relation to agronomic performance of wheat grown under phosphorus sufficient and limited conditions. Plant Science 176: 824–836.

54. BullH, MurrayPG, ThomasD, FraserA, NelsonPN (2002) Acid phosphatases. Molecular Pathology 55: 65–72.

55. DuffSM, SarathG, PlaxtonWC (1994) The role of acid phosphatases in plant phosphorus metabolism. Physiologia Plantarum 90: 791–800.

56. BriggsTA, RiceGI, DalyS, UrquhartJ, GornallH, et al. (2011) Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase deficiency causes a bone dysplasia with autoimmunity and a type I interferon expression signature. Nature genetics 43: 127–131.

57. HelalH (1990) Varietal differences in root phosphatase activity as related to the utilization of organic phosphates. Plant and soil 123: 161–163.

58. Jansson M, Olsson H, Pettersson K (1988) Phosphatases; origin, characteristics and function in lakes. Phosphorus in Freshwater Ecosystems: Springer. pp. 157–175.

59. BuneA, HaymanA, EvansM, CoxT (2001) Mice lacking tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (Acp 5) have disordered macrophage inflammatory responses and reduced clearance of the pathogen, Staphylococcus aureus. Immunology 102: 103–113.

60. LiangCY, ChenZJ, YaoZF, TianJ, LiaoH (2012) Characterization of two putative protein phosphatase genes and their involvement in phosphorus efficiency in phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54: 400–411.

61. MissonJ, RaghothamaKG, JainA, JouhetJ, BlockMA, et al. (2005) A genome-wide transcriptional analysis using Arabidopsis thaliana Affymetrix gene chips determined plant responses to phosphate deprivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 11934–11939.

62. Uhde-StoneC, ZinnKE, Ramirez-YáñezM, LiA, VanceCP, et al. (2003) Nylon filter arrays reveal differential gene expression in proteoid roots of white lupin in response to phosphorus deficiency. Plant Physiology 131: 1064–1079.

63. ChengH, YangH, ZhangD, GaiJ, YuD (2010) Polymorphisms of soybean isoflavone synthase and flavanone 3-hydroxylase genes are associated with soybean mosaic virus resistance. Molecular Breeding 25: 13–24.

64. Edwards D, Forster JW, Chagné D, Batley J (2007) What Are SNPs? Association mapping in plants: Springer. pp. 41–52.

65. YangY, LiSS, ChienJW, AndriesenJ, ZhaoLP (2008) A systematic search for SNPs/haplotypes associated with disease phenotypes using a haplotype-based stepwise procedure. BMC genetics 9: 90.

66. LuY, ZhangS, ShahT, XieC, HaoZ, et al. (2010) Joint linkage–linkage disequilibrium mapping is a powerful approach to detecting quantitative trait loci underlying drought tolerance in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 19585–19590.

67. YanJ, WarburtonM, CrouchJ (2011) Association mapping for enhancing maize genetic improvement. Crop Science 51: 433–449.

68. ChaoD-Y, SilvaA, BaxterI, HuangYS, NordborgM, et al. (2012) Genome-wide association studies identify heavy metal ATPase3 as the primary determinant of natural variation in leaf cadmium in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 8: e1002923.

69. NemriA, AtwellS, TaroneAM, HuangYS, ZhaoK, et al. (2010) Genome-wide survey of Arabidopsis natural variation in downy mildew resistance using combined association and linkage mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 10302–10307.

70. LiuS, KandothPK, WarrenSD, YeckelG, HeinzR, et al. (2012) A soybean cyst nematode resistance gene points to a new mechanism of plant resistance to pathogens. Nature 492: 256–260.

71. WangL, GuanY, GuanR, LiY, MaY, et al. (2006) Establishment of Chinese soybean Glycine max core collections with agronomic traits and SSR markers. Euphytica 151: 215–223.

72. BroughtonW, DilworthM (1971) Control of leghaemoglobin synthesis in snake beans. Biochem J 125: 1075–1080.

73. MurphyJ, RileyJP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27: l–36.

74. BattenG (1992) A review of phosphorus efficiency in wheat. Plant and Soil 146: 163–168.

75. Wang S, Basten C, Zeng Z (2005) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

76. ChurchillGA, DoergeRW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative triat mapping. Genetics 138: 963–971.

77. LivakKJ, SchmittgenTD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408.

78. KeimP, DiersBW, OlsonTC, ShoemakerRC (1990) RFLP mapping in soybean: association between marker loci and variation in quantitative traits. Genetics 126: 735–742.

79. ThompsonJD, GibsonTJ, PlewniakF, JeanmouginF, HigginsDG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882.

80. RozasJ, Sánchez-DelBarrioJC, MesseguerX, RozasR (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496–2497.

81. BarrettJ, FryB, MallerJ, DalyM (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263–265.

82. FalushD, StephensM, PritchardJ (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567–1587.

83. ZhangD, ChengH, HuZ, WangH, KanG, et al. (2013) Fine mapping of a major flowering time QTL on soybean chromosome 6 combining linkage and association analysis. Euphytica 191: 23–33.

84. HardyOJ, VekemansX (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 618–620.

85. YuJ, PressoirG, BriggsW, Vroh BiI, YamasakiM, et al. (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nature genetics 38: 203–208.

Štítky
Genetika Reprodukčná medicína

Článok vyšiel v časopise

PLOS Genetics


2014 Číslo 1
Najčítanejšie tento týždeň
Najčítanejšie v tomto čísle
Kurzy

Zvýšte si kvalifikáciu online z pohodlia domova

Aktuální možnosti diagnostiky a léčby litiáz
nový kurz
Autori: MUDr. Tomáš Ürge, PhD.

Všetky kurzy
Prihlásenie
Zabudnuté heslo

Zadajte e-mailovú adresu, s ktorou ste vytvárali účet. Budú Vám na ňu zasielané informácie k nastaveniu nového hesla.

Prihlásenie

Nemáte účet?  Registrujte sa

#ADS_BOTTOM_SCRIPTS#